‘Dejected' Trump Says Relationship With Musk Is Over; Calls Him a ‘Big-Time Drug Addict': Report
Elon Musk's insults toward Donald Trump left the president 'dejected' and 'rattled,' The Washington Post reported Saturday. Now it's apparently Trump's turn to trash his former ally, saying he will not make amends.
Musk's departure from the Trump administration was announced last week after Trump pulled his nomination for Musk's ally, Jared Isaacman, to lead NASA. Musk then made the feud public when he began dumping on Trump's tax bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' A Trump administration official said they are 'taking away Elon's friends,' Rolling Stone reported, and now, Trump has deemed the relationship over. On Saturday, Trump told NBC News that he is too busy to speak to Musk.
The president called Musk, who reportedly took so much ketamine during the 2024 campaign that he could not pee right, 'a big-time drug addict' in a phone call, a source told The Post. Trump reportedly made several phone calls to those in his inner circle as well as acquaintances about the split.
Musk's drug habits on the campaign trail included ketamine, Ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms, The New York Times reported late last month. His drug usage, and the media discussion surrounding it, helped drive the breakup, White House officials told the Post.
The former head of the Department of Government Efficiency lobbed insults at Trump earlier this week that culminated into one alleging there were files showing the president's connections to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which he has since deleted. Vice President J.D. Vance said in response that Trump 'didn't do anything wrong' with Epstein.
'Most entertaining outcome is most likely,' Musk, who has been posting less often than usual, wrote on X Saturday.
Those close to the president expected him to be more vitriolic toward his new adversary, The Post reported, but he was quieter at first this time, reportedly telling people not to escalate the situation. He even reportedly told Vance to be diplomatic.
'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump posted on Truth Social on Thursday.
'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' he wrote in another post. The furthest Trump went earlier this week was to threaten to cancel Musk's government contracts.
Now the president is looking more and more like his regular self. When NBC News asked on Saturday whether he had any interest in making amends, Trump said, 'No.' The outlet also asked whether he thought his relationship with Musk was over. 'I would assume so, yeah,' he said.
When NBC News asked Trump whether he would speak to Musk soon, he said he was otherwise occupied. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' he said. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.'
He also told the outlet that Musk had been disrespectful. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President.'
Even so, this sounds tepid for a person who, for example, insulted how Heidi Cruz, Ted Cruz's wife, looks and suggested Cruz's father was linked to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He called Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley 'birdbrain' and Vice President Kamala Harris' 2024 running mate Tim Walz 'tampon Tim.'
Musk has been the recipient of Trump's classic insults as well. 'When Elon Musk came to the White House asking me for help on all of his many subsidized projects, whether it's electric cars that don't drive long enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocketships to nowhere, without which subsidies he'd be worthless, and telling me how he was a big Trump fan and Republican, I could have said, 'drop to your knees and beg,' and he would have done it…' Trump posted on Truth Social in 2022.
Trump's biggest escalation was a threat toward Musk in the NBC News interview. He said that there would be 'serious consequences' if Musk funds Democrats to run against Republicans who support Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.'
'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' he told NBC News. He did not say what those consequences would be.
Musk had previously slammed the bill in a post on X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he wrote.
The political arm of SpaceX, Musk's company, has made donations to Democrats. Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) received $24,000 from SpaceX's PAC, which she donated to a food bank, Axios reported. Overall, Democrats are not interested in Musk's help.
'I don't give a shit about Elon Musk,' Rep. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) told Axios. 'I just don't. We've got real problems.'
'He doesn't need to come back into our fold, if he ends up being a spoiler on their end, that ends up helping us,' Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) told the outlet.
Musk does not seem interested in joining the Democrats either. 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' he posted on X earlier this week.
More from Rolling Stone
Vance Says 'Trump Didn't Do Anything Wrong With Jeffrey Epstein'
Dropkick Murphys and Veterans Rally Against Trump for 'Disrespecting the Vets'
'We Are Taking Away Elon's Friends'
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hall declares victory over Davis for Fort Worth City Council District 6 seat
Dr. Mia Hall declared victory over opponent Daryl R. Davis II to the applause and cheers of friends, mentors and family Saturday night at her election watch party at Bowlounge. Unofficial polling data shows Hall leading with 57.12% over Davis's 42.88% in the race for the Fort Worth City Council District 6 seat. Allof the 19 polling locations are reporting. Hall will fill out-going Council Member Jared Williams's shoes to represent Southwest Fort Worth and Como. In the crowd during Hall's speech of thanks were Council Members Chris Nettles, Michael Crain and Elizabeth Beck and Crowley School Board Members Dr. Nedra Robinson and Chakina Watkins. Because none of the four candidates — Davis, Hall, Marshall Hobbs and Adrian Smith — received more than 50% of the votes on May 3, the top two vote-getters went to a runoff election. On May 3, Hall had 46.8% of the votes, followed by Davis with 28.49%, Hobbs with 21.57% and Smith with 3.14%. Now with early voting results, she leads by nearly 400 votes. There was a 4.47% voter turnout. Hall said she was overwhelmed by the outpouring of support from the voters. She was formerly a Crowley ISD Board Trustee and a member of the Fort Worth Zoning Commission. 'It's been my pleasure to to have served this community in the capacity of a trustee for the last 10 years,' Hall said, 'and just to see the voter turnout, and the fact that they are going to bestow or that I may have the opportunity to represent them as the District 6 councilwoman, is just very humbling.' Hall has promised safe neighborhoods, improved roads and infrastructure, enhanced city services and the fostering of economic development. 'I made promises to our neighbors, and I plan to honor those promises,' Hall said. 'Among those were to be responsive and to be accessible, and that's something that I want to be day one. The other part will be just getting my bearings meeting the other council men and women and me and my colleagues, and just getting my footing underneath me so that we can take the priorities that our District 6 neighbors have made and put them to work quickly, without delay.' Her opponent in the runoff, Davis, promised well-planned neighborhoods that are safe and affordable to live in.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ben Crump Says Donald Trump's Spending Bill is Terrible Amid Elon Musk Feud
Ben Crump's picked his side in the Elon Musk and Donald Trump beef ... but, he's not backing a personality, he says he's backing the better idea -- and, he doesn't want the "One Big Beautiful Bill" to pass through the Senate. We caught up with the civil rights activist and attorney and asked him about the fight between POTUS and his former advisor ... and, he doesn't directly say he's on Elon's side -- but, he does think this spending bill is terrible. Crump rips the bill for making cuts to Medicaid -- the medical assistance program for people with lower incomes. BC says the world needs more humanity for all people ... instead of making the life of individuals struggling financially more difficult. As you know ... Elon lost his cool about this spending bill earlier this week -- firing off shots at the president and claiming Trump only won reelection because of his efforts. President Trump called BS on that idea ... but, Elon pushed on and claimed the real reason the administration hasn't released the so-called Epstein files is because the president's name is all over them. He's since deleted the post where he wrote that ... but, today Trump warned of serious consequences if Elon decides to support Dems who are running against Republicans who vote for the bill. BTW ... we also asked Crump about Trump potentially pardoning Diddy -- and, it sounds like Crump's staying out of that one, too. Bottom line ... back the idea, not the man -- that's the Ben Crump way!
CBS News
36 minutes ago
- CBS News
University of California researchers face uncertain future over possible federal funding cuts
Thousands of University of California and California State University system workers are unsure about their jobs and the future of their research after reports that President Donald Trump is going after the federal funding for California. In response, Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to stop paying the state's federal taxes. Tanzil Chowdhury is a graduate student researcher at UC Berkeley with the Materials Science and Engineering Department. He works on semiconductors and is researching how to create more efficient batteries and better solar panels. His academic future, however, is in limbo. "I really want to make a difference with the work that I do, I want to help transition off of fossil fuels and create greener and more efficient energy grid for everyone. With these cuts, I don't know if I'll be able to continue doing that," Chowdhury told CBS News Bay Area. That's because Mr. Trump is considering pulling funding for both the UC and Cal State University systems. "This would just be catastrophic to my work, the work of all my coworkers and the amazing research that happens here in the state of California at the UC and CSU," he said. "We can't access the materials that we need, we can't get the lab space that we need, we can't run our experiments if there's no money coming in." A recent report shows the UC system received more than $4 billion for academic research during the 2024 fiscal year. Schools, including UC San Francisco, rely on those grants. "This is one of the biggest recipients of National Institute of Health's funds, which are some of the funds that the Trump administration is reportedly going to cut," Chowdhury said. He helps lead UAW Local 4811, a union of 48,000 academic workers in the UC system. Chowdhury said about 15,000 of those academic workers are from UC San Francisco and UC Berkeley. "It is one of the nation's leaders in biomedical and biological research. So, groundbreaking treatments in cancer, heart disease, diabetes, all that stuff happens right here," he said. "The patient who needs that sort of groundbreaking research to get better, get healthier, that work stops." One infectious disease doctor and UC San Francisco professor agrees. "We receive 30% of all NIH funding in this country. And that's not because just that we are a more populous state, but because we have fantastic universities here, really high-level academics," Dr. Monica Gandhi told CBS News Bay Area. She added that funding cuts will have a dire impact on the patient level. "It would mean the complete slowing of any progress in biomedical research that is actually fueling American lives, health," she added. "People who are living in California, their health will absolutely be affected. We won't get novel medications, we won't get therapeutics for cancer, for diabetes, for HIV, for infectious diseases." Dr. Gandhi said that a recent analysis showed that three out of 365 medications that had been approved from 2010 to 2019 were from NIH-funded research. "It would be disastrous for California to not be able to continue the lifesaving, NIH-funded research that it does," she added. Meanwhile, Chowdhury hopes that Governor Gavin Newsom can help by rescinding academic budget cuts on the state level. "He should work with the California legislature to ensure that we have job security, and we're able to continue doing the research that we need to do, and fill in the gaps left behind by the federal government," Chowdhury said. While the future remains uncertain, the battle for academia continues. "The administration needs to not do this, because we don't want to mess with American lives and American health," Dr. Gandhi said. "Maybe we need to re-evaluate how much money we give to the federal government from California taxpayer dollars, because I know what my California taxpayer dollars to go to. I want them to go to life-saving medical research to extend human life," she added.
