McDonald's breaks silence on nationwide boycott in US; 'We're disappointed to see…'
McDonald's responded to the countrywide boycott that has been aimed at its restaurants this week. It was partly sparked by the business's decision to rescind its DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) programs. McDonald's mentioned that they were disappointed to see such erroneous accusations that misrepresent their actions and distort their values(Representative Image/AFP)
'As a brand that serves millions of people every day, McDonald's opens our doors to everyone, and our commitment to inclusion remains steadfast,' McDonald's told Newsweek.
In response to some of the complaints made by boycott organisers, McDonald's told Newsweek that they have 2,000 local franchisees across the country, spend millions with local suppliers, offers meaningful employment opportunities for over 800,000 restaurant staff, and acts as a catalyst for economic growth in local communities. 'The McDonald's System also generates billions in federal, state and local taxes annually, and we'll continue to pay our fair share.'
McDonald's Corporation further mentioned that they were disappointed to see such erroneous accusations that misrepresent their actions and distort their values, adding that "we welcome honest dialogue with the communities we serve." The firm said it is still committed to servicing communities and consumers. What we know about People's Union USA's McDonald's boycott
The People's Union USA, a grassroots organisation, has been spearheading a boycott of the corporation since Tuesday, accusing it of price gouging, taking advantage of tax loopholes, engaging in 'corporate greed,' and breaking DEI pledges. In addition to organising boycotts of Walmart, Amazon, and Target, the organization intends to take more action against McDonald's unless the business makes significant policy changes.
The boycott this week coincides with McDonald's struggles with declining sales in the US market. The business reported a 3.6 percent loss in same-store sales in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2020, the worst decline since the peak of the COVID epidemic, in May, citing 'economic uncertainty' and 'dampened consumer sentiment.'
The organization declared that it would support a nationwide boycott until McDonald's renews 'their commitment to the Black community' and 'keeps their promises, and finally does right by the Black owners and operators like us who deserved—but did not get—a fair shot at success.'
Also Read: US to hit Iran again? Trump makes major one word statement as he likens recent strikes to atomic bombing of Hiroshima Here's what People's Union USA founder said
In an Instagram post, John Schwarz, the founder of the People's Union USA, stated: this is about power, not just burgers and fries. 'When we unite and hit corporations in their wallets, they listen.'
'No McDonald's. No compromise,' he continued. 'We're demanding fair taxes, an end to price gouging, real equality, and corporate accountability.'
The boycott is scheduled to finish on June 30. The People's Union USA has also called for a boycott of Starbucks, Amazon, and Home Depot for a month, as well as an Independence Day boycott.
There will be a boycott of McDonald's, Walmart, and Lowe's in August.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘When two kids fight…': NATO chief calls Trump ‘Daddy' while praising strikes on Iranian nuke sites
'When two kids fight…': NATO chief calls Trump 'Daddy' while praising strikes on Iranian nuke sites 'What the F*ck they're doing': Trump raps Israel after it vows 'powerful strikes' on Iran 'What the F*ck they're doing': Trump raps Israel after it vows 'powerful strikes' on Iran 'Very deceptive': Iran rages after Trump calls Tehran 'most destructive force' in Saudi speech 'Entirely illegal and criminal act...': Iran foreign ministry reacts to Trump's 'unjust war' 'Stopped India-Pakistan nuclear war...': US President Trump drops bombshell on Indo-Pak conflict 'Bad things are going to happen to Iran if...': Trump on Iranian drones being used to kill Ukrainians 'Violence unleashed by wokeness…': Pete Hegseth's jaw-dropping speech from US military base in Qatar
Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
Making NATO Great Again Demands More Than Money
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Donald Trump used to quip that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose support. The same might be said of the royal palace in The Hague, where the US president arrived to a hero's welcome despite having relentlessly berated, humiliated and questioned the utility of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and European allies. Even as Trump was his initially cagey self on whether NATO commitments still applied, alliance boss Mark Rutte poured on the charm. America's attack on Iranian nuclear sites, despite its clear repudiation of European diplomatic efforts over the past decade, was praised as 'truly extraordinary'; a move to more than double defense spending targets, another of Trump's obsessions, was described as a 'big success.' Even Germany's Friedrich Merz has described Israel's bombing of Iran as the necessary 'dirty work' of clipping Tehran's nuclear wings. This is apparently called politics — what Europeans feel they must do to preserve an alliance where the US accounts for 70% of capabilities. The America First rhetoric of Vice President JD Vance in February has been politely forgotten in the face of what seems like a flip away from the MAGA world's splendid isolation. After all, Trump has let bunker busters fly; he has publicly laid claim to making 'the world' safer; and he has displayed the kind of credible deterrence Europeans crave as Russia continues to bomb Ukraine. 'Chapeau,' as the French say. Perhaps the global policeman can be persuaded to postpone his retirement with a barrel load of defense spending. Yet this risks being a misreading of the memo from the Mideast. Foreign-policy expert Steven A. Cook has suggested Trump's Iran intervention was a victory of opportunism over ideology — 'Trump likes winners, and, well, the Israelis were kicking ass.' It was also a victory of unilateralism over alliances, with Europeans left in the dark and sidelined by the world's most powerful individual, as French diplomat Sylvie Bermann put it. And in terms of priority, it also put Iran before Russia. Bringing an aspiring regional hegemon to heel isn't a template everywhere, as seen in Trump's subsequent 'very nice' conversation with Vladimir Putin. It's of course tough to pin down where exactly we are between the Pax Americana that for decades upheld a global US-led order and the MAGA alternative that would opt for restraint and retrenchment, particularly in Europe. Trump is neither consistent nor cautious; it may be that he fails to achieve the de-escalation he says he wants. But on the face of it, there are still plenty of elements here in tune with a move away from the old model of global hegemony and towards what's been called 'offshore balancing' — intervening only when necessary to keep aspiring hegemons contained, and otherwise reliant on regional allies to do what Merz might call the 'dirty work.' Given the lack of clarity on where US policy is really headed, European allies would do better to quietly question their strategic dependencies rather than take increasingly Rutte-esque steps to keep them going. 'This is an unhealthy relationship,' says Christopher Layne, distinguished professor of international affairs at Texas A&M University. Promising to spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense may be a victory for Trump, but it's neither realistic for European countries that have only just managed to reach the 2% level after war in Ukraine nor helpful for understanding exactly where the cash should go to fill gaps in building a credible Europe-first deterrence. In this respect, Spain's pushback is saying the quiet bit out loud. Instead of letting Trump's baton conduct the pace of rearmament, it's time for Europe to discover its inner De Gaulle — or at least leaders worthy of the name. Merz and Emmanuel Macron are taking a united stance, but this should go beyond financial commitments and into identifying who should buy what and where in the name of common European defense. It's also notable that there is much talk about defense spending and very little about economic growth, which is AWOL in Germany or France. Europe has a lot of problems, as the US frequently likes to point out, so all the more reason the continent takes ownership of them. This also matters for America's allies beyond Europe. One of the MAGA mantras is that China is the one aspiring hegemon that the US needs to focus on, and Asia the one region where offshore balancing would be too risky given the threat to Taiwan. Yet Trump has also blown hot and cold here, from recent trade talks to his latest declaration that Beijing could keep buying Iranian oil. The US is also reviewing the AUKUS security pact with Australia and the UK. Treaties last while they last, as De Gaulle once said. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. More stories like this are available on
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump compares Iran strikes to bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, calls leaked intel report...
In a controversial move, President Donald Trump has drawn comparisons between his strikes on Iran over the weekend and the US use of nuclear bombs in Japan, saying both were used to successfully end wars. Trump compared his strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities to the US dropping atomic bombs on Japan in WWII — as he insisted the devastation inflicted during both conflicts ended the wars. "I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war. This ended the war," Trump said. Trump argued that Iran's nuclear program had been set back "basically decades, because I don't think they'll ever do it again" and he turned to top advisers to reinforce that message. He maintained that his surprise strikes on Tehran forced Iran and Israel into entering a ceasefire agreement after 12 days of war. ALSO READ: NATO chief dubs Trump 'daddy' as US President likens Israel-Iran conflict to 'two kids in school yard' 'Had we not succeeded with that hit, that hit ended the war,' Trump said of his decision to drop on three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. Broadly, he has argued that the strikes were much more successful than has so far been reported in the U.S. media. Trump plays down intelligence reports Not only did the commander-in-chief compare the impact of American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to the end of World War Two, he argued that the damage was severe even though available intelligence reports were inconclusive, according to Reuters. He pushed back on a leaked intelligence report that said US strikes on Iran only set its nuclear programme back by a few months. Speaking at a Nato summit in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump said the strikes led to the "virtual obliteration" of Iran's nuclear capabilities and set its atomic programme back "by decades". Live Events Multiple media outlets reported that it had been revealed the US Defense Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months. But Trump and his top officials are saying it had been obliterated. ALSO READ: Horrifying 'killer bees' spreading across 13 US states and can sting thousands of times in short period "The intelligence was ... very inconclusive," Trump told reporters while meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte ahead of a summit in The Hague. "The intelligence says, 'We don't know, it could have been very severe.' That's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know'. It was very severe. It was obliteration," Trump added. Trump remained adamant too that Iran wasn't able to remove the uranium being enriched at the sites ahead of the strikes. 'They didn't have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast. If it would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it,' Trump said. ALSO READ: Jeff Bezos-Lauren Sanchez has an unusual request for the guests ahead of their high-profile wedding 'Plus they knew we were coming, and if they know we're coming, they're not going to be down there.' He argued the attacks had set Iran's nuclear ambitions back decades because 'they'll ever do it again.' 'They just went through hell. I think they've had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich,' he said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who both also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment. "When you actually look at the report - by the way, it was a top secret report - it was preliminary, it was low-confidence," Hegseth said. "This is a political motive here." He said the FBI was investigating a potential leak. Rubio suggested that those responsible for sharing the report had mischaracterized it, saying: "This is the game they play." All three men criticized media reports about the intelligence assessment.
