WHO warns Trump cuts put millions of HIV patients at risk
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has raised serious concerns that HIV medication shortages sparked by cuts to USAID will increase resistance to crucial treatment, The Independent can reveal.
Leading epidemiologists have raised fears that shortages could reduce the effectiveness of the most commonly used HIV drug, dolutegravir (DTG), which is used by around 27 million people. This could leave patients without an alternative treatment.
Professor Andrew Phillips, at University College London, has created a model predicting resistance in HIV patients to DTG. He warns the number of people currently resistant to the drug could 'easily at least double in six months' if people take less than one pill per day due to supply fears.
'If resistance starts to grow, this is a substantial problem for long-term HIV control in lower- and middle-income countries,' Prof Phillips said. 'If there is a new reality for another year that people are taking less than 70 per cent of their doses, then it would start to feel like a real concern for building up resistance.'
A WHO spokesperson told this publication it 'remains very concerned that we will not have a suitable replacement option for dolutegravir that is as easy to take, with low side effects, delivered at low cost, and safe for all, including children and pregnant women'.
'We should be doing all that we can to protect this first-line treatment and to ensure that the worst-case scenario of increased drug resistance projected by this UCL modelling exercise does not occur,' they added.
Because DTG-based treatment is intended to be taken daily, 'intermittent use of DTG-based anti-retroviral treatment due to drug shortages is likely to lead to increased drug resistance, and we worry about this scenario'.
The warning comes after The Independent revealed the impact that sudden pauses by the Trump administration on the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR) are having on the ground, with patients in countries across sub-Saharan Africa running out of medication.
On Mr Trump's first day in office, he froze almost all US foreign assistance funds for 90 days, while projects were reviewed to make sure they were aligned with 'American interests'.
Aids-related deaths could jump by four million to 10 million by 2030 unless US foreign aid money is reinstated, according to forecasts from the UN Aids agency (UNAIDS).
The Independent recently travelled to Uganda and Zimbabwe to see the impact of severing aid to those suffering from HIV. Among them was Hadja, who was pregnant and terrified that she would not be able to protect her unborn child. She described visiting hospitals where neither doctors nor drugs were available.
James, a 50-year-old father of four, is also HIV positive and has not had access to HIV medication for over a month and a half. Without antiretroviral drugs, James's emaciated body is shutting down.
The US government is expected to review its decision to stop PEPFAR, but there has been no indication that funding will resume.
UNAIDS deputy executive director Angeli Achrekar told The Independent that drug shortages on the ground are 'a recipe for disaster' in terms of increased drug resistance.
She said: 'When we have drug resistance to the medication that people are on, they have to be put on second- or third-line therapy, which is much more expensive and much more difficult to access. Coupled with all these new infections, that is a recipe for disaster.'
Dolutegravir (DTG) is currently the first- and second-line treatment for HIV, with 90 per cent of the 30 million people living with HIV on a treatment regimen that includes this drug. Currently, resistance to DTG is low, at around 4 per cent, but for groups of patients who have already become resistant to previous antiretroviral regimes, prevalence jumps to 19 per cent.
20 January: Donald Trump orders a freeze on all foreign aid with a 90-day review
24 January: A stop-work order is issued to US aid-funded programmes
1 February: Limited exceptions are granted for "urgent lifesaving HIV treatment', but a lack of clarity and loss of staff mean services are still disrupted
February: Funding decisions are challenged in various courts; the Trump administration fights orders to pay aid partners.
By 10 March: Most aid grants and contracts are cancelled worldwide
25 March: Authorisation for the world's largest HIV programme, funded by the US, expires
By 28 March: US Agency for International Development (USAID) shutdown confirmed, nearly all staff sacked
Professor Brooke Nichols, an infectious disease mathematical modeller and health economist, told The Independent: 'If you have tens of thousands of people thinking they need to ration and take treatment intermittently, and you don't keep the virus fully suppressed, then when the virus rebounds, it could mutate and develop resistance to whatever drug is circulating.
'That is the really scary tipping point for resistance.'
Anyone who develops multi-drug-resistant strains of HIV may need second- or third-line treatment, which costs at least $405 (£305) in lower-income countries: a sixfold increase on the cost of first-line antiretrovirals.
Jeffrey Eaton, senior research fellow in HIV epidemiology at Imperial College London, also warned that if people become resistant to a HIV medication, 'they could transmit that resistance and then newly infected people might not be able to use dolutegravir'.
Clinicians in the worst-hit areas have also told The Independent they're seeing worrying interruptions in HIV antiretroviral drug supplies.
One clinic, the Family Hope Centre in southern Uganda – a country where 70 per cent of the HIV/Aids response was funded by PEPFAR – had to close for a month recently because, without foreign aid, it was unable to afford the rent, water and electricity bills.
Irene Anamu, the Family Hope Centre's administrative director, told The Independent the centre has already seen a rise in clients contracting infections, including tuberculosis.
She is now worried that the gaps in treatment will allow the virus in patients' bodies to replicate, 'meaning more drug-resistant clients', and strains which could spread past Uganda's borders.
A US State Department spokesperson said: 'As directed by the secretary of state, urgent life-saving HIV care and treatment and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services are ongoing. As part of the overall foreign assistance review, all PEPFAR-funded services are currently being reviewed for assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy.'
This article is part of The Independent's Rethinking Global Aid project
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can I donate blood and how do I do it? Urgent call for donors amid low stocks
The NHS needs 200,000 more regular blood donors to sustain a safe and sufficient supply. Low blood stocks in 2024 prompted an "amber alert', but blood stocks have remained low ever since. NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) is now urging more people to donate to avoid a "red alert", which is a critical situation where public safety is threatened. It described the past year as "challenging" for blood stocks, noting that just under 800,000 people are supporting the entire blood supply in England. The whole process of giving blood takes just one hour. When arriving at a blood donation centre, you are asked to complete a safety check to make sure you can give blood. You will be given 500ml of fluid to drink – drinking this will help the body maintain blood pressure, prevent dizziness and help the body replenish the donated blood. Then, to ensure it is safe to donate blood, medics will confirm your identity and information in your health check. In some cases, a registered nurse will follow up. A drop of blood from your finger is then checked for iron levels. If these levels are too low, the appointment will be rescheduled. Those able to donate will be seated in the waiting area before being called to a donation chair. Here, a cuff will be placed on your arm to maintain a small amount of pressure during the donation before a suitable vein is found and the area is cleaned. Then, a needle will be inserted into your arm to collect your blood into a blood bag, which has your unique donor number on it. A scale weighs the blood and stops when you have donated 470ml - that's just under a pint. The needle is then removed from your arm, and a dressing is applied. The NHS says the process of giving blood should not hurt and should only take about 10 minutes. Although more donors are needed, there are some health, travel and lifestyle reasons that may stop you from donating blood. Donors need to be fit and well, aged between 17 and 65, weigh between 7 stone 12 Ibs (50kg) and 25 stone (158kg) and have suitable veins. However, you can't donate blood if you have cancer, some heart conditions, have tested positive for HIV or are a hepatitis B or C carrier. If you have received blood platelets, plasma or any other blood products after January 1980, or if you have injected non-prescribed drugs including body-building and injectable tanning agents, you also cannot donate. If you've had anal sex with a new partner in the last three months you may have to postpone your donation. If you feel unwell, are pregnant or have had a baby in the last six months, have had a tattoo or piercing, or have recently travelled to certain countries outside the UK, you may also have to wait before you can donate blood. There are thousands of blood donation venues across England, some are permanent and others are pop-ups. Church halls, sports centres, mosques, football stadiums and hotels are all used as pop-up venues. To check where your closest one is, visit the Give Blood website. You will need to book an appointment ahead of your donation which can be done online as soon as you have signed up as a blood donor. There is a 'critical' need for more donors who have the so-called universal blood type, O negative blood, which is needed for treatment in emergencies. The NHS said there is also a need for more Black donors, who are more likely to have specific blood types which can help treat people with sickle cell disease.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NIH scientists condemn Trump research cuts
Hundreds of staffers from across the National Institutes of Health (NIH) are speaking out against the politicization of their research and termination of their work while demanding that the drastic changes made at the agency be walked back. In a letter addressed to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, more than 2,000 signatories stated, 'we dissent to Administration policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe.' The letter was titled 'The Bethesda Declaration' in reference to where NIH's campus is located. The signatories cited Bhattacharya's stated commitment to academic freedom that he made in April and called on him to push back against the changes Trump administration has implemented at NIH under his leadership. 'Academic freedom should not be applied selectively based on political ideology. To achieve political aims, NIH has targeted multiple universities with indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science,' they wrote. They pointed to U.S. law and prior research that has shown that the participation of diverse populations in studies is necessary for NIH's work. The NIH staffers further blasted the canceling of nearly completed studies. 'Ending a $5 million research study when it is 80% complete does not save $1 million, it wastes $4 million,' they wrote. The researchers called on Bhattacharya to restore foreign collaborations with the global scientific community, put independent peer reviews back in place, bring back terminated NIH staffers and rethink the 15 percent cap on indirect study costs that the Trump administration enacted. 'Combined, these actions have resulted in an unprecedented reduction in NIH spending that does not reflect efficiency but rather a dramatic reduction in life-saving research,' they stated. 'Some may use the false impression that NIH funding is not needed to justify the draconian cuts proposed in the President's Budget. This spending slowdown reflects a failure of your legal duty to use congressionally-appropriated funds for critical NIH research.' NIH research is not solely centered in Bethesda. The agency is responsible for funding research projects across the country and abroad. Numerous lawsuits have been filed to combat the pulling back of billions of dollars in NIH funding. Last week, a federal judge allowed a suit filed by university researchers and public health groups challenging the cuts to move forward. Bhattacharya responded to the letter on the social media platform X. 'We all want @NIH to succeed and I believe that dissent in science is productive. However, the Bethesda Declaration has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions NIH has taken in recent months,' he wrote. Bhattacharya said the actions taken at NIH have been to 'remove ideological influence from science' and further argued the agency hasn't halted international scientific collaboration but is instead 'ensuring accountability.' 'Claims that NIH is undermining peer review are misunderstood. We're expanding access to publishing while strengthening transparency, rigor, and reproducibility in NIH-funded research,' he wrote. 'Lastly, we are reviewing each termination case carefully and some individuals have already been reinstated. As NIH priorities evolve, so must our staffing to stay mission-focused and responsibly manage taxpayer dollars.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Universal Health Services (UHS) Shares Are Trading Lower Today
Shares of hospital management company Universal Health Services (NYSE:UHS) fell 5.7% in the afternoon session after Chief Financial Officer Steve Filton noted during a recent conference that procedural volumes (an important driver of hospital revenue) "have been slower to recover back to historical levels than we might have imagined." Filton also voiced concern over the Trump administration's proposed federal spending bill, particularly its implications for healthcare funding. Since UHS derives a significant portion of its revenue from government programs like Medicare and Medicaid, the anticipated cuts to Medicaid could significantly affect the company, especially in regions with high dependency on public healthcare funding. The shares closed the day at $177.76, down 6.2% from previous close. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Universal Health Services? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Universal Health Services's shares are not very volatile and have only had 8 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful, although it might not be something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 28 days ago when the stock gained 5.9% after the major indices popped (Nasdaq +3.4%, S&P 500 +2.5%) in response to the positive outcome of U.S.-China trade negotiations, as both sides agreed to pause some tariffs for 90 days, signaling a potential turning point in ongoing tensions. This rollback cuts U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% and Chinese tariffs on U.S. imports to 10%, giving companies breathing room to reset inventories and supply chains. However, President Trump clarified that tariffs could go "substantially higher" if a full deal with China wasn't reached during the 90-day pause, but not all the way back to the previous levels. Still, the agreement has cooled fears of a prolonged trade war, helping stabilize expectations for global growth and trade flows and fueling renewed optimism. The optimism appeared concentrated in key trade-sensitive sectors, particularly technology, retail, and industrials, as lower tariffs reduce cost pressures and restore cross-border demand. Universal Health Services is down 1.1% since the beginning of the year, and at $177.77 per share, it is trading 26.4% below its 52-week high of $241.52 from September 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Universal Health Services's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $1,628. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data