Australian politician likened to 'vampire' after alleged sex assault
A state MP's alleged sexual abuse victim was spurred to action after learning the politician had been appointed as families minister, which he likened to a vampire running a blood bank.
Kiama MP Gareth Ward, 44, is on trial in the NSW District Court after pleading not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault charges.
He is accused of inviting a drunk 18-year-old man - who was 17 when they met - to his South Coast home in February 2013.
The man told the jury Ward plied him with drinks before indecently assaulting him three times in one night.
He said he had been prompted to report the assaults to police in 2020 after he realised Ward had been appointed the NSW minister for families.
'I felt basically that a vampire was running the blood bank and that I had a responsibility that I needed to get it on the record,' the complainant said.
He told the jury he was 'very distressed' by Ward's ministerial role and found it 'very inappropriate'.
But the complainant said he was also scared of Ward's power and feared there could be 'significant consequences' if he spoke out.
The jury heard his decision came years after he confided in a friend about the alleged assaults, only to be told he should have expected it when he went to Ward's house.
'(The friend) said something to the effect of 'that was obviously going to happen' and … I must be gay for wanting to go there,' the complainant recalled.
He told the jury he thought the incident was probably his fault so he decided he needed to put it aside, pretend it never happened, and 'just go on with being Gareth's bro.'
The alleged assault was sparked when the 18-year-old - who had been drinking and was in a 'jocular mood' - decided to play a prank on Ward by pretending to be passed out.
He said Ward tried to wake him up before sliding his hands into the teen's shorts, and touching his buttocks and scrotum.
'The heavy breath and the (feeling of) skin on skin are the two things that have stuck with me about that moment,' the complainant said during his emotional testimony.
'I felt like I shrivelled up inside myself. It was the most awkward feeling ever.'
Later, he said he had been lying facedown on the bed when Ward 'mounted' him without his permission and massaged his lower back.
Despite asking Ward to get off and stop, the complainant said the MP continued while explaining he had masseur training.
Upon reflection, he believes Ward's unwelcome touching contributed to his subsequent drug and alcohol abuse issues.
Ward is also accused of sexually assaulting a drunk political staffer after a NSW Parliament House event in 2015.
The man, who was 24 at the time but is now in his 30s, said Ward climbed into bed with him, groped his backside and sexually assaulted him despite him repeatedly saying 'no'.
Ward was charged in 2022 over the claims, which he denies.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Kristian White did not give Clare Nowland ‘real chance to avoid being Tasered', prosecutors argue
An ex-police officer who 'rushed' to deploy his Taser against a 95-year-old woman during an encounter at a nursing home in Cooma should be sentenced to jail time after a 'manifestly inadequate' non-custodial sentence was imposed on him earlier this year, a court has heard. Kristian James Samuel White, while a New South Wales police constable, fired his Taser at Clare Nowland two minutes and 40 seconds after being called to the Yallambee Lodge nursing home. She died in hospital a week after the incident in the early hours of 17 May 2023. White, 35, was found guilty of manslaughter by a jury last year and handed a two-year good behaviour bond and ordered to complete community service in March. At the NSW court of criminal appeal in Sydney on Friday, crown prosecutors appealed against the sentence, with the director of public prosecutions, Sally Dowling SC, arguing that supreme court justice Ian Harrison made a number of errors when he decided not to send White to prison. 'The truly senseless, impatient, violent conduct of the respondent that resulted in the death of this very vulnerable victim requires a sentence that gives weight to the principle of denunciation,' she said. Dowling argued that the short period from White arriving at the scene to deploying his Taser, Nowland's obvious vulnerability and mobility issues and non-responsiveness to requests 'and of course, the respondent's comment of 'Nah, bugger it', made immediately before he tasered Mrs Nowland is, we say, clearly, evidence of his impatience with her'. 'This evidence goes to the objective seriousness of the offending,' she said. 'It illustrates how extremely vulnerable Mrs Nowland was, and it also illustrates the respondent did not give her any real chance to avoid being Tasered. 'There were many other options available to him.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Harrison had concluded that jailing White would be disproportionate to the seriousness of the offending, arguing that while the police officer had made a 'terrible mistake', his crime was less serious than other manslaughter offences. Dowling pointed to sentencing statistics in NSW, which showed that since sentencing reforms in 2018 allowed a community corrections order to be given as a penalty for manslaughter, only two sentences have involved a non-custodial sentence. 'In the crown submission, this is not such an exceptional case, and anything other than a custodial sentence was not capable of meeting the multiple purposes of sentencing,' Dowling said. The multiple purposes, she said, were adequate punishment for the offence, accountability and denunciation, and recognition of harm done to the community. In his judgment, Harrison decided the need to deter other police officers from committing similar offences played 'only a minor role' in his sentencing decision. But Dowling argued the issue of deterrence should have been more strongly considered in sentencing. White's barrister, Troy Edwards SC, said the issue of general deterrence should not be a principal concern in this case. 'Does general deterrence really follow in those circumstances? A police officer in the position of the accused, placed in a position of confrontation, who assesses a situation ultimately erroneously … will they be deterred by a stern sentence being imposed on Mr White? In my submission that simply can't work,' he said. Edwards told the court that White had already completed a 'significant proportion' of the community service hours he had been ordered to undertake as per the original sentence and that, significantly, he had been so affected by the trial and publicity that he had been 'an involuntary patient in a psychiatric institution as a consequence'. White had also experienced panic attacks within the last two days, while shopping at Aldi, his lawyer said. 'His worries and PTSD anxiety has worsened since the indexed offence because of fears of being stared at and spoken about,' he said. Edwards said that when considering the relevant seriousness of White's offending, his role as a police officer and duty to resolve the situation with Nowland needed to be considered. 'He was thrust into a confrontational situation that he was duty-bound to resolve. That is, he hadn't chosen to be there,' he said. 'There's no planning for him to commit this offence. It occurred within a short space of time in circumstances where he had a sworn duty to resolve the situation.' The barrister argued that the crown submissions that the judge had not adequately considered Nowland's extreme vulnerability due to her age and infirmity in the sentence was 'just not correct'. 'The age and vulnerability of the victim were undoubtedly part of the reason for the determination of guilt that is criminal liability in the first place,' he said. 'The jury … determined that the level of force was unreasonable, and they did so largely on the basis of the age and infirmity of the deceased.' The justices have adjourned to consider their decision.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Cassius Turvey: Men jailed for life for brutal murder of Aboriginal boy
Warning: This article contains the name and images of an Indigenous person who has died. His family has given permission to use his name and image. Two men have been sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering an Aboriginal schoolboy, in a case that shocked Turvey died of head injuries after a brutal assault on the outskirts of Perth in October 2022. The 15-year-old's killing prompted nationwide protests and vigils, also sparking debate on pervasive racism in the country. The killers, Jack Brearley and Brodie Palmer, were "callous and lacking in empathy" as they chased Turvey down and savagely beat the Noongar Yamatji boy with a metal pole, Justice Peter Quinlan told a packed courtroom on Forth, who was convicted of manslaughter, was sentenced to 12 years in jail. The gallery cheered as Justice Quinlan handed down the sentences, while Cassius' mother Mechelle Turvey burst into tears, local media trial, Brearley, 24, and Palmer, 30, had each blamed the other for Cassius' death. Justice Quinlan found Brearley delivered the fatal blows, adding that he had shown "no remorse whatsoever".Brearley had alleged that he acted in self-defence as Cassius was armed with a knife, which the judge rejected as "complete fabrication". "You cannot make amends when you don't acknowledge the pain that you have caused."You cannot be remorseful when in an effort to avoid responsibility… You seek to frame an innocent man and when that does not work you give false evidence that your co-accused was in fact the killer," the chief justice said in a scathing rebuke reported by ABC did not physically strike Cassius, but Justice Quinlan ruled that he was "equally responsible but not equally culpable".The group had also assaulted other Aboriginal teenagers in what the judge described as "so-called vigilante justice [that] was completely misdirected". A fourth offender, Ethan MacKenzie, was handed a two-and-a-half years jail term for his part in some of the other one case, a 13-year-old boy's own crutches were used to beat him, causing bruising to his said the group had been "hunting for kids" because somebody had damaged Brearley's car attack on Cassius was the culmination of a complex series of tit-for-tat events that had nothing to do with him, they said. Justice Quinlan condemned Brearley, Palmer and Forth for their "celebration" after the assaults, calling it a "grotesque display of your complete disregard of the lives of the children you had attacked".In her victim impact statement on Thursday, Cassius' mother Mechelle Turvey said the actions of the three men were racially motivated. "Cassius was not just part of my life, he was my future," Ms Turvey said. "There are no words that can fully capture the devastation of losing someone you love to violence."While Justice Quinlan did not find the attack to be motivated by race, he said the attackers' use of racial slurs "rippled" through the Aboriginal community and created "justifiable fear". "The fear is real and legitimate. You are responsible for that fear," he said.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
English rugby braces for pivotal vote that will decide its future
On Saturday, the British and Irish Lions make their bow on Australian soil while England settle in Buenos Aires ahead of a Test series against Argentina that begins the following weekend. But back in Birmingham, away from the spotlight, is a potentially pivotal day for the future of rugby union in this country. There, at the Rugby Football Union's annual general meeting, members will vote on a set of proposals designed to address the unrest that resulted in a special general meeting three months ago. Bill Sweeney, the chief executive, survived a vote of no-confidence in March, but the same summit delivered a strong mandate to expedite governance reform. The Whole Game Union, a body spearheaded by Alistair Bow, from Nottingham RFC, and Paddy McAlpine, of Chichester RFC, has tabled 11 resolutions in an effort to secure meaningful change and requires 66 per cent approval for them to be passed. What changes are being proposed? The resolutions include a desire for the council to be able to approve the union's annual strategic plan, as well as its budget and business plan. The thorny issue of directors' pay, which sparked outrage across the game, would be addressed with the implementation of a published 'people and pay policy', which members could comment on and influence. As a whole, the Whole Game Union's mission statement is to 'put members back at the heart of major decisions' and 'restore strategic control' to an elected council. A letter to members, seen by Telegraph Sport, lists six reasons why reform has become essential, including the removal of development officers on the ground and reduced investment, in real terms, into the community game. What does it mean for the grass-roots game? At the heart of this campaign is the belief that the RFU executive and board have neglected amateur clubs in favour of a focus on the elite game. It is felt, for example, that £33 million per year was committed to Premiership clubs 'without meaningful consultation with members'. Jeff Blackett, who served as RFU president between 2020 and 2022, has been an adviser to the Whole Game Union and backs the proposals. 'The difficultly is that the game has been struggling to become professional since 1995 and the governance structure has not really caught up to where we are today,' he said this week. 'The professional game and the grass-roots game are two different beasts and it is very difficult to have one organisation in charge of all of it. Our concern is that the senior executive and the board have only concentrated on the elite game. The community game is dying on its feet, unfortunately; numbers are down, clubs are down and fixtures aren't fulfilled. 'It's a watershed moment and these proposals are meant to redress the balance, to put some of the power back into the council, acknowledging that the council has to be reformed itself to be more accountable to its membership, so that the big decisions can be scrutinised properly.' How could it affect the RFU council? The RFU council has been branded as bloated and archaic, with Blackett describing the 2016 Sport England governance code as a 'final nail in the coffin' that reduced its power. An independent review recently labelled it as 'dysfunctional' and advised that it should be scrapped entirely. However, the Whole Game Union argues that this consultation document 'lacks transparency and ambition' and would only create a system 'where members will have less ability to scrutinise the executive and the board'. 'One of the criticisms of the council is that too many of its members are people who have done great jobs for CBs [constituent boards] and are effectively given a reward of going up to Twickenham and having nice seats to enjoy their latter years in rugby,' Blackett added. 'There are people like that, but there are also many good people. The Whole Game Union would have council more accountable to the game. One of the resolutions is for the nominations committee to write a report on each council member that will go back to their constituents. They also want to make the council smaller, because it's difficult to have meaningful debate with 60-odd people in a room, and make it so members feel an attachment to those council members. 'What we're trying to do is to restore democracy. The friction comes because it is also a multimillion-pound business and the board also has to have the ability to run that. We've got to get the balance right.' Could this impact rugby's funding? The Whole Game Union has also addressed the RFU board's criticisms of the resolutions. It disputes, for instance, that reform would cause Sport England to remove funding from the RFU and decline to support the hosting of international tournaments such as World Cups. Blackett suggested that the image of the Whole Game Union as disruptive upstarts is grossly unfair. 'The RFU position is that they're a bunch of rebels and malcontents,' he said. 'They're not. They are people with a genuine interest in making rugby a great sport again and none of them are in it for personal gain.' His endgame would be for the RFU board to oversee both the professional and grass-roots game: 'The way I see it is that the board would delegate a good chunk of money to both and effectively urge them to manage it in accordance with business plans they have put forward. 'I do think it's important that the whole game stays together. And the professional game is the Premiership and the Championship. I think there has been real, valid criticism that the Championship has not been properly supported by the RFU and that needs to be put right as well.' Voting has been open for a fortnight or so, meaning many members will have made up their minds. Blackett would urge any stragglers to give themselves an opportunity to lend their voice to a critical debate. 'The RFU is a members cooperative and every member should have a voice on major issues,' he said. 'The trouble in the past with AGMs is that fewer and fewer people have turned up and things go through without proper scrutiny. 'It's absolutely vital that members look at the merits of this and vote. And, of course, I would urge them to vote for the resolutions that will ensure the future of our game.'
