Shein to increase product safety testing after EU probe
A page from the Shein website is shown in this photo, in New York, Friday, June 23, 2023. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
Fast-fashion retailer Shein on Thursday said it would increase its testing of products this year, after the European Union warned of fines if it does not address the bloc's concerns about unsafe and dangerous products sold on its site.
Shein said it targets 2.5 million product safety and quality tests in 2025, up from 2 million last year, and said it would spend US$15 million on compliance initiatives this year.
Shein, which sells its own-branded clothes in 150 countries, also operates a marketplace for sellers of toys, gadgets, and homeware sent directly from factories mostly in China to shoppers around the world.
Since it launched its marketplace, Shein has stopped working with more than 540 sellers over compliance breaches, the company said.
The EU's Consumer Protection Co-operation network of national consumer authorities and the European Commission on Monday notified Shein of practices that infringe EU consumer law, giving the company a month to reply.
Reporting by Helen Reid; Editing by Saad Sayeed, Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
19 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Premarket: Global shares slide as Russia-Ukraine conflict, OPEC+ output plan push oil prices higher
Global shares sank on Monday and oil prices jumped as trade tensions and the Russian-Ukraine conflict ratcheted up geopolitical uncertainty. The future for the S&P 500 lost 0.5% while that for the Dow Jones Industrial Average gave up 0.4%. Germany's DAX retreated 0.4% to 23,891.11 and the CAC 40 in Paris declined 0.5% to 7,712.40. British FTSE 100 gained 1% to 8,778.84. In Asia, Hong Kong's Hang Seng initially plunged more than 2% as Beijing and Washington traded harsh words over trade. U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement that he will double tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50% layered on still more worries for investors. But the Hang Seng closed just 0.6% lower, at 23,157.97. Markets in mainland China were closed for a holiday. China blasted the U.S. for issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. A report over the weekend that China's factory activity contracted in May, although the decline slowed from April as the country reached a deal with the U.S. to slash President Donald Trump's sky-high tariffs, further undermined market sentiment. Oil prices rallied after OPEC+ decided on a modest increase in output beginning in July. It was the third monthly increase in a row. U.S. benchmark crude oil gained $2.08 to $62.87 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international standard, was up $1.75 at $64.53 per barrel. Moscow pounded Ukraine with missiles and drones just hours before a new round of direct peace talks in Istanbul and a Ukrainian drone attack destroyed more than 40 Russian planes deep in Russia's territory, Ukraine's Security Service said on Sunday. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 0.6% to 23,157.97 as China and the U.S. accused each other of breaching their tariff agreement reached in Geneva last month. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 lost 1.3% to 37,470.67, while the Kospi in Seoul added 0.1% to 2,698.97. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 retreated 0.2% to 8,414.10. India's Sensex lost 0.4% while the Taiex in Taiwan fell 1.6%. On Friday, Wall Street closed its best month since 2023. The S&P 500 retreated less than 0.1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged 0.1% higher. The Nasdaq composite fell 0.3%. Hopes had largely been rising that the worst of such worries had passed, which in turn sent stocks rallying, after Trump paused his tariffs on both China and the European Union. A U.S. court then on Wednesday blocked many of Trump's sweeping tariffs. That all sent the S&P 500 in May to its first winning month in four and its best since November. But the tariffs remain in place while the White House appeals the ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade, and the ultimate outcome is still uncertain. In the bond market, Treasury yields eased after a report showed that the measure of inflation that the Federal Reserve likes to use was slightly lower in April than economists expected. A separate report from the University of Michigan said that sentiment among U.S. consumers was better in May than economists expected. Sentiment improved in the back half of the month after Trump paused many of his tariffs on China. In currency trading early Monday, the U.S. dollar fell to 142.91 Japanese yen from 143.87 yen. The euro inched up to $1.1421 from $1.1351. The Associated Press
Globe and Mail
19 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Wondering If UPS' 6.7%-Yielding Dividend Is Sustainable? Here's What You Need to Know.
I've read several articles recently suggesting that United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) should cut its dividend. The reasoning is that the world's largest package delivery company could create more value for shareholders if it did. While the idea of a dividend cut might be appealing to some, I suspect many income investors won't like it one bit. If you're in that group, you might be wondering if UPS' 6.7%-yielding dividend is sustainable. Here's what you need to know. Reasons for concern If UPS already had ample financial flexibility to fund its dividend and invest in growth, you probably wouldn't hear anyone talk about a potential dividend cut. The reality, though, is that there are some reasons for concern. Let's start with the dividend payout ratio. The closer this ratio is to 100%, the more precarious a company's dividend is. UPS' dividend payout ratio is a little over 95%. However, sometimes dividend payout ratios can be misleading. Why? They're based on earnings, which don't always give the best picture of a company's ability to fund its dividend program. Earnings can be weighed down by non-cash charges such as amortization and depreciation. A better metric to look at is free cash flow. In the first quarter of 2025, UPS generated free cash flow of nearly $1.5 billion. It paid $1.35 billion in dividends during the quarter. The company's payout ratio based on free cash flow is 90%. That gives UPS a little more breathing room to pay its dividend, but it's still not great. I also noticed that UPS Carol Tomé didn't talk about the dividend in the Q1 earnings call. But in the 2024 Q4 call, she said that the company had "plenty of liquidity to pay the dividend." It could be reading something between the lines that isn't there, but the absence of any discussion about management's commitment to the dividend could trigger a not-so-warm-and-fuzzy feeling for some income investors. Encouraging news Want some encouraging news for income investors? I have some for you. UPS' decision to slash its Amazon shipping volume in half by mid-2026 will help in several ways. The company plans to reduce total operational hours by roughly 25 million hours. It's cutting around 20,000 positions this year. UPS is closing 73 buildings by the end of June, with a total of 164 closures in the first phase of its network reconfiguration. Granted, reducing shipments for Amazon will also result in lower revenue. However, the reason behind the move was that this business isn't very profitable. UPS expects its operating margin and profitability to increase as a result of the Amazon glide-down. In addition, the package delivery giant has embarked on a major efficiency improvement project. UPS is using robots to automate label application, sorting, unloading and loading trailers, and more. By the end of 2025, the company expects to have 400 facilities partially or fully automated. With both the Amazon reductions and the efficiency improvements, UPS thinks it's on track to cut costs by $3.5 billion in 2025. This should boost free cash flow to some extent. The Trump administration's tariffs might not hurt UPS as much as anticipated, either. The U.S. International Court of Trade and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled last week that the president can't unilaterally impose some tariffs based on the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA). Although the tariffs remain in place while the administration appeals the decisions, these court rulings could be upheld. Is UPS' dividend sustainable? So, is UPS' juicy dividend sustainable? I think so. That doesn't mean the company's board of directors won't ultimately decide to cut the dividend. However, at least for now, they don't necessarily have to make that call. And if the Amazon glide-down and efficient improvement initiatives pay off as much as expected, maybe UPS won't have to seriously consider a dividend cut for a long time to come, if ever. Should you invest $1,000 in United Parcel Service right now? Before you buy stock in United Parcel Service, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and United Parcel Service wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
CTV News
24 minutes ago
- CTV News
Britain is getting a defence boost aimed at sending a message to Moscow, and to Trump
Director of Mechanical Engineering Matt Beamont shows Britain's Defence Secretary John Healey, left, a storm shadow missile on an assembly line at the MBDA Storm Shadow factory in Stevenage, England, Saturday May 31, 2025. (Dan Kitwood/Pool via AP) LONDON — The United Kingdom will build new nuclear-powered attack submarines and create an army ready to fight a war in Europe as part of a boost to military spending designed to send a message to Moscow — and Washington. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain 'cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses' as he pledged to undertake the most sweeping changes to Britain's defences since the end of the Cold War more than three decades ago. 'We have to recognize the world has changed,' Starmer told the BBC. 'With greater instability than there has been for many, many years, and greater threats.' What's happening on Monday? The government is to respond to a strategic defence review commissioned by Starmer and led by George Robertson, a former U.K. defence secretary and NATO secretary general. It's the first such review since 2021, and lands in a world shaken and transformed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and by the re-election of President Donald Trump last year. Months after Britain's last major defence review was published in 2021, then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson said with confidence that the era of 'fighting big tank battles on European landmass' are over. Three months later, Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine. Starmer's center-left Labour Party government says it will accept all 62 recommendations made in the review, aiming to help the U.K. confront growing threats on land, air sea and in cyberspace. Defense Secretary John Healey said the changes would send 'a message to Moscow, and transform the country's military following decades of retrenchment, though he said he does not expect the number of soldiers — currently at a historic low — to rise until the early 2030s. Healey said plans for defence spending to hit 2.5% of national income by 2027 a year are 'on track' and that there's 'no doubt' it will hit 3% before 2034. Starmer said the 3% goal is an 'ambition,' rather than a firm promise, and it's unclear where the cash-strapped Treasury will find the money. The government has already, contentiously, cut international aid spending to reach the 2.5% target. Starmer said he wouldn't make a firm pledge until he knew 'precisely where the money is coming from.' Deterring Russia Even 3% falls short of what some leaders in NATO think is needed to deter Russia from future attacks on its neighbors. NATO chief Mark Rutte says leaders of the 32 member countries will debate a commitment to spend at least 3.5% of GDP on defence when they meet in the Netherlands this month. Monday's announcements include building 'up to 12' nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarines under the AUKUS partnership with Australia and the United States. The government also says it will invest 15 billion in Britain's nuclear arsenal, which consists of missiles carried on a handful of submarines. Details of those plans are likely to be scarce. The government will also increase conventional Britain's weapons stockpiles with up to 7,000 U.K.-built long-range weapons. Starmer said rearming would create a 'defence dividend' of well-paid jobs — a contrast to the post-Cold War 'peace dividend' that saw Western nations channel money away from defense into other areas. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defence spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Healey said Russia is 'attacking the U.K. daily,' with 90,000 cyberattacks from state-linked sources directed at the U.K.'s defence over the last two years. A cyber command to counter such threats is expected to be set up as part of the review. 'This is a message to Moscow,' Healey told the BBC. Bolstering Europe's defences It's also a message to Trump that Europe is heeding his demand for NATO members to spend more on their own defence. European countries, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defence posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't pull their weight. James Cartlidge, defence spokesman for the main opposition Conservative Party, welcomed more money for defence but was skeptical of the government's 3% pledge, 'All of Labour's strategic defence review promises will be taken with a pinch of salt unless they can show there will actually be enough money to pay for them,' he said. Jill Lawless And Pan Pylas, The Associated Press
