Duffy threatens to pull California's high speed rail funding
The Trump administration notified California officials Wednesday that federal funding for the state's massive high-speed rail project is at risk of being pulled after a four-month review concluded the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) has 'no viable path' to complete the project on time or on budget.
'CHSRA is on notice — If they can't deliver on their end of the deal, it could soon be time for these funds to flow to other projects that can achieve President Trump's vision of building great, big, beautiful things again,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement on the Federal Railway Authority (FRA)'s 310-page compliance review. 'Our country deserves high-speed rail that makes us proud – not boondoggle trains to nowhere.'
The Department of Transportation (DOT) has given CHSRA 'up to 37 days' to respond before it moves forward with terminating two grants worth roughly $4 billion.
A CHSRA spokesperson told The Hill that the state agency 'strongly disagrees' with the federal government's assessment of the project's progress, noting that most of the money for the high-speed rail system is coming from the state.
'We remain firmly committed to completing the nation's first true high-speed rail system connecting the major population centers in the state,' the spokesperson said. 'To that end, the Governor's budget proposal, which is currently before the Legislature, extends at least $1 billion per year in funding for the next 20 years, providing the necessary resources to complete the project's initial operating segment.'
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) addressed concerns about the project's future under the Trump administration during a news conference in Sacramento last month.
'You can see the progress we've actually made with our high-speed rail system,' he told reporters. 'We're now on the other side of the environmental reviews; we're on the other side of the land acquisition.'
'We're now on the other side, and we want to get this done,' he added.
The FRA report highlighted the project's change in scope since its initial approval in 2008 under then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R).
'The purpose of the Federal commitment was clear: to facilitate the delivery of true high-speed rail and serve as a catalyst for future deployment of high-speed rail beyond California,' FRA acting administrator Drew Freely wrote in a letter to CHSRA officials. 'FRA cannot continue to commit taxpayer dollars to CHSRA's Sisyphean endeavor, which now stands as a fraction of what was promised back in 2008.'
'In short, the CHSR project is a story of broken promises and of waste of Federal taxpayer dollars,' he added.
Additionally, he wrote that the federal government is not seeking reimbursement from the state 'at this time' for money already distributed but noted the FRA 'reserves the right to do so consistent with applicable law.'
The CHSRA spokesperson said the state plans to 'fully address and correct the record in our formal response.'
Duffy launched the review of California's high-speed rail project shortly after he was confirmed for as Transportation chief in February. According to the DOT, the investigation's findings were based on discussions with state oversight and CHSRA officials, construction site visits, a risk analysis and reviews of 'several thousand documents.'
It cited numerous change orders, increased costs, missed deadlines, funding gaps, construction delays and questions about ridership projections among the most severe concerns raised.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Venezuelans in Florida react to Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump signed a proclamation to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks, with one of the countries being Venezuela. Venezuelans in Florida reacted to the ban, with one worrying about their visa.
19 minutes ago
Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release
NEW YORK -- A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the 'irreparable harm' caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. 'When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.' He also cited potentially 'career-ending' harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy advisor. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. 'As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States,' he wrote. 'Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?' Spokespersons for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against .
19 minutes ago
Peruvian migrant acquitted in the first trial over the new militarized zone at US-Mexico border
EL PASO, Texas -- A Peruvian woman who crossed the U.S. border illegally was acquitted Thursday of unauthorized access to a newly designated militarized zone in the first trial under the Trump administration's efforts to prosecute immigrants who cross in certain parts of New Mexico and western Texas. Adely Vanessa De La Cruz-Alvarez, 21, was arrested last month near the West Texas town of Tornillo after she entered the U.S. from Mexico by walking across the riverbed of the Rio Grande, court documents show. In addition to being charged with entering the country illegally, she was charged with accessing a military zone. She is among several other immigrants who have been charged under the law since President Donald Trump's administration transferred oversight of a strip of land along the border to the military. It is as part of a new approach the Department of Justice is taking to crack down on illegal immigration. The Associated Press left messages Thursday with De La Cruz-Alvarez's attorney, Veronica Teresa Lerma. The lawyer told The Texas Tribune the acquittal is significant. 'Hopefully, this sets the tone for the federal government,' Lerma said, 'so they know what the El Paso community will do with these charges.' Even before the woman's case went to trial, federal magistrate judges in neighboring New Mexico had dismissed similar cases, finding little evidence that immigrants knew about the zones. Lerma was convicted of entering the country illegally and was already facing deportation, but could have faced up to 18 months in prison for entering the militarized zone. Despite the verdict, U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons of the Western District of Texas said his office will continue to aggressively prosecute National Defense Area violations. 'At the end of the day, another illegal alien has been found guilty of illegally entering the country in violation of the improper entry statute and will be removed from the United States,' Simmons said in a statement. "That's a win for America." The administration wants to sharply increase the removal of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally as Trump seeks to make good on his pledge of mass deportations. The administration has deployed thousands of troops to the border, while arrests have plunged to the lowest levels since the mid-1960s.
