&w=3840&q=100)
May prefer fresh insolvency process, say Bhushan Power & Steel lenders
Lenders of Bhushan Power & Steel (BPSL) on Tuesday indicated before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Delhi that they may prefer a fresh insolvency process for the company rather than sending it for liquidation.
"Every option is under consideration because this will have to be clarified by the honourable court... We may even persuade the court to initiate a fresh CIRP (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) because the ultimate object of the IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) is to preserve the company as a going concern. Liquidation is the ultimate death,' Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the lenders and other stakeholders, told the NCLT.
The tribunal was hearing a plea filed by BPSL's former promoter Sanjay Singhal, seeking enforcement of the Supreme Court's recent order directing the company's liquidation.
The apex court had on May 3 declared JSW Steel Limited's resolution plan for BPSL 'illegal' and ordered the latter's liquidation, four years after the company was acquired by JSW Steel under the IBC.
The NCLT on Tuesday adjourned the case to May 30, after Mehta urged the tribunal to allow Singhal to identify and implead all necessary parties.
'Let him (Singhal) consider whom he would wish to join, or who are necessary parties, before even notice is issued, and thereafter we can issue,' Mehta told the bench led by Justice R Sudhakar.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
9 hours ago
- Business Standard
IBC in stress: Survival depends on commitment to its core principles
Public laws aim to keep the crime proceeds beyond the reach of criminals while punishing the criminals. Although these proceeds were never the state's property, state benefits from their confiscation M S Sahoo Ashish Makhija Listen to This Article The Indian Parliament in 2016 enacted the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to address the country's persistent challenges of financial stress and managing bad debts, with the overarching objective of driving economic growth. In its initial years, the IBC benefited from rare institutional alignment. The legislature amended the code six times in the first five years to address implementation challenges and respond to the evolving economic environment. With alacrity, the executive issued the rules and regulations, established the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), accredited insolvency professionals, and built the supporting ecosystem. The


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Reverse flipping by Indian startups gathers steam: Here's all you need to know
Driven by better listing prospects and regulatory ease, several Indian startups and companies have started to redomicile to India from overseas. Here's a look at prominent companies that have completed or are in the process of 'reverse flipping': Meesho : ET reported on June 13 that Meesho could see the process of its redomiciling from the US to India conclude as early as this week. The ecommerce marketplace is heading for an initial public offering (IPO) this month, at a likely size of $700-800 million. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo Meesho had applied for the National Company Law Tribunal's (NCLT) approval for a reverse merger in January. Flipkart : Rival etailer Flipkart's board on April 22 approved the plan to shift its domicile from Singapore to India. India's largest ecommerce company is eyeing a public listing by 2026. Live Events ET had reported in December that Flipkart had started preparing for its public offering with a definite timeline of 12-15 months. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Dream Sports : Dream Sports, parent of fantasy gaming platform Dream11, completed its flipback from Delaware, US, to India through the reverse merger route in a quiet move. The company was among the first of new-age firms using the fast-track mechanism for cross-border mergers, under which a foreign holding entity can merge with its Indian subsidiary without clearance from the NCLT. Zepto : Quick commerce platform Zepto announced in January that it completed its reverse merger from Singapore to India ahead of its IPO. Chief financial officer (CFO) Ramesh Bafna announced the milestone on LinkedIn, describing it as a 'historic completion in record time.' Groww : In May 2024, wealth management startup Groww moved its domicile back to India from the US. The startup paid Rs 1,340 crore ($160 million) in taxes after the flipback, which resulted in Groww clocking a net loss of Rs 805 crore for the financial year ending March 31, 2024. However, in FY25, Billionbrains Garage Ventures, the parent company of Groww, reported a more than threefold jump in net profit to Rs 1,819 crore and a 31% increase in revenue to Rs 4,056 crore for fiscal 2025. Pine Labs : Digital payments firm Pine Labs received the NCLT's approval in April to merge its Singapore entity with its India entity, thereby reverse flipping its parent entity back to India. Pine Labs will become only the second major fintech to return its headquarters to India after Groww. Razorpay : Bengaluru-headquartered digital payments firm Razorpay is another fintech in the process of moving back its parent entity to India from the US. PhonePe : In 2022, Walmart-backed PhonePe moved its domicile from Singapore to India. The fintech firm also moved the ownership of the recently acquired IndusOS Appstore (OSLabs Pte Ltd) from Singapore to India.


The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
NCLT directs insolvency resolution proceedings against Gensol Engineering and arm Gensol EV Lease
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted Gensol Engineering Ltd. and its arm Gensol EV Lease Ltd for insolvency resolution following separate petitions filed by Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd. (IREDA). However, NCLT appointed an alternative interim resolution professional (IRP) for both the companies, while rejecting the name proposed by IREDA. On May 14, State-run IREDA had filed an application under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against Gensol Engineering claiming a default of over ₹510 crore. IREDA had filed a separate plea against Gensol EV Lease claiming a default of ₹218.95 crore. IREDA had also initiated proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal against both the firms. The IREDA petition against Gensol Engineering satisfies Section 7's substantive requirements, NCLT Judicial Member Shammi Khan and Technical Member Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, said in their order on June 13. Gensol Engineering parallel Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) proceedings do not bar Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), as no moratorium exists pre-admission. Upon admission, the moratorium under Section 14 (1) of IBC will override such proceedings, they noted. DRT May 28 order and the Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) April 15 order reinforce the need for a corporate insolvency resolution process against Gensol Engineering, to protect the creditors and address governance issues, NCLT said. IREDA proposed the name of Pulkit Gupta, EY Restructuring LLP for interim resolution professional (IRP) for Gensol Engineering and Gensol EV Lease However, Gensol Engineering objected to Gupta's appointment citing prior relationships. The Tribunal finds that the undisclosed relationships raised concerns about Gupta's eligibility, necessitating the appointment of an alternative IRP, NCLT said. NCLT appointed Keshav Khaneja as IRP for Gensol Engineering. Making similar observations, NCLT also appointed Khaneja as IRP for Gensol EV Lease. Gensol has been in the spotlight after SEBI via an interim order in April barred the company's promoters from the securities market for alleged fund diversions and corporate governance lapses.