
The Philpster exhausts his repertoire with return to Rwanda at PMQs
Thoughts and prayers with Alex Burghart. Not so long ago, the shadow chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster was allowed out by Kemi Badenoch to stand in for her at prime minister's questions when Keir Starmer was otherwise engaged. Though this may be a memory Alex wishes to forget. It wasn't his finest hour. Angela Rayner ran rings around him without even breaking sweat.
So, on Wednesday, Alex found himself sidelined. Not wanted on voyage. From time to time, he would check his phone for messages. Just in case he had missed something. Willing his phone to ping with a late call-up. Nothing. He just had to suck it up. Take his place on the opposition frontbench and cheer on some other poor sucker. Maybe it was for the best. Some men are born failures. Some achieve failure. Some have failure thrust upon them. Alex is unique. A combination of all three.
Instead it was Chris Philp who got the job. Given the nod by Kemi shortly after breakfast and with next to no time to prepare. The last man standing who can be trusted to be loyal. Or more or less competent. In his own way. At least some of his neural pathways function as they should.
The Philpster is Team Kemi through and through. Up until Team Kemi is no longer a thing. Much as he was with Team Truss. Then he will be his own man. Left to ponder that no one will ever be Team Philp. Chris even looks and sounds a bit like Kemi. Just not as good. Imagine. But this was his moment. His time. It might never happen again. He could be a hero. Just for one day.
Also having an unexpectedly good day was Keir. Of all the days to miss PMQs, this was a good one. A nice snooze on the flight back from Canada. No tricky questions on why the G7 turned into the G6. No having to cover for a US president who seemed to imagine he was the star of his own first-person-shooter computer game. No having to look his own MPs in the eye as his government published its new welfare bill. Over to Angie.
Philp stuck to what he knew. Grooming gangs and immigrants. Which all felt rather familiar. As if we all knew what everyone was going to say before they said it. After all, Kemi had had her say in answer to Yvette Cooper's Commons statement on Monday. The next day she and the Philpster had held their own press conference to fill in any gaps. And now? Now, it was third time lucky. So far, they had consistently struck the wrong note. Maybe this was the chance they needed. And it wasn't as if Chris was capable of coming up with any other questions.
This was all about the survivors, said Philp. Which was a decent place to start, given that he and Kemi had previously made it all about them. A bit of a stretch given that neither had shown much interest in the scandal when they had been in government. Rayner thanked him for his tone and assured the house that the inquiry would be comprehensive and would put the victims first.
After that, it was all rather downhill. Maybe it was nerves, but the Philpster got increasingly shouty and squeaky. His voice racing through the octaves. Starmer should apologise for calling people 'far right' and 'racist' for having demanded an inquiry. Ange corrected him. Keir had only been calling out those who had previously shown no interest in grooming gangs and, besides, he had also done more to secure convictions as director of public prosecutions than the Tory government had managed in 14 years.
It was just weird to think that Philp and Kemi were now positioning themselves as the champions of the survivors, but we were where we were. Chris moved on to his next pet subject. Illegal immigrants. One or two of the people who had arrived on small boats were implicated in child sexual exploitation. Therefore, it followed that every illegal immigrant was probably a paedophile. And should be killed. Or something.
And another thing … The Philpster was racing through his desperately limited repertoire and was already struggling. Rwanda. If only Labour hadn't closed down the Rwanda scheme, then already more than a million immigrants – although why stop at those arriving by small boat? Why not go for those with visas too? – would have been safely rehoused in Rwanda to fight in the war with the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
'The deputy prime minister has a brass neck,' he declared. For … for stating the obvious. That Rwanda was always going to fail. Rishi Sunak would never have called a general election last July if he had believed in the scheme. But to his dying breath, Chris will insist otherwise. He just needed a few more days, a week, even. Then he coulda been a contender.
We ended where we always end on these occasions. Nowhere very much. Philp may have disappointed the Tory benches who had been hoping for a miracle, but Rayner hadn't exactly shone. It was as though she didn't believe the lines she had been given to read out. Was starting to wonder if neither the Tories nor Labour had all the answers. A revelation that comes to all sentient politicians in the end. You could chalk it up as a win for Ange. Largely because she's the more engaging. She connects to people. They believe her.
Well, not all. Labour's Sarah Champion managed to throw a dampener on proceedings, saying she had had enough of point scoring from all sides of the house over the grooming gangs. The victims had even been failed by the criminal injuries compensation scheme. Time for everyone to up their game.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump threatens to withhold funds from California wildfire victims because of his dislike for Newsom
Donald Trump threatened to withhold funds from California wildfire victims because of his dislike for the state's governor, Gavin Newsom. The president took questions from the press on the morning of June 18, 2025, as workers installed a large flag pole on the South Lawn of the White House. Trump was asked if his recent "dust-ups" with Gov. Newsom would impact the wildfire relief California would receive, to which the President responded, "Yeah, maybe". Gavin Newsom has since responded to Trump's threat via X, stating, "Only a truly disturbed person would threaten to withhold aid from victims because they don't like someone."


Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ange's rant on Tory asylum hotels is lost in translation
Such is the misery of living in Labour's Britain that many upper-income voters are fleeing abroad – including Keir Starmer. He couldn't join PMQs this week because an envelope was being opened in Canada. In keeping with our immigration system, one missing PM was replaced by several foreigners – a parliamentary delegation from Tajikistan – who followed a translation via headphones. They appeared confused – and no wonder! Standing in for our roving PM was Angela Rayner, adopting the elbow-on-the-table stance of a barmaid ejecting a drunk, and lisping with fury. 'Quite fwankly, Mr Speaker,' she likes to say, 'it'sss the Toriesss wot should apologiiise!' Labour MPs love it. The delegation looked bewildered. 'I believe she is angry,' said the translator, 'and she says the opposition are doing a bad job of running the country'. It must confuse visitors further that Ange still refers to Yvette Cooper as 'the shadow home secretary'. Rayner was sparring with Chris Philp – the real home secretary – who said he'd met victims of the grooming scandal and wanted to relay their concerns about the proposed national inquiry. Ange accused him of playing party politics (a good chance for her to play party politics) and things descended fast into a Rovers Return ding-dong about illegal immigration. Chris said Ange had 'some brass neck'. Ange calculated the cost of Tory asylum hotels at '£1 million a day, spived up the wall'. Chris cried, 'Goodness me, she's got a cheek' – grabbed his coat and flounced out the pub. The Tajiks waited patiently for a translation of 'spived', no doubt in vain. I imagined Frank Muir on Call My Bluff explaining, 'It's a portmanteau of spiv and spaff, and can mean waste or...' – and then I came to. Sarah Champion was speaking. Labour's admirable crusader against child abuse accidentally called the Speaker a 'deputy speaker', apologised and explained that there were 'too many deputies in the place today' ('ha, ha!') and she had lost track due to the 'point-scoring that's going on… on ALL sides' ('mumble, mumble'). The Government reacted as if slapped in the face. Ange was visibly stung. But it was a point well made. Grooming is a thing of evil; Westminster ought to be able to discuss it soberly. Yet MPs cannot resist turning it into an election broadcast. Otherwise, PMQs was the usual hot air: you didn't miss much, Sir Keir. MPs reminded us it was Grenfell week, Windrush week and refugees week. Edward Leigh, though anti-Tehran, asked if Britain could do more to stop settlements on the West Bank. Daisy Cooper of the Lib Dems – unusually, not dressed for the gym – urged the Government not to 'blindly follow' the US into war with Iran. This is unlikely as Iran is just out of the reach of our combined military force of five soldiers and a pedalo, while what remains of the RAF will be escorting the PM to a philatelist convention in Manila. He's got to be careful. With his domestic agenda crumbling and his MPs rebelling, the PM is exposed to the threat of a soft-Left rebellion. He might return to No 10 in a year's time to find Ange has moved in and changed the locks.


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
SNP rebels do not have an alternative leader to John Swinney
Even the most assiduous of Nat-watchers would struggle to hazard a guess about how many times John Swinney has launched himself into a declaration that he'd fight to his last drop – or words to that effect – to achieve independence for Scotland. Being the relatively modest chap that he is, I doubt if even Mr Swinney would get close to naming the correct number of such speeches. And after all, given the paucity of other policies in the SNP playbook, independence obviously gets a lot of mentions. As a result, we've now had old 'Say-it-Again Swinney' returning again to his favourite theme, this time at a conference that rejoiced in the title of Scotland 2050. Now, I'm assuming that even a long marcher in the cause of independence, as he is, wasn't thinking of hanging around for another 25 years or so – but why return to that boring old tale? There have been suggestions that he's doing it because there are signs of a backbench plot to unseat him as leader following the humiliating SNP defeat in the Hamilton Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. It's true that, for a seasoned warrior, Mr Swinney's campaign was a decidedly cack-handed affair, constantly warning about the danger posed by Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Needless to say, all that did was talk up Reform's chances – and so it proved. Labour reaped the benefit, the SNP was second, with Reform third, and almost immediately the know-nothings on the Nat backbenches rushed forward with audible mutterings that Swinney had to go. However, I can't really believe that the First Minister is losing a minute's sleep over these supposed threats. Like lemmings peering over the cliff edge, these heroes seem to be threatening rebellion but without the foggiest idea about how to go about it. And, most of all, who would lead them? That's the biggest gap in their prospectus because, while there may be a few suicide merchants in their ranks, I can't think of a single overly ambitious Nat candidate who stacks up as 'possible' leader. Kate Forbes is the current Deputy First Minister and just about everybody's choice as a possible successor – everybody, that is, except perhaps the lady herself. Widely seen as a clever politician with sensible economic views, she delivered a ringing denunciation this week of the 'destructive nature' of much of the content of social media, calling it 'totally misogynistic'. She did try to become SNP leader and first minister after Nicola Sturgeon's shock resignation but was beaten by Humza Yousaf, the man Ms Sturgeon wanted as her successor and campaigned for hard. If Mr Swinney were to resign, she might well have another try for the top job but very few expect her to try to force him out any time soon. Furthermore, there's very little chance of him resigning this side of next May's Scottish Parliament election. All of this means that there won't be much scope for plotting at this weekend's gathering of the SNP's national council … always assuming that the plotters turn up.