Supreme Court initiates criminal contempt proceedings against YouTuber for remarks against judge
Supreme Court initiates criminal contempt proceedings against YouTuber for remarks against judge
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Friday initiated criminal contempt proceedings against YouTube journalist Ajay Shukla for his contemptuous, scandalous and defamatory remarks casting aspersions on senior-most judge of SC, Justice Surya Kant, for the way a bench led by him dealt with Madhya Pradesh minister Vijay Shah for his "crass comments" on Col Sofiya Qureshi.
A bench of Justices Kant and N Kotiswar Singh had rejected Shah's apology terming it a facade, and ordered an SIT to probe his comments, but stayed his arrest. The same bench had enforced a similar process against Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad for his "objectionable" comments on Op Sindoor.
On Friday, a bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justices A G Masih and A S Chandurkar took suo motu cognisance of a 150-second YouTube video in which Shukla, who claims to be editor-in-chief of a digital media organisation, was heard attributing motives while making unfounded defamatory allegations against Justice Kant, who is next in line to become the CJI.
Terming Shukla's remarks "scathingly scandalous", the bench said, "No doubt the Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech, but at the same time, this right is subject to reasonable restrictions specified under Article 19(2) of the Constitution.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Truque caseiro noturno eficaz contra a papada (faça hoje mesmo)
Revista & Saúde
Saiba Mais
Undo
A person cannot be permitted to make allegations defamatory and contemptuous in nature which brings the highest institution in judiciary to disrepute."
SC directed its registry to lodge a suo motu criminal contempt case against Shukla and the YouTube channel. SC sought Shukla's response and posted further hearing in July.
SC sought the assistance of attorney general R Venkataramani and solicitor general Tushar Mehta, who said Shukla's comments were defamatory and contemptuous. The bench directed the YouTube channel to take down the video and restrained social media platforms from exhibiting the clip.
In SC's judgment punishing advocate Prashant Bhushan for contempt in 2020, a three-judge bench, of which Justice Gavai was a part, had said, "If a scathing attack is made on judges, it would become difficult for them to work fearlessly and with the objectivity of approach to the issues. The judgment can be criticised. However, motives to the judges need not be attributed, as it brings administration of justice into disrepute.
"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Violated Rights of Deported Venezuelans, Judge Rules
A US judge ruled that the Trump administration violated the due-process rights of more than 100 Venezuelans deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador, and they must now get a chance to challenge their removal. US District Judge James Boasberg in Washington found that the purported gang members never got a chance to challenge their designation as 'alien enemies' before they were sent on March 15 and 16 to the mega-prison in El Salvador known as CECOT. Those removed were 'entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removability' under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which President Donald Trump invoked hours before deeming them members of the Tren de Aragua gang. The judge said in his Wednesday decision he would decide later how exactly the administration now must provide that notice and opportunity to the Venezuelans. 'Absent this relief, the government could snatch anyone off the street, turn him over to a foreign country, and then effectively foreclose any corrective course of action,' the judge wrote. The ruling is another setback for the deportation program of Trump, who has been rebuffed twice in recent weeks by the US Supreme Court. Boasberg cited the language of the Supreme Court, which ruled that Venezuelans still facing deportation under the Alien Enemies Act must receive notice that they face removal in 'a reasonable time and in such a manner' to bring a legal challenge. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said 'fortunately for the American people, Judge Boasberg does not have the last word.' 'Judge Boasberg has no authority to intervene with immigration or national security — authority that rests squarely with President Trump and the executive branch,' Jackson said. 'His current and previous attempts to prevent President Trump from deporting criminal illegal aliens poses a direct threat to the safety of the American people.' Boasberg stopped short of ordering the US to 'facilitate' the return of the Venezuelans, as the Supreme Court ordered in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a wrongly deported Salvadoran national sent to CECOT at the same time as the Venezuelans. The Trump administration has spent weeks fighting implementation of that ruling by a federal judge in Maryland. 'Mindful of national-security and foreign-policy concerns, the court will not — at least yet — order the government to take any specific steps,' Boasberg said. 'It will instead allow defendants to submit proposals regarding the appropriate actions' to allow the detainees to seek legal relief. The judge also declined to say that Trump improperly invoked the Alien Enemies Act by saying the Venezuelans were engaged in an invasion or predatory incursion. Several other federal judges said Trump improperly invoked the law, while the Supreme Court has not ruled on that question. 'Perhaps the president lawfully invoked the Alien Enemies Act,' Boasberg wrote. 'Perhaps, moreover, defendants are correct that plaintiffs are gang members. But — and this is the critical point — there is simply no way to know for sure, as the CECOT plaintiffs never had any opportunity to challenge the government's say-so.' Instead, the US 'spirited away planeloads of people before any such challenge could be made,' Boasberg wrote. 'And now, significant evidence has come to light indicating that many of those currently entombed in CECOT have no connection to the gang and thus languish in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations.' The judge gave the administration one week to tell him how it would comply with his order. Boasberg has previously said there is 'probable cause' to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt of court for sending the Venezuelans to CECOT despite his order to immediately halt the deportations. 'Such defiance is currently the subject of the court's contempt inquiry,' Boasberg wrote Wednesday. The case is J.G.G. v. Trump, 25-cv-766, US District Court, District of Columbia. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Don't label persons with criminal background as Hindu activist: Bhandary
Mangaluru: KPCC working president and MLC Manjunath Bhandary strongly objected to individuals with criminal backgrounds being referred to as Hindu activists. He told reporters on Wednesday, that those affiliated with right-wing organisations like the Bajrang Dal or others should be identified by their organisation name, and not as representatives of the Hindu community. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "We too are Hindus, I identify myself as a Congress functionary. It is unacceptable to misuse religion for political gain and to shield those spreading hatred," he said. He expressed dismay that individuals facing multiple criminal cases and even externment proceedings were being referred to as Hindu leaders. Referring to the recent murder of Abdul Rahiman, Bhandary highlighted the irony that Rahiman previously donated blood to the father of one of the accused. "He was called under the pretext to provide sand and was then assaulted. Isn't this betrayal? Hindu leaders must condemn such acts as they go against the core values of Hinduism and the Constitution," he said. Criticising the BJP, Bhandary said the party failed to counter the Congress on the development front, and has hence resorted to backdoor politics by sowing the seeds of communal hatred in the minds of people. "The murder of Abdul Rahiman was an outcome of such brainwashing, and those engaged in such acts should also be punished," he said. He also voiced concern that such incidents were tarnishing the image of coastal Karnataka. "Though these incidents are concentrated within a 10km radius of Mangaluru, the entire region is being unfairly portrayed. This, at a time when the govt is preparing to boost tourism and attract investments to the coast," he said. Referring to the Dakshina Kannada district police initiating the process of externment against 36 people, he said that one must note that a majority belong to two taluks. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Bhandary said that the KPCC fact-finding committee comprising MP Syed Naseer Hussain, MLA NA Haris, MLC Manjunath Bhandary, AICC secretary Roji M John, KPCC vice-president VR Sudarshan, former minister Kimmane Ratnakar, and former MP K Jayaprakash Hegde will tour the coastal districts from Thursday. The team will study the socio-political atmosphere and meet senior Congress leaders, the deputy commissioner, police commissioner, SP, business figures, religious leaders, labour unions, intellectuals, artists, and civil society members. They will also visit affected areas and meet families of victims before submitting a report.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cabinet nod to new bill for welfare of gig workers
1 2 Ranchi: The state cabinet on Wednesday approved The Jharkhand Platform Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Bill of 2025 for tabling it during the next session of the state assembly. Briefing the media after the meeting, state finance secretary Prashant Kumar said the proposal was moved by labour employment and training department. "The bill is to streamline and work towards welfare of gig workers in the state who are engaged with various online based platforms," he said. After the enhancement of the law, a Jharkhand Platform Based Gig Workers' Board will be formed in the state. "The board will ensure their registration, data keeping and work towards their welfare. A separate welfare fund for gig workers will also be set up," Kumar added. The cabinet approved 11 other proposals during Wednesday's meeting. The cabinet gave it's nod for the creation of teaching and non-teaching staff positions in the newly established government engineering colleges in Bokaro and Godda as per AICTE norms and regulations. "For each college, 85 teaching and 125 non-teaching positions have been created. It will incur an expense of Rs 41.87 crore annually to the state exchequer," Kumar said. The cabinet also approved formation of the Jharkhand Municipal Contractor Registration (Amendment) Rules, 2025, which will make GST registration in state mandatory for entity seeking to take work orders or contracts from the state urban development department. Administrative approval was also given for the transfer, widening, strengthening, and reconstruction of the Pakur-Barharwa main road with an estimated budget of around Rs 40,39 crore. The cabinet also sanctioned transferring of all posts of doctors and medical staff at jails across the state to the health department from home department for better management of resources. It also approved a proposal to reinstate 25 teachers, whose appointed were declared illegal in a in CBI investigation but was later allowed by the Supreme Court and Jharkhand High Court, allowing them to receive their due benefits and pensions.
