New Zealand's ‘Everyone must go!' tourism campaign ridiculed as emigration hits record high
A New Zealand tourism campaign targeting Australian visitors has been ridiculed for sounding like a clearance sale slogan and for being tone-deaf amid widespread public service job cuts and record numbers of New Zealanders moving overseas.
The government launched its 'Everyone must go!' campaign on Sunday, in a bid to encourage Australian holiday-makers to visit New Zealand. The NZD$500,000 campaign will run on radios and social media in Australia between February and March.
'What this Tourism New Zealand campaign says to our Aussie mates is that we're open for business, there are some great deals on, and we'd love to see you soon,' said Louise Upston, the tourism minister.
But the tagline – set against photographs of people sightseeing – quickly became the subject of derision inside New Zealand, with opposition politicians and social media users likening it to a clearance sale advertisement, a marketing campaign for the apocalypse, or a desperate plea for access to the lavatory.
The Green Party's tourism spokesperson, Celia Wade-Brown, told national broadcaster RNZ the tagline 'might refer to the need for toilets in some of our high-tourist spots. I mean, the queues are ridiculous'.
The tourism campaign is the latest in the government's attempt to attract tourists, digital nomads and overseas investors to New Zealand to boost the economy. Prior to the pandemic, tourism was New Zealand's largest export industry and delivered $40.9bn to the country. The most recent figures show those numbers are creeping back up, with tourism bringing in $37.7bn in 2023.
Australia, meanwhile, is New Zealand's largest tourism market, making up roughly 44% of international visitors a year. Visitor numbers are sitting at roughly 88% of pre-pandemic rates.
'The number of Australian arrivals in New Zealand increased by more than 90,000, up from 1.27 million to 1.36 million over the past year, but we know there's more room to grow,' Upston said in a release.
New Zealand's overseas tourism campaigns have a long history of attracting both praise and criticism. The award-winning 100% Pure New Zealand promotion - now one of the world's longest-running tourism campaigns - is lauded for its catchiness but often scrutinised against New Zealand's inconsistent environmental credentials.
Labour's tourism spokesperson Cushla Tangaere-Manuel told RNZ while she broadly supported growing tourism, the latest tourism tagline was tone-deaf at a time when the coalition government is disestablishing thousands of roles across the public sector in a major cost-cutting drive.
'The irony of that messaging is: that's how Aotearoa New Zealanders are feeling right now – there have been so many cuts,' Tangaere-Manuel said.
Some critics said the tagline was tactless for sounding like a directive to New Zealanders to leave the country amid record high departure rates.
'If I was in a [government] seeing record emigration I simply would not pick 'everyone must go' as a slogan,' said one social media user.
Others took the opportunity to turn the campaign back on the government.
'The upside of the gormless 'everyone must go' slogan is that by rights it should be easy to invert for election posters and protest signs …. Done. Dusted. And their own fault,' wrote a BlueSky user.
The Guardian has contacted the tourism minister for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Winter fuel humiliation: After huge U-turn Rachel Reeves bizarrely claims she was 'right' to cut handout - while Sir Keir Starmer is ridiculed for suggesting move is now possible because Labour's 'fixed' stricken economy
Labour 's spending plans descended into chaos last night as Rachel Reeves backed down over winter fuel. The Chancellor said all pensioners with incomes of less than £35,000 will get the payment this winter following a huge public backlash over last year's cuts. The humiliating climbdown means nine million pensioners will receive the handout – worth up to £300 a household – at a cost of £1.25billion. Ms Reeves refused to apologise for the original decision to slash the number of those eligible for the payment – a move which triggered a collapse in Labour's poll rating. She insisted she had been 'right' to cut the payment last year. And, despite having repeatedly attacked opponents for making 'unfunded' spending pledges, she refused to say how she will pay for the U-turn. Labour MPs seized on the Chancellor's political weakness and lined up to demand that she now scrap the two-child benefit cap and cancel plans to cut disability benefits at a combined cost of £8.5billion a year, fuelling fears of further tax rises. Downing Street claimed the U-turn was possible because the economy had now 'turned a corner', despite the fact the Office for Budget Responsibility has halved official growth forecasts for this year. Sir Keir Starmer insisted Labour had ' fixed the foundations of the economy', in spite of rising unemployment and inflation. Reform leader Nigel Farage, who pledged this month to restore the payment in full, said Labour's U-turn was triggered by 'blind panic' at its collapsing poll ratings. The Treasury said the winter fuel reverse would not lead to a 'permanent rise in borrowing'. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said this was likely to mean 'permanent additional taxes'. The move came ahead of tomorrow's spending review, when the Chancellor will announce a spending spree totalling an extra £300billion over five years – equal to £8,100 for every taxpayer in Britain. Labour minister Sir Chris Bryant said the review would mark 'the end of austerity'. But Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith said Labour was 'massively adding to the national debt our children will have to pay and ensuring that taxes will rise and growth will fall'. Economists last night warned that the financial markets could turn on Labour if ministers were unwilling to keep spending on a 'sustainable path'. The Chancellor's decision to means test the winter fuel allowance was one of Labour's first steps in office last July. It meant that around 10million pensioners lost the previously universal benefit last winter. The decision also helped trigger a plunge in Labour's ratings and was widely blamed for the party's dismal performance in last month's local elections, when it lost two-thirds of the seats it was defending. A More in Common poll yesterday found that just 14 per cent of voters now think the Chancellor is doing a good job. Ms Reeves yesterday said she had 'listened to people's concerns'. Kemi Badenoch urged ministers to apologise for the 'callous' decision to cut eligibility for the payment last year. The Tory leader said: 'Pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. Keir Starmer should apologise to them.' Tory work and pensions spokesman Helen Whately said the U-turn was 'most humiliating climb down a government has ever faced in its first year in office'. Ms Whately added that the cut had contributed to an extra 100,000 visits by pensioners to A&E departments last winter. 'Their mistake has hurt people and it is cowardly not to own up to it,' she said. But, asked if she would apologise, Ms Reeves said: 'The irresponsible thing to have done last year was to allow the public finances to carry on on an unsustainable footing.' She added: 'I'm always going to put stability in our economy first.' At present, only pensioners with an income of less than £11,800 are eligible for the winter fuel payment. This will treble to £35,000 this winter. It will continue to be £200 per household or £300 for the over-80s. The winter fuel retreat emboldened Labour rebels pushing for increased welfare spending. Left-winger Nadia Whittome said the episode had been a 'fiasco' for the Government and urged ministers to now abandon £5billion of cuts to disability benefits that are designed to curb the ballooning welfare budget. Bradford East MP Imran Hussain said it would be wrong to continue with 'devastating' cuts to disabled support. Former leadership contender Rebecca Long-Bailey welcomed the U-turn but said it was also 'right to lift children out of poverty' by scrapping the two-child benefit cap. The decision to restore the winter fuel payment to three-quarters of pensioners was welcomed by campaign groups. Caroline Abrahams, of Age UK, said Ms Reeves' reversal 'will be a huge relief to many'. Who will now get winter fuel payments? If you are over state pension age and your income is less than £35,000 your household will now be eligible. How much is it worth? The annual payment is worth £200 per household, or £300 if someone who lives there is over 80. How do I get it? The payment will be made automatically to all pensioner households and then recouped from any that aren't eligible. Who will have to repay it? If your income is above £35,000, your payment will be 'recovered' by HMRC or you can opt out. What if my partner's income is below £35,000? Payments will be assessed on individual, not household, income. Payments are split if a household has two pensioners. In the case of a couple where one has an income above the threshold and one below it, half the total will be paid to the pensioner with the lower income. Can I just turn it down? If you know that you definitely won't qualify for a winter fuel payment, as your income is more than £35,000, you can opt out to avoid the hassle of paying it back. What if I need to pay it back? Pensioners whose income is above £35,000 and who don't opt out will need to pay all of it back. It will be repaid either via a self-assessment tax return, for those who complete one, or automatically through PAYE. The Treasury said: 'No one will need to register with HMRC for this or take any further action.' Is this plan for all of the UK? The Treasury announced this move for England and Wales, but Scotland and Northern Ireland might make separate new arrangements. Last winter, Scotland replaced the Winter Fuel Payment with the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment. Northern Ireland made a one-off £100 payment to pensioners who lost their winter fuel payments. How much will this cost? The cost of reinstating Winter Fuel Payments for those now eligible is estimated at £1.25billion in England and Wales. Compared to when the payments were a universal benefit for pensioners, the savings will now only be around £450million annually.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Supermodel Gemma Ward suffers painful injuries during shocking surfing accident
Gemma Ward has revealed she suffered major injuries during a recent recent freak surfing accident. The Aussie model, 37, took to Instagram on Monday to recall the misadventure and said she broke three vertebrae in her spine. The single mother-of-three added that she was forced to work through her recovery, even travelling to Paris for a modelling job. 'A lot has happened since I last posted,' she started the post, which included a snap of The Great Gatsby actress in a neck brace. 'I broke 3 vertebrae in my spine from a surfing accident, flew to Paris to shoot for Lancôme again, which was a complete honour, but in the wake of my accident I forgot to renew my passport so I had to get an emergency one and nearly missed the whole shoot.' From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. In the wake of the accident, the model assured fans she is working on getting stronger while also balancing motherhood and an exciting new project. 'Currently working on my strength and rehabilitation and my novel as well as the strange mess of life with 3 kids,' she shared. 'Hope you are all doing well and getting some rest here and there,' she finished the post. Several of her famous friends flooded the comments section of the post with well wishes for the blonde beauty. 'So many emotions. Get better soon. Miss you and the babes and a NOVEL?? I cannot [wait] to read!' wrote fellow Aussie Nicole Trunfio. Sports Illustrated alum Jessica Gomes also commented on the post, writing: 'Always back in full form! You are the best!! Love you big!!!' Victoria's Secret model Martha Hunt simply left a bunch of heart and plaster emojis on the post. Gemma was recently spotted catching waves while enjoying a beach day with her children in Sydney. The famously private model was photographed barefoot and makeup free in April as she played doting mum, wrangling towels and carrying her kids' belongings. In one candid moment, she was seen clutching a stack of colourful beach towels and a pink water bottle, along with a pair of Converse sneakers, suggesting the day had been filled with sun-soaked fun and family bonding. Later, she was spotted helping one of her young children - dressed in a red and black wetsuit and covered in sand - navigate the shoreline. The heartwarming moment showed a different side of the international model who once graced the covers of Vogue and walked for Prada, Chanel, and Dior. Another snap captured the former fashion darling confidently carrying a large blue Odyssey surfboard, hinting that the beach outing wasn't just about the kids as Gemma appeared ready to catch a few waves herself.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Concerns raised over £72m shortfall's effect on council
Peter Fox has written to Monmouthshire Council's leader regarding the impact of the shortfall in employer National Insurance (NI) funding. The shortfall comes following the UK Government decision to increase NI contributions without providing full funding to local authorities, leaving public sector bodies to pay more to employ staff. Mark Drakeford, Labour's finance secretary, assured in November that additional funding would cover these increased costs. This week, he revealed the UK government would not provide full funding, leaving a £72 million shortfall across Welsh public services. Mr Fox said: "Mark Drakeford assured us that these tax increases would not fall on the public sector, so last week's news was bitterly disappointing. "Local authorities will now face a difficult choice: either cut vital services or raise council tax to cover the extra costs."
