French court to rule on freeing Lebanese militant
A French court is set to deliver a long-awaited ruling in July on the release of pro-Palestinian Lebanese militant Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, who has been imprisoned for 40 years for the 1982 killings of two foreign diplomats.
The Paris appeals court, initially set to deliver its verdict in February before postponing, will now announce its decision on July 17 after re-examining the request on Thursday.
"I told the judges, either you release him or you sentence him to death," his lawyer Jean-Louis Chalanset told the media after the closed-door hearing.
Abdallah, 74, was sentenced to life in prison for his involvement in the murders of US military attache Charles Robert Ray and Israeli diplomat Yacov Barsimantov.
He has been eligible for release for 25 years, but has seen multiple requests for his freedom denied.
The United States, a civil party to the case, has consistently opposed his release but Lebanese authorities have repeatedly said he should be freed from jail.
In November 2024, a French court ordered his release conditional on Abdallah leaving France.
But France's anti-terror prosecutors, arguing that he had not changed his political views, appealed the decision which was consequently suspended.
Abdallah has always insisted he is a "fighter" who battled for the rights of Palestinians and not a "criminal".
The appeals court said in February the decision to postpone was prompted by the unresolved question of whether Abdallah had proof that he had paid compensation to the plaintiffs, something he has consistently refused to do.
His lawyer said on Thursday he presented documents showing some 16,000 euros ($18,360) in Abdallah's prison account "at the disposal of civil parties".
First detained in 1984 and convicted in 1987 over the murders, the 74-year-old is one of the longest serving prisoners in France -- most convicts serving life sentences are freed after less than 30 years.
mdh/ekf/sjw/giv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to host DRC-Rwanda peace deal — adviser
US President Donald Trump expects to host the heads of state of DR Congo and Rwanda in the 'coming weeks' to sign a peace agreement to end a decades-long conflict in eastern Congo, his senior Africa adviser said on Tuesday. The foreign ministers of both countries will also be in Washington on June 27 for a signing ceremony after the text of the agreement was agreed last week, said Massad Boulos. Boulos, who was speaking at the US-Africa Business Summit in Luanda, Angola, championed the prospect of lasting peace creating an environment where US businesses would be more willing to invest. He said conflict had hindered the Great Lakes region from unlocking the 'full potential of its people and natural resources.' The eastern Congo region in particular has many valuable resources, including rare minerals such as tantalum and tungsten. Access to those minerals has driven some of the conflict, which has displaced millions of people and killed thousands of others. The Trump administration has dangled the prospect of a minerals deal with Kinshasa as part of its push for peace in the region.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The contradictions of Trump's 'commercial diplomacy' in Africa
When I told the head of an Africa-focused startup that I was going to be in Luanda, Angola for the US-Africa Business Summit earlier this week, their quip was revealing: 'So the US still does business with Africa?' That tongue-in-cheek skepticism was absent from the nearly 3,000 people in attendance as a flurry of deals across the continent were announced. President Donald Trump's administration has been keen to champion commercial diplomacy and 'trade not aid' so his top Africa lieutenants Massad Boulos and outgoing Africa bureau chief, Troy Fitrell flitted around for deal photo ops and to champion the US private sector. Witney Schneidman, a board member of the Washington-based organizer, Corporate Council on Africa, said the high attendance suggested 'the new approach is well-timed.' But concerns remain. The chaotic shuttering of USAID by Trump and Elon Musk and the still unfolding humanitarian fallout in several African countries has unsettled many. There's also the likely end of the AGOA preferential trade policy, then there's the overwhelming focus on African citizens facing US visa restrictions. On the opening day, the new African Union Commission chair Mahamoud Ali Youssouf, slammed the Trump administration's visa and trade approach. Jackie Chimhamnzi, regional director for southern Africa at the Tony Blair Institute said: ' It remains to be seen if the US is incentivized to respond to this unified moment of candor by African leaders' A decades-long American investor in Africa, who spoke with me on condition of anonymity so he could be frank, said he largely believes the commercial approach is working so far, but he still sees Trump's attitude toward Africa as 'atrocious' and called the visa constraints 'absurd.' He added: 'Somebody, maybe Boulos, needs to tell him that this directly hurts US business.' When Beijing announced earlier this month in the central Chinese city of Changsha that it would remove all tariffs on exports from 53 of Africa's 54 countries, it handily won a global news cycle. Much of mainstream US media — and even longtime US-Africa watchers — were handwringing over China's growing influence in Africa, even as the US put up more trade barriers that essentially ended the 25-year old AGOA preferential trade pact. But a closer look at China's plan shows it wasn't actually as dramatic a policy change as the headlines suggested. China already allowed 33 low-income African counties to export tariff free. This announcement just meant all countries except eSwatini (because it recognizes Taiwan). It's not even a guarantee to happen, writes China Global South Project's Christian Geraurd Neema: 'The reality is more nuanced,' he says. 'China says it is 'ready' to act,' not that it has agreed to act, he argued. It's all subject to negotiations and a new economic partnership, he explained.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Nike soars on a production shift away from China, but it warns of a $1 billion tariff hit
Nike's shares jumped at the opening bell Friday after the company said it's shifting some production away from China. But it also warned that tariffs imposed by the Trump administration will cost it about $1 billion before it makes internal changes, which include 'surgical' price increases in the U.S. starting this fall. Nike is not the first retail company to warn of price hikes when students are heading back to school. Walmart said last month that that its customers will start to see higher prices this month and next when the back-to-school shopping season goes into high gear. Walmart also cited higher costs from tariffs. Nike is shifting production to avert looming tariffs in China. Production in China represents about 16% of the footwear that Nike imports into the U.S., Chief Financial Officer Matthew Friend said during a conference call late Thursday. That production will be cut to the high-single-digit range by the end of fiscal 2026 as Nike shifts production elsewhere, he said. President Donald Trump and his Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said late Thursday that the U.S. and China have signed an agreement on trade, but provided no details. Nike, Adidas, Under Armour and Puma were among 76 companies that signed on to a letter in April addressed to Trump, asking for a footwear exemption from reciprocal tariffs. The letter warned tariffs would 'become a major impact at the cash register for every family.' Nike said that it will begin to implement 'surgical' price increases as part of its regular approach to seasonal planning, beginning this fall, Friend said. The potential for higher prices from Trump's tariffs have raised alarms for families, notably those who already spend a good chunk of money on equipment needed to participate in sports. Also on Thursday, Nike reported a quarterly profit of $211 million, or 14 cents per share. Revenue totaled $11.1 billion. Both edged out Wall Street projections. Nike is already facing a pullback in spending by Americans, who have grown anxious about the direction of the U.S. economy. While it's still the most significant brand in sportswear, a 'boredom factor' seems to have settled over the Nike brand, wrote Neil Saunders, Managing Director of GlobalData. 'In markets like China, where overall market growth has slowed a little, Nike is also on the back foot for similar reasons,' Saunders wrote. 'We also see some anti-US brand sentiment creeping in, which is unhelpful and difficult to resolve.' Shares of Nike, based in Beaverton, Oregon, jumped 15% at the opening bell Friday. Chapman writes for the Associated Press.
