Seven killed after two bridges collapse in Russian regions bordering Ukraine
Two bridges collapsed in different
Russian
regions bordering
Ukraine
, derailing trains and killing at least seven people and injuring dozens, Russian authorities said early on Sunday, while a Russian politician called Kyiv a 'terrorist enclave'.
Reuters could not independently confirm whether the incidents in the neighbouring regions were related. The areas in Russia's south have been subject to frequent attacks by Ukraine during the war that Russia started with its full-scale invasion more than three years ago.
Seven people were killed and 69 injured when a highway bridge collapsed on to railway tracks, derailing an approaching train in the Bryansk region late on Saturday, Russian emergency ministry and regional officials said.
Russia's Railways initially posted on the Telegram messaging app that the Bryansk bridge collapse was the result of an 'illegal interference in the operation of transport', but the post was later removed.
READ MORE
Bryansk governor Alexander Bogomaz said on Telegram that 47 people were hospitalised. Three children were among those injured with one in serious condition, he said.
The collapse in the Kursk region occurred early on Sunday while a freight train was crossing the bridge, Alexander Khinshtein, acting governor of the region, and Russian Railways said on Telegram.
'Part of the train fell on to a road underneath the bridge,' Mr Khinshtein said. He added that the locomotive caught fire, which was quickly extinguished. One of the drivers sustained leg injuries, and he and the team operating the train were taken to a local hospital, Mr Khinshtein added.
He posted a photo of derailed carriages on a damaged bridge over a road. Andrei Klishas, a senior member of the Federation Council, Russia's upper chamber of parliament, said on the Telegram messaging app that the incident in Bryansk shows that 'Ukraine has long lost the attributes of a state and has turned into a terrorist enclave'.
Russia's Baza Telegram channel, which often publishes information from sources in the security services and law enforcement, reported, without providing evidence, that according to preliminary information, the Bryansk bridge had been blown up.
Prominent Russian military blogger Semyon Pegov, who uses the name War Gonzo, called the Bryansk collapse 'sabotage'.
Reuters could not independently verify the Baza or Mr Pegov's reports. There was no immediate comment from Ukraine.
Since the war began in February 2022, there have been continued cross-border shelling, drone strikes and covert raids from Ukraine into the Bryansk, Kursk and Belgorod regions that border Ukraine.
Russia's ministry of emergency situations said on Telegram that efforts to find and rescue victims in the Bryansk incident continued throughout the night, and that some 180 personnel were involved in the operation.
Among those killed was the locomotive driver, Russia's state news agencies reported, citing medics.
Social media pictures and videos showed passengers trying to help others climb out of the Bryansk train's damaged carriages in the dark and firefighters looking for ways to reach passengers.
The train was going from the town of Klimovo to Moscow, Russian Railways said. It collided with the collapsed bridge in the area of a federal highway in the Vygonichskyi district of the Bryansk region, Mr Bogomaz said. The district lies some 100km from the border with Ukraine.
US president
Donald Trump
has urged Moscow and Kyiv to work together on a deal to end the war, and Russia has proposed a second round of face-to-face talks with Ukrainian officials in Istanbul on Monday.
Ukraine has not committed to attending the talks, saying it first needed to see Russia's proposals, while a leading US senator warned Moscow it would be 'hit hard' by new US sanctions. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: Right's win in Poland will impact EU
The tiny margin of the victory for the hard right in Poland's presidential election is going to place a heavy strain on the government of Donald Tusk, but for the media to describe Karol Nawrocki as 'pro-Trump' is to miss the point. In all right versus left political battles these days, every single one is judged on the similarity to, or popularity with, the current American president, irrespective of their actual policies. So it has been with Nawrocki, who did actually receive an endorsement from the White House, but whether or not that helped convince the notoriously fractious Polish electorate — he won by 50.89% to centrist candidate Rafal Trazskowski's 49.11% — is doubtful. Rather, it was the former's boxer and revisionist historian's position on issues such as abortion, the restoration of the independence of the Polish judiciary, migration, climate issues, and Ukraine's accession to the EU that saw him home. For the 42-year-old, who has never before held public office, his ascension to the presidency marks a huge upheaval in domestic politics, which will also be keenly felt in Brussels. It marks the beginning of a worrying time in which he could use his powers of veto to destabilise an already jittery Tusk coalition government. Backed by the Law and Justice (PiS) party, which was only ousted from power in 2023, his victory will be touted as a full-scale repudiation of the Tusk government's progressive and reformist agenda and it is expected his term will be far more aggressive than that of his fellow PiS-backed predecessor, Andrzej Duda, who only selectively vetoed legislation. It is expected Nawrocki will be more aggressive and systematic. With the ultimate aim of undermining Tusk and his colleagues before the next general election in 2027, Nawrocki will also aim to complicate the EU's united pro-Ukraine stance and his country's relationship with fellow Nato members and their collective shift away from dependence on the US. His was not a 'pro-Trump' victory, but is nevertheless one which will impact greatly on Warsaw and across the wider expanses of Europe and further afield. Room to improve The Irish hotel sector is a hugely valuable element in our vibrant and ever-expanding tourism reach — not to mention the wider economy — and it is perfectly right to add its muscle to a Europe-wide lawsuit against online booking services which overinflate commission rates. Across Europe, hotels have banded together to seek 'substantial financial compensation' from following a European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling that the platform's so-called parity clauses breeched EU competition law. Their legal action maintains that the contested clauses in the contracts they had to sign effectively prevented them from offering lower prices or better availability through other channels and other online platforms. The collective legal case is being supported by the European hospitality association and some 25 national hotel associations across Europe, including the Irish Hotels Federation. More than 900 Irish hotels and guest houses are eligible to join an action which covers the period from 2004 to 2024. In seeking compensation for significant financial harm due to inflated levels of commission charged, the sector is finally challenging what it sees as unfair business practices. And so it should. The tourism industry is going through an unprecedented period of uncertainty due to world political and economic insecurity. Thus, profitability margins are thinner. For it to be hectored out of vital margins by booking firms is unacceptable, and that is what the ECJ judgment found. Compensation levels will be decided in the coming months in a court in Amsterdam, where is headquartered. It is always the case that any unacceptable business practices should be questioned, in whatever sector they occur, but in this instance the hotels have proven the validity of their case and now await rightful compensation. It is to be hoped they get it. Peddling hatred We all know that those far-right agitators, who attempt to stir up hatred and division in their countries and communities across the globe, pay little heed to the veracity of the fact-less claims they make in their attempts to sow dissent and fear. In the wake of the deadly shooting in a Carlow shopping centre on Sunday, far-right activists such as Derek Blighe dug into their predictable playbook to misrepresent the facts of the incident and inject into the local community a parable of retribution and vengeance. Seeing their best interests served by stoking hatred and disaffection with the status quo — as well as stirring up racial tensions — these people and their grimy ideals use tragedy to weaponise shock and fear to their own ends. They mine people's insecurities pitilessly. Their attempts to bend truth for the sole purpose of fracturing opinion and separating reason from reality is as commonplace as it is unwelcome. It is deeply unhelpful, too, for those authorities upon whom the wider community place their faith to defend our society in a modern and splintered world. The claims they make — in this case asserting that the gunman killed as many as seven innocent people, including a nine-year-old girl — are aimed solely at widening existing fissures and open misguided terror in local communities. Theirs is a deadly game with potentially appalling repercussions — they play it with blithe wilfulness and a craven interest only in festering rancour and hatred. They know the consequences of their vile actions on the wider society and do not care about the wellbeing of the communities they swear to defend. They themselves are the enemies of society, not its protectors, as they so vehemently claim. Their opportunism is not only deceitful and ugly, it is very dangerous. Read More Irish Examiner view: Reaching outward is in the Irish nature
The Irish Sun
3 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Greenpeace activists swipe Emmanuel Macron waxwork from Paris's Grevin Museum before using it in anti-Russia protest
A WAX figure of French president Emmanuel Macron was yesterday stolen by Greenpeace activists — then used in an anti-Russia protest. The £35,000 depiction of the 47-year-old head of state has often been compared to a 3 Activists placed the wax figure of the French President in front of the Russian embassy, urging France to halt gas and fertiliser imports from Moscow Credit: Reuters 3 When it was created in 2018, even museum staff admitted the Macron waxwork did not look much like Mr Macron Credit: AFP Two women and a man disguised as staff took the £35,000 model from They placed the figure in front of the Russian embassy, urging France to halt gas and fertiliser imports from Moscow. Greenpeace's Jean-Francois Julliard said: 'France is playing a double game. "Macron embodies this. He supports Ukraine but encourages French firms to continue trading with Russia.' READ MORE WORLD NEWS When it was created in 2018, even museum staff admitted the Macron waxwork did not look much like Mr Macron. Grevin's director, Yves Delhommeau, said: 'A tense and anguished face, a frozen statue that doesn't live, this is not beautiful, it is something that just doesn't work.' Mr Delhommeau said President Macron did not meet with them in order to scan his face, so sculptors were forced to work with pictures of the 40-year-old. Others went online to ridicule the model, saying it was one of the worst depictions of a public figure ever made. Most read in The Sun The Grevin Museum is often compared to London in 1835 by the French sculptor Marie Tussaud. Like the British version, Grevin displays the waxworks of numerous famous figures from around the world. Little Mix waxworks unveiled at Madame Tussauds Both museums are massive tourist attractions, with hundreds of thousands of visitors enjoying the waxworks every year. 3 A wax figure of French president Emmanuel Macron was yesterday stolen by Greenpeace activists — then used in an anti-Russia protest Credit: AFP
Irish Times
20 hours ago
- Irish Times
Forget hope. Be a hopeful pessimist instead
Pope Francis was a nice fella, but was he wrong about hope? Diagnosing the problems of the modern world, he argued that what we need more than anything today is belief in a better future. Yet many of the worst actors globally are infused with overconfidence, or excessive optimism. Hope itself appears to have become an impediment to tackling urgent challenges. Action on climate change is weakened by a general hope technology will come to the rescue. European defence against Russia is undermined by a hazy belief Vladimir Putin will metamorphose into a peacemaker. Dealing with Ireland's housing crisis is crippled by a faith in the same old policies. I've lost track of the number of people who said in the wake of Donald Trump's election as US president 'ah, sure, he mightn't be so bad'. And then there's the irrational exuberance surrounding artificial intelligence , with governments now tending to see the glass as half full regarding this potentially cataclysmic technology. Not for nothing is the biography of OpenAI boss Sam Altman called The Optimist. Philosophers have long discussed the paradoxical nature of hope. READ MORE 'Only one thing is more stupid than absolute pessimism and that is absolute optimism,' said Albert Camus. His thinking on the matter was informed by a conundrum that also troubled Pope Francis: Why are people so indifferent to the suffering of others? Francis described indifference as 'the opposite of love', and believed it was a much more common evil in human affairs than hate. Camus, who was active in the French resistance against the Nazis, was also deeply troubled by political apathy and saw it as essentially anti-love. Modern man 'fornicated and read the papers', Camus wrote in a damning assessment of our unmotivated condition. Francis saw hope as the answer to indifference. 'It is often said that 'so long as there is life, there is hope', but the truth, if anything, is the opposite: it is hope that keeps life going, protects it, takes care of it, helps it to grow,' he wrote. Camus was more ambivalent about optimism, and argued pessimism could be a more powerful force against inertia, what he called 'man's strongest temptation'. He was particularly wary of ideological hope in 'some great idea' – be it religious or secular – that deflected us from reality. 'We find in his [Camus's] pessimism a clearsightedness that cuts through all the subterfuges and evasions available in his time to the beating core of his activism: that we must do what must be done, for reasons of justice and solidarity – because we owe it to our fellow human beings to prevent their suffering as best we can ... Camus proposes a fierce philosophy of action that is as bold as it is stark, stripped from any confidence of victory,' philosopher Mara Van der Lugt writes in a new book, Hopeful Pessimism. [ Don't dismiss Peig Sayers. Her stoic folk wisdom has plenty to offer today Opens in new window ] Camus's wariness of hope seems well founded when considering the utopian thinking of today's tech moguls. Elon Musk , the world's richest man, dreams of occupying Mars and re-engineering democracy. And to achieve this goal, we need less – not more – concern for the suffering of our fellow human beings. 'The fundamental weakness of western civilisation is empathy. The empathy exploit. They're exploiting a bug in western civilisation, which is the empathy response,' the multi-billionaire whined on the Joe Rogan podcast earlier this year. For utopians like Musk, human solidarity interferes with grand visions. So what is the right approach to hope? One way of resolving the conundrum is by definitions. Hope can be defined as either positive thinking or constructive thinking. One is more passive than the other. Optimism can be defined as a belief in a positive outcome. It has a faith element, and potentially carries higher risks and rewards. Studies show optimists live longer but are also more likely to take risks. 'The evidence suggests that optimism is widespread, stubborn and costly,' the psychologist Daniel Kahneman said. He had in mind particularly the optimism around public projects, and how spending estimates on infrastructure were always pitched towards the most hopeful end of the spectrum. Hello National Children's Hospital . Then there is utopianism, which can be defined as an ideological attachment to progress or some idealised future. [ Could there be good reason to believe in life after death? Opens in new window ] So defined, it's always good to have some hope. Treat optimism with caution and be very wary of utopianism. Van der Lugt resolves the matter in a different way, saying we should strive to become 'hopeful pessimists'. This aims to take the best of what optimism and pessimism both have to offer. It has the advantage of drawing us away from self-centred hope, and towards the responsibilities we have to our fellow human beings and the wider world. 'If anything, the pessimists have taught me this: with eyes full of that darkness there can still be this strange shattering openness, like a door cracked open, for the good to make its entry into life. Since all things are uncertain, so too is the future, and so there is always the possibility of change for better as there is for worse,' writes Van der Lugt. An exclusive focus on hope can lead us towards passivity and indifference. Better that we are hopeful pessimists who, as Van der Lugt puts it, 'strive for change without certainties, without expecting anything from our efforts other than the knowledge that we have done what we are called upon to do as moral agents in a time of change'.
