Why are Birmingham bin workers on strike?
Mountains of rubbish continue to grow in parts of Birmingham as the dispute between the city council and the Unite union rumbles on.
Indefinite strike action began on 11 March although recycling collections had been suspended earlier in the year. The authority declared a major incident on 31 March as the ongoing bin strikes and uncollected waste caused concerns over public health and the environment.
Meanwhile, queues of up to a mile have been reported at mobile collection points and the council recently extended the opening hours of its tips, with some now open as late 22:00.
But why are the strikes happening? Where can you actually take your rubbish? And do you still have to pay council tax?
A major incident is an event or situation with a range of serious consequences which requires special arrangements to be implemented by one or more emergency responder agency, according to the Joint Emergency Service Interoperability Programme (JESIP).
The declaration means the authority can increase the availability of street cleansing and fly-tipping removal with an extra 35 vehicles and crews around the city.
It also means the council can work with partners to better manage the risks the city is facing, including health and fire risks and allow for increased data and intelligence sharing.
The authority added that the declaration would allow it to explore what further support was available from neighbouring authorities and the government to assist in managing the situation.
"Unless we declare a major incident and deploy the waste service's contingency plan, then we would be unable to clear the backlog of waste on the streets or improve the frequency of collections," Cotton said.
The dispute centres on the council's decision to remove Waste Recycling and Collection Officer (WRCO) roles.
The union stated that this role brought safety expertise to an "often dirty and dangerous job", citing the example of the death of a Coventry bin worker last year.
It said about 170 affected workers faced losing an average of £8,000 a year due to the decision.
The union believes that removing the role affects the rest of the workforce by "leaving them without a fair path for pay progression", and said it was concerned that the council was preparing to downgrade the pay of other non-management roles in the service.
Birmingham City Council said the WRCO role was not industry standard, and did not exist in other councils.
It also said it was not a role that could be reinstated without opening the authority up to a potential equal pay liability.
The authority said claims that affected staff would lose an average of £8,000 per year were incorrect.
"We have made an offer that means no worker need lose any money," the council said.
"The reality is that the number of staff that could lose the maximum amount (just over £6,000) is 17 people, they will have pay protection for six months in line with council policy."
The change, the council said, was part of the waste collection service restructure, which aimed to improve the quality of service delivery, make sure the workforce could meet the challenges of delivering a modern waste service, and to adhere to the Environmental Act 2021.
Originally, 12 walkouts were planned across four months, and the action started on 6 January.
However, Unite announced on 26 February that it would escalate into an indefinite all-out strike from 11 March.
This means strike action five days a week, Monday to Friday, continuously.
Although the main reason behind the action is because of the loss of the WRCO roles, the Union said the decision to move to an all-out strike was because the authority hired temporary labour to "undermine" the walkouts.
General secretary Sharon Graham had called the alleged use of employment agencies "disgraceful" and added members played a "vital frontline role" in keeping the city clean.
In response to these claims, Birmingham City Council said: "We strongly refute any suggestion that agency workers have been carrying out work normally undertaken by striking workers."
"We continue to deploy the same number of agency workers on days of action as we would on any normal working days."
No deal has been made between the council and the union.
In a statement, Birmingham City Council said all staff had been offered alternative employment and the same pay, and that almost three-quarters of them had either taken up the offer, or decided to take voluntary redundancy.
"There are now 41 workers who have declined any offer, and 35 workers who opted for valuable and skilled driver training who have also told us via a letter from Unite that they are working under protest," it said.
The council announced that from 31 March, it would formally enter a period of collective consultation, to look to make compulsory redundancies for those who had declined all offers on the table.
Finally, it added that its offer, where no worker would need to lose money, remained open to the union.
The union said it hoped that the council would have a change of heart over the potential redundancies.
"The fact that they've threatened those redundancies, for me, it can send one message - that they are not serious about resolving this dispute, but we are," said Onay Kasab, Unite's national lead officer.
He added that Unite was determined to reach a resolution.
Advice on Birmingham City Council's website states that residents should put their household waste out on their normal collection days.
If it is not collected, it should be left out, and it will be collected as soon as the authority is able.
However, it said there were delays to crews that were heading out, as striking staff were blocking trucks from leaving depots.
The union said any delays were caused only by the normal action of asking people not to cross picket lines and to speak to colleagues about why the strike is taking place.
Recycling collections have been suspended every day during the action, so recycling bins should not be put out for collection, the authority said.
Crews would collect "neatly bundled" side waste. Excess waste should be put in black bags, directly next to household waste bins.
The council suggested residents could take their waste to one of its five Household Recycling Centres, but said if that was not possible, residents should keep hold of their recycling until the next opportunity.
Although the council will be aware of bins not being collected, there is an online system to report a missed bin collection.
There are five Household Recycling Centres in Birmingham where residents can take refuse and recycling.
To attend, residents must book a slot.
They are:
Castle Bromwich, Tameside Drive - open 0700-2100 Monday to Friday, and 0800-1630 on weekends
Kings Norton, Lifford Lane - open 1000-2200 Monday to Friday, and 0800-1800 on weekends
Perry Barr, Holford Drive - open 0700-2100 Monday to Friday, and 0800-1800 on weekends
Sutton Coldfield, Norris Way - open 0700-2100 Monday to Friday, and 0800-1800 on weekends
Tyseley, James Road - open 0700-2100 Monday to Friday, and 0800-1800 on weekends
You can book no less than two hours before the time you would like to go to the centre, and no more than three days before your visit.
You can book two visits at a time, which could be on the same day or week.
Proof of address must be shown upon arrival, to show that you live in Birmingham.
Birmingham City Council also has two Mobile Household Waste Centres (MHWCs) visiting all areas of the city.
They visit each location for one morning, from 0730-1300.
You can dispose of household general waste and bulky items at the MHWCs.
However, waste from vans will not be accepted, and will need to book a slot at the Household Recycling Centres.
You can visit an MHWC as many times as you like. You do not need to book, bring ID or pay for the service.
The council updates where they are going on its website.
Items accepted at MHWCs include household rubbish that cannot be reused, and bulky items like toys, furniture and wood.
You are not permitted to take building materials, like rubble or bricks, and white goods such as fridges and washing machines.
Additionally, large items like garage doors or tree stumps, hazardous materials - including asbestos and gas cylinders - and wheelie bins are also not permitted.
You can find out how to recycle specific materials via this link.
Some residents who have paid thousands to hire skips to dispose of rubbish told the BBC they believed they should get a council tax rebate.
"It is a legal responsibility to pay council tax and we urge people to continue doing this," the city council said.
Tony Travers, a local government expert from the London School of Economics, said that while refuse collection was important, it was one of a large number of services provided by the authority and the others were still being provided.
He said: "It's not lawful for people to withhold payments to the council for council tax. They are required by law to pay."
Those who have paid for a 2025 garden waste subscription service will be refunded.
Birmingham City Council said those with a subscription did not need to contact the authority, and refunds would be made automatically.
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Birmingham declares major incident over bin strike
Union hopes over bin strike redundancy plans
Striking bin workers may face losing jobs - council
Councillor cancels Unite membership amid bin strikes
'The rubbish is alive' - rats feast as Birmingham bin workers strike
Birmingham City Council
Unite the Union
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
County Durham club which held 'wrestling death match' to be auctioned off
A County Durham club that rose to prominence after holding an ill-fated wrestling event featuring a 'death match' has had its price slashed as it heads to auction. New Seaham Conservative Club, the venue of the notorious 'Pits of Punishment' event, is now on the market for £250,000, after previously being listed for £300,000. In July 2023, the club was fined close to £1,000 after being convicted of offences related to the wrestling event, which saw wrestlers left covered in blood. It held the event without proper licensing, allowed children to be present after 10pm, and sold alcohol to non-members without the necessary licence or temporary event notice. The estate agents are presenting the property, now wrestling-match-free as a "detached former social club with an adjoining self-contained three-bedroom house". Auctioneers Savills highlight the "asset management potential in its current use or development potential to be converted into multiple dwellings" subject to the necessary consents. The club was fined in 2023 after the so-called 'death match'. (Image: DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL) Constructed in 1895, the property is of brick construction and is set beneath a multi-pitched slate-covered roof. The club also features a beer garden, a beer patio, and car parking for approximately 20 vehicles. The property extends to 0.54 acres in total. The detached single-storey social club includes trading rooms, a games area, a members lounge, a function room, and a public bar with a stage area and dance floor. Ancillary trading areas include customer WCs, store rooms, dressing rooms, a manager's office, and a boiler room. The basement houses a beer cellar and additional storage. The ill-fated event saw wrestlers left covered in blood. (Image: DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL) County Durham venue that ran bloody wrestling event in front of children fined 'Slap in the face for County Durham' if train services axed, rail user warns 'Dad told me 'p*** off!' after hearing of my £1m lotto win two days before he died' An adjoining two-storey house, previously used as stewards' accommodation, includes a living room, kitchen, dining room, and toilet on the ground floor, with three bedrooms and a bathroom on the first floor. The site also boasts a service yard and additional parking spaces at the front of the property. The auction for the property is scheduled for June 17, just a month shy of the two year anniversary of the venue being fined for the 'death match'.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Swinney ‘must be held to account' over Scottish Water pay dispute, unions say
Unions representing Scottish Water employees have said the First Minister 'must be held to account' as staff striking over pay accused the Scottish Government of 'hypocrisy' over its commitment to workers' rights. Members of GMB Scotland and other unions at the publicly-owned organisation began strike action on Monday and it will continue until Sunday. Staff represented by GMB, Unite and Unison previously rejected a 3.4% pay increase covering the last nine months as the company changed the date for annual rises to take effect from July to April. Speaking at a rally of striking workers at Scottish Water's Shieldhall depot in Glasgow on Wednesday, GMB general secretary Gary Smith warned the ongoing dispute could become one of the most significant in the country's public sector and he urged ministers to intervene. Unions also claim Scottish Water has failed to appropriately engage in pay negotiations, and that chief executive Alex Plant attended talks on Tuesday for the first time but only stayed briefly. Mr Smith said: 'How did we end up with workers being refused a fair pay rise while executives line their pockets with record bonuses? How did we end up with a chief executive finally turning up to pay talks after a year and only staying for 20 seconds? 'It is damning of the management of Scottish Water but damning too of the hypocrisy of a Scottish Government that advocates for fair work and the protection of public services. 'John Swinney and his ministers must be held to account for this growing scandal. From this point forward, every time they talk to us about fair work and how Scotland treats working people better, we will point to Scottish Water and its absolute failure to make good on that promise.' Tuesday's meeting escalated the dispute further, with unions now accusing the employer of weakening the pay offer. Workers carrying out emergency repairs, testing and maintenance are now striking, which they have warned will threaten the daily operations of the water supplier. Claire Greer, GMB Scotland organiser, said the unions had agreed to attend the hastily-convened meeting on Tuesday night in the hope of a better offer and a possible resolution. She said: 'Scottish Water has shown no interest in reaching a fair settlement and sat on its hands as a dispute that could have easily been resolved months ago escalated. 'The Scottish Government must now explain to its senior management team why its refusal to clearly and honestly engage with its own workforce cannot stand.' Unison regional manager Simon Macfarlane said: 'Scottish Water staff are very angry in how last night's pay talks were handled by the company. Scottish Water boss, Alex Plant, appeared at the table for less than five minutes. 'First Minister John Swinney needs to step in and help get this sorted. Scottish Water is behaving like a rogue employer, not an exemplar of fair work.' Sam Ritchie, Unite industrial officer, said: 'Unite members are angry and deeply frustrated with the management of Scottish Water. There has been disregard and arrogance shown towards the concerns of the workforce in meetings with management. This dispute is not just about wages, it's about fairness, dignity and respect. 'Alex Plant, chief executive, who received a pay package last year of nearly half a million pounds, came into the negotiating room for all of two minutes. 'If Mr Plant can collect an exorbitant salary from the taxpayer then at the very least he should listen to the staff who earn a fraction of his pay. Talks have hit a roadblock and they are not progressing. 'Unions and management are set to resume talks over the coming days but no new offer is currently on the table which would end this dispute.' Also in attendance was union body the Scottish Trade Unions Congress, and its general Secretary Roz Foyer said: 'The Scottish Government has a responsibility to step in and help find a solution. 'Workers and their unions are committed to securing a positive outcome, not only for their members but to uphold the standards within our public services. 'That cannot happen while Scottish Water continues its intransigence in this dispute.' A Scottish Water spokesperson said: 'This is a matter for Scottish Water and its trade unions, who we value our relationship with. 'Scottish Water has acted in good faith and with integrity throughout these negotiations. 'We have a long history of being a good employer – with wages rising by about 11% above inflation in the past decade – at a time when many people in other sectors saw their wages stagnate or go backwards. 'We've made another strong offer this time that is comfortably above inflation and prioritises those on the lowest wages.' The Scottish Government has been asked for comment.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Birmingham man claims city forced him to sell home 20 years ago that's still standing
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (WIAT) — Eminent domain is the power of the government to take private property for public use, even if the owner does not want to sell. Jimmy Smith, a 92-year-old Birmingham resident, said he knows more about eminent domain than he ever wanted to. Smith has called the Collegeville neighborhood home for over nine decades. Smith was raised in a house that used to belong to him and his mother. But in 2005, Smith got a knock on the door from a Birmingham city official. 'His purpose here was to inform us that the city wanted my mom's property,' Smith said. Smith now lives right next door. He said at first, he didn't want to sell. He said the city official told him if he didn't sell, the home would be taken through eminent domain. 'They told me if you don't sell it, they are going to take it anyway because they need to widen the road,' Smith said. What to know about Alabama laws taking effect Smith referred to a project called on paperwork the '35th Street North Extension Street Improvement.' Because the house is located near businesses, tractor-trailers are often going up and down the road, which Smith said he was told is why the project needed to happen. Two decades later, the road and Smith's former home sit untouched. 'That's the same way it looked 20 years ago,' Smith said. 'The only thing that has changed is that the city owns this house. They own the house right behind us, and I think they own the empty lot over there.' CBS 42 confirmed through GIS mapping that the city of Birmingham owns nearly every property along 35th Street North. CBS 42 reached out to the city about the street improvement project. 'At this time, there are currently no infrastructure related projects targeted for this property,' the city stated. 'This acquisition took place over 20 years ago,' a city spokesperson said when asked why the project never happened. 'Right now, we do not have any related projects targeted for this property at this time.' CBS 42 sat down with real estate attorney Reagan Reeves to find out if Smith's situation was unique. CBS 42 asked him how often he sees properties bought for public use projects that never happen. 'I see a lot that do and a lot that don't,' Reeves said. 'The bad thing about these projects is the city will purchase a lot of property before the project is finalized because they don't know how long the acquisition will take for eminent domain cases.' Birmingham City Council to consider closing part of road Smith said he'd like the house back if the project isn't going to happen and the home is going to remain empty.' 'I want the home back and bring it back to what it was,' Smith said. Birmingham city officials said Smith's former home has been put up for sale. They said they contacted Smith and let him know what steps he needs to take to purchase the property. You can contact the CBS 42 Your Voice Your Station hotline by sending an email to yourvoice@ or calling 205-488-4128. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.