Cliona Ward, Irish green card holder held in US detention centre, to be released
An Irish woman detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) last month after returning from a visit to Ireland to see her ill father is to be released following a court appearance earlier today.
Cliona Ward, 54, a green-card holder, who has been living legally there for around 30 years, first ran into legal trouble in March after arriving back in the US from a trip to Ireland to visit her father in Youghal, Co Cork who is living with dementia.
Advertisement
Ms Ward, whose green card is valid until 2033, was detained and questioned by customs at the San Francisco airport on March 19th over her past criminal record.
Her prior criminal record includes six cases - two felonies for possession of drugs in December 2007 and January 2008, and four misdemeanours.
She and her sister Orla Holladay, who also lives in the US, claimed her convictions were expunged however, prompting customs to temporarily release her to obtain the appropriate documentation to prove that her records had been cleared in California.
When she went to plead her case at San Francisco airport Customs on April 21st and present proof of her expungement, she was detained once more and told to argue her case in front of an immigration judge.
Advertisement
On Wednesday, Ms Ward's Washington state-based attorney Erin Hall, said that an application was made in California on Friday last for the original convictions to be formally vacated in a manner that would be recognised at a federal level.
A California judge agreed to the application, which allowed Ms Hall to subsequently file a motion to terminate the immigration proceedings.
A GoFundme page has been set up by her sister, Orla to cover legal costs.
Ms Ward, a mother of one son, appeared in court in Seattle at 8.30 am local time (Irish time 4.30 pm) and in an update on the fundraising page, Cliona's Hope: A Mother's Fight for Freedom, Ms Hollady said that the charity group her sister works with are organising protests for her 'preliminary court hearing'.
Advertisement
Ms Ward is a caregiver for her son Malachi, who is an 'American citizen, and chronically ill.
On Wednesday, a judge at the Tacoma Immigration Court signed an order ending the removal proceedings against Ms Ward.
Another sister of Ms Ward, Tracey Ward told RTÉ that the development is a "huge, huge relief."
"I was trying to maintain hope today but I know how the system works over there so I was very fearful for her. I'm just completely relieved," she said.
"The outpouring of love worldwide that we've received has been absolutely unbelievable.'
Democrat California Representatives Jimmy who has supported and been calling for Ms Ward's release said in a statement on social media:
"I'm proud to share that Cliona Ward, a 30-year legal permanent resident of Santa Cruz County, will be released after being detained and threatened with deportation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use
June 4 (Reuters) - Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending itself before a jury in Santa Clara County, California, superior court in an $800 million lawsuit, opens new tab by Android smartphone users who say Google misappropriates their cellphone data. A jury of eight women and four men was seated on Tuesday in what lawyers say is expected to be a three-to-four-week trial, with opening statements kicking off on Wednesday. The stakes are high, but the class, which includes an estimated 14 million Californians whose mobile devices use Google's Android operating system, is in some ways just an appetizer. The same plaintiffs lawyers from Korein Tillery; Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner are litigating a parallel case in San Jose federal court covering Android users in the other 49 states, with billions of dollars in alleged damages. The plaintiffs in court papers say that even when their phones are turned off, Google causes Android devices to surreptitiously send information over cellular networks 'for Google's own purposes,' including targeted digital advertising. These transfers improperly eat up data that users purchase from their mobile carriers, the plaintiffs allege. Google spokesperson José Castañeda said the claims 'mischaracterize standard industry practices that help protect users and make phones more reliable,' he told me. 'We look forward to making our case in court." A unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, Google has a well-used playbook for settling class actions. Earlier this week, for example, the company agreed to pay $500 million to resolve shareholder litigation — a move that comes on the heels of a $50 million deal in May to resolve class-wide allegations of racial bias against Black employees and a $100 million payout in March to a proposed class of advertisers who claimed they were overcharged for clicks on ads. So why is Google taking this case to trial? In court papers, Google's outside counsel from Cooley argue that Android users incurred no actual losses, and that consumers consented to Google's so-called 'passive' data transfers via terms of service agreements and device settings. The lawyers also dispute the fundamental premise of the case: that cellular data allowances can be considered 'property' under California law and subject to conversion, a civil cause of action that involves taking a person's property without permission. When the 'rhetoric and hyperbole are set aside, Plaintiffs' theory is revealed as little more than a (misguided) product design claim — not wrongful conversion,' defense counsel wrote. The Cooley team, which includes Whitty Somvichian, Michael Attanasio, Max Bernstein and Carrie Lebel, declined comment. The plaintiffs sued Google in Santa Clara County Superior Court in 2019, asserting that they have a property interest in their cellular plans' data allowances, and that each quantum they pay for has a market value. They don't object to data transmissions when they're actively engaged with Google's apps and properties, like checking email or playing a game. But they say Google never told them it would avail itself of their cellular data when they weren't using their phones to send and receive a range of information on their usage. 'The upshot is that these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year,' plaintiffs lawyer George Zelcs of Korein Tillery said via email. In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiffs want Google to reimburse them for the value of the cellular data the company consumed. Per person, the amount is modest – 1 to 1.5 megabytes of data each day, the plaintiffs estimate. To put that in context, Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, my Reuters colleagues reported. But with a class period dating back to 2016, the totals add up quickly. In court papers, Google lawyers sound almost incredulous at the amount of the claimed nationwide damages, which they say runs in the tens of billions — more than the $7.4 billion Perdue Pharma settlement for the opioid crisis, they note. "Plaintiffs cannot show remotely commensurate harm to the class," they wrote. In denying Google's motion for summary judgment in May, Judge Charles Adams allowed the plaintiffs' claim for conversion to go forward, ruling there are triable issues of material fact for jurors to decide. While Adams said no direct state law precedent exists as to whether cell phone data is property, he pointed to a decision, opens new tab by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in the parallel federal class action, Taylor v Google. In that case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose sided with Google and dismissed the complaint, opens new tab with prejudice in 2022, only to be reversed and remanded on appeal. The appellate panel in an unpublished decision ruled that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged they incurred damages when Google used their cellular data. Adams in a pre-trial order set some limits on what the lawyers will be allowed to argue to the jury. Plaintiffs may not suggest Google engages in "surveillance" of Android users, he wrote, or that the data transfers are a privacy violation. As for Google, Adams said, it 'must not present evidence or argument suggesting that this case is 'lawyer driven' or was 'invented' by Plaintiffs' counsel.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Riots spread in Northern Ireland with 15 arrested after nights of chaos following 'sexual assault of girl by Romanian teens' in Ballymena - as terrified foreign nationals consider fleeing
Fifteen rioters have been arrested as 41 police officers were injured amid unrest in Northern Ireland following the alleged sexual assault of a girl by Romanian teens. Chaos has continued for fourth consecutive night across the region after the reported sexual assault in Ballymena sparked protests which descended into violence. Police have not confirmed are yet to confirm the ethnicity of the two teenage boys arrested and charged with the attempted rape of a young girl. But, the fact that they asked for a Romanian interpreter in court has cast suspicion on the town's long-established migrant community. Terrified foreign nationals are now considering fleeing the province amid rioting in a bid to protect their families. Maria, whose name has been changed to protect her identity, said: 'Why do they attack us? What did we do?' The tearful Romanian, 38, added: 'I don't want to run, cause I did nothing bad... '[But] when I go in the street people are looking at us very bad... they blame me... When they say go home, I say, home is here for me.' Missiles were also thrown at officers after a protest in Portadown on Thursday, continuing a trend that was sparked earlier in the week in Ballymena. Around 400 protestors are understood to have gathered in the County Armagh town where people were seen setting fires and causing damage to a derelict building. Three teenagers also appeared in court yesterday in connection with recent riots. Police and politicians have denounced the ongoing violence within the community, which has been dubbed 'racist thuggery'. Northern Ireland's police chief said those being targeted 'are not criminals', noting their positive impact on society, describing them as 'valued members of society'. However as tensions continue, in an unprecedented move, some households have begun to display British or Northern Irish flags in their windows. Blanka Harnagea, who has lived with her family in the region for five years, said the flags served as a kind of 'protection' amid the unrest. 'We put (the flags) as a sign of peace... to say that we are not against them,' said the 38-year-old originally from the Czech Republic. The mother-of-five, who is considering leaving, said: 'We are a bit worried they keep going on because some people said that they are not gonna stop until everybody who is not from Ireland has left.' Other houses displayed posters announcing 'Locals live Here' or 'Filipinos live here' and 'British household'. A report by the Northern Ireland assembly published in February revealed only 3.4 percent of the province's 1.9 million people were from an ethnic minority. It comes after a family of the girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted by Romanian teens pleaded with rioters in Ballymena to end the violence after nights of chaos. Northern Ireland 's police chief Jon Boutcher said the young girl had been 'further traumatised' by the rioting that has been witnessed since Monday. Mr Boutcher, who met with the girl's family on Thursday, delivered a stark message to the rioters as he spoke to the media in Belfast following a meeting with his oversight body, the Northern Ireland Policing Board. He said that 80 officers from Scotland were due to arrive, as the town braced itself for a another night of rioting. 'Stop this violence,' Mr Boutcher said on Thursday: 'We will come after you. We will arrest you. We will prosecute you successfully. It is not in any way a way for a civilised society to behave and it must stop now. 'I want to specifically mention the 41 police officers who've been injured. Each of those officers have put themselves in harm's way to protect our communities. 'And I want to send a very clear message to all our diverse communities: we stand absolutely shoulder to shoulder with you. We are here to protect you. 'We are your police service, and these bigots and racists will not win the day. This will be policed properly. We will deal with this - and we all know that in this room - but let's call an end to it now. 'This girl's family and this girl want it to end. Our communities want it to end. We need it to end. So please don't come out on the streets tonight. If you do, we will police you and we will deal with you through the criminal justice system. Mr Boutcher added that he would 'always be concerned' the unrest would spread across towns in the region. Tense scenes emerged in Portadown following the warning as masked individuals hurled masonry and other objects at riot police later into the night. However, the unrest in Northern Ireland appeared of a lower intensity than scenes earlier in the week. Some gatherings planned in other towns proceeded largely without any major disturbance by 9pm on Thursday. A significant police presence had been deployed to Ballymena but there was no initial repeat of the violence of previous nights. Police said a separate protest in east Belfast also ended early yesterday evening. A judge previously warned that courts will deal 'robustly' with those involved in violence in Ballymena. District Judge Nigel Broderick warned that young people who got involved were risking a significant custodial sentence as three teenagers faced rioting charges at the town's magistrates' court on Thursday. Michael Elliot, 18, of Lanntara, Ballymena, and two youths were the first defendants to appear in court since the sustained violence erupted in the County Antrim town on Monday. The officer told the court that Elliott was arrested at 11.50pm on Tuesday night following an incident where a house on Bridge Street had been set on fire. The detective constable said it was originally believed the occupants were still inside the property. Elliott was detained after he was seen running from the scene, the court was told. He was wearing gloves and a balaclava, the court heard. During police interview he had made admissions to the offence of riotous assembly, the detective said. He told cops he had become involved in the disorder because others were involved and blamed the situation on police. The detective constable said there was 'strong public feeling' currently within Ballymena. He said police believed it is important that courts send out a 'strong message'. He said if the court did not, there was a risk of further disorder that could lead to 'death or serious injury' for foreign nationals living in Ballymena. A defence solicitor said his client's involvement was limited to 'throwing stones'. The district judge told Elliott he was a young man who now found himself in the dock in court. He said the court would deal 'robustly' with those where there was evidence they were involved in the disorder. The judge refused an application for bail. He said: 'Your case should be an example to others who are considering getting involved in further public disorder.' The judge said there was a high likelihood that those who were charged over rioting would be refused bail and would face a significant custodial sentence if convicted. He remanded Elliott in custody until July 10. A 15-year-old boy and a 17-year-old boy also appeared in the dock charged with riotous assembly and criminal damage. Both were rejected bail and remanded to appear at a youth court on June 18. The riotous behaviour saw vandalism, vehicles burned and arson attacks on a number of properties across several towns. Petrol bombs, fireworks, masonry and a hatchet were among items thrown at officers over the three nights of disorder over the course of this week. Police responded with water cannons, dogs and plastic baton rounds in an attempt to disperse crowds in the town. PSNI chief Mr Boutcher said the initial lawful and legitimate process before unrest broke out was done in a way that was responsible and empathetic to the victim. However, he said the protest was subsequently 'hijacked' and turned into 'wanton, disgraceful criminal behaviour that is absolutely race motivated'. The chief said the service was under-resourced and needed to be funded 'properly' rather than 'disgracefully'. However, he said his officers would still bring people to justice: 'We've put our public order inquiry team together, we'll be releasing images of those responsible. We will be going after them.' The head officer described how PSNI members helped evacuate foreign national families who were hiding in attics and wardrobes in their homes in Ballymena as rioters went on the rampage on Monday night. He said the families targeted had done nothing wrong. 'They are not criminals. They contribute positively to society here and are well integrated,' he said. 'They are valued members of society in Northern Ireland. 'Fire Service colleagues described how they went to the scenes to stop arson attacks at those addresses, and how they, in all their years in the Fire Service, have not seen levels of violence to that level, and told me specifically and directly of the bravery, the courage of a very thin green line of police officers that without doubt, in my view, saved lives that night.' Secretary of State Hilary Benn described the scenes as 'mindless racist thuggery' while Stormont Justice Minister Naomi Long said it has been a 'three-day festival of hate and destruction' which needs to stop before someone loses their life. Thirty minutes from Ballymena, a leisure centre in Larne was subjected to arson after temporarily being used as an emergency shelter for those in urgent need following disturbances in the town earlier in the week. Communities Minister Gordon Lyons, who highlighted the use of the building in a social media post, said all those who had been staying at the leisure centre are in the care of the Housing Executive and have been moved out of Larne. Northern Ireland's First Minister Michelle O'Neill said Mr Lyons should resign over his social media post while the leader of the opposition in the Northern Ireland Assembly SDLP MLA Matthew O'Toole said he would refer the Communities Minister to the standards commission. Mr Benn also asked the minister to 'reflect upon his words' and 'not upon his position'. Mr Lyons has resisted calls for his resignation and said he would 'strongly hit back at any notion' that he had publicly revealed the facility was being used to house immigrant families who had been affected by violence in Ballymena.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ICE Barbie Kristi Noem's LA riots press conference interrupted as Democrat Senator is thrown out
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's LA riots press conference descended into chaos on Thursday when a screaming Democrat Senator interrupted the event. California Senator Alex Padilla shouted over Noem before he was forcibly removed from the room by multiple guards and placed in handcuffs. Noem was speaking and the Q&A portion of the meeting had not yet started when Padilla begun heckling and interrupting. He said: 'I'm Senator Alex Padilla, and I have questions for the secretary.' SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO As Padilla was escorted out of the room during the tense interaction, he said: 'The fact of the matter is half a dozen violent criminals that you're rotating on your... hands off!' Startling footage shared by Padilla's team show him being forced to his knees, then onto the ground and outside of the room before being put in handcuffs by the FBI. Padilla, who is the son of Mexican immigrants, slammed the Trump administration and their treatment of migrants after the ordeal at his own blistering press conference. In a statement he said: 'If this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community.' Trump's immigration chief Noem was in Los Angeles to discuss the Trump Administration's response to the anti-ICE protests and immigration raids that have been occurring in the area. As Padilla interrupted, Noem said: 'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and mayor have placed on this country and what they've tried to insert in this city.' Noem condemned the senator for the disruption and noted that he had not even asked for a meeting with her. She added: 'I think everybody in America would agree that that was inappropriate.' Padilla's team released a statement shortly after insisting that he was at the press conference to perform his congressional duties. The statement read: 'Senator Padilla is currently in Los Angeles exercising his duty to perform Congressional oversight of the federal government's operations in Los Angeles and across California. 'He was in the federal building to receive a briefing with General Guillot and was listening to Secretary Noem's press conference. 'He tried to ask the Secretary a question, and was forcibly removed by federal agents, forced to the ground and handcuffed. He is not currently detained, and we are working to get additional information.' After the press conference, Noem addressed the incident while standing outside the federal building. She said: 'If he would have reached out and identified himself and let us know who he was and wanted to talk. His approach was something I don't think was appropriate at all. But the conversation was great and we are going to communicate. 'We exchanged phone numbers and we are going to continue to talk. People need to identify themselves before lunging during press conferences.' DHS said on X that Secret Service agents believed Padilla was an attacker and so acted accordingly. The agency said: 'Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem. 'Mr Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands. @SecretService thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately. 'Secretary Noem met with Senator Padilla after and held a 15 minute meeting.' Noem called Padilla's statement about the incident 'ridiculous' and told Fox News she believed he wanted to cause a scene. She said: 'The way that he acted was completely inappropriate. It wasn't becoming of a U.S. Senator or official and perhaps he wanted the scene. 'This man burst into a room and started advancing towards the podium, interrupting an opening statement and, elevating his voice and shouting questions. 'People tried to stop him from interrupting the press conference, but he refused and continued to lunge towards the podium.' Noem told the outlet that she met with the senator for about 10 to 15 minutes afterwards and the two even exchanged phone numbers. California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned Padilla's detention on social media. He said: 'Sen Alex Padilla is one of the most decent people I know. This is outrageous, dictatorial, and shameful. Trump and his shock troops are out of control. This must end now. 'If they can handcuff a U.S. Senator for asking a question, imagine what they will do to you.' Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who Padilla replaced in the senate when she was elected VP, said: 'United States Senator Alex Padilla was representing the millions of Californians who are demanding answers to this Administration's actions in Southern California. This is a shameful and stunning abuse of power.' Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski told reporters: 'It's horrible. It is shocking at every level. It's not the America I know.'
