Chandigarh administration set to roll out fare checks for app-based cabs
1
2
3
Chandigarh: To prevent mobile app-based aggregators from overcharging commuters, the Chandigarh administration will establish minimum and maximum fares charged by aggregators, with a cap on 'surge pricing'.
The Punjab Governor and UT Administrator, Gulab Chand Kataria, approved the 'Chandigarh Administration Motor Vehicle Aggregator Rules, 2025', which will be notified soon.
According to the rules, the city taxi fare, indexed by the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) for the current year, will serve as the base fare chargeable to customers using aggregator services. The Chandigarh Administration will notify taxi fares periodically.
The base minimum fare chargeable to customers using aggregator services will cover a minimum of 3 kilometres to compensate for dead mileage and the distance travelled, as well as fuel used for picking up customers.
Aggregators will be allowed to charge a fare 50% lower than the base fare and a maximum surge pricing of 1.5 times the base fare specified under the rules. This approach will promote asset utilisation, a fundamental concept of transport aggregation, and support the dynamic pricing principle, which is crucial for ensuring asset utilisation in line with market demand and supply forces.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
The rules also stipulate that the UT may, through notification, direct 2% of the total fare for each ride towards the state exchequer for amenities and programmes related to aggregator-operated vehicles. These vehicles have significantly reduced traffic congestion and pollution. The rules prohibit the use of private vehicles under the aggregator service, as many aggregators, particularly those operating two vehicles, are using private vehicles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Musk: How Donald Trump can cripple SpaceX and Tesla—if he chooses to pull the plug
As political tensions flare, experts warn that Elon Musk's empire, built on public funding, could face steep fallout. At the intersection of ambition and politics, Elon Musk's multibillion-dollar space and electric vehicle empire may soon be at the mercy of President Donald Trump . Despite being a vocal critic of government subsidies, Musk's companies—SpaceX and Tesla—have long depended on them. And now, Trump's public feud with the billionaire threatens to upend a financial relationship that has fuelled some of the most significant technological advances in America's recent history. An in-depth investigation by The Washington Post revealed that Musk's ventures have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, subsidies, loans and tax credits, much of it in just the past five years. That includes at least $6.3 billion pledged in 2024 alone. Tesla and SpaceX—two of the world's most prominent tech companies—have not only thrived on this backing but, in many cases, owe their very survival to it. With Trump threatening to slash federal support over their growing differences, the question now being asked in Washington and Wall Street alike is: Could he actually destroy Musk's business empire? Built on billions: The scale of public support Tesla's journey from a cash-strapped start-up to the world's leading EV manufacturer has been paved with government help. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Adidas Three Shorts With 60% Discount, Limited Stock Available Original Adidas Shop Now Undo According to The Post, a $465 million low-interest loan from the Department of Energy in 2010 allowed Tesla to engineer its flagship Model S and purchase a major California factory. The company repaid the loan by 2013, but not before it became central to Tesla's survival and eventual IPO. In total, Tesla has earned $11.4 billion in regulatory credits from federal and state programs incentivising zero-emission vehicles—enough to offset years of operating losses. As The New York Times notes, those credits were instrumental in turning Tesla's first annual profit in 2020. Without them, the company would have reported a loss of $718 million. Meanwhile, SpaceX has grown into the most vital contractor in America's space program. NASA alone has invested nearly $15 billion in the company, which now operates the only crew and cargo transport to the International Space Station. The Pentagon and US intelligence agencies have also poured billions into SpaceX launches and secure satellite deployments. Trump's leverage: Political feud meets financial power As the relationship between Musk and Trump deteriorates, so do the prospects for continued public support. Trump has already proposed slashing key tax credits and subsidies, including the $7,500 consumer EV credit. According to analysts at JPMorgan, this could cost Tesla $1.2 billion in annual profit. Worse still, The New York Times reports that Trump has publicly threatened to cancel federal contracts to Musk's companies. While that might seem unlikely given SpaceX's dominant position, experts warn it's not out of the question. As Ars Technica reports, such a move could set back the US space program by a decade. SpaceX is currently the only provider of crewed space flights for NASA and is contracted to safely de-orbit the International Space Station in 2030. It is also critical to America's Moon mission via NASA's Artemis program. A SpaceX pullout could leave NASA with no short-term alternatives, and even pose national security risks. As one analyst put it, 'If the Trump administration were to sever its relationship with SpaceX, it would effectively give China's space program global supremacy.' Regulatory chokehold: How else Trump could strike Even without tearing up contracts, Trump could take a more insidious route: the regulatory bottleneck. As Ars Technica notes, agencies like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) could slow or stall key Musk projects. The FAA could restrict Starship launch expansions, while NHTSA could ramp up scrutiny of Tesla's Full Self Driving and Autopilot features—putting product development at risk. These tools are under Trump's executive branch influence and could be weaponised without needing Congressional approval. 'If the Trump government does in its feud with Musk is attack his financial interests,' said Paul Levinson, a professor at Fordham University, 'Musk is very likely to not only survive but continue to thrive. But regulatory delays could reshape timelines and margins.' 'We earned that': Musk's companies respond Despite the heavy reliance on public funding, Musk and his executives have defended their role in serving government interests. 'We earned that,' SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell said recently of federal contracts, pointing to the company's track record in cutting costs and delivering results. Indeed, many in Washington see Musk's ventures as having advanced key US goals—from decarbonising transport to dominating low-Earth orbit. 'NASA is working with partners like SpaceX… for the benefit of all,' said NASA spokeswoman Cheryl Warner. Still, the contrast between Musk's anti-subsidy rhetoric and the billions his companies receive hasn't gone unnoticed. Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld told The Post, 'With DOGE [Department of Government Efficiency], there does seem to be a paradox there. He has been a big beneficiary of national industrial policy.' Can Musk survive without Washington? In the short term, the answer is: possibly. Tesla has repaid loans and now generates billions in profit. SpaceX's commercial Starlink service is booming. But long-term survival without government support is far less certain—particularly in the face of regulatory headwinds or a cancelled lunar contract. 'Elon Musk is undeniably the architect of his empire,' said George Washington University's John Helveston to NPR. 'But government scaffolding helped build the skyscraper. If Trump starts pulling pieces out, the whole thing doesn't collapse—but it shakes.' For now, Musk appears publicly defiant. But behind closed doors in Washington and Silicon Valley, the calculations are more cautious. The fate of America's most iconic tech visionary may yet hinge on politics more than engineering. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amid Trump-Musk spat, Tesla CEO's immigration status under scanner. Can President deport him?
Former White House official Steve Bannon has urged US President Donald Trump to investigate Elon Musk's immigration status, deport him 'immediately". Bannon, a known vocal critic of Elon Musk , requested Trump to 'seize' his company SpaceX, amid the war of words between the world's richest man and the commander in chief. Bannon urged the president to immediately invoke the Defense Production Act to take control of Musk's rocket company in response to the billionaire entrepreneur's declaration that he would decommission the SpaceX craft used to shuttle astronauts back and forth from the International Space Station (ISS). ALSO READ: Deport 'illegal alien' Elon Musk and 'seize SpaceX': Trump ally Steve Bannon demands probe into Tesla CEO's immigration status by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like I lost my wife, now my son is in danger, please help him! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo 'The action that President Trump should be taking immediately, I think, is when [Musk] threatens to take one of the big programs out of Space X, President Trump tonight should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production Act to be called in on SpaceX and seize SpaceX tonight, before midnight,' Bannon said on his 'War Room' podcast. — jrrosenb (@jrrosenb) Live Events Could Trump deport Elon Musk? Musk had been one of closest allies of Donald Trump over the past few months and had spent nearly $300 million to support him and other Republicans during the 2024 presidential election. He voiced his support on his social media platform X and was picked by the President to lead a newly created department DOGE aimed at downsizing federal government and slash spending. He left DOGE at the end of May as his tenure of 'special government employee' got over. But in the past week, things took a U-turn and this relationship unraveled after Musk launched an all-out attack on President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'. Things escalated further and Musk has now suggested Trump should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance, while the president suggested Musk's companies could lose government contracts potentially imperiling SpaceX's relationship with NASA. ALSO READ: Tom Felton to reprise Harry Potter Draco role for first time in 14 years as he makes broadway debut in Cursed Child Amid the public fallout of Musk and Trump, Steve Bannon, prominent conservative commentator Bannon, told New York Times, "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately." Bannon later doubled down on this argument during an appearance on his War Room podcast when he said: "Elon Musk is illegal, and he's got to go. He's illegal? Deport immediately." "You're going to ship these other people home. Let's start with the South Africans, OK?" Elon Musk's citizenship saga Born in Pretoria, South Africa, in 1971, Elon Musk relocated to Canada in 1989 before moving to the United States in 1992 to study at the University of Pennsylvania. After spending several years living and working in the US, he became a naturalized citizen in 2002. The US law says that the citizenship gained through naturalization can be revoked if it was "procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation." In October, 2024, the Washington Post published an article claiming that Musk had previously "worked illegally in the United States" by setting up a company while on a student visa in 1995, despite never enrolling in Stanford University as promised. ALSO READ: Elon Musk to start new political party amid feud with Trump? Tech mogul drops big hint on X Citing 'former business associates, court records, and internal company documents,' the publication reported that Elon Musk entered the US on a J-1 student visa. Musk then started working on a startup — which later evolved into Zip2 — without holding the necessary work authorization. The Washington Post also referenced a 2005 email, presented in a defamation lawsuit, in which Musk acknowledged he applied to Stanford University primarily because he otherwise had 'no legal right to stay in the country.' The case was raised at a campaign event by then President Joe Biden who said: "That wealthiest man in the world turned out to be [an] illegal worker here when he was here. "I'm serious. He was supposed to be in school when he came on a student visa. He wasn't in school. He was violating the law. He's talking about all these illegals coming our way?" In a post on X shortly after the Post's story was published Musk denied the allegation against him, saying: "I was in fact allowed to work in the US" ALSO READ: Amid Elon Musk-Trump feud, tech billionaire's ex Ashley St Clair offers 'breakup advice' to President Speaking to Wired about Musk, Professor Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration law expert at Cornell Law School, said that if the claims of illegal working are true "on purely legal grounds, this would justify revoking citizenship, because if he had told the truth, he would not have been eligible for an H1-B, a green card, or naturalization." Amanda Frost, a legal expert at the University of Virginia, said: "If a noncitizen violated the terms of a nonimmigrant visa, and then adjusted to immigrant (green card) status without admitting the violation, and then naturalized without admitting the violation, that person could be denaturalized on the ground that their naturalization was 'illegally procured." Musk vs Trump explodes In a series of sharp attacks on Friday, Elon Musk called for President Donald Trump to be impeached, mocked Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful [spending] Bill' by labeling it 'The Big Ugly Bill,' and warned that Trump's tariff policies could push the U.S. into a recession in the second half of 2025. Trump responded on his Truth Social platform, claiming Musk had 'just gone CRAZY,' and added: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget—Billions and Billions of Dollars—is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' ALSO READ: 'Without me, Trump would have lost election': Elon Musk launches all-out attack on US President As tensions escalated, Musk posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' However, Musk did not provide any evidence to support the explosive claim. While Trump's name has appeared in previously released court documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, he has not been accused of any wrongdoing, and there's no proof he is named in any unreleased files. Whether the Trump-Musk feud will continue—and if it will impact policy decisions—remains to be seen. Trump has not suggested investigating Musk's American citizenship, and according to Politico, the two are still expected to speak on Friday.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
'We can't build bananas in America': Pennsylvania Rep. Madeleine Dean highlights consumer costs of Trump's trade plan; uses banana in heated exchange
Representative Madeleine Dean holding a banana during a house appropriations committee (Image credits: X @atrupar) US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick was put on the spot Thursday by Representative Madeleine Dean, and a banana, during a House Appropriations committee meeting. Lutnick, a former stockbroker, was defending US President Donald Trump's tariff proposals, arguing they would teach American companies to become more self-reliant. But Representative Dean challenged him with a simple example: bananas. 'Americans, by the way, loooove bananas. We buy billions of them a year. I love bananas. What's the tariff on bananas?' Dean asked. Lutnick responded that the banana tariff 'would be representative of the countries that produce them,' which he said was 'generally 10 per cent.' Dean pointed out that Walmart had already raised banana prices by 8 per cent. Lutnick tried to reassure the committee that prices would drop as countries signed new trade deals with the US, but Dean focused on current realities. ″But the cost is on the American consumer now, and on the businesses with the confusion now,' she said. 'Mr secretary, I believe you know better. I believe you recognize that a trade deficit is not something to fear. I believe you know that predictability, stability, is essential for businesses. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo I wish you would show that truth to this administration.' Lutnick added, 'There's no uncertainty that if you build in America and produce your product in America, there will be no tariff.' Dean quickly responded by holding up a banana and stating, 'We cannot build bananas in America.' While bananas can be grown in Hawaii and southern Florida, the current supply isn't enough to meet the demand in the US, where people eat an average of 26 pounds of bananas per year. Later, Dean shared the moment on X, saying she was surprised to find herself 'giving economic lessons to the US commerce secretary.' She followed up by noting, 'Not everything can be produced in the US' The exchange sparked plenty of reaction online, with many praising Dean's pointed use of the banana to make her case. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
