
Poll reveals the British communities most likely to back first cousin marriages - but huge majority think it should be outlawed
A new poll has revealed the British communities that are most likely to back first cousin marriages, although a large majority think the practice should be outlawed.
Pakistani and Bangladeshi Britons are most likely to support the first cousin marriages, with 39 percent of those polled saying it should be legal.
While 47 percent of the community say the practice should not be legal, this compares to just eight percent of white Britons who support first-cousin marriage.
Six percent of black Britons say marrying a cousin should be legal, with nine percent of Indian Britons holding the same view.
While marrying close relatives including siblings and half-siblings is illegal in the UK, marrying a first cousin is technically legal.
Some 77 percent of white and Indian Britons believe marrying a cousin should be made illegal, compared to 82 percent of black Britons.
Currently the UK follows the practice of 'genetic counselling', in which first cousins who are in a relationship are offered education about the risk of having children together and encouraged to receive extra checks during pregnancy.
It is estimated that children of a first-cousin union have a six percent chance of inheriting a recessive disorder such as cystic fibrosis or sickle cell disease - double the risk of the general population.
Conservative MP Richard Holden last year introduced a private members' bill to ban the practice, which would bring cousin marriages into the same bracket as marrying a parent, child, sibling or grandparent.
But some have warned that outlawing the practice completely risks stigmatising those already in first cousin marriages in the UK.
Amongst these was Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed, who drew huge criticism last year for defending cousin marriage.
Instead of banning it outright, he said a 'more positive approach' involving advanced genetic tests for prospective married cousins would be more effective in addressing issues around it.
One of Britain's foremost experts on child health also defended the right for first cousins to marry, dismissing concerns about inbreeding.
Professor Dominic Wilkinson, an NHS neonatologist and ethics expert at the University of Oxford, argued a ban would be 'unethical'.
Instead, Professor Wilkinson backed calls for such couples to be offered special screening on the NHS to help them decide if they should have children.
Such tests can cost £1,200 privately. They are designed to spot whether prospective parents are carriers for the same genetic conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy.
It comes as data from 2023 showed in three inner-city Bradford wards, 46 percent of mothers from the Pakistani community are married to a first or second cousin, according to data published in 2023.
The overall estimate for Bradford Pakistani couples was 37 percent ten years ago, and this figure has since dropped.
Reasons behind the fall are thought to include high educational attainment, stricter immigration rules and changes in family dynamics.
It compares to just one percent of white British couples.
YouGov's data also revealed that those in London are most likely to support first cousin marriage, at 15 percent.
The north followed at 12 percent, while in the Midlands it was ten percent. The south of England and Wales were the least likely to support it being legal, at six and seven percent respectively.
Historically, first cousin marriages were extremely common amongst royalty and the British upper classes. It was seen as a way of firming up alliances and keeping wealth and land in the family.
MailOnline recently revealed that no-one is tracking the rate of cousin marriages in the UK, with councils not recording any data on the issue.
Studies have put Pakistan as having one of the highest rates globally at 65 percent of unions.
This is followed by Saudi Arabia (50 percent), Afghanistan (40 percent), Iran (30 percent) and Egypt and Turkey (20 percent).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
Majority on Dumfries and Galloway Council back special meeting
A majority of councillors in Dumfries and Galloway have backed a move for a no confidence motion in the Conservative-led administration.A total of 22 members of the 43-strong local authority signed the call, which has triggered a special meeting for 16 move came after a number of Conservatives left their political group to form a new Labour and Democratic Alliance councillors have backed the move which could see current leader Gail Macgregor and depute leader Malcolm Johnstone replaced. The Conservatives formed an administration in 2023 after the collapse of a previous had 16 members but that fell to just nine when seven councillors quit the group - four to form a group called Novantae and three to create the Dumfries and Galloway Independent a result a request was lodged to convene a special meeting of the local authority to consider a no confidence vote in the standing orders, the move must be backed by at least a quarter of councillors. However, papers published on the council website show that support has significantly exceeded that 11 SNP members, eight Labour councillors and three from the Democratic Alliance signed the they were to agree to work together in future they could form an outright majority on the full council will meet to decide the way ahead on Monday.


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Awkward moment new Reform UK chair David Bull is shown his tweet calling Nigel Farage an idiot
New Reform UK chairman David Bull was shown a previous tweet he posted calling Nigel Farage an 'idiot' during a live breakfast TV interview. Dr Bull appeared on Good Morning Britain on Wednesday morning (11 June), where host Susanna Reid showed him a tweet he made from 2014, calling Mr Farage an 'idiot', stating comments made by him were 'dangerous'. The tweet was over comments Mr Farage made about migrants with HIV. Dr Bull replaces Zia Yusuf, who resigned as Reform's chairman last week.


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's vital green spaces are in grave danger unless we act now
This week, as the Chancellor announces the Government's latest spending review, we are bracing for cuts across the board. In tough times, difficult choices must be made. At such a moment it is important to remember that the numbers in the spreadsheets are not simply economic abstractions, and that some cuts can cost more than they save. World Environment Day is an excellent moment to remember that green spaces are a case in point. They are one of the most powerful and under-appreciated tools for improving public health and fostering social cohesion while sustaining wildlife. The truth is that local parks are delivering huge value and can contribute so much more. Green spaces, parks and playing fields are frontline services for the wellbeing of our communities. They are where we exercise, connect with others, improve our mental health and, crucially, where connect with Nature. At a time of rising isolation and disconnection with the natural world, these places matter more than ever. But they are vanishing. In the last ten years, more than 800 parks and playgrounds have closed across the UK. In many communities, especially those already suffering the effects of inequality, access to safe, high-quality outdoor spaces has become a postcode lottery. Seventy per cent of children in low-income areas don't meet the recommended daily exercise levels. One in five young people now face an actual or probable mental health disorder. We're seeing the consequences in our health service. Lack of physical activity and limited access to nature are directly linked to long-term conditions, ranging from obesity and Type 2 diabetes to anxiety and depression. We are spending a fortune in fixing problems which could in part be prevented at much lower cost. Regular use of parks and green spaces generates over £34 billion in health and wellbeing benefits each year. At a time when the Health Service is under extraordinary pressure, investing in green spaces is not a 'nice to have.' It is a preventive public health policy. But the benefits of green space are not just physical or economic; they are emotional and deeply formative. As someone who has spent my life seeking ways to sustain Nature, I know how critical early experiences are in shaping our relationship with the natural world. My own love of Nature wasn't sparked in some distant wilderness, but in the green areas close to home: wonderful patches of wild 'brownfield' scrub, local fields, and neighbourhood parks. These everyday encounters with Nature weren't spectacular, but they were profound. You can't foster a love of the natural world through screens or textbooks alone. It must be felt, seen, heard. That spark happens outdoors. Every child deserves that spark. Yet today, far too many children grow up without ever hearing birdsong or walking beneath a canopy of trees. Girls, ethnic minorities, and families in deprived communities face the greatest barriers to experiencing the simple, profound benefits of nature. That is not just a social failing. It is a moral one. Green spaces are where future conservationists are born. When children climb trees, build dens, or simply lie on the grass and look up at the sky, they're doing more than playing. They're forming bonds with Nature that can last a lifetime. That sense of care and wonder is what leads people to protect and preserve the wild as they grow up. Our future depends on it. This year marks the centenary of Fields in Trust, a charity that has spent 100 years quietly protecting more than 3,000 green spaces across the UK. It is a remarkable achievement, but there is still so much more to do. Fields in Trust believes that everyone should live close to a protected park. As we face the overlapping challenges of poor public health, rapid urbanisation, and the climate and Nature emergencies, that vision has never been more important. Yet green spaces continue to be at risk, and once lost they are rarely replaced. Parks are places of healing. Places where children run, families connect, and communities thrive. They are one of the few remaining spaces where people of all ages and backgrounds naturally mix. We must reframe access to quality green spaces, including wilder ones, as a right, not a privilege. We stand at a crossroads. If we want to create a future where our world's living systems are restored and thriving, we must begin by protecting Nature on our doorsteps. The next generation of conservationists and environmental stewards won't appear by magic. They will emerge from the children and families who had the chance to explore, love and connect with nature today.