
Apple reels from share selloff as Trump's 25% tariff threat drives uncertainty
Apple shares are coming off their longest sell-off in more than three years as escalating attacks from the White House threaten to further erode the company's profit outlook, suggesting the stock's struggles this year are far from over.
U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday threatened to levy a 25% tariff on the company's products if it doesn't shift iPhone production to the U.S. Shares fell 3% to end the week, their eighth straight negative session, the longest such sell-off since January 2022. The stock rose 1.7% on Tuesday.
Some analysts are skeptical that the tariffs will come to pass, but any movement in this direction will put the company in a position where it either has to absorb the higher costs, weighing on its earnings and margins, or pass along higher prices to consumers, which could erode demand at a time when Apple is already struggling with tepid growth and difficulties with its artificial intelligence offerings.
"The threat may be politically motivated but markets can't ignore the headline risk,' said Haris Khurshid, chief investment officer at Karobaar Capital. "This kind of tariff rhetoric, even if it never materializes, chips away at investor confidence. You can't run a $3 trillion company with a trade grenade hanging overhead.'
Apple is the worst-performing 'Magnificent Seven' stock this year, and its 2025 drop of 21% stands in stark contrast to the 1% rise of the Nasdaq 100 Index. The stock has broken under key moving averages, but isn't yet at the level that would indicate oversold conditions, based on its 14-day relative strength index. The CBOE Apple VIX, which tracks a market estimate of future volatility for the stock, jumped more than 30% last week.
The stock has endured political and tariff-related swings, though Friday's sell-off was far milder than Apple's drop after the initial announcement of tariffs in April, when the stock underwent historic volatility including its biggest four-day drop since October 2000.
The Trump administration subsequently walked back several of its more extreme tariff pronouncements. It exempted key categories of electronics — including smartphones and computers — from its so-called reciprocal tariffs, while the U.S. and China agreed to temporarily lower tariffs on each other's products.
"It would be probably a surprise to most investors if this actually happens,' Matt Stucky, chief portfolio manager of equities at Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management, said. He added that Friday's move in Apple shares underscored this point: If investors believed the 25% rate will be enforced, traders likely would have sent the stock down further.
Trump's quickly evolving position was on show Friday when, a few hours after taking aim at Apple on social media, he said the 25% tariff would apply to all foreign-made smartphones. Ironically, this could be to Apple's benefit, according to JPMorgan analyst Samik Chatterjee, who said that if all competitors in the industry face the same hurdle, "Apple's pricing power with consumers as well as suppliers would position the company favorably relative to peers, rather than at a disadvantage.'
Still, the situation is difficult for Apple because it has few obvious recourses to appease Trump. The idea of fully domestic iPhone manufacturing is "a fairy tale that is not feasible,' according to Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives. Given the complexity of Apple's supply chain — including materials, assembly, labor, and machinery — Bloomberg Intelligence estimated it would take several quarters to move iPhone assembly to the U.S. Last month, Bank of America calculated that iPhone costs could rise 90% or more if they were made in the U.S.
Apple was reportedly already considering price increases, though trying to avoid the perception they were related to tariffs, as Trump has also attacked companies that have raised prices due to the levies.
Estimates vary on how significant tariffs could be to Apple. Bloomberg Intelligence estimated they "might cut gross margin by 300-350 bps for fiscal 2026,' while Citigroup analyst Atif Malik estimated "about 130 bps incremental gross margin impact, or 4% incremental EPS impact in FY26.'
Wells Fargo Securities analyst Aaron Rakers is skeptical tariffs will materialize, but said Apple would have to raise prices by $250 to $300 per iPhone in order to maintain gross margins. Ives at Wedbush said iPhones would cost about $3,500 if made in the U.S.
Analysts have been trimming their estimates on account of the uncertainty. The consensus for Apple's net 2026 earnings has dropped by 5.1% over the past three months, while the view for revenue is down 3.9% over the same period.
Further cuts to estimates would have the effect of making the stock appear more expensive by shrinking the denominator in the price-to-earnings ratio. Apple currently trades around 26 times estimated earnings, above its 10-year average, and more than megacap peers that are expected to grow faster. The combination of a higher multiple and slower growth suggests a difficult setup, even outside of the tariff situation.
"We're in that ugly space because it's a bit of a no-win situation right now,' said Brian Mulberry, a client portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management. "There is probably a point where you can see the price becoming attractive enough for long-term investors,' but the valuation and uncertain backdrop means it isn't there yet.
"You're trying to catch a falling knife right now,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nikkei Asia
39 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump signs order doubling steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%
WASHINGTON -- U.S. tariffs on steel aluminum and steel are set to double to 50% on Wednesday, a levy the Trump administration says will safeguard the American steel industry from inexpensive imports. On Tuesday evening, U.S. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation for the tariff hike -- up from 25% announced in March -- to take effect on Wednesday at 12:01 a.m. U.S. Eastern time. The U.K. is exempt from the increased levy.


Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
Trump asked Japan to help with Golden Dome missile shield: report
U.S. President Donald Trump discussed cooperating with Japan on developing technology for his planned Golden Dome missile defence shield during a phone call with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba this month, the Nikkei reported. The two countries are expected to work together on systems to intercept incoming threats, and Tokyo's participation could serve as a bargaining chip for it to win concessions in ongoing tariff negotiations with Washington, the paper said, without citing its sources. Trump this month said he had selected a design for the planned $175 billion defense shield and appointed U.S. Space Force General Michael Guetlein to head the project, which he wants to complete by the end of his term in 2029. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that Golden Dome could cost $831 billion over two decades. Japan and the U.S. have previously collaborated on ballistic missile defense, including the joint development of an interceptor capable of striking warheads in space. © Thomson Reuters 2025.

8 hours ago
How Social Media Is Reshaping Politics in Japan—for Better or Worse
Social media has rapidly become a force in Japanese politics—shaping public opinion and tipping the scales in national and local elections around Japan. What does this mean for political engagement, trust in mainstream institutions, and the future of Japanese democracy? The Internet and Political Engagement Most Japanese voters rarely observe political debates or take the time to follow policymaking directly, instead relying on the media to stay informed. For decades, that meant newspapers. National surveys by the Association for Promoting Fair Elections (APFE) showed that by the early 2000s, though, TV had overtaken newspapers as the main source of political information. Today, the Internet has surpassed both. At the same time, Ikeda Ken'ichi, an expert on voting behavior, notes that political participation in Japan remains low compared to other mature democracies. Japan's stable but stagnant political environment, dominated by entrenched political interests and personal political support groups, may dampen the motivation to vote. In an APFE survey conducted in the wake of the 2024 House of Representatives election, common reasons respondents gave for abstaining included 'no interest in elections' (24.3%), 'elections don't improve politics' (17.3%), and 'my vote doesn't matter' (11.6%). Young voter turnout in particular has hovered at about half the rate of older generations, raising serious concerns about the health of Japanese democracy. Yet the Internet, especially social media, has opened new doors for political engagement, particularly among those who feel alienated from mainstream politics. People who find traditional media coverage inadequate often turn to the Internet to explore issues on their own terms. Social platforms enable them to connect with others who share their views—or push back against those who see things differently. In a phenomenon known as 'filter bubbles,' users are increasingly exposed to content that matches their beliefs and engage with like-minded users in echo chambers, reinforcing their preexisting views. The political rise of Donald Trump in the United States has been driven by this dynamic. Social media has fueled political polarization, but it has also drawn more people into the political conversation and boosted turnout. In this way, social media acts as a double-edged sword for democracy. The Rise of Social Media Campaigns in Japan Gubernatorial elections in Tokyo and Hyōgo in 2024 showcased just how transformative social media can be. For candidates lacking traditional political capital—such as local support bases, funding, or name recognition—social media offered a vital battleground for guerrilla-style campaigning. Candidates livestreamed speeches, shared campaign events in real time, and rallied support online. These tactics brought a sense of immediacy and authenticity that resonated with many voters, especially those disillusioned with establishment politics, conventional media, or vested interests. This kind of impassioned support for political candidates was sometimes likened to oshikatsu—a term describing the enthusiasm and devotion fans show for their favorite idols. Such social-media-driven campaigns tend to center around charismatic individuals rather than 'faceless' party platforms or abstract policy debates. The Democratic Party for the People made major gains in the 2024 House of Representatives election, but analysis of the seventh Japanese Election Study political survey showed that social media users were not necessarily aligned with the policies advocated by the party or its leader, Tamaki Yūichirō. Rather, disillusioned voters active on social media appear to have been drawn to Tamaki personally, irrespective of his ideology. The flip side of social media politics is its susceptibility to manipulation. Slander, rumors, fake news, and eye-catching stunts can distort the political process. Globally, Internet-based misinformation campaigns, attacks on political opponents, and foreign interference have plagued elections since the 2010s. In Romania's 2024 presidential race, for example, support for an obscure, far-right candidate surged via social media—only to be later traced to foreign influence, leading to the annulment of the election. In Japan, concerns have arisen over possible violations of the Public Offices Election Act and the role of PR firms in manipulating social media narratives, prompting calls for clearer regulations and penalties. Long-Term Shifts in Voter Behavior Given these dynamics, can the Internet fundamentally reshape how Japanese people perceive politics or vote? In the short term, the effects are likely to vary depending on the type of election and the demographics involved. Urban areas with more young people, higher social media use, and a larger share of residents born elsewhere are fertile ground for online campaigns—especially in local, personality-driven races like the gubernatorial elections that were held in Tokyo and Hyōgo. But in rural regions with older populations and limited social media penetration, or in party-centered contests like national legislative races, the impact may be more muted. That said, recent developments—rising prices, rice shortages, geopolitical tensions, major accidents, and natural disasters—have shaken public confidence and intensified political frustration. As seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, such periods are conducive to conspiracy theories and misinformation, often spread via social media. When these conditions align, even short-term shifts in social and political awareness can occur. Meanwhile, long-term transformations are also underway. The 2024 APFE survey showed that older generations still rely on newspapers, middle-aged voters favor TV, and younger people increasingly turn to the Internet for political information. As generations shift, Internet influence is likely to grow. Another major change is the decline of traditional intermediary organizations like business associations, labor unions, and religious groups that once helped shape party-centered political identity and behavior. These groups play a key role in 'political socialization,' but as their influence wanes, individuals find fewer structured ways to understand and engage with politics. Instead, the Internet and online communities are gradually taking on that role. Over time, these changes may fundamentally reshape how Japanese voters think and act politically. Social media has proven to be a powerful tool for new political movements. But established players—with deeper pockets and greater organizational reach—could eventually learn to use it just as effectively and strategically, if not more so. Political success in a democracy hinges on effectively delivering one's message to large numbers of voters, and communication tools—social media included—are likely to continue to grow and evolve. The future of democracy will hinge on how well we navigate this evolving media environment. As AI-generated deepfakes and sophisticated misinformation campaigns become harder to detect, it will be critical for news organizations, monitoring groups, and platform companies to step up their fact-checking efforts. At the individual level, information literacy must be strengthened across all generations. This includes diversifying news sources, checking facts, and fostering critical thinking through discussion with others. Understanding political dynamics requires more than reacting to sensational headlines; it demands the ability to discern the broader structures behind them. Finally, civic education must also evolve, especially since the voting age was lowered to 18. Teaching young people how politics works and how to make informed electoral choices is crucial to sustaining a healthy democracy. (Originally published in Japanese. Banner photo: Saitō Motohiko, ousted as Hyōgo governor in a no-confidence vote, addresses a crowd of voters holding up smartphones on the final day of his reelection campaign, November 16, 2024. © Kyōdō.)