S. Korean posts misattribute unnamed White House official's remarks on 'Chinese election interference'
"The Guardian, UK: Lee Jae-myung was elected president due to China's election interference," reads part of a Korean-language X post shared on June 7, 2025.
The post features screenshots of an analysis The Guardian published on June 4, which looked at the issues facing Lee, from trade to diplomacy (archived link).
A paragraph from the article, which was also highlighted and translated into Korean, reads: "Inevitably, though, he will soon have to find a way to engage with Donald Trump's White House, whose initial reaction to Lee's resounding victory over his conservative opponent was to suggest that his bumpy path to power had been smoothed by Chinese interference in the vote."
The June 3 polls that elected Lee, triggered by the impeachment of former president Yoon Suk Yeol over his failed martial bid, were clouded by unsubstantiated claims of foreign interference, with South Korea's conservatives accusing Beijing of underhandedly backing progressive candidates.
Similar posts were shared elsewhere on X, as well as on Facebook, Threads and South Korea's DC Inside forum.
"Even the UK's left-leaning outlet The Guardian discusses Chinese election interference, yet only South Korean leftists remain unaware," read a comment on one of the posts.
Another said, "Britain has confirmed Lee Jae-myung was made president by China."
The Guardian article, however, does not say China interfered in the June 3 vote.
The analysis piece appears to be referring to remarks from an unnamed White House official in response to a request for comment from Reuters and the Yonhap News Agency after the election (archived here and here).
The official told the news agencies: "The US-ROK Alliance remains ironclad. While South Korea had a free and fair election, the United States remains concerned and opposed to Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world."
"The official did not elaborate on the reference to alleged Chinese interference or connect it directly to the South Korean election," the Reuters article adds, but notes that US President Donald Trump's right-wing allies have criticised Lee who has "spoken of the need to balance Seoul's relations with China and the United States".
The White House official's remarks stood in contrast to the congratulatory statement from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also reaffirmed the "ironclad" alliance between the countries (archived link). Rubio's statement made no mention of interference in the election.
AFP has previously debunked other misinformation surrounding the 2025 presidential election in South Korea.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Korea's Lee pledges support on trade issues in meeting with top conglomerates
SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korean President Lee Jae-myung said on Friday that his government would focus on easing regulations and helping companies on trade issues. His comments were made at a meeting with heads of top conglomerates and other business leaders. He sat between Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee and Hyundai Motor Group Executive Chair Euisun Chung. SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won also attended the meeting, according to the president's office. The future of South Korea's export-oriented economy may hinge on what kind of tariff deal Lee can strike with U.S. President Donald Trump, with all of his country's key sectors from chips to autos and shipbuilding heavily exposed to global trade. "Companies are currently having difficulties in international competition, and we will focus on minimising the difficulties they are experiencing in international competition and expanding their economic territory," Lee said at the meeting. "Please tell us what we should do regarding overseas trade situations, and we will do our best to align with those," he told the executives. Lee, a liberal, was elected on June 3 with promises to become business-friendly.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to attend security meeting on Friday after Israeli strikes on Iran
By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump will attend a National Security Council meeting on Friday morning, the White House said late on Thursday after Israeli strikes on Iran that have put the Middle East on edge. The meeting will be held at 11 am ET (1500 GMT) on Friday, the White House said. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Israel said early on Friday Middle East time and late Thursday U.S. time that it had struck Iran to block Tehran from developing atomic weapons, and Iranian media and witnesses reported explosions including at the country's main uranium enrichment facility. U.S. top diplomat Marco Rubio called Israel's strikes against Iran a "unilateral action" and said Washington was not involved while also urging Tehran not to target U.S. interests or personnel in the region. The U.S. State Department said late on Thursday that the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem has directed all U.S. government employees and their family members to shelter in place until further notice. CONTEXT Trump had been seeking a new nuclear deal to place limits on Iran's disputed uranium enrichment activities but the talks have appeared to be deadlocked. Trump said earlier on Thursday an Israeli strike on Iran "could very well happen" but reiterated hopes for a peaceful resolution. The U.S. military is planning for the full range of contingencies in the Middle East, including the possibility that it might have to help evacuate American civilians, a U.S. official told Reuters. SECURITY ALERT BY U.S. EMBASSY A security alert by the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem said the security environment was complex and could change quickly. In response to security incidents and without advance notice, the U.S. embassy may further restrict or prohibit U.S. government employees and their family members from traveling to certain areas of Israel and the Israeli-occupied West Bank, the State Department said.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration seeks to distance US from Israeli strikes on Iran
By Steve Holland WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's administration sought to distance the United States on Thursday from Israel's strikes on Iran, attacks that are likely to complicate Trump's drive for a nuclear deal with Tehran. Israel said it had struck Iranian nuclear targets to block Tehran from developing atomic weapons, even as the Trump administration was preparing to hold a sixth round of talks on Sunday on Tehran's escalating uranium enrichment program. Marco Rubio, Trump's secretary of state and national security adviser, stressed that Israel's strikes were unilateral, while saying the U.S. had known attacks would occur. "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense." Just hours before the strikes, Trump had urged a diplomatic solution to the tensions, while saying a strike on Iran "could very well happen." Iran says its nuclear energy program is only for peaceful purposes, although the International Atomic Energy Agency on Thursday declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. Rubio had a stark warning for Iran, a day after the United States ordered some U.S. personnel to leave the Middle East in response to tensions in the area. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel," he said. His statement did not mention whether Washington would support Israel if it faces retaliatory strikes, a standard line in the past. Trump has been increasingly at odds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over both Iran and his handling of the Israel's war in Gaza, wanting to seal a deal with Tehran and accelerate food aid into Gaza. Trump and Netanyahu spoke on Monday, and Trump told reporters the main topic was Iran. Speaking to reporters on Thursday, he suggested an Israeli attack was imminent. "Well, I'd love to avoid conflict. Iran's going to have to negotiate a little tougher, meaning they're going to have to give us some things that they're not willing to give us right now," he said. Retaliation by Iran for Israel's strikes could put U.S. troops and diplomats around the region at risk, given that the United States is Israel's main backer. Security concerns had risen since Trump said on Wednesday that U.S. personnel were being moved out of the region because "it could be a dangerous place" and that Tehran would not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. Washington and Tehran on Thursday had announced plans for another round of talks on Sunday in Oman between U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi. Whether that meeting will take place is now unclear. A Witkoff spokesperson did not immediately respond to a query. (Reporting By Steve Holland; Editing by Don Durfee and William Mallard)