Charity faces legal action after relocated elephants in Malawi allegedly kill 10 people
People living on the edge of a protected area in Malawi are taking legal action against an NGO that moved more than 250 elephants into the area, which they say have killed at least 10 people.
Villagers near Kasungu national park, which is Malawi's second largest and crosses the Zambian border, say they are living in fear for their livelihoods and safety after 263 elephants were introduced in July 2022, causing a sharp spike in human-wildlife conflict. Ten people claiming to be affected by the translocation from Liwonde national park have begun legal action against the International Fund for Animal Welfare (Ifaw), demanding that the conservation NGO construct adequate fencing to protect the 167 villages around the park and compensate local people for the damage caused by the elephants.
More than 50 children were orphaned between July 2022 and November 2024 as a result of the translocated elephants, according to local communities. Among the 10 people killed were John Kayedzeka, 31, who was trampled by a herd while working in a field in September 2022 and Masiye Phiri, 31, who died after she was charged by a bull elephant while in the garden with her two-year-old child a year later.
One farmer from Zambia said he was walking across his farm when he came across two elephants and a calf, which charged. 'I couldn't run away in time. They stepped on me and then broke off branches and covered me in them,' he said.
'I was in Lumezi hospital for four months while my wounds healed … Since that incident, my stomach is swollen on one side. I don't know what is wrong. I can't straighten my arm, so I can't farm. I depend on the well wishes of others to survive,' the 53-year-old said. 'I am very afraid to move around on my own, so I tend to stay at home alone. I am in pain all of the time.'
Two deaths do not directly involve elephants but have been blamed on the translocation: one person was killed by a hippo displaced by elephants and another by hyenas believed to be trailing the mammals out of the park. Local people say that elephants are also routinely raiding their crops and trampling fields, threatening their livelihoods.
The UK law firm Leigh Day has been instructed to act on behalf of the 10 people against Ifaw in the UK, Zambia and Malawi, potentially bringing the case to the high court in England. Claimants have not been named so far to protect their identities. While elephants have long been in the park, with populations falling due to poaching, local people said the spike in human-wildlife conflict started after the translocation.
'My farmland has been destroyed five times. Three times in April 2024. Twice in May 2024. I was growing maize, sugarcane, rice and beans. Everything was destroyed,' said one 73-year-old farmer. 'Before the relocation, sometimes I could harvest 35 bags of rice. This year, I have nothing.'
Another farmer who lives on the Zambian side of the park, whose father-in-law was killed by the animals, is also part of the case.
'My father-in-law was old and he didn't manage to run away and they trampled him, and he was killed. The news spread across the community and the community members went to help but he had already died,' she said.
In a statement, Ifaw said it had received notice of legal action in December and rejected allegations of wrongdoing.
'Ifaw is deeply saddened by all cases of human-wildlife conflict in and around Kasungu, where it has been working to support government and communities develop sustainable solutions for reducing human-wildlife conflict and promote coexistence,' a spokesperson said, highlighting that Malawi's government had overall responsibility for its national parks. Ifaw provided technical and financial support, following international best practice while moving the elephants, they said.
The elephant translocation was among the largest of its kind and images of the operation were used for fundraising, with pictures of the mammals being lifted by crane described as 'scenes reminiscent of the Disney classic Dumbo'. It was a three-way operation between Malawi's national park service and two NGOs: Ifaw and African Parks.
Another claimant in the case said they hoped to live in peace with the elephants and wanted the NGO to take steps to protect them.
'We need the owners of the elephants to compensate us, they need to barrier the park, if they don't barrier the park, they should find another way to protect us and our crops. We want to claim the damage and barrier the park. If it is like this next year how are we going to live? We can't be removed from this place. These are our ancestral places, inherited. If we moved it would take a very long time to settle and start over,' they said.
'We can't do anything as we are just human beings – we know the law, we can't attack the elephants. We want to ensure there is protection. We are peace-loving people, we don't want to have a war between us and the elephants. We just want peace.'
Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
17 hours ago
- BBC News
St Albans mental heath unit pays £2.5m damages to former patients
More than 60 former patients of a teen psychiatric unit have each been awarded a five-figure sum in damages totalling more than £ settlement is for patients at Hill End Adolescent Unit in St Albans, Hertfordshire, who were subject to alleged sexual abuse or mistreatment during the late 1960s to early Burridge, 59, who was admitted twice aged 13, said: "The violence was for the sake of it."Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, which now provides mental health services in the county, said it was "deeply sorry to those people who had such a traumatic and unacceptable experience". A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care said: "Apologies have been issued for the events at Hill End and we will do everything in our power to make sure other families do not suffer such an appalling breach of trust in the future." Mr Burridge said he was forcibly sedated and "in my case there was a huge amount of sexual abuse".He spent almost 300 days at Hill End after being admitted twice - from May 1979 to September 1979 and from March to September described his time there as "like some experiment".He recalled the staff members using physical violence if they felt the children were not being claims have been settled under a compensation scheme launched in July last year by law firm Leigh Day on behalf of about 90 former were unlawfully sedated and/or subjected to physical or sexual abuse or mistreatment during the time they lived at the unit which was set up for young people aged under follows an investigation by Hertfordshire Police which concluded there was "insufficient evidence" to support any prosecution and no arrests were made. Leigh Day partner Emma Jones, who has been working with clients from Hill End for more than seven years, said: "The claims are being settled, but not, at times without a further battle, for my already vulnerable clients."She added: "Despite Victoria Atkins, the then secretary of state for health and social care in her apology letter recognising how incredibly difficult it must be for my clients to have to relive their trauma, this is exactly what a number of them are being forced to do in order to justify what happened to them." Mr Burridge said: "Only a few who worked at Hill End will remain working in the field, but I think it is safe to say that those who do, will have some seniority, and they can influence how care delivery methods are implemented, and that includes dangerous, abusive and damaging working practice."We need a concerted effort that challenges the official bodies and government to strengthen the policies and bring about sustainable change."He added that there should be more robust protections for Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust said: "The legal process is ongoing and we are not aware of any outstanding claims that are waiting for the trust to respond."A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care said: "Every patient deserves to be treated with dignity, care and safety." Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Guardian
02-06-2025
- The Guardian
Disabled woman killed herself after DWP mistakenly withdrew benefits
A disabled woman killed herself after her benefits were mistakenly stopped leaving notes saying she had no food, could not pay bills and was in 'debt, debt, debt'. At a rare second inquest into the death of Jodey Whiting, her mother blamed the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) for her suicide in 2017. Joy Dove told the hearing in Middlesbrough: 'I know for a fact. It was the DWP that caused it … I'm sorry, I've got to say it.' A coroner, Clare Bailey, recorded a conclusion of suicide which, she said, had been precipitated by the mistaken withdrawal of benefits by the DWP. Afterwards Dove said it was not a one-off failing by the DWP. 'The way they have treated some of their most vulnerable claimants is absolutely disgraceful.' She added: 'It should not have taken an eight-year fight for justice to get where we are today. It has been an uphill battle to get answers and accountability.' Merry Varney, a solicitor for Leigh Day representing Whiting's family, said the cause of death was the same for many other families: 'the DWP'. Whiting, a mother of nine children, was 42 and housebound, unable to walk even a few steps, when she took her own life, the inquest heard. It followed the stopping of her employment and support allowance because, the DWP said, she had failed to attend a medical assessment. She was deemed fit to work and was told she would also lose her housing and council tax benefits. Dove said the reason why she had not attended was because she had been in hospital, with pneumonia, at the time. She recalled seeing her daughter 'shaking and crying', feeling ashamed and embarrassed and saying she had lost hope of ever getting her benefits back. Dove said she was sure that the stress of losing her benefits was the trigger for her daughter to decide to take her own life. 'I know my daughter and I know it was [that].' The first inquest into Whiting's death lasted 37 minutes, her family said, and heard no evidence relating to the DWP decision. Dove has fought a long and relentless legal battle for a second, fuller inquest, going all the way to the court of appeal. That took place at Teesside magistrates court on Monday with the inquest hearing of Whiting's physical and mental health problems which included chronic pain, making her dependent on opiates. Dove described her daughter as 'the most caring person ever', the 'perfect daughter' and someone 'not afraid to show her feelings'. Extracts from notes found alongside prescription drugs in Whiting's flat in Stockton-on-Tees were read in court. Bridget Dolan KC, the coroner's counsel, said: 'She wrote about not being able to pay her bills and having no food. 'In some she wrote about feeling breathless and having back pain and trying to pay her bills and being in debt.' Another note stated: 'I have had enough.' One note ended with the words: 'Debt, debt, debt.' An independent case examiner report on the decision to remove Whiting's benefits found that mistakes had been made and her payments should not have been withdrawn. Helga Swidenbank, a director at the DWP responsible for accessibility and disability services, said the department should have recognised that Whiting had 'good cause' not to attend a health assessment, given her illnesses and mental health concerns. She said opportunities were missed to identify Whiting's vulnerabilities and people who worked for the department at the time were 'deeply regretful and very sorry' for what happened. Swidenbank was not at the department in 2017 but said she thought staff were not as 'tuned into mental health disabilities' as they should have been. She added: 'I understand that there is a culture shift from being process-driven to being much more compassionate.' The department's processes have changed but work still needed to be done, she said. 'We are a work in progress.' The coroner said she was sorry that Whiting's family had had to 'walk such a long road' and described Dove's persistence and resilience as remarkable. She recorded a conclusion that Whiting's death was suicide 'in the context of a deteriorating mental state, precipitated by the withdrawal of state benefits'. But she said she had heard of many changes and new structures at the DWP which left her satisfied that no wider recommendations were needed.
The Guardian
27-05-2025
- The Guardian
Another Windrush generation man has UK deportation order revoked
A Windrush generation man who was wrongly excluded from the UK by the Home Office has had his deportation order revoked in the second case of its kind to come to light in the space of a week. Gersham Williams, 74, who first arrived in the UK in 1961 at the age of 10, was deported in August 2016 after being convicted of and serving a sentence in relation to a firearms conspiracy conviction. He has now had his deportation order revoked after the Home Office told him he should have been exempt due to the date he arrived in the UK, which was before the Immigration Act 1971. That law granted indefinite leave to remain to many Commonwealth citizens settled in the UK. However, while the rest of his family became British citizens, Williams decided he did not need to obtain a British passport because, he said, Jamaica was 'ruled by the Queen of England' at that time. His case follows that of Winston Knight, who had lived in the UK for 47 years before being deported. The Home Office agreed to fly Knight back to the UK after accepting he was a member of the Windrush generation and revoking his deportation order. Knight lived on the streets of Jamaica for more than a decade. Williams's solicitor, Jacqueline McKenzie of Leigh Day, said: 'I am of the view that cases like these are probably amongst many.' McKenzie said she was asking the Home Office to 'intensify its efforts' to provide information on people from Commonwealth countries who were settled in the UK before January 1973 and who were deported, in order to 'start an effective programme of outreach and engagement'. She also called for the government 'to agree to a statutory inquiry so that we can understand not just the causes of the Windrush scandal, but review its ongoing manifestation'. Williams is in a state of poor health in Jamaica, with neurological and urological problems. He has difficulties walking and has struggled to survive there. Although the Home Office has revoked his deportation, before being removed from the UK Williams had received an IPP – imprisonment for public protection – sentence. Officials have warned him in a letter that due to his IPP sentence, he could be sent back to prison on arrival in the UK. The letter states: 'You will therefore be liable to be returned to prison to serve the remainder of your sentence.' Speaking from Jamaica, Williams said he did not accept that the conviction that led to his deportation was sound. 'When I was in the UK the police would never leave me alone, that's the reason I'm in Jamaica now,' he said. 'The Home Office has accepted they were wrong to deport me but I'm not returning to the UK to go back to prison. I don't belong there. I want to get an assurance from the UK government that I can come back here as a free man. I have not committed any crimes in my nine years in Jamaica. My priority is freedom of movement.' Williams was politically active when he was living in Ladbroke Grove in west London, helping to establish Grassroots, a bookshop and centre for black art and culture. He trained as a youth and community worker and helped support young black people subjected to police harassment. He attended the 11th World Festival of Youth and Students in 1978 in Cuba alongside people such as Paul Boateng, now a Labour peer. He befriended Winnie Mandela on her visits to London and she invited him to Nelson Mandela's inauguration. 'I come from injustice and I still speak truth to power,' he said. The Guardian published a report about a July 1983 conviction received by Williams and two others for an armed hold-up of a petrol station. The court heard that he had described himself as a Robin Hood raising money for community projects and told police: 'You people sold my people into slavery and I'm fighting back.' McKenzie said: 'Each day that passes worsens the injustice for this family because Mr Williams is elderly, unwell and has been living in very austere conditions. I hope all arrangements will be now put in place, swiftly, to reunite him with his loved ones.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'It is our longstanding policy not to comment on individual cases; however, it is also this government's determination to ensure that all those affected by the Windrush scandal are treated with the upmost care and consideration in their future dealings with the Home Office, and that principle will guide our approach in all such cases.'
