Tánaiste to include services from Israeli settlements in trade ban
The Tánaiste has vowed to include the provision of services to legislation that will ban imports from Israeli settlements if it stands up to legislative scrutiny.
Simon Harris also said he wants to put pressure on the other 26 European countries to consider banning trade with occupied Palestinian territories, and called on opposition parties to contact their counterparts in the bloc.
Advertisement
Mr Harris said Ireland is the only country to publish legislation to ban imports from the occupied Palestinian territories, saying it is 'pretty lonely out there', adding it would be 'a hell of a lot better' if Europe moved together on it.
The legislation was approved by the Cabinet on Tuesday morning.
Mr Harris brought forward the renamed Israeli Settlements (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025.
The Government opted for fresh legislation instead of progressing the Occupied Territories Bill, first tabled in 2018.
Advertisement
It will now go before an Oireachtas committee for examination.
Mr Harris said that every Government TD will be expected to back the legislation as it forms part of the Programme for Government.
'Let's not forget one thing before we get into the detail of the legislation, there isn't another country in the European Union that you can visit today and ask a government minister about their Bill to ban trade and the detail of it, because they don't have one,' he added.
'We're the first country in the European Union to take this step. We're the first country in the European Union say, yes, trade is a European competency, and it'll be a hell of a lot better if Europe moves together, and a hell of a lot more impactful.
Advertisement
'But in the absence of Europe moving together, we're going to go ahead with our own domestic legislation.
'I would really ask the opposition here not to do this lazy politicking of you know, opposition good, government bad. Everybody in this country is sickened to the pit of their stomach with the genocide they see in Gaza.
'They don't care, the people of Ireland, who they vote for in an election in relation to this, they just know in their gut what is happening, particularly children in Gaza, is genocide is wrong, and everyone has to do everything they want.
'I have no policy difference, zero policy difference with the opposition in relation to the inclusion of services, but we do have a Constitution, we are members of the European Union, and I'm not in the business of putting together legislation that would fall at the first legal hurdle.
Advertisement
'I presume everybody here wants to pass a law that is impactful, a law that is in compliance with the laws of our land.'
Earlier this week, a number of countries, including Ireland, asked the European Commission to examine how goods produced in illegal Jewish settlements 'can be brought into line with international law'.
Mr Harris said he does not believe the European Union has made itself compliant with the ICJ advisory opinion.
'We will do our own legislation, (I am) open to services, absolutely open to working constructively with the opposition, but also keep the pressure on at the European level,' he added.
Advertisement
'What I hope the opposition will be doing today, every opposition leader should be picking up the telephone, and they should be ringing their counterparts in European countries and saying, 'hey, have you seen here in Ireland we're bringing forward a domestic legislation, would you think about doing it yourself?
'Because so far, it's pretty lonely out there. There's not one other country in Europe that has published any legislation to ban trade, and I'd really appreciate the opposition's help with their counterparts in the 26 other European states.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
6 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Swinney apology to Gypsy Travellers ‘significant milestone', campaigner says
Roseanna McPhee welcomed the apology, which she said was the result of years of campaigning. John Swinney made the formal apology at Holyrood on Thursday over 'unfair and unjust policies' that caused 'trauma' in what was known as the 'tinker experiment'. Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called experiment – supported by councils and the UK Government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of Gypsy Travellers, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in. A report published by the Scottish Government stated that 'the context within which the TE (tinker experiment) occurred is best understood as cultural genocide'. Ms McPhee, whose family was among those settled in Pitlochry on the former Bobbin Mill site, had grown up in a prefabricated Second World War-style Nissen hut which had no electricity and used candles for light. She welcomed the First Minister's apology, but said more needed to be done to stop the discrimination that her community continues to face. First Minister @JohnSwinney has apologised in @ScotParl for historical policies affecting Gypsy/Traveller communities, acknowledging they were unacceptable and caused enduring harm. More information here: — Scot Gov Fairer (@ScotGovFairer) June 25, 2025 She told the PA news agency: 'It's a milestone that we have reached in our long, long campaign, with no resources and just two or three generals and few food soldiers, really, because most people want to hide. 'I think the fact we managed to achieve that apology from the Government is a significant milestone. 'We're hopeful that discussions shall move forward, and perhaps something may be done about the general level of racism which we suffer, particularly in relation to public bodies.' Ms McPhee said the apology could have been 'more robust' and expressed disappointment that Mr Swinney did not label the Tinker Experiment as 'cultural genocide', the description used in the report published by the Government. 'Cultural genocide is a crime against humanity,' she said. 'They did not name the offence. They did not say they took full responsibility of the offence. 'However, it's a positive step on the road towards the discussion around restitution and just satisfaction.' Asked if she believed the Scottish Government should offer redress to affected families, she said: 'I absolutely believe it. 'If you'd been kept in degrading conditions as long as I have, with 16 health conditions and prevented from working with a joint-honours degrees and two post-graduates I think you might see some reason to have redress too.'
Rhyl Journal
7 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Planning reforms could break housebuilders' ‘failed' dominance
Lord Best, who is vice president of the Town and Country Planning Association, hit out at the 'oligopoly' in the sector said the major firms for building homes had failed in their task of building enough. He told peers that small building firms were responsible for 10% of new homes since 2000, down from a previous figure of 40%. A Government report from 2024 found the 11 biggest housebuilders, including Barratt Homes, Taylor Wimpey and Persimmon made up 40% of all new homes built in 2021-22. The crossbench peer said: 'A key question hanging over the ambition to build 1.5 million more and better homes is, who will the nation entrust to get this job done? 'For many years, the answer for most house building has been 'we will let the volume housebuilders acquire the sites, come up with the plans, design and build the homes, and make their profits, while we try to require them to allocate a modest proportion of their output for affordable housing'. 'My lords, this reliance on the large housebuilders has not produced the quantity or quality of homes we need.' Lord Best's comments come a year after a report by the Competition and Markets Authority criticised the speculative model employed by many of the largest housebuilders. He added: 'It's led to so-called 'fleece-hold' sales to homebuyers, to uniform, soulless design, and with little attempt to provide the green spaces and community facilities that are the making of any place. 'And the housebuilders have worked at a rate that suits themselves, a build-out rate that ensures no reduction in house prices.' He said he believed the proposed development corporations, which form part of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill which was getting its second reading in the House of Lords on Wednesday, would make the Government less reliant on large firms which could see more homes built. '(It) enables the use of this development corporation model for any major development, introducing an alternative to the failed business model of the oligopoly of volume housebuilders,' he said. 'Here is the breakthrough that the Bill could achieve.' The Bill includes measures to help the Government achieve its central manifesto commitment of building 1.5 million homes by 2029. It restores mandatory housing targets, legislates for a generation of new towns, and will reform planning to make it harder to reject developments. The debate heard that there are 1,000,000 planning permission applications for homes that have gone unbuilt in England, with 250,000 in London. ONS figures showed fewer than 185,000 homes were completed in 2024. Housing minister Lord Khan of Burnley had hit out at his predecessor's 'mismatched territory of ill-fitting, short-termist reforms, tinkered around the edges rather than resolving our problems'. The Labour peer said the Bill could 'turn this around'. He said: 'Home building has fallen from already insufficient levels. There are simply not enough homes … this would be the lowest year for net-additional dwellings in England since 2015-16.' However, his opposite number, shadow housing minister Baroness Scott of Bybrook said: 'In 2019 the Conservative Party committed to delivering one million additional homes over the Parliament. In 2024, before the general election, we delivered on that commitment. 'The Labour Party has now committed to deliver 1.5 million homes over this Parliament, and it is essential that they deliver on that manifesto commitment.' Conservative former housing minister in John Major's governments, Lord Young of Cookham warned about a lack of planning officers in councils which could hamstring the Government's housebuilding hopes. Lord Young recalled a discussion with a senior economist from his time as a Treasury minister. He said: 'I suggested a new policy that had been tried in New Zealand. He said it may work in practice, but it doesn't work in theory. 'Now, the risk of this Bill is exactly the opposite. It may work in theory, but it won't work in practice unless planning departments are resourced.' Party colleague Lord Patten, who as John Patten served as education secretary in the 1990s, declared a shareholding in housebuilder Persimmon. He said: 'The record sadly shows that no Conservative or Labour government since 1945 have ever met their stated aspirations or hopes or pledges to build this, or that particular number of homes in any one year or in any one decade.' Tory peer Lord Lilley, who held ministerial positions under Mr Major and Margaret Thatcher said reforms to speed up the planning process were much-needed, as he decried sums spent on planning processes. He said: 'Virtually every housing project in my old constituency, and in indeed parts of the country, faced objections locally. We've created in effect, a 'vetocracy', objectors can impose such costs and delays on project developers that they can effectively veto those projects going ahead. 'We must find ways of reducing the power of that plutocracy and I welcome steps in this Bill to do that.'
BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wetin be di kasala wey dey happun wit di burial of former Zambia president, why di burial dey drag?
One South Africa court don pause di plans to bury former Zambian President Edgar Lungu for one private ceremony just as e dey about to start. Dem announce di news to mourners for South Africa afta dem finish one funeral mass. Dis na di latest twist inside one gbas-gbos between di goment and di Lungu family ova im burial. Di family bin decide to do private ceremony for South Africa, instead of full state funeral for dia kontri. Di Zambian goment bin file one urgent case for di Pretoria High Court to stop di burial wey im family dey plan. Di court tok say di funeral no go kontinu afta one "agreement between di parties" as e be now, e be like say no funeral go happun until August at di earliest. Di kasala dey come sake of one long-standing quarrel between Lungu and im successor, President Hakainde Hichilema, Lungu family tok say di late president indicate say make Hichilema no attend im funeral. Afta Lungu death for South Africa at di age of 68, di family wan dey in charge of di funeral arrangements, wey include bringing back im body, but di Zambian authorities wan control evritin. Afta plenty back and forth, di goment and di family later agree say e go get state funeral, bifor disagreement enta ova di exact arrangements, all dis wahala make di family decide to bury di late president for South Africa. President Hichilema dey argue say Oga Lungu, as a former president, "belong to di nation of Zambia" and dem suppose burial am for di kontri. For one address, President Hichilema tok say Lungu, as a former president, "belong to di nation of Zambia" and im body therefore suppose "dey buried in Zambia wit full honours, and no be for any oda nation". However, because of di row, e announce immediate end to di mourning period, e say di kontri need to "resume normal life". "Di goment don do evritin possible to engage wit di family of our departed sixth president," e tok. Di national mourning period initially run from 8 to 14 June but dem later extend am until 23 June, wit flags flying at half-mast and radio stations playing solemn music. President Hichilema and senior officials bin ready to receive Lungu coffin wit full military honours. However, Lungu family block di repatriation of im remains for di last minute, dem say goment go back on dia agreement ova di funeral plans. Di current disagreement ova Lungu burial highlight di tense relationship between im and im successor, wey play out in life and continue even in death. Wen Lungu be president, e lock Hichilema up for more dan 100 days on treason charges afta Hichilema motorcade allegedly refuse to make way for am. E bin take di intervention of di Commonwealth bifor e release Hichilema. Four years later, and afta five attempts at presidency, Hichilema defeat Lungu. Di Pretoria court give Zambian attorney general Mulilo D Kabesha until 4 July to submit im "amended notice of motion" in support of Lungu repatriation to Zambia. Im family get until 11 July to file dia opposing papers. "Dem go hear dis mata as special motion on di 4th of August 2025," di court tok. Dem go determine di costs of di urgent application then. Di Zambian goment argue say personal wishes no suppose override di greater public interest, as dem cite di case of founding President Kenneth Kaunda. For 2021, Kaunda family bin tok say im want make dem bury am next to im wife and no be di site wey goment allocate. However, di goment bin go ahead and dem bury Kaunda for Embassy Memorial Park for Lusaka. "Di High Court rule say national interest take precedence ova individual or family preferences bicos designated burial place dey for former presidents, and laid down set of protocol dey ground to handle those proceedings wey di state dey carry out, no be political party," Oga Mweetwa tok. Dis argument - about di state rights to dead president body - don play out many times across Africa. For 2019, Robert Mugabe die nearly two years afta im former right-hand man, Emmerson Mnangagwa unseat am as Zimbabwe president. Mugabe family no gree make dem bury am for di national Heroes' Acre,dem argue say im former colleagues betray am.
