Inside Asia's top military summit, where the world's generals and defense ministers meet at the glitzy Shangri-La Hotel
The Shangri-La Dialogue is the top summit in Asia for some of the world's most powerful military leaders.
They meet every year at a famed hotel in the heart of Singapore for three days.
There, Pete Hegseth accused China of preparing for war, while Beijing sent in a downgraded team.
When I arrived early on a Friday morning, the world's men and women of war were already collecting their keycards.
For 22 years, the Shangri-La Hotel in Singapore has hosted what's become Asia's biggest defense summit, which ran this year from May 30 to June 1. The Shangri-La Dialogue is an annual mass gathering of military leaders, with generals and ministers from 47 countries flooding into the 792-room hotel this year.
There, the war chiefs of five continents spent three days in elaborate, carefully choreographed diplomacy. Defense contractors dipped in and out of conference rooms on the sidelines, hoping to catch customers amid the flurry of closed-door bilateral meetings.
Security outside was simple but tight. One road leads into the Shangri-La, and one road leads out. Pairs of assault rifle-wielding men stood watchfully at checkpoints on every street corner.
But inside the building, security was surprisingly low-key. A freely accessible mezzanine opened up to a sprawling lobby where suits and one-stars mingled. In the lounge, sunlight spilled through the floor-to-ceiling windows as ministers held court.
There were no checkpoints at the hotel's entrance, where regular guests were still allowed to enter. Several asked me for directions as they wandered by with flip-flops and shopping bags. A few feet from where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met with the Thai delegation on Friday, two people were playing tennis.
"This would never happen in D.C.," an American reporter who flew in with the Pentagon press corps told me.
Past the metal detectors, generals and chiefs filed into meetings in the half-dozen or so private rooms upstairs. The Dialogue, bringing together leaders from Europe and Asia, is a rare chance for many to talk face-to-face.
Reuben Johnson, a defense journalist who's covered the event for 13 years, said attendance is a major sign of legitimacy on this side of the world.
"If you're not here, then you're left out of the game," he said.
Hegseth swung hard at China
It all comes together in the Shangri-La's Island ballroom, which requires a security check to enter. There, heads of state and top ministers addressed crowds of the military elite.
French President Emmanuel Macron opened the event, but the entire hotel was itching to hear what Hegseth, who announced his arrival days before, had to say.
"No one really knows what to expect," one staffer from a European embassy said of Hegseth, as we waited among a sea of delegates holding wine glasses in the foyer.
The speech was a chance for the second Trump administration, and a new face like Hegseth, to lay bare their intentions for the Asia Pacific, a region still reeling from some of the White House's steepest tariffs.
Hegseth's slot was on Saturday morning. In the first few sessions, the ballroom was so packed that staffers, colonels, and majors were stuck outside watching giant displays while their bosses sat within.
Some filtered into nearby viewing rooms, where aides scribbled furiously on notebooks and whispered to each other.
Hegseth spent much of his 35-minute address praising President Donald Trump and slamming Beijing, naming China over two dozen times.
"It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific," Hegseth told the audience.
Beijing was given an opening to strike back during a Q&A, but it threw a soft punch, asking Hegseth a rhetorical question about regional alliances.
When a Malaysian delegate quizzed Hegseth about the tariffs, the latter said he was in the "business of tanks, not trade."
After answering a few more questions, the secretary left the stage unscathed.
Zack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told me in the lobby that he felt Hegseth handled his talk "generally well."
"I think the bar was very low, and I think Hegseth passed. People expected him to come in with a fairly nationalistic speech, and he did that, but I think people also expected him to struggle in the Q&A session," he said.
Beijing barely put up a fight
A day before the forum opened, Beijing announced that, unlike previous years, its defense minister, Dong Jun, would not attend. Instead, a delegation from its military academy, led by Rear Adm. Hu Gangfeng, arrived at the hotel.
It was a major snub. A central part of the Dialogue is the chance to see the US and China face off in front of the military world's top dogs. Susannah Patton, the director of the Southeast Asia Program from Adelaide's Lowy Institute, described it to me as "gladiatorial."
"It's an opportunity missed," said Andrew Yang, a former national defense minister for Taiwan.
With Dong not showing up, the Dialogue's organizers discreetly deleted Beijing's plenary from the schedule. Hu instead spoke at a smaller panel just before dinner on Saturday.
Most of Beijing's defense was left to scholars at the event.
"China's forces have always been strengthening quickly, that is a fact," Da Wei, the director of Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy, said of Hegseth's accusation that China's military build-up signaled an intention for war.
The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement at midnight condemning Hegseth's speech.
"The remarks were filled with provocations and intended to sow division," it said.
China showed its teeth on Sunday
Though attendees waited for a potential US-China clash, the weekend's dramatic moment came after Hegseth flew home.
The Philippine defense chief, Gilberto Teodoro, was speaking at Sunday morning's plenary when he fielded barbed questions from two Chinese senior colonels.
The officers had publicly suggested that the Philippines could become, or already was, an American proxy state.
"If the proxy war in Europe needs to be ended, are you concerned that a proxy war in Asia might be launched?" Zhang asked.
Distracted aides looked up from their phones. China was taking a swing.
Teodoro dropped the diplomacy in his answer.
"Thank you for the propaganda spiels disguised as questions," he said.
The ballroom laughed and applauded. It was a rare moment of frankness amid the slow waltz of the last two days, where everyone, from lieutenant to minister, had danced around each other to the tune of defense-speak alliance acronyms and diplomatic buzzwords.
By early Sunday afternoon, when the Dialogue closed, many of the senior ministers and CEOs had already departed the Shangri-La for their next big appointment. Aides and officers traded their suits and dress uniforms for cargo shorts and sandals, speeding off in cabs to explore the city.
There was an air of disappointment among some of the journalists and analysts emptying out of the Shang. Dong's absence and the lack of a Chinese meeting with Hegseth, they said, had robbed much of the wind from the Dialogue's sails.
Johnson, the veteran defense journalist, wrote me a message before his flight back to Warsaw, telling me about what had changed in the last 13 years. He remembered the late Sen. John McCain, whom he said would attend the Dialogue and hold impromptu press conferences, speaking candidly to reporters about big-ticket issues like Teodoro had on Sunday morning. At the forum, Johnson said, no one had stepped in to fill McCain's shoes.
"His presence is sorely missed and even more sorely needed in these times," Johnson said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump renegotiating Biden-era Chips Act grants, Lutnick says
President Donald Trump's administration is renegotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said at a hearing on Wednesday, suggesting some awards may be axed. Some of the Biden-era grants "just seemed overly generous, and we've been able to renegotiate them," Lutnick told lawmakers on the Senate Appropriations Committee, adding the goal was to benefit American taxpayers. "All the deals are getting better, and the only deals that are not getting done are deals that should have never been done in the first place," Lutnick said, appearing to signal that not all the awards would survive renegotiation. Biden in 2022 signed the CHIPS and Science Act to plow $52.7 billion into boosting semiconductor chips manufacturing and research in the U.S. and luring chipmakers away from Asia. The program rolled out billions in grants for semiconductor heavyweights, including Taiwan's TSMC, South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix, as well as U.S.-based Intel and Micron. The grants, while signed, had only just begun to be disbursed by the time Biden left office. The details of those plans are not public but the money is meant to be disbursed as companies make progress toward their pledged plant expansions. Lutnick pointed to TSMC as an example of successful renegotiation. He said the chipmaker -- which won a $6 billion Chips Act award -- had increased by $100 billion its initial pledge to invest $65 billion in U.S. manufacturing. "We were able to modify the award for the same $6 billion of (government) funding," he said. TSMC announced the $100 billion in added investment in March but it was not immediately clear whether that was part of a renegotiation of its Chips Act award. TSMC declined to comment. Reuters reported in February that the White House was seeking to renegotiate the awards and had signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements. Lutnick also said the administration agrees with the goal of having more than 50% of global AI computing capacity in America, responding to concerns that deals like the one announced by Trump last month to allow the United Arab Emirates to buy advanced American artificial intelligence chips could deprive the United States of key AI computing power.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with 'hostile attitudes' to the US
President Trump has signed an order banning people from 12 countries from entering the US. He said Sunday's had shown "the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas". "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," he said in a video statement. The countries affected are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The White House said they posed a "very high risk" to the US and had poor screening and vetting to identify dangerous individuals. People from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will also face partial restrictions. Mr Trump's proclamation said America must ensure people entering don't have "hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles" - and don't support terror groups. The move echoes a controversial executive order enacted eight years ago during his first term, when he banned people from predominately Muslim countries. The countries initially targeted then were Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. said on Thursday that policy was a "key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil". His new list adds more countries, but notably removes Syria after Mr Trump met the country's leader recently on a trip to the Middle East. Athletes and their coaches competing in the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics, both of which are taking place in the US, will be exempt. Permanent US residents and existing visa holders are also among those unaffected. The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat to the US. The ban takes effect from 9 June but countries could be removed or added. The proclamation states it will be reviewed within 90 days, and every 180 days after, to decide if it should be "continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented". "These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information," said White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson. President Trump's first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a "Muslim ban". It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes - or held at US airports when they landed. Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign. It faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version of it in June 2018, with judges calling it "squarely within the scope of presidential authority".

USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen
Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen The White House investigation comes on top of similar inquiries at the Justice Department and a House committee. Show Caption Hide Caption Biden speaks in public for first time since cancer diagnosis Former president Joe Biden delivered his first public speech at a Memorial Day event in Delaware since his cancer diagnosis was announced. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump ordered an investigation of former President Joe Biden's alleged "cognitive decline" to determine who decided his signature should be applied to official documents by autopen. Trump's directive to the White House counsel, David Warrington, in consultation with Attorney General Pam Bondi, ratchets up the pressure behind Trump's longstanding criticism of Biden's mental ability. The probe comes amid similar inquiries at the Justice Department and in a House committee. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history," Trump wrote in his order. "The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts." But Biden has replied in a series of recent public appearances that he was in command of his faculties. He has also been critical of Trump, arguing that his successor was taking a hatchet to the Social Security Administration. "They are wrong,' Biden said of his alleged cognitive decline on ABC's "The View." Trump directed the investigation to cover whether Biden's aides coordinated to shield the public from information about Biden's mental and physical health. A new book, "Original Sin," describes aides shielding Biden from Cabinet secretaries and limiting his access. Biden recently revealed his diagnosis of prostate cancer. Trump also directed the investigation into how Biden took executive actions during his final years in office, to determine who ordered the autopen for granting clemencies or other presidential actions. Presidents have used autopens for decades under DOJ memo Presidents have used automated pens to mimic their signatures on documents for decades, often when away from the office, when Congress completed urgent legislation. Justice Department memos in 2002 and 2005 confirmed that a president could direct an aide to use an autopen to sign legislation that remains valid under the Constitution. "This memorandum confirms and elaborates upon our earlier advice that the President may sign a bill in this manner," the 2005 memo said. Biden pardoned his brother, James Biden, and other relatives for unspecified crimes during his final days in office. Biden had previously pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, after gun and tax convictions. At the Justice Department, pardon attorney Ed Martin said he would investigate Biden's pardons and use of the autopen. Congressional Republicans have long argued that the president profited from his son's and brother's overseas business deals, which the family denied. The chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, Rep. James Comer, R-Kentucky, asked former Biden aides to sit for transcribed interviews about his mental fitness for office. Trump notes special counsel's finding about Biden's condition Trump's order highlights a particular sore point involving the different treatment of him and Biden in retaining classified documents after leaving office. Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith charged Trump with unlawfully retaining more than 100 classified documents at his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, where they were retrieved 18 months after he left office during an FBI search. The charges were dropped when Trump was elected to a second term under a policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Robert Hur decided against charging Biden for classified documents found at his Delaware home and a Washington, D.C., office during a search Biden invited. Hur concluded jurors would have found Biden "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.' "For years, President Biden suffered from serious cognitive decline," Trump wrote. "The Department of Justice, for example, concluded that, despite clear evidence that Biden had broken the law, he should not stand trial owing to his incompetent mental state."