logo
Israel welcomes ‘all help' in striking Iran

Israel welcomes ‘all help' in striking Iran

The Sun5 hours ago

JERUSALEM: Israel on Thursday welcomed 'all help' in striking Iran's nuclear sites as President Donald Trump dangled the prospect of US involvement in the war, saying he will decide 'within the next two weeks'.
Israel, claiming Iran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon, launched air strikes against its arch-enemy last week, triggering deadly exchanges.
After an Iranian missile hit an Israeli hospital on Thursday, in an attack that Tehran said targeted a military and intelligence base, Defence Minister Israel Katz issued a threat against Iran's supreme leader, spiking tensions in the week-old war.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran would 'pay a heavy price' for the strike on Soroka Hospital in the southern city of Beersheba that left 40 people injured and the facility in flames.
In an televised interview later on Thursday, Netanyahu said Israel is 'capable of striking all of Iran's nuclear facilities' but 'all help is welcome'.
'Trump will do what is good for for the United States, and I will do what is good for the State of Israel,' Netanyahu told public broadcaster Kan.
Citing 'the fact that there's a substantial chance' to resume nuclear negotiations with Iran -- which had been derailed by the Israeli attacks -- Trump said in a statement he will decide 'whether or not to go within the next two weeks'.
Trump said on Wednesday that Iran had asked to send officials to the White House to negotiate a deal on its nuclear programme and end the conflict with Israel.
Iran denied it would do so, but its Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is due to attend nuclear talks in Geneva on Friday with top diplomats from France, Britain, Germany and the European Union, officials and diplomats said.
Meanwhile Russia, an Iranian ally, told the United States that joining the conflict would be an 'extremely dangerous step'.
Katz, in a stark warning for supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told reporters: 'He considers the destruction of the State of Israel to be a goal. Such a man can no longer be allowed to exist.'
Asked whether Israel plans to kill Khamenei, Netanyahu said: 'No one is immune.'
The latest escalation came on the seventh day of deadly exchanges between the two countries that have plunged the region into a new crisis, more than 20 months into the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip.
- Panic -
At Soroka, hospital director Shlomi Codish said 40 people were injured.
'Several wards were completely demolished and there is extensive damage across the entire hospital,' he said.
'It's only medical professionals here, and patients... and look what happened to us,' ophthalmologist Wasim Hin told AFP.
World Health Organization director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called attacks on health facilities 'appalling', while UN rights chief Volker Turk said civilians were being treated as 'collateral damage'.
In Iran, people fleeing Israel's attacks described frightening scenes and difficult living conditions, including food shortages and limited internet access.
'Those days and nights were very horrifying... hearing sirens, the wailing, the danger of being hit by missiles,' University of Tehran student Mohammad Hassan told AFP, after returning to his native Pakistan.
'People are really panicking,' a 50-year-old Iranian pharmacist who did not want to be named told AFP at the Kapikoy crossing on the Turkish border.
Any US involvement would be expected to involve the bombing of a crucial underground Iranian nuclear facility in Fordo, using specially developed bunker-busting bombs.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump told aides he had approved attack plans but was holding off to see if Iran would give up its nuclear programme.
The US president had favoured a diplomatic route to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran has consistently denied -- seeking a deal to replace the 2015 agreement he tore up in his first term.
- Nuclear sites -
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed Iran was 'a couple of weeks' away from producing an atomic bomb.
'All they need is a decision from the supreme leader to do that,' she told reporters.
Iran had been enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far above the 3.67-percent limit set by the 2015 deal, but still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead.
Israel has maintained ambiguity on its own arsenal, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute says it has 90 nuclear warheads.
A key Iranian government body, the Guardian Council, threatened a 'harsh response' if 'the criminal American government and its stupid president... take action against Islamic Iran'.
On Thursday, Israel said it struck 'dozens' of Iranian targets overnight, including the partially built Arak nuclear reactor and a uranium enrichment facility in Natanz.
Iranian atomic energy agency chief Mohammad Eslami confirmed in a letter to the UN nuclear watchdog that the Arak reactor was hit, demanding action to stop Israel's 'violation of international regulations'.
Iranian media reported blasts in Tehran late Thursday, while the Revolutionary Guards said more than 100 'combat and suicide' drones were launched at Israel.
In the central Israeli city of Bat Yam, the body of a Ukrainian woman was found in a site hit on Sunday, taking the death toll in Israel from Iranian missiles since Friday to 25 people according to authorities.
Iran said Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil set to rise for third week on escalating Israel-Iran conflict
Oil set to rise for third week on escalating Israel-Iran conflict

The Star

time20 minutes ago

  • The Star

Oil set to rise for third week on escalating Israel-Iran conflict

SINGAPORE: Oil prices were on track to rise for the third straight week despite slipping on Friday, with investors on edge as the week-old war between Israel and Iran showed no signs of either side backing down. Brent crude futures fell $1.57 cents, or 2%, to $77.28 a barrel by 0030 GMT. On a weekly basis, it was up 3.9%. The U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for July - which did not settle on Thursday as it was a U.S. holiday and expires on Friday - was up 86 cents, or 1.1%, to $76. The more liquid WTI for August rose 0.7%, or 50 cents to $74. Prices jumped almost 3% on Thursday as Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, and Iran fired missiles and drones at Israel after hitting an Israeli hospital overnight. "Oil prices remain high due to doubled tanker rates and ships avoiding the Strait of Hormuz," said Phil Flynn, analyst at The Price Futures Group. "The risk to supply is keeping them on edge while there have been no major disruptions of Iranian exports," Flynn said. Iran is the third-largest producer among members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day of crude oil. About 18 million to 21 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast, and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows in a blow to supplies. There was no sign of an exit strategy from either side, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tehran's "tyrants" would pay the "full price" and Iran warned against a "third party" joining the attacks. The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump will decide whether the U.S. will get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks. "The "two-week deadline" is a tactic Trump has used in other key decisions. Often these deadlines expire without concrete action,.. which would see the crude oil price remain elevated and potentially build on recent gains," said Tony Sycamore, analyst at IG. - Reuters

60 per cent of Americans don't think US should get involved in Israel-Iran conflict
60 per cent of Americans don't think US should get involved in Israel-Iran conflict

Sinar Daily

timean hour ago

  • Sinar Daily

60 per cent of Americans don't think US should get involved in Israel-Iran conflict

US President Donald Trump said Thursday that he will decide on whether or not to carry out strikes on Iran within two weeks. 20 Jun 2025 10:15am White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt takes questions from reporters during the daily briefing in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on June 19, 2025. US President Donald Trump on Thursday said he will decide whether to attack Iran within a fortnight, as Israel and its regional rival continued to trade fire for a seventh day. (Photo by Alex WROBLEWSKI / AFP) WASHINGTON - A majority of Americans do not want the US to get involved in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, according to a poll released this week. The Economist/YouGov poll found that just 16 per cent of Americans believe the US military should intervene in the conflict, while a clear majority - 60 per cent - oppose involvement and 24 per cent remain undecided, Anadolu Ajansi reported citing the poll. A woman holds a heart shaped sign in the colors of the Iranian flag as protesters rally during a "No War on Iran" demonstration outside the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles on June 18, 2025. US President Donald Trump said on June 18 that he was still deciding whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran, claiming Tehran now wants talks at the White House but may have waited too long. (Photo by Apu GOMES / AFP) Majorities across party lines -- 65 per cent of Democrats, 61per cent of Independents and 53 per cent of Republicans -- oppose US involvement, reflecting broad bipartisan resistance to entering the conflict. The poll was conducted among 1,512 US adult citizens and the margin of error for the overall sample was approximately 3 per cent. US President Donald Trump said Thursday that he will decide on whether or not to carry out strikes on Iran within two weeks. "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," Trump said in a statement read aloud by White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt. The announcement came as Trump faces an internal rift within his Republican base over whether or not he should join Israel's campaign against Iran. Prominent voices including media personality Tucker Carlson, Trump strategist Steve Bannon, Sen. Rand Paul and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene have warned against the president becoming involved in direct military action. Many have voiced criticism that direct involvement would lead to Trump becoming entangled in another costly foreign intervention, something he vocally campaigned against while running for president. - BERNAMA-ANADOLU

US court lets Trump retain control of California National Guard for now
US court lets Trump retain control of California National Guard for now

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

US court lets Trump retain control of California National Guard for now

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Marines stand watch as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and federal immigration sweeps during a No Kings Day demonstration in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder/File Photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court let Donald Trump on Thursday retain control over California's National Guard while the state's Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Republican president's use of the troops to quell protests and unrest in Los Angeles. A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals extended a pause it placed on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's June 12 ruling that Trump had called the National Guard into federal service unlawfully. Breyer's ruling was issued in a lawsuit against Trump's action brought by Governor Gavin Newsom. Breyer ruled that Trump violated the U.S. law governing a president's ability to take control of a state's National Guard by failing to coordinate with the governor, and also found that the conditions set out under the statute to allow this move, such as a rebellion against federal authority, did not exist. Breyer ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom. Hours after Breyer acted, the 9th Circuit panel put the judge's move on hold temporarily. Amid protests and turmoil in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration raids, the president on June 7 took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops against the wishes of Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard. Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marine Corps mobilization. At a court hearing on Tuesday on whether to extend the pause on Breyer's decision, members of the 9th Circuit panel questioned lawyers for California and the Trump administration on what role, if any, courts should have in reviewing Trump's authority to deploy the troops. The law sets out three conditions under which a president can federalize state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" against the government or a situation in which the U.S. government is unable with regular forces to execute the country's laws. The Justice Department has said that once the president determines that an emergency that warrants the use of the National Guard exists, no court or state governor can review that decision. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in the second most-populous U.S. city. The protests in Los Angeles lasted for more than a week, but subsequently ebbed, leading Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to lift a curfew she had imposed. California argued in its June 9 lawsuit that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violated the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The lawsuit stated the situation in Los Angeles was nothing like a "rebellion." The protests involved sporadic acts of violence that state and local law enforcement were capable of handling without military involvement, according to the lawsuit. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they are instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The 9th Circuit panel is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York and Kanishka Singh in Washington, Editing by Will Dunham and Alexia Garamfalvi)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store