logo
The lived experiences of communism should serve as a cautionary tale

The lived experiences of communism should serve as a cautionary tale

Al Jazeera25-02-2025

In Sunday's general elections in Germany, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) came second for the first time since World War II. Its electoral success is part of a Europe-wide trend of far-right resurgence that has worried many. As a university lecturer, I have observed that as a reaction to this phenomenon, many young people are becoming interested in far-left ideologies, such as communism. Students study Karl Marx as a key political thinker and often admire the old ideas of Marxism and the writings of other communist ideologues for their critique of class relations and capitalism.
As young people engage with these ideologies, it is important for them to be aware that they did not remain just theories. Communism was applied as a political ideology of the Marxist-Leninist parties in dozens of countries in Europe and Asia, which resulted in repressive totalitarian regimes.
The communist regime in my country, Czechia, which in the 1940s was part of an entity called Czechoslovakia, has left a horrific legacy. Today, on the 77th anniversary of the election that brought the communists to power in Prague, I cannot help but think about how the regime scarred the lives of many families, including my own.
I was born soon after the 1989 Velvet Revolution and grew up hearing about what it was like to live under communism for Czechoslovaks. It was a bleak and oppressive world in which the nationalisation of the means of production in reality meant stealing factories and homes from wealthier citizens so that the state could turn them into farmhouses or residences for top communist state officials. The concepts of fair elections and freedom of speech were mere dreams.
In that world, individuals' opportunities to study, travel, or secure good jobs were often determined by their 'unblemished political profile' rather than their abilities. As a result, it was common to find qualified people who disagreed with the regime working in poorly paid and stigmatised jobs, while active members of the Communist Party, despite poor academic performance or lack of experience, occupied top positions. 'This all became normal for us. No one believed the totalitarian regime would fall,' my mother told me recently.
Those who disagreed with or confronted the regime paid a heavy price. There are many accounts in academia and the media of the brutal practices of the State Security (StB) directed at Czechoslovak citizens deemed 'enemies of the state': mass surveillance, blackmail, arrests, torture, execution, and forced emigration. The stories of high-profile dissidents, such as the executed lawyer Milada Horakova or the imprisoned writer Vaclav Havel, who became the first democratically elected Czech president, are well known.
But there are many other stories of people who faced repression that remain unknown to the public. The Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes has documented the cases of about 200,000 people arrested in communist Czechoslovakia due to their social class, status, opinions, or religious beliefs. Of these, 4,495 died during their time in prison.
My father belongs to this mass of prisoners who are largely unknown. He was labelled 'dangerous to communist society' in 1977 and sentenced to 18 months in prison.
When I was in my 20s, I found an old, yellowed paper file hidden in a drawer of the living room table, with the title 'Verdict in the Name of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic'. The fading typewritten text revealed that my father, along with his friend, was found guilty of avoiding military service and spreading negative political opinions.
My father strongly disagreed with the Communist Party leading the country, and he refused to serve in the army because it had failed in its primary duty to protect the country and its civilians during the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968.
In the summer of that year, 200,000 soldiers from the Soviet Union and other communist European countries invaded to suppress the democratic reform movement that was emerging – what came to be known as the Prague Spring. By the end of the year, 137 Czechs and Slovaks were killed. To maintain control in Prague, the Soviet Union permanently stationed troops as an occupying force in the country. Until they withdrew in 1991, Soviet soldiers killed 400 people and raped hundreds of women.
Despite the brutal violence and crimes, the Communist Party still considered the Warsaw Pact armies to be Czechoslovakia's allies.
So the court condemned my father for 'being against the Communist Party and society, damaging relations between the Czechoslovak Army and the Warsaw Pact forces due to his selfish reasons, and being a huge disappointment, given his promising working-class background'. He was just 22 years old and was about to get married to my mother.
When I asked my father about the document and his time in prison, he fell silent. Only my mother shared a few insights: 'I was heavily pregnant and lost the baby. Your dad came to see me at the hospital and said he would be leaving for work for some time. Later, I found out he was in prison.'
My mother sent my father dozens of letters, but the prison guards did not deliver them. She tried to visit him several times but was not allowed to see him. She would wait outside the prison, hoping to catch a glimpse of him when the prisoners returned from their forced labour. 'I saw him once for a few seconds. He was just a thin figure with no hair. He looked exhausted. We waved at each other,' my mother recalled. My father was released after 10 months for good behaviour.
Recently, I finally managed to persuade my father to visit, with me, the National Security Archive in Prague. We hoped to find more information about who had led his case and who had spied on him – perhaps a friend or even a family member? To our disappointment, the staff handed us a thin file with a note: 'The majority of the documents with your father's name were destroyed by the State Security.'
To hide as much of what it did as possible and make people forget, the communist regime destroyed documents just before its collapse. What we did find was a document from a prison guard who had tried to coerce my father into spying on other prisoners.
'The prisoner is friendly and very popular in the collective, making him a good candidate for delivering information to us. He is emotionally dependent on his fiancee, which can be used against him,' the document read. Perhaps his refusal to become a spy was the main reason why my father was never given any of the letters from my mother and was threatened with solitary confinement.
Many people, however, collaborated with the regime, which makes it difficult for families to reconcile with loved ones who happened to be on the other side. This collaboration was driven either by belief in political propaganda or by fear of having a 'poor political profile', which could result in job loss or a lack of good prospects for their children. Simply put, families were confronted daily with a horrible choice; their lives were riddled with betrayal and the paranoia of being spied on.
This also happened in my own family. For example, while my father was a political prisoner, my mother's brother was a notorious StB officer who blackmailed people to obtain information on dissidents and contributed to the arrest of many citizens – probably even my father.
My paternal grandfather tried to flee the country to West Germany, while one of my uncles from my mother's side worked in a border guard unit known for shooting and killing people trying to escape the Eastern bloc. My paternal grandmother was an active member of the Communist Party, writing propaganda columns for one of the party newspapers Rudé právo (Red Law) and denying any wrongdoing by the regime, including the arrest of her own son.
My father was rehabilitated by a democratic court in 1993 and his criminal record was expunged. My family members who had worked in the security forces were expelled from their positions. However, the choices, beliefs and deeds of the past continue to affect the present.
There are many families like mine whose relations continue to be marked by traumatic experiences of communism. Many lost family members or relatives to various forms of political violence, including imprisonment in harsh conditions and executions.
People who read theoretical Marxist and Leninist texts or embrace communist ideas in the Western context – where there is no direct experience with communist regimes – often fail to acknowledge these real histories.
This lack of acknowledgement helps sanitise the flaws inherent in communist regimes – which promised to eliminate economic and social inequalities but introduced new ones and, in the process, engaged in grave human rights violations.
When searching for a genuine alternative to the current social and political climate, we must learn from the experiences of those who lived under totalitarian regimes. Major political theories do affect our society, and thus, the lived experiences of those who suffered under such political systems should inform our understanding of them. Only then can we prevent the repetition of historical wrongdoings.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran warns against IAEA pressure, Israel attack as more US talks loom
Iran warns against IAEA pressure, Israel attack as more US talks loom

Al Jazeera

time2 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Iran warns against IAEA pressure, Israel attack as more US talks loom

Tehran, Iran – Iran has warned against Western-led escalation by the global nuclear watchdog and any attack by Israel amid preparations for a sixth round of talks with the United States. Behrouz Kamalvandi, the deputy head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said the country will have a 'proportionate' response to any action against it by Western countries, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 'If we wanted to reduce our cooperation, the agency would not be able to carry out its duties. We have cooperated beyond our duties, and if the agency does not appreciate that, we will degrade cooperation to its normal levels,' Kamalvandi told Iranian state television late Monday. His comments come as the IAEA Board of Governors is holding a five-day meeting in Vienna, with Iran's nuclear programme once again in the spotlight as Tehran is accused of 'non-compliance' with nuclear non-proliferation obligations. Backed by the United States, the three European powers still party to Iran's 2015 nuclear deal – France, Germany and the United Kingdom – are pushing for yet another censure resolution against Iran for insufficient cooperation. The latest resolution, however, could prove the most serious in two decades and signal a shift toward escalated confrontation. The 2015 deal lifted United Nations sanctions in exchange for strict curbs on Iran's nuclear programme, including a 3.67 percent limit on its enrichment of uranium. US President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from the landmark nuclear accord in 2018 and imposed harsh sanctions. But the European signatories to the nuclear deal could still activate a 'snapback' mechanism baked into the 2015 deal that would reinstate all United Nations Security Council sanctions on Iran lifted as part of the agreement. A strongly worded IAEA resolution could pave the way for that to happen. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi again warned this week that such a move would signal 'another major strategic mistake' on the part of France, Germany and the UK. Araghchi said the European powers appear poised to ratchet up tensions again by reviving an investigation into Iran's developing nuclear weapons, despite Tehran's insistence that its nuclear programme is strictly peaceful. Iranian authorities have for long emphasised that the country could abandon the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) – designed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons – and cut off access to IAEA inspectors if the UN sanctions are reimposed. The IAEA scrutiny also involves traces of nuclear particles found in several undeclared Iranian sites, mainly based on intelligence from Israel – which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu boasted were obtained as part of a major 2018 raid on a warehouse holding documents in Tehran. Iran's deputy nuclear chief Kamalvandi told state television this week that the country has provided evidence to the IAEA that the cases are a result of 'sabotage' and that the nuclear materials were planted. He said Iranian officials were surprised when in Turquzabad, one of the sites in question near Tehran, agency inspectors knew exactly which points to test for suspected materials. 'It is natural that whoever contaminated the site, has given the exact coordinates for the inspectors to look,' Kamalvandi said. The wrangling over Iran's nuclear programme is likely to be affected by Tehran's major announcement this week that a 'treasure trove' of thousands of documents has been obtained from inside Israel. The documents, which are allegedly related to Israel's clandestine nuclear programme, will be unveiled soon, according to Iranian authorities. No details have been published yet, but the fact that the Iranian Army, Supreme National Security Council, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and Ministry of Intelligence have all separately hailed the announcement shows Iran is doubling down on the significance of the documents. Specifically, Iran says the documents could increase deterrence against long-threatened Israeli aggression against Iranian nuclear sites, and reverse the perception that Iran has been weakened amid the regional fallout of the war on Gaza that saw ally Bashar al-Assad fall in Syria and Hezbollah take heavy blows in Lebanon. The Supreme National Security Council said the information will allow Iran to 'immediately retaliate against any potential Zionist regime [Israeli] aggression on the country's nuclear facilities by attacking its hidden nuclear sites, and to respond proportionately to any hostile acts against economic and military infrastructure'. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said this week that he believes Israeli air strikes would push Iran to seek nuclear weapons. Grossi himself has come under fire from Iran, with Iran's nuclear head Mohammad Eslami saying that he had proven 'that the IAEA is merely a tool in the hands of a few nations'. 'They issue the commands, and he obediently follows, executing their directives,' Eslami said on Tuesday. Iranian authorities have claimed Grossi is looking to become the next secretary-general of the UN, and is therefore sacrificing the nuclear watchdog's integrity by adopting pro-Western rhetoric to gain personal favour. Grossi says the agency is merely doing its job. Trump said the sixth round of talks with Iran will take place on Thursday, but Iran's Foreign Ministry said planning is under way to hold a meeting next Sunday. After five rounds of negotiations mediated by Oman, Iran and the US have yet to see eye-to-eye on the most fundamental issue: enrichment. Trump, who initially emphasised his only demand was that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, has in recent weeks shifted his rhetoric to push for zero nuclear enrichment taking place on Iranian soil. Tehran maintains this is a non-starter since it has a legitimate right to use nuclear energy for civilian use such as power generation and making radiopharmaceuticals, but said on Monday it will offer a counterproposal to Washington soon to advance the talks. Mossad chief David Barnea and other Israeli officials are slated to meet with Steve Witkoff, Trump's envoy leading the talks, before the sixth round.

Nine people killed in school shooting in Austria's Graz
Nine people killed in school shooting in Austria's Graz

Al Jazeera

time7 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Nine people killed in school shooting in Austria's Graz

Nine people have been killed and at least 10 injured in a shooting at a school in the Austrian city of Graz. Police were deployed to the BORG Dreierschutzengasse school in Austria's second largest city on Tuesday morning after shots were heard. The suspected attacker is also dead, according to the Austrian Press Agency, bringing the total death toll to 10. Police said they arrived at the school shortly after the shots were reported and secured the premises. 'No further danger is expected,' the police said, adding that students had been evacuated and were receiving support from a crisis intervention team along with their parents. Among those killed are at least seven students, Graz Mayor Elke Kahr said, describing the attack as a 'terrible tragedy'. At least one adult was also killed. The Kronen Zeitung newspaper reported that at least 10 people were wounded. Mario Kunasek, governor of the southeastern Austrian state of Styria, of which Graz is the capital, expressed condolences to families of the victims. 'As a father, I am deeply saddened by this insane act, which has caused so much harm and incredible suffering,' he said. 'My thoughts are with the innocent victims, families and teachers.' The Kronen Zeitung reported shots were first heard about 10am (08:00 GMT) and the attack was carried out across two classrooms at the upper secondary school, which is attended by pupils 14 years and older. Police said they're working on the assumption that there was a sole suspect. Media reported that the perpetrator, who died by suicide, is a former student of the school and said the attack is one of the country's worst mass shootings. Graz is located in southeastern Austria and has a population of about 300,000 people. Chancellor Christian Stocker is on his way to the school, a spokeswoman said. Interior Minister Gerhard Karner was also expected at the scene. A spokeswoman for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called the killings 'absolutely horrible and tragic'. 'We would like to offer our deepest condolences to the families of the victims and the entire city of Graz. We stand together in mourning while we seek clarity in the wake of this horrible event,' she said.

Ukraine says Russia took 20,000 children during war. Will some be returned?
Ukraine says Russia took 20,000 children during war. Will some be returned?

Al Jazeera

time10 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Ukraine says Russia took 20,000 children during war. Will some be returned?

Kyiv, Ukraine – Russian President Vladimir Putin faces criminal charges for the 'unlawful deportation and transfer of children'. That is the definition of the 2023 arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court, the intergovernmental tribunal based in The Hague. On June 2, as ceasefire talks rumbled on, Ukrainian diplomats handed their Russian counterparts a list of hundreds of children that they said were taken from Russia-occupied Ukrainian regions since 2022. The return of these children 'could become the first test of the sincerity of [Russia's] intentions' to reach a peace settlement, Andriy Yermak, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's chief of staff, told media. 'The ball is in Russia's corner.' But Ukraine claims the number of children taken by Russia is much higher. Kyiv has so far identified 19,546 children who it says were forcibly taken from Russia-occupied Ukrainian regions since 2022. The list could be far from final, as Ukrainian officials believe that some children lost their parents during the hostilities and cannot get in touch with their relatives in Ukraine. As of early June, only 1,345 children had returned home to Ukraine. But why did Russia take them in the first place? 'The aim is genocide of the Ukrainian people through Ukrainian children,' Daria Herasymchuk, a presidential adviser on children's rights, told Al Jazeera. 'Everybody understands that if you take children away from a nation, the nation will not exist.' Putin, his allies and Kremlin-backed media insist that Ukraine is an 'artificial state' with no cultural and ethnic identity. Russian officials who run orphanages, foster homes and facilitate adoptions are being accused of changing the Ukrainian children's names to deprive them of access to relatives. 'Russians do absolutely everything to erase the children's identity,' Herasymchuk said. The Reckoning Project, a global team of journalists and lawyers documenting, publicising and building cases of alleged war crimes Russia commits in Ukraine, said 'indoctrination' is at play. 'The system is in the aspects of indoctrination, the re-education of children, when they are deprived of a certain identity that they had in Ukraine, and another identity, a Russian one, is imposed upon them,' Viktoria Novikova, the Reckoning Project's senior researcher, told Al Jazeera. Russia's ultimate goal is to 'turn their enemy, the Ukrainians, into their friend, so that these children think that Ukraine is an enemy so that [Russia] can seize all of Ukraine', she said. A group of researchers at Yale University that helps locate the children agrees that the alleged abductions 'may constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity'. Moscow conducts a 'systematic campaign of forcibly moving children from Ukraine into Russia, fracturing their connection to Ukrainian language and heritage through 're-education', and even disconnecting children from their Ukrainian identities through adoption,' said the Humanitarian Research Laboratory of the Yale School of Public Health. The group has located some 8,400 children in five dozen facilities in Russia and Belarus, Moscow's closest ally. In 2022, Sergey Mironov, head of A Just Russia, a pro-Kremlin party, adopted a 10-month-old girl named Marharyta Prokopenko, according to the Vaznye Istorii online magazine. The girl was taken from an orphanage in the southern Ukrainian city of Kherson that was occupied at the time. Her name was changed to Marina Mironova, the magazine reported. The girl's name is on the June 2 list. The alleged abductions are far from 'chaotic' and follow detailed scenarios, Herasymchuk said. She said some children are taken from parents who refuse to collaborate with Moscow-installed 'administrations' in Russia-occupied areas. During this 'filtration' procedure, she alleged that Russian intelligence and military officers and Ukrainian collaborators interrogate and 'torture' the parents, checking their bodies for pro-Ukrainian tattoos or bruises left by recoiling firearms. Viktoria Obidina, a 29-year-old military nurse taken prisoner after failing a 'filtration' that followed the 2022 siege of the southern city of Mariupol, feared such an abduction. She also thought that her daughter Alisa, who was four at the time, would witness her torture and then end up in a Russian orphanage. 'They could have tortured me near her or could have tortured her to make me do things,' Obidina told Al Jazeera after her release from Russian captivity in September 2022. Instead, she opted to hand Alisa to a complete stranger, a civilian woman who had already undergone the 'filtration' process and boarded a bus that took 10 days of endless stops and checks amid shelling and shooting to reach a Kyiv-controlled area. Another alleged method is 'summer camping', in which children in Russia-occupied areas are taken to Crimea or Russian cities along the Black Sea coast and are not returned to their parents, Herasymchuk claimed. Some parents plunge into the abyss of trying to reach Russia to get their kids back. But very few succeed, as Ukrainians trying to enter Russia are often barred from re-entry. Attempts to return a child are 'always a lottery', Herasymchuk said. Children of preschool age often do not remember their addresses and do not know how to reach out to their relatives, while teenagers are more inventive, she said. Ukrainian boys are especially vulnerable as they are seen as future soldiers who could fight against Ukraine, she said. 'All the boys undergo militarisation, they get summons from Russian conscription offices so that they become Russian soldiers and return to Ukraine,' she said. A return is often more feasible through a third nation such as Qatar, whose government has helped get dozens of children back home. On Wednesday, Russia's children's rights ombudswoman said she had received the list of 339 Ukrainian children. She denied that Russia had abducted tens of thousands of children. 'We see that there aren't 20,000-25,000 children; the list contains only 339 [names], and we will work thoroughly on each child,' Maria Lvova-Belova told the Tass news agency. In 2022, Lvova-Belova adopted a 15-year-old boy from Ukraine's Mariupol. Along with Putin, she is wanted by the International Criminal Court for her role in the alleged abductions. Ukrainian observers hope that the children's return may be one of the few positive things to come out of the stalled Ukraine-Russia peace talks, which were last held in Turkiye's Istanbul. 'Once everyone understands that no ceasefire is discussed in Istanbul, the Ukrainian side is trying to squeeze things out maximally out of the humanitarian track,' Vyacheslav Likhachyov told Al Jazeera.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store