Sandipan Dhar's father accuses Joondalup Health Campus doctors of lies over toddler's death
The father of a toddler who died at a Perth hospital after presenting to the emergency department two days earlier has walked out of a coronial inquest into his son's death, accusing medical staff of lying in their evidence.
Sandipan Dhar was 21 months old when he died at Joondalup Health Campus on March 24 last year.
An autopsy later revealed he died due to complications from undiagnosed leukaemia.
Sandipan's father Sanjoy Dhar left the court as hospital doctor Dr Yii Siow was giving evidence.
'I cannot take anymore lies,' he told the court.
'I am just exiting myself.
'It's too much for me to take.'
The WA Coroner's Court inquest is trying to discern whether blood tests could have detected the blood disease earlier and spared Sandipan's life.
Sandipan had a fever for about three weeks after he received routine vaccinations.
One GP told the court on the first day of the inquest he 'just couldn't ignore the parental concern' and sent the family to Joondalup Hospital with a letter requesting blood tests on March 22.
His parents took Sandipan to the ED that day but left the hospital after about five hours, without his bloods being taken.
Sandipan was brought back two days later and died that evening.
The allocated nurse and junior doctor on duty told the inquest on Tuesday they didn't recall Saraswati and Sanjoy Dhar insisting on blood tests.
Dr O'Hearrain told the court on Wednesday he also did not remember Mr Dhar asking for the blood tests, referring to Sandipan's parents as 'very reasonable' and 'patient.'
Coroner Sarah Linton suggested cultural differences could have influenced the degree of concern expressed by the parents.
'There certainly seems to be disconnect between how concerned they say they were … and how they seemed to you,' she told Dr Caolan O'Hearrain incourt.
Mr Dhar said he did not know he had to demand his child's needs in a specific way.
'We've been polite. We didn't consider to raise our voice because other patients are in the other beds,' he said outside court.
Mr Dhar said he asked Dr O'Hearrain 'minimum, three times' to ask Dr Siow, to take a blood test.
Dr Siow told the court Sandipan looked well and his parents were calm on March 22.
'They appeared really calm and relaxed to me. I didn't think there was a heightened level of concern,' she told the court.
Dr Siow told the court she and the family even joked at one point about mothers always being right.
She said the family did not ask for a blood test and if they had insisted on one, it would have been an 'easy decision' to complete it.
The court heard there was conflicting evidence on whether the family were told to leave the ED on March 22, or whether they left of their own accord.
Mr Dhar said outside court Dr Siow had asked the family to leave, but she was not questioned on that on Wednesday.
She will continue to be questioned on Thursday, when the inquest continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Low influenza and COVID vaccination rates spark concern as flu season kicks off
The number of Australians vaccinated against influenza is "worryingly low", health experts say, as new data reveals the winter flu season has begun. Since mid-May, flu cases have increased in most parts of the country, following a record-breaking number of infections earlier in the year that had recently plateaued. At the same time, COVID-19 infections have begun to climb, while cases of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have steadily increased since the start of 2025. "We had an early bump [in flu cases] that seemed to flatten out, but it really does look like the season is kicking off," Phillip Britton, an infectious diseases physician at The Children's Hospital at Westmead, said. So far, more than 109,000 cases of flu have been reported in 2025, most of which have occurred in children under 10 years. Flu vaccines are recommended from April onwards each year in time for the peak flu season, which is typically June to September. While flu vaccination is recommended for everyone aged six months and older, just a quarter of Australians have received a flu jab this year. Among children aged six months to five years, who are at increased risk of serious complications from influenza, only 15.9 per cent are immunised. "That really is concerning," Dr Britton said. "We've already had a small number of children with very severe influenza in intensive care, and we're expecting now … that those cases are going to become more frequent." Current flu vaccine coverage in children, although similar to rates this time last year, is less than half of what it was five years ago. Vaccine uptake is also lagging in other at-risk groups, Australian Medical Association president Danielle McMullen said. Just over half of Australians over 65 have received a flu jab this year. "We are particularly concerned by vaccination rates among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, which have declined across all age groups," she said. Each year, on average, seasonal flu results in 3,500 deaths and 18,000 hospitalisations. Dr McMullen said a reduction in COVID-19 booster rates this year compared to last year was also "alarming". In the past six months, just 26.2 per cent of people aged 75 and older have received a COVID-19 booster, down from 39.9 per cent this time last year. While the risk of dying from COVID-19 is now much lower than it was at the beginning of the pandemic, it still poses a significant risk to older Australians, and remains the leading cause of death from acute respiratory infection. "New COVID-19 strains continue to circulate leading to increased hospitalisations, making regular boosters essential for maintaining protection against severe illness," Dr McMullen said. Mater Health infectious diseases physician Paul Griffin said the new NB.1.8.1 COVID variant appeared to be "more infectious and a little bit immune evasive", and may explain the recent uptick in COVID cases. "That's what we've seen in a few countries already, and looks to be, whilst early days, what is potentially happening here," Professor Griffin said. "The concerning thing is the overlap with the other viruses — flu and RSV — which is a very significant burden of respiratory infections for us to have to manage." While some people consciously choose not to get themselves or their children vaccinated, research shows the most common barriers to flu vaccination that parents report include feeling distressed when thinking about vaccinating their child, as well as barriers related to access and cost. Dr Britton said he believed a combination of vaccine fatigue "coming out of the pandemic" and complacency over the flu also meant many parents weren't taking up the opportunity. "That might be the case for some people, but as a doctor who works in a hospital, it is tragic to see children end up in intensive care … with a preventable infection." Yesterday, the federal government revealed plans to tackle declining childhood vaccination rates with the launch of a new immunisation plan. The National Immunisation Strategy sets a goal of increasing immunisation uptake around Australia over the next five years by reducing vaccine hesitancy and improving access. Among adults, research shows there is a significant gap between vaccine intention and action: many more people want or intend to get a yearly flu vaccine than end up doing so. In Australia, the flu vaccine is available through GPs, pharmacies (for people above the age of two), community health centres, and Aboriginal Medical Services. It is free for at-risk groups (however some providers may charge a consultation or service fee), which includes: Queensland and Western Australia are currently offering flu vaccines to everyone. "The flu vaccine isn't a perfect vaccine, but it really does work, and it's our best tool to protect people from severe flu," Dr Britton said. "If your child is under five or if your child has got any medical conditions that put them at risk, now is the time to get their flu vaccine." Dr Britton also encouraged pregnant women and parents of young children to take up the opportunity to protect their kids against RSV. While RSV causes mild illness in most people, it can lead to serious, life-threatening complications, particularly in infants and older adults. RSV immunisation is available and free for women who are 28 to 36 weeks pregnant, as well as infants under eight months whose mothers were not vaccinated, and infants up to 24 months of age who are at increased risk of severe illness. According to the Department of Health, more than 60,000 women have received an RSV vaccine since the program began in February, which has resulted in an almost 40 per cent drop in cases in children from last year. In addition to improving vaccination rates, Professor Griffin said there was a lot Australians could do to reduce the impact of respiratory illnesses. "Vaccinations are obviously the backbone of prevention … but it's also those simple things that reduce the risk of getting infected, including mask wearing, hand hygiene and so on," he said. "People think they're doing the right thing by coming to work or sending their kids to school when they clearly have respiratory symptoms. "The best thing people can do is stay home until they recover and limit that onward transmission."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Prisoner takes fight to freeze her eggs to Queensland's highest court
A Queensland prisoner has taken her fight to have her eggs frozen while in custody to the state's highest court. Rachel Smith is currently serving a 10-year sentence after being convicted of drug trafficking and will be eligible for parole in 2029. In 2024, when Smith was aged 33, she attempted to apply to the chief executive of Queensland Corrective Services (QCS) to undergo a privately funded Oocyte cryopreservation procedure. Her application was unable to be considered based on QCS legislation which bans prisoners from applying for access to medical treatments involving "assisted reproductive technology". Last year, Smith tried and failed to have that decision overturned in the Supreme Court and has now brought her challenge before the Court of Appeal. This week, lawyers for Smith argued the Supreme Court judge who upheld the chief executive's decision had made an error in law when interpreting the QCS legislation. Paula Morreau told the court egg freezing does not fall under the "ordinary meaning" of "assisted reproductive technology" because the procedure alone cannot cause reproduction. Although pregnancy is Smith's "ultimate aim", as she intends to have her frozen eggs fertilised and implanted after she leaves prison, Ms Morreau said this is only "a possibility". In a judicial review decision published in November, Smith submitted egg freezing was merely a "preparatory" activity, which could later lead to other processes "which involve conception". "[Smith] submitted the ordinary meaning of the phrase is the application of technology at a point where reproduction can occur by its implementation, such as in vitro fertilisation or artificial insemination", the judgement said. "On Ms Smith's case, it is only those later processes which constitute 'assisted reproductive technology'." However, Justice Tom Sullivan rejected this argument, and determined the process involved the use of various technology "solely for the purpose of assisting in reproduction". He said this was because it includes multiple drug administrations, daily medical examinations, blood tests, ultrasounds, and the egg extraction, which is performed under sedation. "[Egg freezing procedures] are one in a series of sequential, technological steps required for the potential birth of a child," he said in the judgement. Smith also tried to argue her human rights were being breached. She submitted the section of the Human Rights Act — which states "all statutory provisions must, to the extent possible that is consistent with their purpose, be interpreted in a way that is compatible with human rights" — was not considered by the chief executive. This included her right to have access to health services "without discrimination" and to be "treated with humanity and respect for the inherent dignity of the human process" while incarcerated. Justice Sullivan also rejected this argument, finding a consideration of this part of the legislation "does not lead to a different result". "The decision of the chief executive was correct in law and the application should be dismissed," he said in the judgement. The Court of Appeal decision on whether Justice Sullivan's ruling was lawful has been reserved.
SBS Australia
8 hours ago
- SBS Australia
New study reveals some popular Australian sunscreens are not meeting their sun protection claims
New study reveals some popular Australian sunscreens are not meeting their sun protection claims Published 12 June 2025, 9:45 am A new study has found some of Australia's most popular sunscreens are failing to meet their sun protection claims. Independent testing by consumer group Choice has revealed a large proportion of sunscreens they tested did not have the advertised protection level. Several sunscreen manufacturers have disputed the findings.
