logo
Trans ban in ladies' pool events passed after ‘loads of complaints' from players, sports chief says

Trans ban in ladies' pool events passed after ‘loads of complaints' from players, sports chief says

Independent08-04-2025

A decision to ban transgender women from ladies' pool events was made after an 'unreal' number of complaints from players, the chairman of an English sports body has said.
Paul Thompson, chairman of the English Blackball Pool Federation (EBPF), told a court on Tuesday that 'nobody knew how to manage' the 'delicate' situation after concerns were raised about transgender players' participation in 2023.
Professional pool player Harriet Haynes is taking legal action against the EBPF over its ban on transgender women playing in the ladies' county competitions, a decision that was made in August 2023.
Mr Thompson told Canterbury county court that Ms Haynes was not allowed to play in EPBF competitions for no other reason than 'the fact Harriet is a biological male'.
He clarified: 'The only reason she's not playing for the county team at present is to do with her being a biological male from birth.'
Mr Thompson said he had to take into consideration the feelings of female-born players who had objected to competing against trans women.
'I think the subject was kind of taboo to a certain degree, in this day and age you can't come out and say what you want to say, because you get called a bigot or transphobic,' he told the court.
Mr Thompson said that he organised a meeting of the executive committee to consider the issue in July 2023, and then made the announcement about the ban on the 27th August.
When asked by Robin White, counsel for Ms Haynes, why he did not consult with transgender players, Mr Thompson said: 'What about the hundreds and hundreds of other women that it affected, am I just supposed to ignore that?
'We had loads of complaints. The amount of complaints was unreal.'
He added: 'It was a new thing for all of us, nobody knew how to manage it. If I was allowed to manage it myself... I would have said no to Harriet playing in any games. As a pool player I know that males are far superior than what women are at playing pool.'
The court heard that around 15-20 anonymous written complaints were passed to Anna Goodwin, the EPBF secretary, but Mr Thompson said that many more complaints were raised with committee members personally.
Ms Goodwin told the court that they made the decision 'because we didn't think it was fair on our female players', adding: 'We didn't exclude transgender people, we made a section in the open section for them to play'.
After the ban was announced, the men's section was made into a open category for trans women to play there, she said.
Ms Haynes, who is represented by legal firm Colman Coyle, told the trial on Monday that a 'big part of my life was playing county ladies' blackball pool' with the Kent team, something she now cannot do.
Ms Haynes said she was offered the captaincy of the Kent ladies' team but could not take it up because of the EBPF ban.
Ms Goodwin said that another transgender player, not Ms Haynes, captained her ladies' county team and is 'happy' with that, despite not being able to play in the ladies tournaments.
Lawyers for Ms Haynes have argued that eightball English pool is not a gender-affected sport. Ms White said the case centred on 'fairness' and how that could be achieved within the sport.
The trial at Canterbury county court, sitting at the Magistrates, continues for the rest of the week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Calls for the government to address demand for prostitution
Calls for the government to address demand for prostitution

Edinburgh Reporter

time18 minutes ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Calls for the government to address demand for prostitution

The MP for Edinburgh North and Leith, Tracy Gilbert today led a parliamentary debate on Tuesday in Westminster Hall calling for urgent government action to address the demand driving prostitution and sex trafficking in the UK. Ms Gilbert said that the debate, 'That this House has considered the matter of tackling demand for prostitution and sex trafficking', focused on the urgent need to adopt a demand-reduction approach to tackle the exploitation of women and girls who are coerced, trafficked, or driven by poverty into the sex trade. Her speech highlighted the issue in Edinburgh, and some of the vulnerable women who have been affected by it, including Fiona Broadfoot who has spoken out about her treatment whilst working in an Edinburgh brothel. Tracy Gilbert said: 'In Edinburgh over the weekend (7 –8 June 2025), 142 women were being advertised for prostitution on one pimping website alone. Five of the top ten adverts are explicitly posted by so-called 'agencies' – so the site isn't even trying to hide the organised nature of this exploitation.' She outlined that current legislation fails to effectively deter those who purchase sex and called on the Government to explore legislative models that criminalise the buying, not the selling, of sex, as adopted in countries such as Sweden and Norway, and she gave examples of reviews made after the buying of sex including the following: 'Bad attitude. Everything was off limits.' 'Finally got her to lay there but it's like shagging a dead fish.' 'No smile, her atrocious English made the interactions even more impossible.' Tracy added: 'Men who buy sex are reviewing women as if they are reviewing an Xbox game. These comments prove that men who pay for sex treat women as subordinate sex objects whose role is to service their sexual desires.' Watch the debate online here: Like this: Like Related

SNP opposition to new nuclear power stations in Scotland 'makes no sense', claims Ed Miliband
SNP opposition to new nuclear power stations in Scotland 'makes no sense', claims Ed Miliband

Daily Record

time44 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

SNP opposition to new nuclear power stations in Scotland 'makes no sense', claims Ed Miliband

Scotland has just one remaining nuclear power plant still generating electricity, with a further two currently being decommissioned. The SNP's refusal to allow new nuclear power stations to be built in Scotland "makes no sense", the UK Energy Secretary has said. Ed Miliband said today Scots will miss out on a "golden age of nuclear" after Labour ministers signed-off a £14.2 billion investment in the Sizewell C nuclear plant in south-east England. ‌ Scotland has just one remaining nuclear power plant still generating electricity, with a further two currently being decommissioned. ‌ SNP ministers have repeatedly refused to consider allowing the construction of replacement nuclear plants since winning power at Holyrood in 2007. Scottish Labour MP Gregor Poynton today claimed the policy had cost workers and taxpayers north of the border 'billions of pounds of investment and thousands of high-skilled jobs'. But SNP MP Kirsty Blackman described the UK Government's new £14.2 billion investment into Sizewell C in Suffolk as a 'splurge'. Miliband said the Sizewell development will 'power the equivalent of around six million homes with clean homegrown energy for 60 years, and it will be a jobs and growth engine for Britain, supporting 10,000 jobs in the peak construction and creating 1,500 apprenticeships'. It is one of several nuclear projects which the UK Government has backed, which also include a prototype fusion plant at West Burton, Nottinghamshire, and a partnership between Rolls-Royce and Great British Energy – Nuclear to rollout small modular reactors. Poynton, MP for Livingston, told the Commons: 'Scotland was once a pioneer in nuclear energy and should be again, but due to the SNP Scottish Government's outdated, backward, quite frankly bizarre opposition to nuclear energy, turning away billions of pounds of investment and thousands of high-skilled jobs. ‌ 'So, does the Secretary of State agree with me this is yet another way the SNP Scottish Government has lost their way?' Miliband replied that Mr Poynton was 'so right', and added: 'People in Scotland will be looking at these announcements and saying, 'well why isn't it us that are benefitting from this? Why are we not even in the race?'' Lillian Jones, the Labour MP for Kilmarnock and Loudoun, criticised the position as an 'ideological block on nuclear power, blocking billions in investment, blocking thousands of well-paid, secure Scottish jobs, and blocking growth'. ‌ In his response, Miliband said: 'We can announce a golden age of nuclear with our investments but not in Scotland, because of the position of the SNP Government. It makes no sense.' Blackman had earlier said: 'This £14 billion splurge on English nuclear power plants comes on top of £22 billion for English carbon capture and storage, while there's nothing for Scotland's Acorn project. 'With Grangemouth allowed to close, with a fiscal regime that is ruining north-east energy jobs, this latest announcement shows that Scotland isn't just an afterthought, it isn't a thought at all. ‌ 'If nearly £40 billion can be found for English energy projects, why is it that money is never found for Scotland's carbon capture project?' Miliband replied: 'Well look, I think maybe there is an SNP change in position coming. If she wants to have a conversation about Scottish nuclear power stations, then absolutely. 'We're in favour of the Acorn project and we'll be saying more about this in the coming weeks. ‌ 'But let me just say to her – on nuclear power, they've really got to think again. 'They are absolutely sticking their heads in the sand when it comes to this. This is about jobs, it's about investment, it's about clean energy, they should really rethink.' In an earlier statement, Miliband said: 'The Government is taking decisive steps today to usher in a new golden age of nuclear for Britain.' ‌ He added: 'For too long, our country has not made the crucial energy – or indeed other infrastructure investments – we need. A short-sighted failure to invest for which the British people have paid the price in lower living standards, insecurity and declining public services. 'This week's announcements symbolise a decisive change in approach, to invest in the future – the right choice for energy security, the right choice for jobs, the right choice for climate and our children and grandchildren, the right choice for Britain, investment, not decline. 'This Government has made its choice.'

SNP opposition to new nuclear power stations ‘makes no sense', says Miliband
SNP opposition to new nuclear power stations ‘makes no sense', says Miliband

South Wales Guardian

time44 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

SNP opposition to new nuclear power stations ‘makes no sense', says Miliband

The Energy Secretary said Holyrood's position 'makes no sense', as Labour MP Gregor Poynton claimed the policy had cost workers and taxpayers north of the border 'billions of pounds of investment and thousands of high-skilled jobs'. SNP MP Kirsty Blackman described the UK Government's new £14.2 billion investment into Sizewell C in Suffolk as a 'splurge', when she pressed Mr Miliband on whether the Government will back the Acorn carbon capture and storage project. Mr Miliband said the Sizewell development along East Anglia's North Sea coastline will 'power the equivalent of around six million homes with clean homegrown energy for 60 years, and it will be a jobs and growth engine for Britain, supporting 10,000 jobs in the peak construction and creating 1,500 apprenticeships'. It is one of several nuclear projects which the Government has backed, which also include a prototype fusion plant at West Burton, Nottinghamshire, and a partnership between Rolls-Royce and Great British Energy – Nuclear to rollout small modular reactors. Mr Poynton, the MP for Livingston, told the Commons: 'Scotland was once a pioneer in nuclear energy and should be again, but due to the SNP Scottish Government's outdated, backward, quite frankly bizarre opposition to nuclear energy, turning away billions of pounds of investment and thousands of high-skilled jobs. 'So, does the Secretary of State agree with me this is yet another way the SNP Scottish Government has lost their way?' Mr Miliband replied that Mr Poynton was 'so right', and added: 'People in Scotland will be looking at these announcements and saying, 'well why isn't it us that are benefitting from this? Why are we not even in the race?'' The Scottish Government, led by SNP First Minister John Swinney, has a policy of opposing the building of new nuclear power stations. Lillian Jones, the Labour MP for Kilmarnock and Loudoun, criticised the position as an 'ideological block on nuclear power, blocking billions in investment, blocking thousands of well-paid, secure Scottish jobs, and blocking growth'. In his response, Mr Miliband said: 'We can announce a golden age of nuclear with our investments but not in Scotland, because of the position of the SNP Government. 'It makes no sense.' Aberdeen North MP Ms Blackman had earlier said: 'This £14 billion splurge on English nuclear power plants comes on top of £22 billion for English carbon capture and storage, while there's nothing for Scotland's Acorn project. 'With Grangemouth (oil refinery) allowed to close, with a fiscal regime that is ruining north-east energy jobs, this latest announcement shows that Scotland isn't just an afterthought, it isn't a thought at all. 'If nearly £40 billion can be found for English energy projects, why is it that money is never found for Scotland's carbon capture project?' Mr Miliband replied: 'Well look, I think maybe there is an SNP change in position coming. If she wants to have a conversation about Scottish nuclear power stations, then absolutely. 'We're in favour of the Acorn project and we'll be saying more about this in the coming weeks. 'But let me just say to her – on nuclear power, they've really got to think again. We are backing nuclear with the biggest building programme in a generation. 🔧£14.2bn for Sizewell C👷10,000 jobs & 1,500 apprenticeships⚛️ Small Modular Reactor programme Clean, homegrown power will boost the UK's energy security, protect billpayers & drive economic growth. — Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (@energygovuk) June 10, 2025 'They are absolutely sticking their heads in the sand when it comes to this. This is about jobs, it's about investment, it's about clean energy, they should really rethink.' In an earlier statement, Mr Miliband said: 'The Government is taking decisive steps today to usher in a new golden age of nuclear for Britain.' He added: 'For too long, our country has not made the crucial energy – or indeed other infrastructure investments – we need. A short-sighted failure to invest for which the British people have paid the price in lower living standards, insecurity and declining public services. 'This week's announcements symbolise a decisive change in approach, to invest in the future – the right choice for energy security, the right choice for jobs, the right choice for climate and our children and grandchildren, the right choice for Britain, investment, not decline. 'This Government has made its choice.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store