
Rosita Sweetman: I was poor when the country was — being poor in a rich Ireland must be torture
Being 'poor' is miserable. Being poor in an affluent society is torture.
Ireland is now, statistically, one of the richest countries in the world - but child poverty, or children in consistent poverty, has increased by an astonishing 78% in the past year, according to a new report. And renting a house, never mind buying a house, for you and your children, has never been more difficult.
This week the Government serendipitously announced its plans for the housing market where rents on Daft show new build apartments in Dublin (seemingly made mostly of MDF) are €2,300 for a single bed, €3,500 for a double.
So what does our delightful new government do?
Sadly, far from beating their breasts, saying, our nation's children should not be in 'consistent poverty', our lovely young people should not be beggaring themselves to rent or buy a home, our old people should definitely not be forced to sell their homes and go into so-called 'homes' where they could be neglected or even unsafe, the Government plan to bring in legislation that will enable landlords to raise rents even higher.
They say it's the only way to increase supply.
In a way, it's not surprising.
We've been bastards to each other over property ever since the Famine, when Gombeenism, (ie taking over your dying or emigrating neighbour's gaff) signalled the birth of native capitalism. It's a tradition so ingrained that many of our politicians run side hustles as landlords.
Remember the Celtic Tiger, when Bertie and Co whipped the country into a frenzy of acquisition that everyone knew was going to end in a massive crash? And when the crash hit the property boys circled the wagons, bailed out the banks, created Nama.
Welfare was slashed. Supports for the vulnerable were slashed. Social and affordable builds came to a stop. Hospitals and schools had their budgets shaved to the bone. New entrants to teaching, nursing, the police, the civil service got salaries a fraction of their predecessors'. Housing regeneration projects in the most deprived areas were abandoned.
To top it all the 'poor' were openly derided. Remember a plush, well fed Leo Varadkar and his 'Welfare cheats cheat us all?' schtick? A slogan that whitewashed the reality: since the crash the wealthy have been increasing their take, worldwide. A 2024 Oxfam report showed that billionaire wealth increased by €13 billion in 2024, or €35.6 million per day. It's the dodgy ground on which our current crisis is built.
Poverty in the 90s
Going through papers and photograph albums recently for my memoir, ' Girl with a fork in a world of soup', I was struck over and again how poor my children and I were in the 90s when my marriage crashed.
We were lucky in one way, I'd managed to keep our home (despite vigorous attempts to ensure the opposite by my ex), we had a roof over our heads.
But with the charmingly named 'Deserted Wives Allowance' then IR£69 a week, heating the house was not possible. Mould marched the walls. Eating right was not possible either. We went from proper hot dinners to yellow pack pizzas. All our clothes came from charity shops. I had unpaid bills in every small supermarket for miles.
"Everything in this house is broken," said the son of one of the school mums who came to visit. She was mortified but he was right.
You think you live in a decent society, that there will be a safety net when you fall, but no. The children and I fell and fell through a whistling void. As we went down I sold paintings, rugs, desks, cabinets, more paintings. Anything I could lay my hands on to keep us afloat.
I went to the family lawyer to find he was now working for 'the other side', ie my ex. I went to Social Welfare who said they couldn't help since I was still 'technically' married.
I went to a GP who said I should take a holiday, away from the children; I seemed "very stressed". Through gritted teeth I explained I didn't have enough money to get to the end of the week, never mind go on holiday, never mind getting someone to mind the children who anyway were also deeply traumatised and would have suffered more if I'd left.
I went to the local priest. He almost tore his soutane in half, slamming the drawer of his desk, stuffed with cheque books and see-through envelopes bulging with rolls of notes.
Once a film company used the house as a location. When their cheque for IR£1,300 was read by our local bank as IR£3,300 I whooped. Money! When the bank took me to court their representative said: "She went to DID Electrical the next day and bought a new washing machine, and a fridge!" As if I'd blown their precious loot on heroin.
Thankfully that judge was just. The case was dismissed. For once, it wasn't Josephine Soap's fault. It was the bank's. For not reading the cheque properly. Hurray!
The Dublin housing market
When, after 17 years, the children and I were forced to leave our home for other reasons, we encountered the Wild West that is the Dublin rental market. Oh boy. The first home we got was a beauty but at €2,300 a month roared through the money my mum had left us. The next house - about one tenth the size of the first - was a former groom's habitat off South Circular Road.
Then it was an old Georgian off Leinster Road with cartoonishly avaricious landlords. When we asked permission to strip out an old and stinking carpet and paint the three flights of stairs white they agreed. Then they served notice. The place looked so lovely it was going back on the market the following week at twice the price.
The next landlord was an ex-garda. When he couldn't legally hike his rent he booted us on the grounds his daughter was moving in and charged us for 'cleaning' new curtains, bringing the pine table and the sofa we'd left behind to the dump. When I looked through the window a month later there were strangers, enjoying our stuff with nary a daughter to be seen. When I tried to take up the case with the PRTB - the Private Rental Tenancies Board, it went nowhere, and of course the PRTB replaces all recourse to the courts, so that was that.
Happy Gombeening.
Rosita Sweetman: 'When, after 17 years, the children and I were forced to leave our home for other reasons, we encountered the Wild West that is the Dublin rental market. Oh boy.'
Throughout our shenanigans I had the advantage of being educated. Of having a voice, however small. Imagine the despair trying to navigate this entanglement without those advantages?
Being poor is miserable. Being poor and at the mercy of landlords who've basically been given free rein is going to be terrifying for so many. Being the child of poor parents at the mercy of this system has got to be the worst of all.
Come on Irish government. We're rich. We have billionaires amongst us. We can do better than this, for everyone. Can't we?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Rent reforms: Coalition's big cure for rental market somewhat diluted by mixed messages
Story of the Week The Government presented it as a coup, something that came as a surprise to the Opposition, that would remove any basis for attack. For weeks, there were rumours that the rent pressure zones (RPZs) were about to come a cropper, and the Government was going to scrap, or seriously curtail their use, in a bid to attract big finance to reboot the construction of apartment blocks, which has been moribund for many months. And yes, the news that the RPZs were being extended across the State did serve to blunt Opposition attacks. After all, has the Opposition not been calling for months to save them? And applying them everywhere made sense, given that 24 of the 31 councils, and 111 of the 166 local electoral areas, were already in RPZ zones. Curbing the 'no-fault' notice to quit was also a smart move in heading off the Opposition. READ MORE It was the subsequent policy announcement that was to prove more tricky. The new distinction between small and corporate landlords. The fact that there will be different rules for new tenancies in the future, which will be set at market rate, with increases measured against inflation. The right of landlords to reset rent after six years. Those new rules were designed to attract institutional investors back to the Irish market. They wish to have predictable returns on their investment, and it is clear that RPZ was a big impediment for at least some of those. It's clear that the purpose of the change was to strike a balance between protecting the rights of tenants (already paying painfully high rent) and those of investors who are badly needed to to be part of the solution. The policy, or the communication of it, was not thought through, however. When detailed questions were asked, there were conflicting and ambiguous answers coming from different Ministers. Would existing tenants in RPZ be subject to that six-year rent review? It took a day for that to be clarified, with the Opposition claiming some hasty revision took place. Would announcing the start date of March 2026 encourage landlords to hold off renting properties and then benefit from higher rents from next year? James Browne ended up taking some flak. He's not the world's best communicator but he's a doer. That said, it's going to take a long time before we know if this measure will make any difference. Elsewhere, Stephen Collins is writing about the tortuously slow pace of any development or project in Ireland . He adjudges this to be a hard decision. Time will tell on that. But many more hard decisions need to be taken to bridge that yawning gap between supply and demand. Bust up The first item on the agenda of any Irish political party is the split. And the smaller and more marginal the party, the bigger the chasm. Our colleague Ronan McGreevy brought us this intriguing report this week about 30 activists leaving People Before Profit because – wait for it – it had become too mainstream and establishment. The walkout has been led by Dublin city councillor Madeleine Johansson. There was some jaw-dropping rhetoric in it. The 'fake democracy of the Dáil' should be replaced by a 32-county workers' republic. 'Assemblies of workers in workplaces and communities elect delegates, who are recallable, to a workers' national assembly.' Wow. To effect, one working-class revolution is required involving mass protests and strikes leading to workplace occupations and a challenge to the old State. Democracy in action? Well, not quite. One of the bases of the objection is that PBP would consider joining that bastion of the establishment, Sinn Féin, in Government. To quote the statement, a Sinn Féin-led government would 'coalesce with the establishment and leave untouched the real government, the permanent government – the State bureaucracy, army chiefs and head Guards'. That's what you call sweeping changes. Not that Paul Murphy is overly concerned right now, having been detained in Egypt while on the Great March to Rafah. That's all very well but does any of this affect me? It happened so long ago, 36 years ago, in 1989, that it seems historical. But the circumstances of the murder of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane by loyalist gunmen have suppurated like a wound for more than three decades. Today's announcement by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Hilary Benn, is a big moment. He confirmed the independent chair and assessors for the public inquiry into the murder of Mr Finucane. And so it is important. As Taoiseach Micheál Martin said in a statement: 'This is the final outstanding inquiry from those that were recommended by Judge Cory in 2004, and it is positive that it can now move to beginning its important and substantive work. 'Today's announcement highlights the importance that a way forward is found to comprehensively address all the outstanding cases of the Troubles.' Banana skin The National Shared Services Office (NSSO) is usually a backwater for news stories but on Tuesday all that changed when Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers held an unexpected media conference. As Cormac McQuinn reported, pension payment calculations for some Ministers, including current serving ones, might have been overstated, or understated, up to the tune of €30,000. It was also revealed that a pool of 13,000 retired civil servants who were on work-sharing arrangements are to have their pension deductions checked for underpayments. There is also an issue in relation to the pensions of 30 retired senior civil servants. One of them could owe as much as €280,000 as a result of NSSO errors. Now the Public Accounts Committee is taking an interest in it. This could get very sticky for the NSSO. Winners and losers Winner: James Browne, for pushing through a hard political decision. Loser: James Browne, for failing to communicate clearly enough what it did and did not do. The Big Read Pat Leahy and Jack Horgan-Jones are examining in detail the background and the implications of this week's big RPZ announcement. Ellen Coyne has an interview with a grieving mother who has serious questions for Children's Health Ireland. And, of course, Miriam Lord's Saturday column. Hear here Friday's Inside Politics podcast looks at Minister for Housing James Browne's announcement of plans to change the rules around rent pressure zones (RPZs). Will the Government's gamble on investment pay off? And why was the roll-out so haphazard?


The Irish Sun
4 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
‘Shambles' rent reforms move blasted as Govt accused of ‘making it up as they go along' amid landlord price hike fears
THE Government's rent reforms have again come under heavy fire after no Dail time was scheduled for the emergency legislation next week. The decision, which was heavily blasted, was made despite claims that landlords will jack up prices before the regulations change. 2 The Government has been accused of 'making it up as they go along' Credit: Getty Images - Getty Part of the plan will see the two per cent cap on However, there are fears that landlords in the 11 counties that are currently not designated rent pressure zones will pump up their prices before the Following this criticism, the Government announced that they were introducing the new rent reforms in two separate pieces of legislation with the rent pressure zone extension to be dealt with in an emergency bill as soon as possible. READ MORE IN NEWS Coalition leaders denied claims that they were caught out by the blunder with Tanaiste However, the Labour housing spokesman Conor Sheehan claimed the Government were 'making it up as they go along' with rental reforms that he labelled 'a shambles.' He said: 'It's crazy that in an effort to calm the horses the Tánaiste was clearly making it up as he went along to avoid the ire of the Opposition. Most read in Irish News 'Well, I have news for him and for the Housing Minister, their disastrous treatment of renters will not be forgotten for a very long time.' Sinn Fein chief whip Padraig MacLochlainn said: 'The failure to include legislation for next week's Dail business demonstrates once again the shambles at the heart of the government's housing policy.' Sinn Fein housing spokesman Eoin O Broin reacts to record number of homeless people Housing Minister James Browne today defended his rental reforms and claimed that 'there were a few moving parts' to the legislation. He said: 'There's always going to be a challenge around the complexity of doing anything like this, there's no one size fits all to bring a solution to this kind of complex situation.' The Irish Property Owners Association today also took aim at the Government rental reforms as they claimed the changes could hit house prices and damage tourism. The IPOA also claimed that landlords who currently have vacant properties are enticed to keep their property empty until the new changes kick in on March 1 next year when they will be able to rise their rents to market level. 2 The Government's big rental reform strategy was launched this week Credit: Getty Images - Getty


Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Minister denies U-turn on smartphone pouches as new school guidance issued
National guidelines on restricting mobile phone use in schools have been issued after 9 million euro in funding for phone pouches for secondary schools was announced in Budget 2025. The opposition criticised the pouch funding as a waste of public money while the Government said the funding averaged out at around 20 euro per student. In the Dail on Thursday, Tanaiste Simon Harris said the budget funding would be for all kinds of phone storage solutions rather than just phone pouches. This includes lockable boxes, cubby holes or drop off and collection at the school office. He said a new procurement process is to be published "in the coming days". "This will not delay schools in applying for and accessing funding for phone-storage solutions," he said. "An application process will be open to post-primary schools soon and the issuing of funding will commence shortly thereafter. "A new procurement process will be published in the coming days and then schools will be able to seek to apply to draw down funding and put in place the phone-storage solution that works best for them. This is a pragmatic and sensible way to proceed." Speaking on RTE Radio on Friday, Ms McEntee denied this was a U-turn and said it was "always the case" that the funds could be used for other storage solutions as well as phone pouches. "There is absolutely no U-turn here," she said. ADVERTISEMENT In the guidance issued on Friday, primary schools now require a policy to ban the use of and access to mobile phones during the school day, while secondary schools require a policy to restrict mobile phone use during the school day, using the 9 million euro funding. The Department of Education said the measure aimed to "enhance" student wellbeing, reduce cyber bullying and exposure to inappropriate content, and "promote" focus in school. "First and foremost, this policy is about ensuring that our schools are phone-free learning environments," Ms McEntee said. "Students should not be on their phones during the school day. This guidance and support will ensure all schools have the supports they need to achieve this, having regard to their own requirements. "Having engaged with many different school communities across the country, I am confident that this policy will support student wellbeing, engagement and their interaction with their peers, while also recognising the experience and expertise of school communities and the need for consultation." She added: "This initiative empowers school communities to lead on the issue, backed by 9 million euro in funding to allow post-primary schools to use the phone storage solution that works best for their school community and their students." The department said the method used to limit phone use will be decided by each school, and could include phone storage pouches or lock boxes, keeping phones in lockers, using classroom lockable boxes or cubbies, and drop-off and collection at the school office. "Schools will adopt a consistent approach for the full school day, with limited exemptions allowed for medical or compassionate grounds, as outlined in the guidance information," it said.