FIFA's inaugural Club World Cup set to kick off in the US amid challenges
June 3 (Reuters) - FIFA's billion-dollar gamble to revolutionise club football begins a week on Sunday with plenty of cash up for grabs but questionable enthusiasm as 32 teams prepare to contest the expanded Club World Cup in 12 stadiums across the United States.
The tournament – designed as a glittering showcase ahead of the 2026 World Cup – has had to contend with the prospect of empty seats along with controversial qualification rules and player welfare concerns after an exhausting European season.
Lionel Messi's Inter Miami face Saudi Arabia's Al Ahly in the opening fixture on June 15 at Miami's Hard Rock Stadium, with tickets still widely available days before kickoff.
A glance at FIFA's website shows lots of tickets available, including for the July 13 final at New Jersey's MetLife Stadium.
Messi's presence underscores the tournament's contentious foundations.
Inter Miami gained entry by topping Major League Soccer's regular season standings, despite losing in the first round of the playoffs – a decision critics say shows FIFA's desperation to have the Argentina great at their inaugural showpiece.
FIFA's decision to give the host nation a spot and award it to Inter Miami underlined the opaque nature of the qualifying criteria for the tournament, which won't feature Liverpool, Barcelona or Napoli who have all just been crowned champions of three of the most prestigious leagues in Europe.
Apart from the winners of each confederation's premier club competitions, teams qualified according to a ranking based on their performances over a four-year period.
There is also the case of Club Leon, the 2023 CONCACAF Champions Cup winners, who were excluded from the tournament just over a month ago due to having shared ownership with another qualifier. The spot has gone to MLS's Los Angeles FC.
Nailing down a last-gasp $1 billion TV rights deal with sports streaming platform DAZN six months before the tournament means a total of $2 billion in expected revenues.
That led FIFA to announce a total prize pot of $1 billion, with the winning club to receive up to $125 million.
That figure represents 25% more than Paris St Germain earned from their entire 17-match Champions League campaign.
But this largesse has not quelled concerns about player welfare, with the global players union FIFPro taking legal action against FIFA over a tournament that further compresses the precious recovery time between gruelling seasons.
Furthermore there is still concern over the playing surfaces after last season's Copa America, when many headlines focused on the sub-par conditions and smaller pitch dimensions.
Those pitches, measuring 100 by 64 metres, were 740 square metres smaller than FIFA's standard size, prompting widespread discontent among players and coaches.
FIFA has given assurances that this time the NFL stadiums hosting the matches will meet their specifications, confirming that all venues will feature natural grass and adhere to the standard regulation dimensions of 105 by 68 metres.
Divided into eight groups of four teams, top contenders include Real Madrid, winners of six of the last 12 Champions League titles, plus German champions Bayern Munich and 2023 Premier League and Champions League winners Manchester City.
European champions Paris St Germain are the in-form team heading into the tournament after their historic 5-0 thrashing of Inter Milan in the Champions League final on Saturday.
But they must survive a tough Group B featuring South American and Brazilian champions Botafogo and 2024 CONCACAF winners Seattle Sounders plus Spanish giants Atletico Madrid.
Whether you call it soccer or football, for FIFA the tournament represents a dress rehearsal and a referendum on America's appetite for the sport and on the world governing body's vision for its commercial future ahead of the 2026 World Cup being co-hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Unions file complaint over Saudi Arabia's treatment of migrant workers
GENEVA, June 4 (Reuters) - The International Trade Union Confederation and its sister African organisation filed a formal complaint on Wednesday urging the International Labour Organization to investigate Saudi Arabia's labour practices. It raised concerns about mistreatment of migrant construction and domestic workers as the 2034 soccer World Cup looms on the horizon, citing examples of workers being forced to work up to 20 hours a day, denied wages and subjected to beatings. Human rights groups have strongly criticised FIFA's decision to award Saudi Arabia the 2034 World Cup as the kingdom does not have a minimum wage for migrant workers and also enforces the "kafala" system that binds them to a specific employer for the duration of their residence in the country. FIFA and Saudi Arabia's communications office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Saudi Arabia has previously denied accusations of human rights abuses. "Workers are being treated as disposable in Saudi Arabia. They leave alive and return in coffins," Joel Odigie, General Secretary of ITUC-Africa, said in a statement. ITUC said it had asked the ILO to investigate because it had not seen improvements in workers rights after having tried to engage with the Saudi government. The ILO, the United Nations body that sets international labour standards, told Reuters its governing body would consider the complaint lodged against Saudi Arabia in November. In 2024 the Saudi government announced an expatriate insurance policy to protect workers if their employer defaults on salary payments. In 2021 it amended the kafala system by allowing some migrant workers to leave the country without their employer's permission. Neighbouring Qatar came under similar ITUC criticism ahead of hosting the 2022 World Cup. The ITUC later praised Qatar for introducing labour reforms, though more recently it has raised concerns that they had not been fully implemented.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Disney World fans threaten to BOYCOTT as theme park reveals closing date of beloved ride: 'Canceling my trip'
Disney World fans are threatening to boycott the theme park after it unveiled the first major details on its upcoming Cars land... and finally confirmed the closing date of a beloved ride. The Happiest Place on Earth announced last year that it would be getting rid of Tom Sawyer Island in Magic Kingdom's Frontierland to make way for a new Lightning McQueen-themed area. Now, the theme park has revealed when it will officially be shut down - and the news has left hoards of Disney fans across the globe outraged. Tom Sawyer Island, as well as the Liberty Square Riverboat ride, will have its final day of operation on July 6, 2025. That means guests only have a little more than a month left to enjoy the serene island inspired by the stories of Mark Twain. Immediately, Disney park-goers took to X, formerly Twitter, to share their heartbreak over the announcement, and some even admitted that they no longer wanted to visit the park. 'Canceling my trip in October and sadly, will never visit that park again,' one user announced. 'This is an abomination and a real disservice to all those who booked summer trips hoping to enjoy all this one more time,' added another. 'Talk about timing. Thankful we enjoyed it recently.' 'Never going back,' someone else wrote. 'I have a lot of happy memories there, and I'll keep them.' 'Huge mistake. Huge,' a fourth tweet read, while a fifth said, 'Largest downgrade.' 'Sorry but I'm not going to Disney World anymore. I'm staying at my home park, which is Disneyland in Anaheim, California,' a different user shared. 'I am heartbroken at the loss of Tom Sawyer island this is the WORST decision ever,' someone else penned. 'This is a travesty! Build new somewhere else. We want nostalgia,' urged another person. Disney shared new details about the upcoming changes coming to Magic Kingdom in a press release on Tuesday. The new Cars land will contain two dazzling attractions. One will 'be geared towards smaller guests and will be fun for the whole family,' while the second will 'invite you on a thrilling rally race through the mountains.' The company explained that the new area will be called Piston Peak National Park and described it as an 'awe-inspiring wilderness filled with towering trees, snowcapped mountains, breathtaking waterfalls, roaring rivers and impressive geysers.' The Cars land will contain two attractions. One will be 'fun for the whole family,' while the other will 'invite you on a thrilling race through the mountains.' Concept art for the land is seen 'While fictional, Piston Peak is inspired by the Rocky Mountain area and the history and iconic sights of the American Frontier and its national parks,' it added. 'Inside Piston Peak, guests will be able to see and explore the visitor lodge, Ranger HQ, trails, and more - all set within the Disney and Pixar Cars universe. 'To make sure these buildings fit naturally within the surrounding majestic landscapes, Imagineers are using a style of architecture called "Parkitecture," which was developed by the National Park Service to create structures that harmonize with the natural environment. 'Rugged mountains with dramatic peaks will be nestled along a calming waterway across from Grizzly Hall and soaring geysers from the famed Big Thunder Mountain Railroad will stretch into the trails of our off-road rally.' Disney also promised that 'imagineers are hard at work' bringing the 'first-ever land inspired by the Disney villains' to life, which will be located behind the Big Thunder Mountain ride in Magic Kingdom. The company explained in a press release on Tuesday that the new area will be called Piston Peak National Park. A concept art for one of the Cars rides is seen Disney also promised that 'Imagineers are hard at work' bringing the 'first-ever land inspired by the Disney villains' to life. Concept art for the villains land is seen Over in Hollywood Studios, a new Monsters Inc. land will replace Muppets Courtyard; The Muppet*Vision 3D ride will close on June 8, 2025 That land will feature two more new rides, dining, and shopping 'all on an incredibly twisted grand scale.' Tons of other new stuff are in the works at Disney World, including an Encanto river ride, an Indiana Jones attraction, and a Zootopia show at Animal Kingdom. But that means guests will have to say goodbye to DinoLand and the Dinosaur ride, which is slated to close in 2026. Over in Hollywood Studios, a new Monsters Inc. land will replace Muppets Courtyard; The Muppet*Vision 3D ride will close on June 8, 2025. The Monsters Inc. area is set to have a suspended rollercoaster that will put riders 'right in the middle of the monster action.'
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Millions of doses of ‘pandemic-ending' HIV jab at risk over Trump's aid cuts
Professor Linda-Gail Bekker recalls having 'shivers' when she found out that not one single woman given a revolutionary new jab in her medical trial had caught HIV. She told a global Aids summit last year that she 'literally burst into tears.' Now, she tells The Independent, that emotion has turned into an 'acute sense of despair '. The funding to get lenacapavir – a twice-yearly preventative jab that has been described as the nearest thing we have to an HIV vaccine – out to at least two million people around the globe is in question amid the turmoil accompanying Donald Trump decision to slash US aid spending. Lenacapavir stops HIV from replicating meaning that, as long as someone is on the drug, they are almost totally protected from developing the virus if they are exposed to it. Prof Bekker's study found a 96 per cent reduction in HIV overall - but in the arm of the trial looking at women and adolescent girls, there were no infections at all. Global funders, led by Pepfar and the Global Fund, in December promised to secure enough doses of the jab to protect at least two million people over three years. Its manufacturer Gilead says it will sell these at no profit, though it has not made the cost of a dose public. Gilead has also signed agreements with six pharmaceutical companies in India, Pakistan, Egypt, and the US to allow them to make generic versions of the drug in order to increase supply and drive down the cost of the jab. A significant chunk of the money to fund the doses of lenacapavir was set to come from the US-led global Aids response programme, the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar). But this funding, and the future of Pepfar itself, is now uncertain. 'In all of the excitement [of the trial results] we were thinking, well, what do you do with [the] doses? What's the best way to use it?' Prof Bekker says. 'Suddenly, that is very much up in the air'. The other main funding source, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has said that it still aims to fund the doses of lenacapavir. Speaking to The Independent, however, Global Fund executive director Peter Sands tempers this by saying the success of his organisation's funding round coming up later this year would, 'determine how much scope we have for this'. The US was the Global Fund's biggest donor. Sands says that while he would 'love to say' the Global Fund could fill the gap, this would be contingent on how much money is raised from governments and private donors. "Despite all the uncertainties both around Pepfar and our own future funding, we are still very keen to deliver on the ambition,' Sands says. But, more funding than they have currently been pledged will be needed to, 'realise the full potential of lenacapavir'. At the World Health Organisation (WHO)'s annual decision-making meeting which concluded late last month, the United Nations' Aids agency (UNAIDS) called for 'urgent action to avoid millions of avoidable HIV infections and Aids-related deaths,' saying this included, 'access to long-acting injectables for HIV prevention which are almost 100 per cent effective at preventing infections' – a nod to lenacapavir. 'A missed opportunity' Prof Bekker played a crucial role in trialling the jab in eight countries including her home country of South Africa, and she was on the brink of seeing that breakthrough rolled out – it could have been in people's arms by the end of this year. Long-acting jabs like lenacapavir are not only about protecting individuals, they are a crucial part of ending the Aids pandemic, Prof Bekker explains. 'A six-monthly injectable is as close as we can get at this moment to a vaccine,' Prof Bekker says. Just like with a vaccine, it can help keep whole populations safe by stopping vulnerable people from catching the virus and then potentially spreading the virus to more people. 'You finally have something that could actually bring us to a conclusion [of the Aids crisis]. 'It just feels like such a calamitous missed opportunity,' she says. Overcoming stigma A daily preventative medicine – a combination of two drugs known collectively as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) – is already available and is very effective. But people without reliable access to healthcare find it harder to maintain a regime that involves regular pills. Girls, young women and LGBT+ people in Southern Africa can also face questioning from family members if they have packets of daily pills in their homes which indicate they are sexually active, and it can put women in relationships at higher risk of domestic violence. A six-monthly jab on the other hand can be maintained more discreetly and with less user error. Offering lenacapavir to young women – among the hardest to reach with HIV prevention - when they book into prenatal care can also prevent them from passing the virus onto their children. 'That is a good use of money, right?' Prof Bekker says. 'You're saving two infections; one of them a lifelong infection in a child that will need antivirals for the next 70 to 75 years'. 'They are young people in front of us. We can introduce them to Republican Congressmen if needed'. A State Department spokesperson said: 'Pepfar continues to support lifesaving HIV testing, care and treatment, and prevention of mother to child transmission services approved by the Secretary of State. 'As directed by the Secretary of State all other Pepfar-funded services are being reviewed for assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy. Pepfar, like all assistance programmes, should be reduced over time as it achieves its mission.' Ending Aids Figures previously reported by The Independent suggest Trump's slashing of foreign aid has derailed the projected end of the Aids pandemic and could lead to four million extra deaths by 2030. The latest global figures show there were 1.3 million new HIV infections and roughly 630,00 people dying from Aids around the world in 2023. Regardless of the cuts, before any doses can be made available, the drug has to be approved by regulators. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s decision is understood to be on track to approve the preventative jab on 19 June, followed by other national medicines regulators and the WHO. Before the cuts, an FDA approval would have marked the moment it would be full steam ahead to roll lenacapavir out to the people who need it most. But those approvals won't count for much if the money to pay for the drug and get it out to the people who need it doesn't materialise, as Prof Bekker fears. 'It does feel like this thing that could help us end the epidemic sooner is suddenly receding in the chaos'.
