logo
Hairdresser fears she could lose home over tax hikes

Hairdresser fears she could lose home over tax hikes

Yahoo25-04-2025

"I never wanted to do anything else but be a hairdresser," said Kerry Larcher, who opened her first salon when she was 21-years-old.
Despite successfully growing her business in Hornchurch, in East London, over three decades, the 50-year-old says she now faces losing her life's work and her home.
Tax rises in October's Budget are "crippling" her salon business, she said, and the extra £23,000 a year imposed by the chancellor could prove the final nail in the coffin.
"I have been crying myself to sleep because, since October, this has been the worst period of my personal life in 30 years," she said.
"I feel ashamed to get into debt but we are gradually eating through our business reserves and I can't take wages if I don't make a profit.
"I could lose my house if the business folds - that is the reality and if things don't change it is frightening the life out of me."
'I don't have the margin to invest in apprentices'
'Perfect storm' could see end of salon apprenticeships
'We're always hammered' - Beauty industry ahead of budget
The government says the tax changes announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves were needed to stabilise the economy.
They say their plan to reform business rates will mean lower taxes for High Street businesses such as hair salons when it comes into effect in 2026-27.
But salon owners fear this may come too late to save their businesses.
Cutting a client's hair, Kerry explained she could not afford to take on any new apprentices this year and had been forced to reduce the hours of her current 12 apprentices to the minimum.
The next step will be to halve the number of apprentices over the next year as their contracts finish, ending up with six by the end of this year.
If the business cannot recover over the next four years, the rest of her 28 staff, who are nearly all local women who became stylists after serving an apprenticeship at the salon, are facing potential redundancy.
"I'm having to drastically reduce my overall employee numbers to cut costs just to survive," she said.
"Where are the future hairdressers going to come from if good, employed salons go out of business?"
Kerry added the way the chancellor is treating salons, which overwhelmingly employ women, "totally goes against the objectives of the government" in growing the economy and supporting workers.
Part of the pressure is coming from the UK's Value Added Tax (VAT) rules, which do not allow businesses to reclaim tax on staff costs in the same way they can for goods, putting labour-intensive businesses such as hair or beauty salons at a disadvantage.
"If you look at a cafe, one waiter can serve several tables of four customers in the space of an hour and the cafe can reclaim the VAT on all the food and drink they serve," Kerry explained.
"Whereas one salon customer needs attention from the receptionist, the apprentice for hair-washing, and the stylist in that same hour and we can only claim VAT back on a tube of hair colour."
Many hairdressers went into debt due to the pandemic, said Kerry, and the added pressures of increases in employer National Insurance contributions (Nics) and business rates are now threatening the future of salons across the country.
For Kerry's salon, the Vanilla Rooms, the tax increases have added a "devastating" £23,000 extra to her annual costs, through a combination of the threshold at which employers start to pay Nics on staff wages being lowered to £5,000 and changes to business rates.
Her Nics costs have risen 29%, from £42,000 to about £54,500 - now costing more than £1,000 a week - and business rates have gone up by 144%, from £700 to £18,000 a year.
Kerry is one of 50,000 UK hairdressing professionals represented by the British Hair Consortium (BHC), which has urged Rachel Reeves to take action or face the "collapse" of the industry due to rising costs.
The BHC argues the most efficient support the government could offer is through halving VAT for salons, because staff wages make up 60% of their costs.
The association says cutting VAT could actually increase overall tax take, by preventing more workers going self-employed or entering the black market.
Kerry's case was one of those raised by Conservative MP Julia Lopez in a debate this week in Parliament's Westminster Hall, where she urged Rachel Reeves to lower VAT from 20% to 10% to support the hair and beauty sector.
Lopez, the MP for Hornchurch and Upminster, said Kerry was not alone in being forced to consider whether she will have to shut up shop completely.
"Some the increased bills for salons are just unbelievable," she said, adding that women were disproportionately impacted by the changes.
"It's hard to ignore the impact, let alone the irony, of a chancellor celebrating herself for being the first woman to hold that office while simultaneously hammering the sectors that employ, serve and are often led, by women."
Liberal Democrat business spokesperson Sarah Gibson agreed that Reeves' Budget had implemented "an unfair tax on jobs" and the government must offer tax relief for small businesses in June.
Gibson said an increasing number of salons are opting to rent chairs out to self-employed staff, instead of employing stylists directly, to avoid paying tax.
"If salons don't get support we will see a huge increase in people becoming chair renters," she said, which reduces the Treasury's overall tax take.
Responding for the Labour government, Small Business Minister Gareth Thomas defended the chancellor's decisions in her October Budget as "important for long term stability".
Salons are "a vital pillar of our high streets", he said, adding "many hair and beauty businesses will benefit from some of the other measures the chancellor introduced".
"We increased the employment allowance so that almost one million employers pay no national insurance contributions at all.
More than half of employers will see no change or gain from that package, and that includes many hair and beauty businesses," he told MPs.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House approves cuts package
House approves cuts package

E&E News

time2 hours ago

  • E&E News

House approves cuts package

The House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package Thursday, a White House priority that would claw back more than half a billion dollars for international disaster aid and clean energy programs. The 'Rescissions Act of 2025,' H.R. 4, now heads across the Capitol, where senators say they want to amend it before voting on it later this summer. The upper chamber must act on the bill by July 18, or the funds in question will have to be spent. House leaders were able to pass the package Thursday despite reluctance from some moderate Republicans, who had expressed concerns about proposed cuts to the public broadcasting budget and a popular AIDS prevention program. The bill passed 214-212. Advertisement 'Today's House passage of this initial rescissions package marks a critical step toward a more responsible and transparent government that puts the interests of the American taxpayers first,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). The rescissions, requested by White House budget chief Russ Vought, are based on recommendations from the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. They target $8.3 billion in current funding for the State Department and $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which would mainly impact local PBS and NPR stations. 'Every dollar spent on woke foreign policy is not only a dollar wasted but is a dollar devoted to tarnish our own nation's image,' said Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), a senior appropriator, during a hearing on the bill earlier this week. Among the State Department cuts is a $496 million clawback for various international disaster assistance initiatives. The White House has said it would leave intact programs that the administration believes are 'life-saving or have a clear, direct nexus to U.S. national interests.' Officials have not specified which programs would be cut or spared. Additionally, the bill would repeal the United States' entire $125 million contribution to the international Clean Technology Fund for fiscal 2025. The White House Office of Management and Budget has said that the rescissions would cancel $6 million for 'net zero cities' in Mexico, $5 million for 'green transportation and logistics in Eurasia,' $2.1 million for 'climate resilience in Southeast Asia, Latin America [and] East Africa' and $500,000 for 'electric buses in Rwanda.' It's not clear how the rescissions request would target those specific initiatives. They are not explicitly named in Congress' explanatory statement for the fiscal 2024 State-Foreign Operations funding law, which was extended through fiscal 2025. And investments that countries receive for projects under the Clean Technology Fund are not directly tied to donor countries' contributions. A spokesperson for OMB did not respond to emailed questions before publication. OMB said in its rescission request to Congress that the repeal would be in line with President Donald Trump's executive order pulling the U.S. out of international climate agreements. It said the Clean Technology Fund 'invests in Green New Deal projects in developing countries that do not reflect America's values or put the American people first.' Other cuts would go after funding for programs meant to support democracy, global nutrition, LGBTQ people, AIDS prevention and contraception access, as well as the World Health Organization, the U.S. Institute of Peace and public radio broadcasters. More to come The package of cuts could be the first of multiple efforts by the White House and congressional Republicans to rescind funding that was already appropriated with bipartisan support in order to save taxpayer dollars and target Democratic priorities. Democrats say the effort could harm or kill people across the country and around the world. They have blasted it as a dangerous precedent and part of a broader effort to illegally impound, or withhold, funding approved by Congress. OMB said in a statement of administration policy this week that Trump has 'exercised his authority' under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to request the rescissions in the bill. The White House is claiming those same authorities to unilaterally freeze appropriated funds and may send Congress a spending deferral notice before the end of this Congress. 'These rescissions would eliminate programs that are antithetical to American interests and values, such as funding radical gender ideology, 'equity' programs, and policies that threaten our energy security,' the White House said in the statement. The public broadcasting cuts would mostly impact locally owned radio and television stations, which many Americans rely on for emergency alerts during and after natural disasters. Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-N.M.) noted during the bill's Rules Committee hearing this week that when Hurricane Helene hit the Southeast last year, 'people were relying on public radio because that's all that existed.' House Appropriations ranking member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said the cuts to international disaster aid would hurt farmers in Republican-led states whose crops help feed people around the world following extreme weather events.

Louisiana's 2025 legislative session ends with governor saying he plans to call a special session
Louisiana's 2025 legislative session ends with governor saying he plans to call a special session

Associated Press

time2 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Louisiana's 2025 legislative session ends with governor saying he plans to call a special session

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — With just minutes to spare, Louisiana lawmakers concluded the 2025 legislative session on Thursday — but, per usual, it ended with a bang. Before lawmakers could even walk out the Capitol doors, Gov. Jeff Landry said he planned to call a special session in the future, with the hopes of reviving controversial legislation that died Thursday. It is unclear when exactly lawmakers would be asked to return. Last-minute amendments to bill, which would prohibit companies from owning both pharmacy benefits managers and drugstores, caused a frenzy in the final days of session — complete with fiery testimony from lawmakers, a massive lobbying campaign to block the measure by retail giant CVS and promises of legal action by the Attorney General. Also in the final hours of session lawmakers approved the state's $51 billion budget. Lawmakers earmarked $1.8 million for 'expenses related to the recapture of fugitive offenders' in the aftermath of a massive New Orleans jail escape. They also pulled $1.2 billion from a state savings fund mainly to spend on infrastructure improvements and spruce up sites seeking private sector investment. In a blow to Landry, the GOP-dominated Legislature allocated less than half the $93.5 million he requested for expanding a school voucher program. Traditionally this year's gathering is fiscally focused, But the GOP-dominated legislature filed hundreds of bills to tackle issues that lawmakers felt were plaguing the state, from fiscal matters to social issues. Here's a look at some of the bills. Passed ABORTION LIABILITY EXPANSION: The measure expands who can be sued over abortions, targeting out-of-state doctors and activists who prescribe, sell or mail pregnancy-ending drugs to residents in Louisiana — where abortions are banned with few exceptions. MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN: Louisiana passed its own package of nutrition reforms. The measures restrict certain food additives in schools, set nutrition education requirements for health care providers, require food manufacturers to disclose the use of certain artificial ingredients, and order restaurants to post if they are using seed oils. INSURANCE: Despite facing stiff opposition from the insurance industry and pushback from Republican lawmakers, Landry succeeded in passing legislation giving the state's insurance commissioner more authority to block auto insurance rate increases by companies. Other passed bills aim to limit the damages for people involved in vehicle accidents, such as barring damages to cover injuries for the driver primarily responsible for a crash. IMMIGRATION: Lawmakers passed a package of legislation that expands the state's role in immigration enforcement and promises cooperation with federal efforts. One bill would make it a crime for law enforcement agents and public officials to obstruct federal immigration enforcement efforts. Another measure requires state agencies to verify and report anyone illegally in the U.S. who is receiving state services. ETHICS: Lawmakers overwhelmingly approved a bill written by the governor's personal attorney that makes it harder for the state's ethics board to investigative allegations of wrongdoing and file charges against elected officials. IVF TREATMENT: In an effort to avoid what happened in Alabama, lawmakers passed a bill that protects in vitro fertilization providers from criminal charges and lawsuits. CAMPAIGN FUNDING: Lawmakers raised the disclosure thresholds for campaign finance matters, meaning less information will be shared with the public about the donations they receive and their spending of donations. They also expanded the ways elected officials' campaign funds could be spent, including on Mardi Gras celebrations in Washington, D.C. IVERMECTIN: One measure allows the antiparasitic drug, a discredited COVID-era treatment, to be sold for over-the-counter use. WEATHER MODIFICATION: Louisiana is the latest state to prohibit anyone from 'intentionally' injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' Rejected DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION: After emotional pleas from Black lawmakers, a bill that bans state government DEI programs died on the vine in the Senate. SPLIT JURY: Incarcerated people, who were convicted under the now-banned practice of split juries, would have had the opportunity to ask for a new trial under one proposed measure. However, Republicans rejected the bill. MINIMUM WAGE: One bill would have gradually increased Louisiana's minimum wage, which currently stands at $7.25, over the next four years. Similar bills have repeatedly been shot down. ABORTION BAN EXCEPTIONS: For the third year, lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added rape, in cases where the victim is under the age of 17, to the narrow list of exceptions to the state's abortion ban. LGBTQ WORKPLACE PROTECTIONS: A measure that would prohibit employment discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation failed in committee. FLUORIDE BILL: A bill that would have outlawed fluoride in Louisiana's public water systems failed.

Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS
Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS

Rachel Reeves is a "gnat's whisker" away from having to raise taxes in the autumn budget, a leading economist has warned - despite the chancellor insisting her plans are "fully funded". Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said "any move in the wrong direction" for the economy before the next fiscal event would "almost certainly spark more tax rises". 'Sting in the tail' in chancellor's plans - politics latest Speaking the morning after she delivered her spending review, which sets government budgets until 2029, Ms Reeves told hiking taxes wasn't inevitable. "Everything I set out yesterday was fully costed and fully funded," she told Sky News Breakfast. Her plans - which include £29bn for day-to-day NHS spending, £39bn for affordable and social housing, and boosts for defence and transport - are based on what she set out in October's budget. That budget, her first as chancellor, included controversial tax hikes on employers and increased borrowing to help public services. Chancellor won't rule out tax rises The Labour government has long vowed not to raise taxes on "working people" - specifically income tax, national insurance for employees, and VAT. Ms Reeves refused to completely rule out tax rises in her next budget, saying the world is "very uncertain". The Conservatives have claimed she will almost certainly have to put taxes up, with shadow chancellor Mel Stride accusing her of mismanaging the economy. Taxes on businesses had "destroyed growth" and increased spending had been "inflationary", he told Sky News. New official figures showed the economy contracted in April by 0.3% - more than expected. It coincided with Donald Trump imposing tariffs across the world. Ms Reeves admitted the figures were "disappointing" but pointed to more positive figures from previous months. Read more: 'Sting in the tail' She is hoping Labour's plans will provide more jobs and boost growth, with major infrastructure projects "spread" across the country - from the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, to a rail line connecting Liverpool and Manchester. But the IFS said further contractions in the economy, and poor forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility, would likely require the chancellor to increase the national tax take once again. It said her spending review already accounted for a 5% rise in council tax to help local authorities, labelling it a "sting in the tail" after she told Sky's Beth Rigby that it wouldn't have to go up.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store