
As South Korea Gets Ready to Vote, Women Don't Like the Choices
Young South Korean women are often dismissed by men as apolitical, but they were prominent in the movement to impeach former President Yoon Suk Yeol, whom they accused of encouraging contempt and even hatred for them. They were among the first to take to the streets to condemn Mr. Yoon's short-lived imposition of martial law in December, enlivening large rallies with K-pop songs and glow sticks.
But as South Korea prepares to elect Mr. Yoon's replacement on June 3, many women say their priorities — making the country safer and fairer for them — are taking a back seat, and not for the first time.
They endure some of the worst gender-based discrimination in the developed world, including lower pay and underrepresentation in management and politics, as well as rampant online sexual abuse that the law has done little to stop. But addressing such issues has become one of South Korea's most politically delicate subjects.
With the economy in a slump and jobs scarce, many young men consider themselves victims of reverse discrimination and bristle at any hint of a feminist agenda in government. Mr. Yoon and his right-wing People Power Party leveraged such sentiments to win the young male vote, and the presidency, in 2022. During the campaign, he said there was no structural discrimination against women in South Korea.
Lee Jae-myung, who lost that election to Mr. Yoon by a razor-thin margin, has a substantial lead in the polls this time. But though he has recognized the 'leading role' that young women played in Mr. Yoon's ouster, Mr. Lee and his left-wing Democratic Party are being careful not to provoke male voters with messages that could be seen as feminist.
As a result, neither Mr. Lee nor his conservative main rival, Kim Moon-soo of the People Power Party, is saying much about women's issues. Some women have concluded that nothing will change, regardless of who wins.
'We only have poor options in this election,' said Park Jia, who leads a gender equality education center run by the Seoul Women's Association. 'Sure, many women will vote for Lee Jae-myung — not because they expect him to be a great leader for women, but because they are desperate to keep the other side, the conservatives, from power and stop the regression.'
On average, South Korean women are paid 31 percent less than men, the widest gap in the developed world. They hold less than one-fifth of legislative seats, just three of the government's 29 top positions and 14.6 percent of senior corporate management roles (the average among wealthy nations is 33.8 percent). All six presidential candidates are men.
The country's only female president, the conservative Park Geun-hye, was impeached in 2016. Many women who joined the rallies that precipitated her ouster said they wanted to drive out a corrupt leader, but they also hoped for a president who would do more to protect them from violent crime and online misogyny. Moon Jae-in, who was elected to replace Ms. Park, promised to be a 'feminist president.'
But he did not live up to that moniker. An anti-feminist backlash, part of a global trend, kicked in, driven largely by conservative Christian churches and young men. 'Feminist' is now such a forbidden word that some women are afraid to use it in online profiles. Some are even reluctant to take women's studies classes, fearing that they will be targeted for abuse.
As part of his bid for young men's votes in 2022, Mr. Yoon promised to abolish the ministry of gender equality. He did not follow through, but during his presidency, the national gender equality index, which the ministry has compiled since 2010, fell for the first time.
When Mr. Yoon declared martial law, women were ready to strike back.
'For us, it was very personal,' said Jang Hyun-ji, 28, a digital comics artist. 'We joined the rallies against him not only because his martial law undermined our democracy, but also because he became president by encouraging hatred and discrimination against women.'
Women in their 20s were the most highly represented group in the rallies calling for Mr. Yoon's ouster, while men of that age were largely 'silent' and 'cynical,' Hanna Kim, a political scientist at Chinju National University of Education, said in a study published by the East Asia Institute. Young women channeled their K-pop fandom into political activism, supplanting the refrains of hit songs with slogans like 'Out, Out, Yoon Suk Yeol Out!'
'His impeachment was a victory for women, proof that women have become a leading force in society,' said Park Min-ju, 27, a rally M.C. who interspersed protest music with K-pop.
After Mr. Yoon was driven out — the National Assembly impeached him in December, and a court formally removed him last month — women demanded their dividend. Rights groups called on the new government to fill half of its decision-making positions with women. They also wanted more government support for child care, since women are often forced to leave work to care for their children.
But for the major presidential candidates, such concerns have been sidelined by the need to chase the elusive, and sharply divided, youth vote. Mr. Lee's popularity is lowest among men in their 20s and Mr. Kim's among women in their 20s, according to surveys. But there are also more swing voters among young adults than any other demographic.
Mr. Lee has been careful not to say anything that could galvanize anti-feminist emotions. Some of his campaign promises are aimed at helping women, like tougher punishments for dating violence and digital sex crimes, as well as police hotlines for women who own small businesses like shops and restaurants. Mr. Lee has also said he would require corporations to make gender-based disparities public, including pay gaps.
But Mr. Lee has been silent about some of the top priorities among women's groups, such as anti-discrimination legislation and expanding the definition of rape to include sex without consent (currently, the law requires violence or explicit coercion).
'His strategy is to ignore the gender equality agenda, because he sees it as a stumbling block against his election,' the Korea Women's Political Network, a feminist civic group, said in a statement.
Mr. Lee has denied such accusations. He has acknowledged that women face structural discrimination, and he has vowed to create more jobs, saying it would ease the economic stress that fuels gender conflict among young South Koreans.
If young female voters are less than satisfied with Mr. Lee, many see Mr. Kim as a worse choice.
Mr. Kim says he will seek 'gender equality in military service' by letting more women join the armed forces. He wants young men to get workplace benefits after they finish their mandatory military service. To boost South Korea's low birthrate, Mr. Kim has promised tax breaks and more affordable child care and housing for young people who marry and have children.
But women have bristled at appeals from the government to have children, given the difficulty of pursuing both motherhood and a career. Mr. Kim once addressed the birthrate issue by saying that South Korean women would rather take care of a dog than have a baby. He has also been criticized for recruiting a campaign organizer with a reputation for being anti-feminist.
Many women say there is no one in the race who clearly deserves their support.
'Women like me will never vote for the candidate of the People Power Party,' said Jeong Eun-byeol, a college student. 'That makes the Democratic Party treat us like fish already caught.'
Still, some are willing to give Mr. Lee the benefit of the doubt.
'We don't have any option other than to trust and vote for him,' said Kim Do-won, 28. 'If he is not doing well after his election, we can protest again.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Korean Stock Hedges Cheapen With $3.2 Billion of Bullish Bets
South Korea's presidential election last week has sparked the biggest equity surge in more than four years. Options traders are betting there's more to come. As the Kospi 200 Index rallied 8.4% in the past six days, the cost of hedging against declines has tumbled. The measure known as skew is now hovering around its lowest level since last July after a series of newly created, big bullish options block trades.


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
South Korea Enters a Post-Election Bull Market
South Korea's June presidential election ended six months of political uncertainty and policy paralysis in the country. Investors are optimistic that President Lee Jae-myung, with the support of the legislative assembly, can boost the economy with fiscal stimulus and corporate governance reform. The Kospi Index has surged more than 20% this year, surprising many global investors who have until now been hesitant to allocate capital in the country. President Lee faces many challenges, however, including the threat of US tariffs, increasing competition from Chinese exports and a sluggish economy. And what does a return to democratic party policies mean for the chaebols, the scions of Korean industry? Peter Kim, investment strategist and managing director for KB Securities, discusses the outlook for Asia's fourth-largest economy with John Lee and Katia Dmitrieva on the Asia Centric podcast.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
As Trump's ‘two week' deadline for Russia expires, he faces a series of unresolved foreign conflicts
Two weeks after President Donald Trump set a 14-day timeline for determining the willingness of his Russian counterpart to end the conflict in Ukraine, he says he is coming to believe Vladimir Putin doesn't care about the human cost of his war. 'I'm starting to think maybe he doesn't,' Trump said when an interviewer asked whether Putin minded losing thousands of his soldiers in Ukraine every week. The candid admission, made in a New York Post podcast recorded this week, underscored the difficulties Trump continues to face in brokering complex international deals, including on issues he once said could be easily resolved. He also now appears less confident in striking a nuclear deal with Iran, despite saying days ago he believed the talks were progressing in the right direction. And negotiations to end the war in Gaza have been deadlocked, with Trump's agitation toward Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu deepening. While Trump did find success this week in working out an agreement with China to roll back some of the punitive measures each side had enacted amid a worsening trade war, it wasn't clear how long the new framework would hold. A deal made last month in Switzerland with similar terms quickly fell apart. And so far there has been only one trade agreement to emerge from the 90-day negotiating period Trump set with US partners this spring after pausing his reciprocal tariffs. The deadline comes due in early July. Even Trump's overtures to his onetime pen-pal Kim Jong Un have apparently fallen flat. Attempts to deliver a letter from Trump to the North Korean dictator were rebuffed by diplomats based at the headquarters of the United Nations in New York, according to the Seoul-based NK News, scuttling immediate hopes of rekindling the first-term friendship Trump enjoyed with the strongman. 'The president remains receptive to correspondence with Kim Jong Un. He'd like to see the progress that was made at that (2018) summit in Singapore,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday when asked about the report. But the administration hasn't given up on any of the difficult issues that remain unresolved. Despite suggesting he might walk away entirely from the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump hasn't entirely abandoned his efforts. He is entering an intensive stretch of summitry that is likely to focus on the war, including a Group of 7 meeting in Canada next week and a NATO summit in the Netherlands later this month. His team, led by special envoy Steve Witkoff, plans another round of Iran talks in the coming days, even amid loudening opposition to a deal from some Iran hawks and Israeli officials. And trade talks continue apace as the July 9 deadline nears. 'You're going to see deal after deal that's going to start coming next week. And the week after and the week after,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC on Wednesday. 'We've got lots of them in the hopper. We just want to make sure they're the best deal we can possibly make. We don't want to rush.' Still, Trump's own comments this week offered stark insight into his frustrated — and, for him, frustrating — attempts at negotiating deals around the world. 'We make progress and then all of a sudden, something gets bombed that shouldn't be bombed, and that's the end of the progress,' he said of the Ukraine conflict, describing a two-steps-forward, one-step-back reality to the grinding efforts to broker a ceasefire. It was two weeks ago Wednesday that Trump vowed to have an answer in a fortnight on Putin's willingness to end the war, a timeline he's used repeatedly this spring when questioned about his Ukraine policy. Since then, Trump has not made a decision on applying new sanctions on Moscow, even as his Republican allies on Capitol Hill agitate for harsher measures and Europe imposes new restrictions on Russia's oil and gas sector. 'I'll use it if it's necessary,' he told reporters aboard Air Force One last Friday. He said senators, many of whom have signed on to a bill to increase sanctions on Russia, are leaving the decision up to him. But he said he hadn't discussed the matter with them. 'I haven't spoken to them about it,' he said. 'They have a bill, it's going to be up to me, it's my option.' At the same time, Trump hasn't taken steps toward boosting military assistance to Ukraine, which this week has come under some of the biggest drone assaults of the war. It's something he's likely to hear about from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the upcoming summits, which Zelensky is expected to attend. Trump's defense chief Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Tuesday there would be a 'reduction in this budget' of military assistance to Kyiv. 'This administration takes a very different view of that conflict. We believe that a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests, especially with all the competing interests around the globe,' Hegseth said in congressional testimony. Since he offered the two-week deadline two weeks ago, Trump spoke to Putin once. But in his own telling, the conversation was not enough to prompt an immediate peace. 'We had a good conversation,' Trump said. 'But so far, nothing's come of it.' So, too, has nothing come yet from his efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. 'I'm getting more and more less confident about it. They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame, but I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,' Trump said in the podcast interview. 'Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made,' he went on, saying it was his 'instincts' telling him a deal was moving further from reach. At issue is Iran's insistence it be able to continue enriching uranium, which Trump has said it must give up in order to see some sanctions lifted as part of a deal. That's much the same issue that prolonged nuclear talks with Iran under Barack Obama, whose eventual deal allowed low levels of enrichment. Trump withdrew from the pact during his first term, but now finds himself working through many of the same sticking points. A new round of talks with Iran is set to take place in the coming days, US officials have said. The US has been waiting for an official response from Tehran to its latest proposal. A two-month deadline to reach a deal that Trump set in a letter to Iran's leaders in April is set to expire this week. In the podcast interview, Trump said Iran would regret not making a deal, since the alternative was war. 'It would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying,' he said. 'Yes, so much nicer to do it. But I don't think I see the same level of enthusiasm for them to make a deal.' This story has been updated with new reporting.