Trump memo tells USAID to put ‘America first' in reviewing foreign aid
The Trump administration urged US Agency for International Development (USAID) workers to join the effort to transform how Washington allocates aid around the world in line with Trump's 'America First' policy. It threatened 'disciplinary action' for any staff ignoring the administration's orders. A sharply-worded memo sent on Saturday to more than 10,000 staff at USAID offered further guidance to Friday's 'stop-work' directive that effectively put a sweeping freeze on US foreign aid worldwide. The memo, reviewed by Reuters, laid out expectations for the workforce on how to achieve Trump's goals.
'We have a responsibility to support the President in achieving his vision,' Ken Jackson, assistant to the administrator for management and resources wrote in the internal memo, titled 'Message and Expectation to the Workforce'.
'The President has given us a tremendous opportunity to transform the way we approach foreign assistance for decades to come,' the memo said. Reuters confirmed the authenticity of the memo with several sources.
Since taking office last week, Trump has taken steps towards fulfilling his vow to remake a federal bureaucracy he believes was hostile to him during his 2017-2021 presidency. He has reassigned or fired hundreds of federal workers in simultaneous moves against a swathe of agencies.
Hours after taking office, Trump ordered a 90-day pause in foreign aid to review if it was aligned with his foreign policy priorities. On Friday, the State Department issued a stop-work order worldwide even for existing and appropriated assistance, calling into question billions of dollars of life-saving aid.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
2 hours ago
- Asia Times
For once, Musk may be doing us all a service
A famous governor of New York State, Mario Cuomo, said that politicians should 'campaign in poetry, but govern in prose'. His son, Andrew, also a former governor, will surely follow this advice when running for election as mayor of New York in November. But Donald Trump has always thought differently. He campaigns with slogans and insults and then governs with theater, threats and tantrums. So it feels appropriate that the central contradiction of Trumpism was exposed last week in a theatrical, threat-filled clash between what we can call MAGA and MAPA: between Trump's 'Make America Great Again' and Elon Musk's accusation that Trump's policies will, in effect, 'Make America Poor Again.' As Trump is truly the comeback king, it would be foolish to underestimate his capacity for recovery and renewal. Nonetheless, what the clash with Musk has done is to expose Trump's vulnerability and to damage, perhaps permanently, his aura of power and impunity. The key test will now be whether more Republican senators and representatives feel willing to oppose Trump over his extravagant budget bill or his tariffs, now that one of their big fears may start to fade – namely, the fear of being attacked in their party's primary elections next year by the combination of Trump's words and Musk's billions. Until now, the only check against the White House has been the judiciary, but if Congress decides to wake up from the supine sleep it has been in since January, it too could start to act as a restraint on Trump's excesses. We knew this could change next year, once the campaign season begins ahead of the mid-term Congressional elections in November 2026. Now, assuming the Musk-Trump divorce persists, it could change much sooner. Those are the political and constitutional stakes. But the economic stakes are high, too. The cause of the bust-up is that Musk clearly fears that Trump's policies are leading America toward a recession and possibly economic disaster, outcomes that he does not want to be personally associated with. They are leading in this direction because the budget (which Trump calls his 'big, beautiful bill'), passed by the House of Representatives and now being examined by the Senate, will make America's already gigantic federal public debt – which stands at nearly 130% of GDP – even higher. It also includes provisions to give the Treasury the power to impose taxes on foreign investors, making that debt potentially harder to finance. At the same time, Trump's import tariffs are adding to inflation while discouraging both household consumption and business investment. Higher borrowing costs, as lenders worry about the size of the debt; a weaker, perhaps slumping economy, which makes it harder to pay the interest-burden on the debt – this is indeed a recipe for MAPA. Some comfort can be drawn from another slogan, one which Trump hates: TACO, which stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out' – in other words, the idea that this bully always retreats after making wild and aggressive threats. The President's two less theatrical encounters last week, his meeting in the Oval Office with Friedrich Merz, Germany's Chancellor, and his phone call with China's President Xi Jinping, both suggest that the outcome on tariffs may be better than we feared when he made his dramatic announcement on his 'Liberation Day' April 2. The negotiations with the European Union and China still lie ahead, as they also do with Japan, so we cannot be sure. But a pattern seems to be emerging of a less severe tariff regime being agreed if it is accompanied by some multi-billion dollar promises of investment in the United States and of purchases of US liquefied natural gas, defense equipment or soybeans. Those promises give Trump political wins, perhaps reducing the economic losses. What the EU can hope to achieve in its talks is a 10% import tariff, matching the tariff already agreed with the United Kingdom, while China is likelier to end up with something more like 40-50%, with higher figures for some sensitive products. China has flexed its muscles by showing its willingness to cut off supplies of critical minerals needed by US manufacturers, and its resilience by continuing to make progress on high-tech products despite US export controls, so it will probably be content with 40-50%. If this is the sort of outcome that emerges during negotiations this summer, it will not be a good one for the world economy, nor for America itself, but it will be less bad than it might have been. The most important hope is that whatever emerges will at least be stable, allowing businesses to make long-term plans based on predictable regulations and tariff levels. The trouble is that Trump always loves uncertainty and loves to use whatever instruments he can to display his power, so it is hard to be sure that even after the negotiations the tariff volatility will come to an end. That, however, is why Congress is so important. Tariffs, like all other federal taxes, are supposed to be set by Congressional legislation, not executive fiat. Trump has broken with that rule by claiming that there is a 'national emergency' under which he has the power to set tariffs, and that for specific products such as steel and aluminium he can do so on grounds of national security. On May 28, the US Court of International Trade, supported soon afterward by another federal court, ruled that Trump's claim of an 'emergency' is invalid, making his tariff decisions illegal too. The White House has lodged an appeal, but if it loses then the power to set most tariffs will revert to Congress. If so, this will be good news, both for avoiding MAPA and for restoring some rationality to trade policy and thus to international relations. Elon Musk is just as capricious and egotistical as Donald Trump, so we would also be foolish to depend on him being consistent either in his opinions or on his apparent divorce from Trump. He is always driven by the interests of his businesses and his billions, so let us not get starry-eyed about him. But let us nonetheless, for the time being, enjoy this moment by taking it at its face value. If Musk's schism with Trump encourages even a few senators to rediscover their spines, if it helps to restore Congress's role as the ultimate controller of spending, taxes and tariffs, and if it thereby hinders the White House's tendency to attack Europe and other allies on spurious grounds, it will have done America, and the world, a service. Other billionaire backers of Trump should take note: backing economically destructive policies that also lose global allies cannot be in their, or America's, interests. Formerly editor-in-chief of The Economist, Bill Emmott is currently chairman of the Japan Society of the UK, the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the International Trade Institute. First published on Bill Emmott's Global View, this is the English original of an article published on June 7 in Italian by La Stampa. It is republished here with kind permission.
The Standard
11 hours ago
- The Standard
How will the impeachment trial of Philippines VP Sara Duterte be held?
Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte delivers a statement following her impeachment by the lower house of the Congress, in her office at Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila, Philippines, February 7, 2025. REUTERS/Eloisa Lopez/File Photo
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US-China trade talks, Qin Shi Huang's western expedition: SCMP daily highlights
Catch up on some of SCMP's biggest China stories of the day. If you would like to see more of our reporting, please consider subscribing Top officials from China and the United States are expected to start a second day of negotiations in London on Tuesday morning local time, as the two sides strive to de-escalate a stand-off over trade and technology that has sent shock waves across the global economy. Chinese state media have sought to portray the escalating Los Angeles protests against President Donald Trump's immigration policies as proof of a broken government and the lack of social cohesion in the United States. Visitors look at depiction of human experiments at the Unit 731 museum in Harbin, in northeast China's Heilongjiang province. The facility was built to conduct research into germ warfare, weapons capabilities and the limits of the human body, rather than for mass extermination. Photo: AFP As thousands of students gather this week for the finals of the National History Day contest in the US state of Maryland, one research project may stand out – not only as a sobering reminder of an infamous, often forgotten Japanese military unit, but also for America's role in keeping its war crimes quiet.
