A developer wants to remove wetlands in Orange County. Will it make Osceola flood?
Three years ago, as Hurricane Ian dropped nearly 18 inches of water on Central Florida, flooding from Shingle Creek left hundreds of Osceola County residents stranded.
Now Orange County is considering a development that threatens to increase the flood risk.
The Tuscana project would bring over 1,600 hotel rooms and 5,200 multi-family dwelling units to an area of agricultural-zoned land near Central Florida's theme parks and close to parts of 20-mile long Shingle Creek, extending into sensitive wetlands that serve as the headwaters to the Everglades and run through Osceola County.
'Florida originally had like 4 million acres of wetlands and … they're like the kidneys of our land so the pendulum of protecting them as they get more rare is critical,' said Gabrielle Milch of the Sierra Club, noting that wetlands absorb stormwater that otherwise can run off into neighborhoods. 'We've tried to do a good job but the competing interests of economics and social values doesn't always consider the environmental impacts.'
Last week the Tuscana project was set to be reviewed by Orange County's Development Review Committee. But applicant Kimley-Horn, representing developers Shingle Creek Co-owners LLC and Geyer Development LLC, amended its rezoning proposal the night before in an apparent effort to make it more palatable.
Included was a 22-acre decrease, from 58 to 36 acres, of the portion of the development that would remove wetlands. The entire development would occupy 227 acres surrounded by undeveloped forest and lying on the eastern portion of Shingle Creek Basin.
Kimley-Horn had already requested waivers from the county's code to build at a higher density, raising some buildings over 200 feet in the air. In this case, the company argues, the more intense development mitigates the environmental impact by reducing the buildings' footprint and the amount of wetlands affected.
Orange County staff said they didn't have enough time to review the new details and scheduled a decision on whether to move the proposal to public hearings at the next development committee meeting on April 2.
Kimley-Horn declined an interview request from the Orlando Sentinel.
While Orange County staff has many questions for the developer, Tuscana is being judged under more relaxed county rules established in 1987, but later tightened. The developer only needs to show it is attempting to minimize the project's wetland impact and that it doesn't require a cumulative impact analysis, said Tim Hull, environmental programs administrator for the Orange County's environmental protection division.
Kimley-Horn is seeking to make that case. Project Manager Jennifer Stickler told the committee board that the developer plans to offset any impact to the wetlands by preserving over 176 acres.
In 2023 the county adopted a more stringent code that more aggressively protects wetlands, but Tuscana began its application process right before the new code took effect. However, Hull said the county will require Kimley-Horn to explain in more detail how it will handle stormwater as part of its project.
'Shingle Creek is a very important drainage basin in the county,' Hull said. 'The county is very tuned in to flood concerns… once the applicant is at the level where they're providing engineering plans that's when they provide more details on stormwater management.'
Even though the impacts may be felt in Osceola, that county is not involved in the process, Hull said. Instead the South Florida Water Management District, which oversees waters in both Orange and Osceola, has oversight and it has already issued a preliminary permit for the development, he said.
Environmentalists say that's a concern.
John Capece is an environmental researcher who leads Kissimmee Water Keeper, a global network of water protection organizations. Capece said it's alarming that the development is even under consideration, given its invasion into critical wetlands that store so much water.
'The undeveloped complex there west of Shingle Creek where Tuscana is proposed is the largest wetland complex remaining along the Shingle Creek System,' Capece said. 'Whenever you constrain a flood plain, you have the potential to enhance flooding that will occur in other areas.'
Even with the existing level of devleopment, flooding along Shingle Creek during Hurricane Ian in 2022 rendered more than 500 homes uninhabitable in the Good Samaritan retirement community at Kissimmee Village.
Adding to Capece's concern, climate change has made previous flood maps outdated and extreme rainfall events more common, he said. A 2022 study Capece was involved with researching for the South Florida Water Management District estimated that extreme rainfall events would increase by roughly 60% regionwide, including in Orange County, from 2020 through 2059.
'It's a huge amount,' Capece said. 'And it'll generate even more than 60% runoff or flooding because much of the initial rainfall is stored in various parts of wetlands…therefore every acre of wetland, every acre of storage potential becomes more critical.'
Capece said the county or developer should be required to do computer modeling of flooding. State agencies in charge of overseeing multiple counties have become lax, he said.
Tuscana is just the latest illustration of the pressures growth is placing on environmentally sensitive areas in Central Florida. Once protected, Split Oak Forest soon will have a highway slice through a portion of it despite fierce community opposition.
There may be more stringent guidelines in the future. Hull said Orange County's new updated code increases environmental protections. While Tuscana is being considered under the earlier codes, the Board of County Commissioners has the ultimate say as it balances growth with conserving land. The project is scheduled to be presented to the board on May 20.
Gordon Spears formerly sat on the planning and zoning advisory board of Orange County. He said not only will the development increase flood risk but the area lacks urban infrastructure.
'It may pass the development review committee but it wouldn't surprise me if the board of county commissioners don't pass it,' Spears said.
The Shingle Creek basin not only offers wetlands that store water to mitigate flooding but trails and bike paths that are close to the heart of many in the region.
A mother of five, Lauren Allen brought two of her children to the development committee meeting where she spoke against Tuscana. Allen said her kids, who range in age from 7 to 18, enjoy the creek and are worried the development will destroy a treasured play spot.
'One of the things my daughter said is she was very concerned that they were not going to be any more beautyberries because when she had been hiking on one of the trails with her grandma they found them,' Allen said. 'Her grandma said next time we'll make some beautyberry jam but now she's worried she'll never get to make beautyberry jam.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Nova Scotia's ambitious 'Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions
HALIFAX — Two leading environmental groups are giving a thumbs up to Nova Scotia's ambitious plan to dramatically expand its fledgling offshore wind energy industry. But both groups were quick to add caveats. On Monday, Premier Tim Houston said the province's plan to license enough offshore wind farms to produce five megawatts of electricity would be increased eightfold to 40 megawatts, well beyond the 2.4 megawatts Nova Scotia needs. He called on Ottawa to help cover the costs of his new Wind West project, saying the excess electricity could be used to supply 27 per cent of Canada's total demand. "Nova Scotia is on the edge of a clean energy breakthrough," the Progressive Conservative premier said in an online video, adding the province is poised to become an "energy superpower." Gretchen Fitzgerald, executive director of Sierra Club Canada, said the premier's bold plan, which includes building transmission lines across the country, represents an exciting opportunity for the province. "It could be a game-changer for the region and for Canada," she said in an interview from Ottawa. "But it needs to be done correctly and with consultations." Fitzgerald said the Nova Scotia and Canadian governments must focus on securing long-term benefits from the nascent offshore wind industry because they did a poor job on that front when dealing with the offshore oil and gas sector. "We have to make sure that we are not selling out what is a massive resource for less benefit than communities should have," Fitzgerald said, adding that Nova Scotia continues to suffer from a high rate of energy poverty. In May of this year, utility affordability expert Roger Colton produced a report showing that 43 per cent of Nova Scotians were struggling to pay their energy bills — the highest proportion in Canada. While Fitzgerald applauded Houston's clean energy plan, she criticized what she described as the premier's populist penchant for taking decisive action before consulting with experts and the public. "Moving from a couple hundred turbines to thousands in the next decade needs to be done in a staged way so we learn how to do this right," she said, adding Houston appears to have adopted a "'move-fast-and-break-things mentality." "(That) can lead to unacceptable harm to sensitive ocean life," she said. "From a community benefits and acceptance point of view, breaking trust can be the biggest barrier to getting to good climate solutions." In October 2023, the Public Policy Forum released a study saying Sable Island Bank, an ocean area about 180 kilometres south of Nova Scotia, is among the world's best locations for wind energy generation. "It and several other similarly endowed areas off the coast of Atlantic Canada hold the potential to place the region among the leading global hubs of offshore wind-powered energy development," says the report from the independent non-profit think tank. It goes on to say that as the world shifts from a dependence on fossil fuels to forms of energy that do not emit climate-changing greenhouse gases, Atlantic Canada is facing "a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ... to recover an economic vitality comparable to the Age of Sail — fittingly built again on the power of wind at sea." The report says the installation of 15 gigawatts of offshore wind generation would create about 30,000 direct jobs annually. Despite the hype, the industry must also earn acceptance from Nova Scotia's fishing industry, which in 2023 contributed $2.5 billion to the province's economy and employed 19,000 people. In Halifax, a spokesman for the Ecology Action Centre called on the provincial government to build public trust, especially with coastal communities. "There really needs to be a priority on stakeholder engagement for all ocean users," said senior energy co-ordinator Thomas Arnason McNeil. "We're going to need to prioritize ecological safeguards and preserve the existing livelihoods that we have. That includes the fishing industry. That's half the economy in Nova Scotia." Still, he said the province's big push for clean energy is on the right track, especially when it comes to building out its electricity grid to better connect with the rest of the country. If done right, the payoff would be enormous, Arnason McNeil said. "We're talking serious job creation here and a lot of revenue potentially," he said. "The bottom line is that you have to do this right. (But) the prize at the end of the road is monumental in terms of the benefits." A call for bids to build enough offshore turbines to generate five gigawatts of electricity is expected as early as this year. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Michael MacDonald, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
NV Energy's proposed rate hike panned by some, praised by others at consumer sessions
Vinny Spotleson of the Sierra Club speaks at a rally Wednesday protesting NV Energy's proposed rate hike. NV Energy's bid to raise electric rates drew condemnation from customers and support from non-profits that benefit from the largesse of the utility's charitable foundation at two consumer sessions held Wednesday by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada. The utility, which provides electricity to most of Nevada, is asking state regulators to approve a revenue increase of $215.7 million that could hike rates by 9% in Southern Nevada. It's also asking to increase shareholder return on equity from 9.5% to 10.25%; level the playing field between rooftop solar and conventional ratepayers; and save low-income Southern Nevadans about $20 a month by eliminating their basic service charge. 'NV Energy is acting like it's so benevolent,' Las Vegan Angel DeFazio told the Current of the proposed elimination of the service charge for customers earning less than 150% of the federal poverty level. 'They're not the good guys. They're passing it on to us. They're just redistributing the cost.' But representatives of charitable groups and veterans organizations that receive grants from NV Energy voiced support for the rate hike, as did the Asian Chamber of Commerce and Latin Chamber of Commerce. 'My business community relies on energy, relies on being able to open their doors and conduct business. That takes an investment. That takes reliability. That is NV Energy,' said Peter Guzman, president of the Latin Chamber of Commerce. Guzman said he was not asked by NV Energy to speak on its behalf. The utility's spokesperson did not respond when asked if NV Energy solicited support from the organizations. Longtime gaming executive and former acting UNLV president Don Snyder, who is currently chairman of the United Way Board of Directors, defended the utility's bid to raise rates. Snyder said the non-profit touches one in four Nevadans through a variety of services. 'We are uniquely positioned to understand the needs of our community, particularly our low income individuals and families,' Snyder told PUC Commissioner Tammy Cordova, who is presiding over NV Energy's rate hike request. Snyder added United Way has a 'longstanding partnership' with NV Energy, its employees, and its foundation, which 'provides financial grants supporting utility assistance for our low income senior citizens.' Others contend now is no time to raise the cost of electricity. Dr. Mary House, co-founder of Caring, Helping & Restoring Lives (CHR), urged the commission to hold NV Energy accountable for energy policies that she says disproportionately affect low-income individuals and families. 'They're sacrificing necessary medicines just to pay their bills. They're limiting how much they spend on groceries just to pay their bills,' House said, adding many of the families her organization serves pay a disproportionate share of their income toward electricity. House added that she has taken steps to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and increase energy efficiency. 'But many households, the ones who I represent, don't have the means to even make those changes.' NV Energy overcharges at least 80,000 customers, scrimps on refunds House also encouraged the utility to fully refund overpayments of at least $17 million the utility assessed against some 70,000 customers in multi-family units over a 20-year span. Angela Hollimen moved to Las Vegas in 2018. The retiree said although she lives with family, making ends meet remains a struggle. 'Since I moved here, I've noticed that everything's been going up,' she said, adding her family has taken all the recommended steps to reduce energy costs. 'Were doing what we're supposed to do, and questioning whether we should have moved here.' Tracy Puckett, another retiree, said she 'saved and saved' to install a $30,000 rooftop solar array on her home. NV Energy's efforts to tweak its net metering formula will cost her and other solar customers more, extend the time it takes to recoup their investment, and deter more ratepayers from going solar. 'I want my investment to mean something.' The utility's request to impose peak usage rates on customers drew protests from ratepayers who say the scheme penalizes working people who are not home to run appliances during hours when the system faces less demand. A customer using 5 kWh would pay $27 more per month, while a customer using 6 kWh would pay $38 more per month, according to data provided by Advanced Energy United, a trade group that represents renewable energy providers. Total usage during the monthly billing period would be irrelevant. NV Energy peak usage plan could be costly for Southern Nevadans Should the PUC turn down the proposal for a peak demand rate, NV Energy wants to increase the basic service charge in Southern Nevada from $18.50 to $24, far less than the projected increase of maximum demand charges. The proposed changes 'reflect the company and its shareholders' best interests and not its customers',' Julia Hubbard of Solar United Neighbors (SUN), an organization dedicated to educating ratepayers, said at the consumer session. 'When someone goes solar, they are not just saving on future utility bills. They are adding infrastructure to the grid on their dime.' 'This proposal doesn't account for their recent mismanagement of customer classifications, resulting in millions of dollars in overcharges, or lack of real progress on their transportation electrification plan and their community solar program,' Hubbard said, adding the utility, charged with constructing 120 electric vehicle charging stations, has completed 40. Hubbard said NV Energy's plan to change the way it calculates net metering by calculating excess energy returned to the grid every 15 minutes rather than monthly, would reduce the value of rooftop solar and disincentivize investment in 'a powerful tool that Nevada residents can use to lighten their energy burden while contributing to statewide goals.' The change is expected to increase monthly bills for rooftop solar customers by about $11 a month, and would affect customers who apply for net metering after Oct. 1 of this year. The move would delay return on investment for homeowners who install rooftop solar in the future, Hubbard said. 'People are struggling to pay their energy bills,' she said. 'This is not the time to raise rates.' The PUC will hold hearings on NV Energy's rate hike request in September. If approved, the changes would go into effect in April 2026.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Can Fort Myers Beach close door to what's ahead? Potentially not anymore with 'precedent'
For Fort Myers Beach Mayor Dan Allers, the island's future might have gotten a little muddied with this week's Town Council approval of the Moss Marina entertainment complex and hotel. "Asking for a 200% increase in density is difficult for me to get behind," said Allers, who voted against the planned Arches Bayfront. "To me, this is something that could potentially open a door. And I'm not a person that likes to use the word, precedent. But to me this opens a door that's never been opened on this island." Here's what to know. The Arches backing comes after at least a couple of recent major development approvals by the council, which helped provide a path for Moss Marina operator Ben Freeland to give it another shot after being largely rebuffed the past couple of years or so. Changing numerous zoned residential properties to commercial as part of adding to the marina, the latest plans call for a 263-room hotel and other structures rising to about 100 feet featuring dining, bars and retail along a bayfront promenade wedged between Old San Carlos Boulevard and a neighborhood. Many nearby residents pretty much resigned themselves to the fact that approval would be coming from a current council that has backed other major endeavors in recent months. Instead, as the island continues to recover from 2022's Hurricane Ian and subsequent storms, they pushed for some concessions to reduce noise and traffic by their houses after construction begins. "I'm here representing the neighbors who aren't here because they already know you're going to change our neighborhood," said resident Chris Mosteiro, who represented owners of 15 homes and properties in submitting a letter to the council. "I'm representing the neighbors that are out of town. I'm here representing the neighbors who are exhausted after years of rebuilding." The mayor agreed that "this neighborhood will be impacted," and that he could "honestly say" it was not in line "with what the comprehensive plan and land development code sought out to do, specifically with commercial intrusion." And the town staff agreed in recommending against the enterprise. "It appears incompatible with the residential neighborhoods that are directly abutting and has the potential to create additional nuisances, such as noise and traffic, both vehicle and pedestrian, into the residential area," said Town Principal Planner Judith Frankel. Freeland said he's been doing his best working with residents and city leaders and reduced the size of what he had in mind while offering amenities to the public, which helped lead to support from four of the five council members, such as Vice-Mayor Jim Atterholt. "I thought to his credit, he made some significant commitments to not only operating a water ferry terminal but also operating a water ferry," said Atterholt, as some ferry specifics need to be worked out. "I think this project is in the public benefit. I think we've again as an island done an excellent job, (and) I'm obviously also excited about the ferry and a number of other things that this has to offer." At one point, there were at least 400 units in play on the nearly 5 acres for what has been tabbed as Arches Bayfront Resort, near the shadow of the Matanzas Pass Bridge. Arches would have buildings varying in height between one and seven stories, with a total maximum height of 102 feet, according to what's been drawn up. By comparison, the six-story Marina Village at Snug Harbor next door has an overall height of 71 feet, town records show. A goal has been to get interest in the compound from potential companies, said Moss consultant Patrick Vanasse, president of The Neighborhood Company: "The Freelands will be the developer/builder. They're going to turn this to an operator. Obviously, they need to make their resort attractive to get the best operator possible." No exact construction start date has been set as Freeland sorts through potential contractors. "This is going to be a very high-end resort," he said. "We prefer to build it all at once ― more efficient if you could do it all at once. (The) goal would be to build it all at the same time." Even though Allers didn't back it, the mayor appreciated some of the scaling back, such as the number of hotel units. "Where it came from to where it is now is leaps and bounds," he said. "I do support a project there. I just can't support the project as it's proposed, but I appreciate all the negotiations back and forth." Freeland had told In the Know last summer that he was not giving up and had gone back to "the drawing board reimagining the site." He also hired The Neighborhood Company, with its Fort Myers Beach roots that has been involved in various endeavors on Estero Island. Going back to about when Margaritaville made its historic debut in December 2023 after a long and winding road, Freeland then said he expected his project to come back as well, about 110 paces from his new Jimmy Buffett-inspired neighbor. At the time, he was disappointed by the continued reluctance by the town to change its land use plan that would pave the path for his endeavor, saying "We strongly believe we're on the right track to be an important part of our island's rebuild." Freeland had put the project on pause in October 2023 after members of the Beach Town Council and planning board signaled they didn't plan to deviate far from the comprehensive plan that's been in place for almost three decades. The plan is a blueprint that guides future land use, such as density. However, some residents feel the Town Council may have gone too far in recent approvals of the Pink Shell expansion and especially the high rises to replace the Red Coconut RV park, saying it may lead to more major development. As In the Know has reported, the Coconut, as approved near the library, would rise as high as 17 stories and occupy space 10 times larger than the White House. Pink Shell received backing for a new 40-room structure that could rise six stories above the bay on the north side. In the Know: Latest on Buc-ee's SWFL opening. Company leaders address traffic concerns The Freeland family has gone to battle with the town in the past and prevailed. Just before the turn of the century, they won a suit over their gambling yacht operation after officials raised concerns about parking and licensing. Captiva: South Seas holds official grand reopening just in time for hurricane season As originally conceived, Freeland, working with the Restore the Arches group, has been wanting to have a memorial dedicated to the iconic Beach symbol along the planned bay walk as a way to educate the public about the history tied to them. The late entrepreneur Tom Phillips perched gateway stone bell tower arches in 1924 on the future San Carlos Boulevard near the McGregor Boulevard intersection to promote massive development he had planned to assemble but didn't execute due to a variety of factors. He had planted a similar arch of native coral rock not far from where the Sky Bridge to Fort Myers Beach is now. Based at the Naples Daily News, Columnist Phil Fernandez (pfernandez@ grew up in Southwest Florida and has led Pulitzer Prize-winning efforts. He writes In the Know, one of USA TODAY Network's most read local news columns in the state. Support democracy. Subscribe to a newspaper. This article originally appeared on Naples Daily News: Fort Myers Beach future: 'Door that's never been opened on the island'