New Pentagon memo reveals how military will screen for transgender troops to purge from service
The Department of Defense under Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered military officials to 'immediately' review medical records for transgender service members to begin removing them from service.
Service members will also be asked whether they experience gender dysphoria in their annual health exams, according to a newly released Pentagon memo.
The memo from the Pentagon's acting head of personnel follows an order from a divided Supreme Court that allows Donald Trump 's administration to continue banning trans service members despite court rulings that found the measure plainly discriminatory.
Routine exams will be 'the primary method' for identifying and removing trans service members — or 'service members who have a current diagnosis or history of' or are 'exhibiting symptoms' of gender dysphoria, according to the memo.
Commanders who are 'aware' of service members 'with gender dysphoria, a history of gender dysphoria or symptoms consistent with gender dysphoria' must perform 'individualized medical record reviews,' the memo states.
The president's January directive claims the 'adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual's sex conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one's personal life.'
Subsequent Defense Department guidance claimed that 'the medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals who have a current diagnosis or history of, or exhibit symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria are incompatible with the high mental and physical standards necessary for military service.'
In February, Washington, D.C. District Judge Ana Reyes condemned the president's 'demeaning,' 'biologically inaccurate' and 'frankly ridiculous' language in an executive order that revoked federal recognition of trans, nonbinary and intersex people. Trump's ban on transgender people in the nation's military is 'soaked in animus,' she wrote.
And in March, George W. Bush-appointed District Judge Benjamin Settle said Trump's transgender military policy 'plainly' discriminates and is not backed by any evidence to support the claims behind it.
Roughly 4,200 people with gender dysphoria are serving across the U.S. military.
About 1,000 trans troops have voluntarily identified themselves to begin their removal, according to military officials.
Active-duty service members have until June 6 to identify themselves, and reserve members have until July 7. If they miss that deadline and face involuntary removal from service, they will receive fewer benefits, according to officials.
The Supreme Court's ruling earlier this month pauses Judge Settle's order that blocked the ban while the legal challenges continue. But attorneys for 32 trans service members and recruits who are separately suing in Washington, D.C. argued that the Supreme Court's order is not binding in that court.
They told a federal appeals court that 'recent statements by Secretary Hegseth underscore that the ban was motivated by anti-transgender animus, not by the medical considerations advanced by the government,' after Hegseth said the military is 'leaving wokeness and weakness behind,' including 'dudes in dresses.'
'The American people are sick of cowardly doublespeak coming out of this administration,' attorneys said in a statement. 'Secretary Hegseth's comments about transgender troops are a disgrace to the military and all those who serve.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
RFK Jr. fact checked: Physician reveals what Kennedy gets wrong on vaccine safety
In the four months since he began serving as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made many public statements about vaccines that have cast doubt on their safety and on the objectivity of long-standing processes established to evaluate them. Many of these statements are factually incorrect. For example, in a newscast aired on June 12, 2025, Kennedy told Fox News viewers that 97% of federal vaccine advisers are on the take. In the same interview, he also claimed that children receive 92 mandatory shots. He has also widely claimed that only COVID-19 vaccines, not other vaccines in use by both children and adults, were ever tested against placebos and that 'nobody has any idea' how safe routine immunizations are. As an infectious disease physician who curates an open database of hundreds of controlled vaccine trials involving over 6 million participants, I am intimately familiar with the decades of research on vaccine safety. I believe it is important to correct the record – especially because these statements come from the official who now oversees the agencies charged with protecting Americans' health. Do children really receive 92 mandatory shots? In 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule contained about 11 doses protecting against seven diseases. Today, it includes roughly 50 injections covering 16 diseases. State school entry laws typically require 30 to 32 shots across 10 to 12 diseases. No state mandates COVID-19 vaccination. Where Kennedy's '92 mandatory shots' figure comes from is unclear, but the actual number is significantly lower. From a safety standpoint, the more important question is whether today's schedule with additional vaccines might be too taxing for children's immune systems. It isn't, because as vaccine technology improved over the past several decades, the number of antigens in each vaccine dose is much lower than before. Antigens are the molecules in vaccines that trigger a response from the immune system, training it to identify the specific pathogen. Some vaccines contain a minute amount of aluminum salt that serves as an adjuvant – a helper ingredient that improves the quality and staying power of the immune response, so each dose can protect with less antigen. Those 11 doses in 1986 delivered more than 3,000 antigens and 1.5 milligrams of aluminum over 18 years. Today's complete schedule delivers roughly 165 antigens – which is a 95% reduction – and 5-6 milligrams of aluminum in the same time frame. A single smallpox inoculation in 1900 exposed a child to more antigens than today's complete series. Since 1986, the United States has introduced vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis A and B, chickenpox, pneumococcal disease, rotavirus and human papillomavirus. Each addition represents a life-saving advance. The incidence of Haemophilus influenzae type b, a bacterial infection that can cause pneumonia, meningitis and other severe diseases, has dropped by 99% in infants. Pediatric hepatitis infections are down more than 90%, and chickenpox hospitalizations are down about 90%. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that vaccinating children born from 1994 to 2023 will avert 508 million illnesses and 1,129,000 premature deaths. Placebo testing for vaccines Kennedy has asserted that only COVID-19 vaccines have undergone rigorous safety trials in which they were tested against placebos. This is categorically wrong. Of the 378 controlled trials in our database, 195 compared volunteers' response to a vaccine with their response to a placebo. Of those, 159 gave volunteers only a salt water solution or another inert substance. Another 36 gave them just the adjuvant without any viral or bacterial material, as a way to see whether there were side effects from the antigen itself or the injection. Every routine childhood vaccine antigen appears in at least one such study. The 1954 Salk polio trial, one of the largest clinical trials in medical history, enrolled more than 600,000 children and tested the vaccine by comparing it with a saltwater control. Similar trials, which used a substance that has no biological effect as a control, were used to test Haemophilus influenzae type b, pneumococcal, rotavirus, influenza and HPV vaccines. Once an effective vaccine exists, ethics boards require new versions to be compared against the licensed standard because withholding proven protection from children would be unethical. How unknown is the safety of widely used vaccines? Kennedy has insisted on multiple occasions that 'nobody has any idea' about vaccine safety profiles. Of the 378 trials in our database, the vast majority published detailed safety outcomes. Beyond trials, the U.S. operates the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, the Vaccine Safety Datalink and the PRISM network to monitor hundreds of millions of doses for rare problems. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System works like an open mailbox where anyone – patients, parents, clinicians – can report a post-shot problem; the Vaccine Safety Datalink analyzes anonymized electronic health records from large health care systems to spot patterns; and PRISM scans billions of insurance claims in near-real time to confirm or rule out rare safety signals. These systems led health officials to pull the first rotavirus vaccine in 1999 after it was linked to bowel obstruction, and to restrict the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine in 2021 after rare clotting events. Few drug classes undergo such continuous surveillance and are subject to such swift corrective action when genuine risks emerge. The conflicts of interest claim On June 9, Kennedy took the unprecedented step of dissolving vetted members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the expert body that advises the CDC on national vaccine policy. He has claimed repeatedly that the vast majority of serving members of the committee – 97% – had extensive conflicts of interest because of their entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry. Kennedy bases that number on a 2009 federal audit of conflict-of-interest paperwork, but that report looked at 17 CDC advisory committees, not specifically this vaccine committee. And it found no pervasive wrongdoing – 97% of disclosure forms only contained routine paperwork mistakes, such as information in the wrong box or a missing initial, and not hidden financial ties. Reuters examined data from Open Payments, a government website that discloses health care providers' relationships with industry, for all 17 voting members of the committee who were dismissed. Six received no more than US$80 from drugmakers over seven years, and four had no payments at all. The remaining seven members accepted between $4,000 and $55,000 over seven years, mostly for modest consulting or travel. In other words, just 41% of the committee received anything more than pocket change from drugmakers. Committee members must divest vaccine company stock and recuse themselves from votes involving conflicts. A term without a meaning Kennedy has warned that vaccines cause 'immune deregulation,' a term that has no basis in immunology. Vaccines train the immune system, and the diseases they prevent are the real threats to immune function. Measles can wipe out immune memory, leaving children vulnerable to other infections for years. COVID-19 can trigger multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Chronic hepatitis B can cause immune-mediated organ damage. Preventing these conditions protects people from immune system damage. Today's vaccine panel doesn't just prevent infections; it deters doctor visits and thereby reduces unnecessary prescriptions for 'just-in-case' antibiotics. It's one of the rare places in medicine where physicians like me now do more good with less biological burden than we did 40 years ago. The evidence is clear and publicly available: Vaccines have dramatically reduced childhood illness, disability and death on a historic scale.
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court to issue term's final rulings on Friday
WASHINGTON, June 26 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court will issue its final rulings of its current term on Friday, Chief Justice John Roberts said. It has yet to resolve several important cases, including one involving President Donald Trump's bid to limit birthright citizenship as well as others involving Obamacare, age verification for online pornography and LGBT story books in elementary schools. Due to the unusual procedural nature of the birthright citizenship case, which was brought to the court on an emergency basis but was argued before the justices, a decision in that case could be among the court rulings issued on Friday. Trump signed an executive order to restrict birthright citizenship, a move that would affect thousands of babies born each year in the United States. Federal judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts blocked Trump's order, finding it likely violates the Constitution's 14th Amendment citizenship language. The administration is seeking to broadly enforce the directive. The court also could act at any time in other pending disputes on its emergency docket including Trump's bids to carry out mass job cuts at federal agencies and gut the Department of Education. Other cases awaiting rulings include ones involving preventive care under the Obamacare law, opting children out of certain classes in a Maryland school district when with LGBT characters are read, Louisiana electoral districts and the Federal Communications Commission's mechanism to fund a multi-billion dollar effort to phone and broadband internet access.
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Jill Biden's 'work husband' slapped with subpoena after snubbing Republicans demanding info on Joe's mental decline
Anthony Bernal, the longtime Biden aide nicknamed 'Jill's husband,' was slapped with a subpoena by Republicans after he missed Thursday's session to testify on former President Joe Biden 's mental health. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer issued a subpoena demanding Bernal appear on July 16 as part of his probe into aides' management of the former president. Bernal was scheduled to appear before the committee on Thursday and Republicans accused him of refusing to appear. But his allies pushed back against that accusation. 'Calling this a 'refusal' is misleading, when there was simply a request to reschedule the interview,' a person familiar with Bernal's interactions with the committee told Bernal's refusal to appear came after President Donald Trump 's administration waived executive privilege for Bernal and other aides who were called to testify about the former president. 'With no privilege left to hide behind, Mr. Bernal is now running scared, desperate to bury the truth,' Comer said. Executive privilege guarantees aides ability to speak frankly to a president by giving the president authority to withhold certain information from Congress. It is not unusual for one administration to waive it for another. Biden's administration, for example, waved it for Trump aides who were subpoenaed by Democrats on the special committee looking into the January 6th insurrection. Comer's letter issuing the subpoena outlines a repeated back-and-forth between the committee and Bernal's lawyer over the date of his appearance. 'Yesterday, on June 25, your counsel informed the Committee that you were no longer willing to appear voluntarily for the transcribed interview on the agreed-upon date: today, June 26,' Comer wrote. 'To avoid any further delays, your appearance before the Committee is now compelled.' Bernal has worked for the Bidens since Joe Biden served as vice president. He worked for Jill Biden in the East Wing when she was first lady. But he had an outsized influence over the couple and over White House operations. He continues to work for them. Michael LaRosa, Jill Biden's former press secretary who worked with Bernal, told Fox News that Bernal 'was probably the most power human inside the Biden's orbit and inside the White House.' LaRosa later took to social media to weigh in on the situation. 'For Anthony's sake, I hope there is a shrewd legal strategy behind this move,' he wrote on X. 'Otherwise, it feels like a needlessly bonehead escalation that does a major disservice to Dr. B + 46. Media attention was largely focused elsewhere but now the alarm bells are deafening. Bad look for him and the Bidens.' Comer and fellow Republicans are investigating whether senior Biden aides played any role in keeping quite concerns about the 82-year-old's mental health capacities. The first Biden aide, Neera Tanden, appeared before lawmakers on Tuesday for a sworn deposition. She told reporters afterward that there was 'absolutely not' any effort by aides to disguise Biden's mental state. 'I answered every question, was pleased to discuss my public service, and it was a thorough process, and I'm glad I answered everyone's question,' she said. Comer, however, said Tanden revealed she was the one who controled access to Biden's autopen. Tanden, who served as staff secretary, said she had 'minimal interaction' with the president and sent numerous 'decision memos' to an 'inner circle' of White House advisers for approval. 'Her testimony raises serious questions about who was really calling the shots in the Biden White House amid the President's obvious decline,' he said. But Tanden was not as personally close to Biden as Bernal, who had walk-in privileges for the Oval Office and the residence, the upper floors of the White House where the Bidens live. Very few aides - usually only the closest and most-trusted - have access to the residence. Comer told Bernal in the letter that his testimony was particularly important. 'Given your close connection with both former President Biden and former First Lady Jill Biden, the Committee sought to understand if you contributed to an effort to hide former President Biden's fitness to serve from the American people,' he wrote. Bernal is not the only person close to Biden to receive a subpoena. Dr. Kevin O'Connor, who served as the former White House physician for Biden, has already been issued a subpoena to appear for testimony Friday.
