Apple wins appeal to overturn $300 mln US patent verdict
June 17 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab has convinced a U.S. appeals court to throw out a $300 million verdict by a jury that found it infringed wireless standard-essential patents owned by IP management company Optis Wireless Technology.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Monday sent Optis' case back, opens new tab to Texas for a new trial after determining that the jury instructions in the previous trial were flawed.
The decision marks the second time that a nine-figure U.S. patent verdict for Optis has been overturned in the case.
Attorneys and spokespeople for Optis and Apple did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment on the Federal Circuit ruling.
Plano, Texas-based Optis and its affiliates sued Apple in 2019 in Marshall, Texas federal court, arguing that the tech giant's iPhones and other products violated their patent rights in technology related to the LTE wireless standard.
A jury found in 2020 that Apple owed $506 million for infringing Optis' patents. U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap ordered a new trial on damages in 2021 after finding the award may not have been in line with Optis' responsibility to license the standard-essential patents on fair and reasonable terms.
A new jury awarded Optis $300 million in damages after the retrial later that year.
The Federal Circuit on Monday overturned the award and remanded the case for a new trial on both infringement and damages. A three-judge panel said Gilstrap improperly worded the jury verdict form by combining all of the patents at issue into a single infringement question.
"The problem with the district court's single infringement question is that it deprived Apple of its right to a unanimous verdict on each legal claim against it," the appeals court said.
A UK court separately ruled last month that Apple owes Optis $502 million for infringing Optis' UK wireless patents. Apple has said that it plans to appeal the ruling.
The case is Optis Cellular Technology LLC v. Apple Inc, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 22-1925.
For Optis: Willy Jay of Goodwin Procter
For Apple: Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr
Read more:
Apple socked with $506 million patent verdict in East Texas
Apple wins new damages trial in $506 million patent loss
Apple hit with $300 million patent verdict after new Optis trial
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Top Gear
6 minutes ago
- Top Gear
The US and UK have signed an agreement for a 10 per cent tariff on car imports
Business The reduced tariff now applies to the first 100,000 British-made cars imported into the States, but other details are missing Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading President Trump has officially signed an executive order giving the UK a more favourable 10 per cent tariff on car imports. Though, some bits and pieces are yet to be confirmed. More on that shortly. In broad terms, the tariff applies to the first 100,000 British-made vehicles imported by the USA. Now ratified, carmakers can begin to undo the temporary suspensions of their shipments and send stuff across the Atlantic again. The sighs from JLR, counting the US as its biggest market, are especially audible. Advertisement - Page continues below "We welcome the signing of the UK-US deal," the carmaker told "which gives a good level of relief from the steep and sudden US tariffs applied to the UK auto sector in April. We thank both governments and their teams for their work in bringing this deal about." SMMT boss Mike Hawes said: 'This is great news for the UK automotive industry, helping the sector avoid the severest level of tariffs and enabling many manufacturers to resume deliveries imminently.' You might like But it's not all gravy yet. There are still details to be announced 'in coming weeks' according to President Trump. They include confirmation of the tariff on steel and aluminium (a handshake agreement in principle is that the tariff will drop to zero). What's more, EU vehicles – for example, the Mini Countryman built in Germany – will still be liable for the higher 25 per cent blanket tariff. Ouch. Hawes added: 'We wait to see the full details of the deal and how it will be administered but this will be a huge reassurance to those that work in the sector and bolster the confidence of our important US customers. Advertisement - Page continues below "The fact the UK has secured a deal, ahead of many competitors, and which makes automotive a priority, should be recognised as a significant achievement.' Looking for more from the USA? Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will the US-UK trade deal make Starmer popular again?
To general surprise, at least as to the location and the timing, the British prime minister and the American president have confirmed that the US-UK economic prosperity deal (EPD) has indeed been signed and will now be in force. It is the first, and only, trade deal of any kind to have been signed by the Trump administration since 'Liberation Day' on 2 April. It was a notable moment, but for Keir Starmer, one question will be how far it will go in helping his government recover from its rapid fall from grace since the general election... What's with the optics? Obviously, someone – possibly in the British embassy in Washington – came up with the idea of the president and his counterpart springing the announcement on the world's media when they were least expecting it, for maximum impact. So instead of the usual photo-op in the Oval Office, with Trump signing the executive order and then posing with it for the cameras, it was displayed in the open air at an impromptu press conference. The pages fell out of the presidential folder, to be retrieved by Starmer, but that just seemed to add to the easy informality of the occasion. The prime minister was allowed to address the president as 'Donald', and Trump said nice things about him. The British are to be shielded from further tariffs because, as Trump put it, 'I like them', and he thinks Starmer's team are 'great people'. What's missing? Steel, most urgently. The Americans insist that steel 'made in Britain' should be virgin and not dependent on raw materials from, let us say, China or the EU. For the steel works at Port Talbot that implies trouble, because the capacity to make such steel has been lost with the closure of the last blast furnace, now replaced with electric arc technology. So the ruinous 25 per cent tariff on UK steel exports to the US will stay, after all, and will rise to a prohibitive 50 per cent on 9 July. Politically, if Starmer can get the right conditions over the line by then and the threat of such tariffs subsides, it will mean a great deal to the voters in south Wales, who are being enthusiastically, if cynically, courted by Reform UK ahead of next year's Welsh parliament elections. Scunthorpe, too, should benefit from the deal, with a comparable electoral dividend. Any other winners? The car industry, especially Jaguar Land Rover, BMW and Aston Martin in the Midlands, plus Bentley in Crewe, Rolls-Royce in Sussex, and similar centres for export production. Aerospace actually escapes US tariffs completely, which is excellent news for manufacturing centres in Derby, the northwest, north Wales and Bristol. With the orders going in for new rails, girders, and the defence industry, the government can make some claim to be rebuilding the industrial base – although high energy prices remain an obstacle to competitiveness. The government, particularly Ed Miliband, has probably yet to win the argument that renewables are a cheaper and reliable alternative to fossil fuels. Even the farmers, badly disadvantaged in the Australian and New Zealand trade deals, have some protections against low-cost US imports. The economy as a whole? Broadly, on US trade, things are worse than they were under Joe Biden, but better than they would be without a deal. It's only fair to add that if the UK were still in the EU then a trade deal would not yet have occurred, although the EU's collective bargaining strength may in time prove to be a strategic advantage in securing better terms. In terms of growth, the net effects will be small, given that the 10 per cent US 'baseline' tariff implemented by the Trump administration remains on all other UK goods. But, again, the situation is undoubtedly better than it would otherwise have been. For a government and a nation desperate for growth, this partial relaxation of US taxes, the Indian free trade deal, and, most of all, the EU 'reset', should boost overall growth by a modest but useful amount. The EPD also has the promise of more cooperation on everything from financial services to AI. What could go wrong? The NHS uses its huge purchasing power to drive a hard bargain with US pharma giants, and these companies, along with the president, resent the way in which so much of the production of final products, and of the compounds used to manufacture them, has been outsourced by the US. There are vague but ominous-sounding words in the EPD about this: 'The United States and the United Kingdom intend to promptly negotiate significantly preferential treatment outcomes on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients. The United Kingdom confirms that it will endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the United Kingdom.' The treatment of US pharma giants has long been a complaint of Trump's. A net gain in the domestic political balance of trade? Yes. Starmer has done well on the international stage, and all these deals show that his government can actually get things done. It adds some lustre to Starmer's dullish image, and also adds to his 'prime ministerial' air, which contrasts with that of the more inexperienced Badenoch and the 'unserious' Nigel Farage. Starmer could plausibly claim to be the kind of steady, dependable leader needed to steer the country through stormy times, even if he sometimes needs to adjust course. The local economic boost in areas most affected will help, as well as the contribution to growth at the national level. But, as ever, a demanding electorate will want to feel the tangible benefit of growing real wages, stabilised taxes, and improving public services before Labour can dream of catching up with Reform UK. Deals such as this, alongside some dramatic U-turns on the winter fuel payment and the grooming gangs, give the government hope that it's at least possible to win some voters back.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Amazon makes major change to Prime Day for 2025
Amazon 's fan-favorite Prime Day sales event will be expanding to four days from two following last year's success. The company announced today that its annual Prime Day deals are scheduled to run from July 8 through July 11. 'With an extended 4-day event, our Prime members will have more time and flexibility to conveniently shop, while enjoying exclusive deals and incredible savings,' an Amazon spokesperson told Amazon's Prime Day extension comes after the rise of inflation and growing fears of recession due to tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. Amazon's CEO Andy Jassy warned shoppers of tariffs potentially rising prices, which, according senior vice president of strategy and insights at Cordial Rob Garf, could affect product availability. It is also in close competition with Walmart, both in the process of exploring the possibility of creating their own currency. Other sales competitors include Target and ByeDance's TikTok Shop. Amazon racked in $14.2 billion in revenue from US shoppers during last year's summer Prime Day event, an 11.8 percent increase compared to its 2023 results. The event, which is expected to be successful, will also be a way to lure shoppers into early spending on back-to-school and back-to-college merchandise. 'Prime Day is now a key date in the retail calendar and is seen positively by a lot of consumers who use it to snag bargains and deals. With people even more conscious about prices and nervous about the impact of tariffs, this year's Prime Day should be big,' retail expert Neil Saunders from GlobalData told 'This is one of the reasons Amazon has extended the event to 4 days – to allow people more time to get the things they want in a considered fashion.' Saunders added that customers also focus on household goods and school items, categories where shoppers 'appreciate savings.' Launched in July 2015, Amazon threw its first annual Prime Day event to celebrate its 20th anniversary in nine countries. It became an instant success, leading to the e-commerce empires decision to begin celebrating Prime Day in October as well. Besides popular products, the online retailer is looking to entire younger shoppers to sign up for its Prime subscription service. The company is doing so by offering discounted memberships and other perks for people ages 18 to 24. Memberships for this streaming platform usually cost $14.99 per month or $139 per year. Walmart rolled out massive deals to compete with Amazon Prime Day last year full of Walmart+ Week offers. This year, Walmart held it early, and while the retailer did not announce the event earnings, some of it went toward its first quarter 165.61 billion revenue. Target went head to head with Amazon last year through its 'Target Circle Week.' However, the retailer changed it up by hosting the event in March, coinciding with Amazon's Big Spring Sale. Best Buy is turning up the heat by hosting a weeklong 'Black Friday in July' special. Unlike the other retailers, this week long celebration will run from July 7th to the 13th, directly overlapping Prime Day.
