
If you've always dreamed of RV life, here's how to try it
If you've always dreamed of RV life, here's how to try it
Show Caption
Hide Caption
What to know before traveling in a camper van
It's important to know these camper van tips before you hit the road.
ProblemSolved, Reviewed
RV rentals are a popular option for travelers seeking unique and flexible vacations.
Rental costs vary depending on factors like RV type, location, and duration, with potential fees for excess mileage and generator use and damages.
Staying in an RV can be more affordable than hotels, especially for larger groups, with the added benefit of cooking meals instead of dining out.
My bucket list is pretty short, but one thing I have always wanted to try was staying in an RV. I'm not alone.
A survey of 1,709 leisure travelers commissioned by the RV Industry Association last year found that 50% of Americans showed interest in taking an RV trip within a year.
While recreational vehicle ownership has risen in recent years, the number of people who want to stay in RVs far eclipses the number of people who own them.
That's where RV rentals can come in. Just like booking a vacation rental through Vrbo or Airbnb, travelers can rent RVs from owners through platforms like RVshare and Outdoorsy or from companies like Cruise America.
Here's what it's like and what travelers should know.
How do I choose an RV?
There are all different sizes and styles of RVs, ranging from small teardrop trailers to luxurious Class A motorhomes as big as buses.
Two things to consider off the bat are how much space you need and what you're comfortable driving or towing.
'The Class As, I always recommend my renters have some driving experience,' said Asher Cousins, whom I rented from through RVshare. He owns Bozeman RV Adventures in Montana.
On the plus side, Class As are very spacious, but that also means they can be harder to drive. Cousins recommends first-timers start with smaller Class Cs, those mid-size motorhomes that look kind of like U-Hauls with a bunk over their cab, or even Class Bs, also known as camper vans, if they want a drivable motorhome.
'They're just much more maneuverable,' he said. 'There aren't any like hydraulic leveling systems that you have to worry about.'
If you'd rather drive a regular vehicle, you could rent a travel trailer, like I did. I chose a 2017 Jayco White Hawk trailer for my trip to the Yellowstone area, but I didn't tow it.
Because it was my first RV rental and the idea of driving it around the national park felt daunting, I purposefully looked for a rental with destination delivery, a search filter in RVshare.
'It's essentially like (a short-term homestay) waiting for you at whatever concert venue, family reunion, something like that you want,' Cousins said. 'Pretty much, you don't need to know anything about RVs. It'll just be essentially a mobile house where you need it.'
Perfect.
How much is it to rent an RV?
Rates vary widely depending on the RV type, location, rental duration, add-on services like delivery, and fees covering things like insurance.
RVshare says their average rental ranges between $150 to $200 a night, including taxes and fees.
Travelers should also budget for related expenses like gas and campsite fees.
With larger RVs, Cousins said, 'You're also going to have to book usually larger spots at RV parks, which can be slightly more expensive than, say, a shorter trailer.'
What are the hidden costs of RV rentals?
While not hidden per se, renters can be surprised by post-trip fees, which owners may assess upon the RV's return. Reasons include but are not limited to vehicle damage, unpaid tolls and traffic violations, and exceeding allotted mileage or generator use, according to RVshare.
In an abundance of caution, I meticulously documented the condition of my RV rental at dropoff and pickup with photos and video. I also made sure to tidy up, follow checkout instructions to a T, and wait for Cousins to review everything before we parted ways.
Yes, you can camp at Disney World. But here's what you should know first.
Is renting an RV cheaper than a hotel?
Nothing about RVs is cheap, but renting one can be more affordable than staying in a hotel, particularly considering how many people can stay in an RV.
The RV I rented sleeps up to six people, but some Class As sleep up to 10. You'd need to book multiple hotel rooms to accommodate that many.
You can also save money by cooking in the RV instead of eating out, like you might have to during a hotel stay.
What it's like staying in an RV
I've only tent-camped before, so having a spacious RV with a memory foam bed, full kitchen, private bathroom with hot showers, and climate control felt luxurious.
Even though the model was several years old, it was comfortable, clean and had everything I needed for my short trip.
I did encounter a few minor hiccups during my stay, including the tub not draining the last day, but Cousins was quick to respond and help me troubleshoot. RVshare also offers 24/7 roadside assistance, an RV tech hotline and a mobile mechanic, all included in the fees that renters pay up front.
As a whole, it was such a smooth experience, I might just try a motorhome next time and drive to different destinations.
'It all depends on what you want out of your adventure – if you want a trailer as a base camp with a rental car that you can explore the surrounding area (with) or if you want to be mobile, stay in a different spot every night,' Cousins said.
Something else for the bucket list.
The reporter on this story received access from RVshare. USA TODAY maintains editorial control of content.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
If we want NC to be a great place to live, we all have to pay for it with taxes
Richard Bostic's May 29 editorial hit the nail on the head. The truth is you get what you pay for. If North Carolina Republicans, Independents and Democrats want good schools, highways and government services that benefit individuals and society (including housing assistance, environmental protection and disaster preparedness) and make our state a great place to live, we all have to pay for it. If we don't, we will reap what we sow. I am glad to pay my fair share in income taxes not just to get what I pay for but to benefit fellow citizens and build a future we can be proud of. John Saxon, Hillsborough The 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles and any additional tariffs Donald Trump may impose are hurting Americans and U.S. climate goals. We must eliminate these tariffs as soon as possible. Chinese EVs cost much less than American ones because of government subsidies and cheaper production. These tariffs force us to pay inflated prices for domestic EVs or stick with gas cars. How are Americans supposed to contribute to the fight against climate change when they can't afford low-emission vehicles? Chinese companies like BYD offer longer battery life, faster charging and hybrid systems that outlast most American models. Protectionist policy proponents fear that without these tariffs, American workers and automakers will be harmed. A solution would be to require Chinese automakers to establish plants in the United States. Workers will have even more job opportunities in a future-proof car market. Congress must end these tariffs. Americans deserve access to innovative, affordable electric vehicles while we fight climate change and strengthen our economy. Holton Mody, Chapel Hill Thank you for the May 29 edition's article on Scott Pelley's (CBS 60 Minutes) commencement address at Wake Forest University. I was inspired to stream it on C-Span and found it eloquent, inspirational, dynamic and reassuring. He wasn't afraid to voice the truth of what is happening today, unlike many who have compromised their integrity in fear. He supported his statements with facts, not in support of any political party, but for democracy. Wanda Easley, Cary We are deeply concerned about the proposed $2.7 billion cut — nearly 40% — to the National Cancer Institute's budget. As representatives of the American Cancer Society in Central and Eastern North Carolina, we know firsthand this funding saves lives. Federal investment in cancer research has led to every major treatment breakthrough over the last 50 years. Because of this support, more than 18 million cancer survivors are alive today in the U.S. Slashing funding would delay progress, limit innovation and hurt patients and families. Cancer doesn't discriminate. Cutting lifesaving research is a step backward we cannot afford. We urge people to contact their lawmakers. Protect cancer research. Richard Averitte, executive director American Cancer Society – Central & Eastern North Carolina, Raleigh Studies approximate that 18 per 100,000 people people are intersex, meaning they have male and female sex characteristics, and about 1.7% of people are born with some intersex traits, which can put them in a gray area of sexual identification and gender conformity. As newborns, many are, intentionally or unintentionally, falsely classified as male or female (some are correctly listed as intersex). Intersex has been documented throughout history. How does this fit in with many Christian institutions stating that there are only two sexes, and supporting policies that recognize only two sexes? T This is important to not only for LGBTQ+ communities, athletic and marriage issues but to all of us who care about discrimination. Marnie Cooper Priest, Raleigh Our don't confuse me with the facts president has done it again; chickening out on tariffs as markets deliver their verdict and chickening out with Putin every time. Trump is unable to stand his ground, let alone lead. All talk and no action, withering in every interaction with Putin. Instead of leading, Trump enables China to win the innovation race. By attacking our own academic institutions, drivers of innovation gave us the edge, Trump is following Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy's model to bully those in the U.S. It's no longer a place for the best and brightest. China seems to be benefiting from Trump's policies. Jacqueline Allen, Carrboro


Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
London's ‘Little America' is no more. What's taking its place?
From the Eagle Bar on the top floor of the new Chancery Rosewood Hotel in Mayfair, the views across London are unobstructed, save for a gilded aluminum eagle, its wings spread wide, which crowns the midcentury modern building that once housed the U.S. Embassy to the United Kingdom. The Americans pulled up stakes in 2018, relocating the embassy to a giant fortified cube on the south bank of the Thames. They left behind the eagle, along with a collection of monuments and memorials in the adjoining Grosvenor Square — relics of what was once an American citadel in its ancestral land. John Adams lived on the square. Gen. Dwight Eisenhower had his wartime office there. A statue of Franklin Roosevelt gazes across the patchy lawn. Diplomats threw star-spangled election night parties, while hopeful travelers lined up outside for visas. During the Vietnam War, protesters clashed with police under the trees. Now, Grosvenor Square is being recast for a post-American age. The Chancery plans to open to guests in early September, its Persian Gulf owners having converted the Brutalist landmark, designed by Eero Saarinen, into a Rosewood luxury hotel, with junior suites starting at 1,400 pounds (nearly $1,900) a night. The square, which lies in front of the hotel and has a different owner, is closing this week for a 13-month refurbishment. The project will add lush plantings that celebrate biodiversity and link the 6-acre expanse, which has fallen into a state of neglect, more closely to its 18th-century Georgian roots. The owner, Grosvenor Property, insists it is preserving the legacy of a place once known as 'Little America.' But Grosvenor Square attests to how much the world has changed, not least since President Donald Trump returned to the White House. Start with the fact that the embassy was bought by investors from Qatar, whose government recently gave the Trump administration a Boeing 747 as a replacement for Air Force One. 'If you're trying to attract people, if you're trying make money, highlighting America's prominence is not the way to do it,' said Leslie Vinjamuri, the director of the U.S. and Americas program at Chatham House, a research group in London. 'It's a good time to take a step back, to play it down a bit.' Ties between Britain and the United States ebb and flow, she noted, in a 'special relationship' that is neither as serene nor as harried as often portrayed. A new global crisis could swiftly bring these old allies back together. But Trump's acrimonious dealings with Europe have indisputably changed the mood. 'There is just a sense of pulling apart between the U.K. and the U.S.,' said Vinjamuri, who will leave London this month to become CEO of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Trump, who has a soft spot for the royal family and other totems of imperial Britain, complained bitterly about the sale of the embassy. He blamed it, wrongly, on his predecessor President Barack Obama. (The decision was made during the George W. Bush administration because of security concerns.) 'We had the best site in all of London,' Trump said in 2018. The new location, in a redeveloped industrial section of London known as Nine Elms, was 'lousy,' he said, spurning an invitation to a ribbon cutting. Indeed, since the days of Charles Dickens and Oscar Wilde, Grosvenor Square has been synonymous with posh London. The Grosvenor family laid it out in the 1720s to anchor the expansion of its property empire into West London. With grand dimensions and an elegant oval shape, it attracted wealthy residents, who were given keys to their own private Eden in the capital. (It became a public park after World War II.) It also attracted Americans, starting with Adams, who lived on the northeast corner from 1785 to 1788 as America's first envoy to Britain. After Eisenhower quartered himself there, it was nicknamed 'Eisenhower Platz.' The Roosevelt statue was paid for with donations from ordinary Britons as a gesture of gratitude to the United States for its aid in the war. Nothing sealed the American connection like the opening of Saarinen's chancery in 1960, a hulking nine-story building that was the first purpose-built embassy of any country in London. In its early days, it was reviled by some critics as a jarring intrusion on the genteel Georgian symmetry of the square. 'It had this sense of America being big and bold, and in a British context, a sense of 'Wow, how American,'' said Matthew Barzun, the last U.S. ambassador to have an office in the building. Barzun, who witnessed ups and downs in the trans-Atlantic relationship over Syria and Brexit, said the old embassy was designed to be 'light and open and welcoming.' But after the terrorist bombings of embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, 'we added more and more fences and bollards,' he said. 'You start out building things to keep people out,' Barzun said, 'but you end up trapping people in.' Converting a diplomatic fortress into a sleek, five-star hotel was a design and engineering test for Qatari Diar, a real estate company backed by Qatar's sovereign wealth fund. The Qataris brought in Rosewood, a luxury hotel chain that was started in Dallas and is now owned by a Hong Kong conglomerate. 'Creating warmth was the biggest challenge,' said Michael Bonsor, the hotel's managing director, as he offered a sneak peek. 'You have this juxtaposition of one of the most secure, fortified buildings in London, where Marines used to run around with machine guns. It wasn't the most hospitable building in the world.' Dapper and discreet, Bonsor could have been a diplomat if he hadn't gone into hospitality. He said the hotel would make nods to its past, but would avoid becoming a Cold War-style theme park. In addition to the eagle, which is a protected landmark, the hotel has reinstalled statues of Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan that once flanked the building (the statues are wrapped in tarp to protect them during construction). Inside, the Chancery has retained some of Saarinen's design elements, notably his exposed-concrete ceiling. But prizewinning British architect David Chipperfield has reconfigured the building to add an atrium with cascading chandeliers. Two palatial penthouses are named after Elizabeth and Charles, monarchs not presidents. The hotel said their scale would appeal to guests from the Middle East. Across the street, the proprietors of Grosvenor Square are similarly aware of the tug between past and present. While they will retain the FDR statue, as well as a memorial to victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, they plan to add serpentine paths and extensive plantings to soften the square's stark appearance. 'The austere design, which was important during the Cold War period, has had its day,' said Cordula Zeidler, a heritage and design expert who advised Grosvenor Property. 'Having more plantings is both a Georgian concept and something people want today.' James Raynor, the newly named CEO of Grosvenor, acknowledged the complicated political backdrop to the project. But he said, 'I don't think we should be altering it for the long term on the basis of short-term noise.' In turbulent times, Raynor even holds out hope that the 18th-century square can still serve as a 21st-century bridge. 'Will the park by itself change the diplomatic relationship between the countries?' he said. 'I doubt it. But it will allow us to recognize what the two countries have done for each other.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025


CNBC
5 hours ago
- CNBC
Speaker Johnson hopes Musk and Trump can 'reconcile' their differences after public fallout
House Speaker Mike Johnson said Sunday that he hopes President Donald Trump and Elon Musk can "reconcile" after their public fallout last week. "There's a lot of emotion involved in it, but it's in the interest of the country for everybody to work together," the Louisiana Republican said on ABC News' "This Week." Johnson said that he has not spoken with Musk about the GOP-led "big, beautiful bill" since last Monday. Musk last week went on a rant against the multitrillion-dollar spending package that narrowly passed the House, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that would lead to exploding federal deficits. On Sunday, Johnson brushed aside the Tesla's CEO's criticisms of the bill. "I didn't go out to craft a piece of legislation to please the richest man in the world, what we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans," he said. The spending bill is now with the Senate. Musk's vocal opposition to the legislation was in part what triggered the public clash between Trump and the billionaire SpaceX founder, CNBC previously reported. The two men have not spoken since their feud, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday on "Fox Sunday Morning Futures," adding that she doesn't think Trump "intends to." Trump also told NBC News' Kristen Welker on Saturday that he was not interested in repairing his relationship with Musk following their spat, signaling that their rift could be irreversible. Musk was the largest donor of the 2024 presidential campaign, and his super PAC spent roughly $200 million to propel Trump to the White House. In the midst of Musk's criticisms against the bill, he threatened to "fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." But Trump warned Saturday that Musk would pay "very serious consequences" if he funds Democratic candidates challenging Republicans who support the bill. Johnson, a loyal Trump ally, echoed the president's remarks, saying it would be a "big mistake" if Musk were to back Democratic candidates.