
New report accuses France of 'continuously' delivering military equipment to Israel
A new report has accused France of "regularly and continuously" delivering military equipment to Israel since the start of its war on Gaza.
According to the study by a coalition of NGOs released on Tuesday, deliveries have been continuous, both by sea and by air, since October 2023.
They include more than 15 million "bombs, grenades, torpedoes, mines, missiles and other munitions of war" worth more than $8m, as well as 1,868 "parts and accessories for rocket launchers, grenades, flamethrowers, artillery, military rifles and hunting rifles" worth more than $2m.
The report was produced by the activist network Progressive International (PI) in cooperation with a coalition of NGOs including the Palestinian Youth Movement, the French Jewish Union for Peace, BDS France and Stop Arming Israel France.
To compile the report, the organisations say they relied on data from the Israel Tax Authority, verifying imports that corresponded to French-made military equipment.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
By comparing these imports with French exports, they found "no fewer than 14 freight flights" as well as "at least 16 shipments destined for the Israeli ports of Haifa or Ashdod."
At a press conference to launch the report at the National Assembly in Paris, David Adler of Progressive International said that the document "reveals a very stunning hypocrisy at the heart of President Macron's foreign policy and the sustained violation of international humanitarian law."
'The data presented in this report offers a very partial picture of French complicity in the occupation, destruction and genocide of the Palestinian people'
- David Adler, Progressive International secretary general
Denouncing "very hollow promises about Palestinian liberation" and the positioning of France "as a champion of human rights", he said the report confirmed "what many people in this country have long suspected to be true: that France has played and continues to play a central role in the traffic of arms to Israel not for defensive purposes but to be deployed against the people of Gaza and the occupied territories of the West Bank."
Adler said the report also identified shipments of F-35 fighter jet components, artillery systems and machine gun ammunition, weapons that have been documented in use during the mass killing of Palestinian civilians attempting to access humanitarian aid in recent days.
The authors have specified that the study is limited in scope. For example, drone components sold by the French group Thales are not included.
"The data presented in this report offers a very partial picture of French complicity in the occupation, destruction and genocide of the Palestinian people," Adler said.
More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of Israel's war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now describe as "genocide".
"The full scope of this military cooperation, including classified licences and covert operations, remains hidden from public view and remains hidden from parliamentary view as well," Adler added.
"We're here to demand accountability, transparency and a full parliamentary investigation into France's role in arming and aiding Israel as it continues to bomb, kill and starve the people of Gaza and occupy the West Bank."
'Double standards'
The report follows revelations by the investigative media outlet Disclose last week that France was preparing to deliver machine gun equipment to Israel.
According to Disclose, an Israeli cargo ship stopped last Thursday in Fos-sur-Mer, near Marseille, to deliver to Israel 19 pallets containing several tons of spare parts for machine guns.
The parts, called "links", are small metal pieces used to connect machine gun bullets and allow rapid bursts of fire. There has been concern in the media and among rights groups that they have likely been used against civilians in the Gaza Strip.
Gaza war: French arms sales to Israel marked by lack of transparency and control Read More »
According to Disclose, the operation was authorised by the French government and was to be carried out in the utmost secrecy.
Anne Savinel-Barras, president of Amnesty International France, said such deliveries were taking place "in opacity and in total contradiction" with the recent statements by French President Emmanuel Macron, who had expressed horror over the humanitarian situation in Gaza.
"These weapons could be used to commit serious crimes under international law in Gaza and the West Bank," she said, urging France to end its "double standards" and impose a total embargo on all arms intended for Israel.
"If France continues to authorise the delivery of war material to Israel, it is fuelling this genocide," Savinel-Barras added.
According to Disclose, which had access to maritime data, two other such shipments between Fos-sur-Mer and the Israeli port of Haifa took place on 3 April and 22 May.
French Defence Minister Sebastien Lecornu had stated at the time that these parts exported by a Marseille company, Eurolink, would be "re-exported" through Israel and not used by the Israeli army.
On Friday, after French dock workers in Fos-sur-Mer blocked the shipment in protest, Lecornu stated again France's "clear" position that it does not sell weapons to Israel.
Only "components" intended for the "Iron Dome", Israel's anti-missile system, or "elements for re-export" are sold to Israel, he added.
In the latter case, "some items go to Israel, undergo industrial intervention, and are often re-exported. Sometimes even to France. And all of this is subject to monitoring," Lecornu said.
Lack of accountability
According to experts, including the report's authors, it is impossible to verify whether equipment sold by France are actually used by the Israeli army and deployed in Gaza.
In France, military affairs fall exclusively under the executive branch. Arms deliveries are covered by state secrecy, which means the parliament has almost no room to manoeuvre in controlling the government's actions.
UK and France abandon plans to recognise Palestinian state at conference Read More »
During the press conference on Tuesday, Bastien Lachaud, a France Insoumise MP and a member of the parliamentary defence committee, said that his party had been questioning the government about arms exports to Israel for months without satisfying answers.
"There is no guarantee and no follow-up on the supposed reshipments of weapons assembled in Israel. Similarly, we see that the parts cited in this report are not used in the Iron Dome."
He pointed out that France is a signatory to the Arms Trade Treaty and, therefore, "there should not even be a question about what type of weapons or what quantity.
"The treaty is very clear: when there is a risk of committing a war crime, a crime against humanity or a genocide, arms deliveries must cease immediately. This has not been the case here," he added.
No French company can sell arms to Israel without "specific, detailed authorisation" from the French prime minister and government, he said, lamenting that parliament is "deprived of any power to control arms deliveries".
Meanwhile, on Tuesday, a French court rejected a request from NGOs asking it to ban Israeli companies from the Paris Air Show scheduled from 16 to 22 June at Le Bourget, near Paris, citing the risk of perpetuating "international crimes".
The court considered that an obligation to screen exhibitors would involve "in-depth legal and political analyses, closely linked to the conduct of France's international relations, which SIAE [the organiser] does not appear capable of conducting," a lawyer for the NGOs told AFP.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Israel's disconnection with allies and partners has rarely been clearer
Tuesday's decision by the UK to impose sanctions on two ultra-nationalist Israeli ministers means Britain has joined Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Norway in taking the extraordinary step of introducing travel bans and financial restrictions on members of an ostensibly friendly government to these countries. Perhaps even more extraordinary was the response from one of the ministers concerned. A statement issued by the office of Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich the same day confirmed that Israel cancelled a waiver that allowed the country's banks to work with Palestinian ones. Instead of retaliating against the UK directly, Mr Smotrich instead authorised a move that threatens to paralyse Palestinian financial institutions. Such intransigence – and its deeply embedded position within the current Israeli government – explains why more and more of the country's allies and trade partners are losing patience and taking action. Tuesday's sanctions are the latest example of Israel's increasing isolation and the substantial diplomatic and political cost it is paying for its war of collective punishment in Gaza and continuing military occupation of Palestinian land. The fact that Mr Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are determined opponents of a just political settlement of the conflict also highlights the disconnection between Israel's current leadership and most of the international community. Next week, hundreds of diplomats will gather in New York for a UN summit on the two-state solution, co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. Israel's leadership has already said it will not attend; that is its choice, but it is a poor one. Determinedly opposing the majority of international opinion – that is in favour of an equitable settlement – puts the onus on Israel to provide a realistic alternative that does not involve further displacement or other illegal policies. If it cannot, then it will be clear that Israel, which is currently led by a divided and precarious coalition with an uncertain future, is on a collision course with the international community, one that may even try the patience of a much more capricious and transactional White House. The coming UN summit must be bold and ambitious, holding fast to the overall framework of a solution that most of the international community supports: an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the return of the remaining Israeli hostages, the release of Palestinian detainees as well as a process that leads to Palestinian freedom coupled with security guarantees for Israel. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed It is a source of frustration that the case for this position has to be made time and again. Arab nations have already said they are ready to play their part, as was made clear in the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. Last September, while speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said 57 Muslim and Arab countries were 'willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation' and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state. However, what the world is witnessing right now on the streets of the West Bank and in the rubble of Gaza is what the absence of a peace process looks like. More partners of Israel are making it clear that this situation is simply unsustainable. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed.


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
UN adopts resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, aid access and release of hostages
The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on Thursday calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, days after the US vetoed a similar measure in the Security Council. A total of 149 countries voted in favour while 12, including the US, Israel and Argentina, opposed the resolution. And 19 countries abstained. The resolution, presented by Spain, demands the release of all hostages held by Hamas, the return of Palestinian prisoners detained by Israel, and the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. It underscored the need for accountability to ensure Israel's adherence to international law but stopped short of explicitly calling for sanctions. In addition, it 'strongly condemned any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and the unlawful denial of humanitarian access', and further stressed the obligation to avoid depriving Gaza's civilians of basic survival needs, 'including by wilfully impeding relief supplies and access'. Before the resolution's passage, Palestinian ambassador Riyad Mansour declared the measure's language to be the 'strongest to date' but stressed that words must now turn into decisive action. 'Israel's continuing defiance of international law, UN resolutions and global condemnation demands an immediate response,' Mr Mansour said. He urged member states to stamp their national authority: 'Use the tools available to you, each and every one of you. 'No arms, no money, no trade to support the oppression, ethnic cleansing and land theft against Palestinians." While General Assembly resolutions are non-binding, they serve as a significant indicator of global opinion. Previous UN calls to end the war between Israel and Hamas have gone unheeded. Unlike the Security Council, where permanent members such as the US have the power of veto, the General Assembly operates on a majority vote. There has been increasing international pressure over the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where thousands have been killed and millions face severe shortages of food, water and medical supplies. With the vote taking place days before an international conference at the UN aimed at reviving two-state negotiations, the text also reiterated the General Assembly's 'unwavering commitment to the two-state solution … where two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace and security". The vote comes more than 77 years after the General Assembly's 1947 resolution partitioned British-ruled Palestine into Arab and Jewish states. Israel declared independence in 1948, sparking a war with neighbouring Arab nations, while Palestinian statehood remains unrealised. The US is now urging countries to boycott next week's UN conference, co-sponsored by France and Saudi Arabia. When asked by The National about Israel's attendance in next week's summit, Israel's UN envoy Danny Danon said 'absolutely not". "We will not take part in this conference," he said. 'I was very happy to see that the United States decided also not to participate in this circus." Mr Danon also took aim at French President Emmanuel Macron. 'When Mr Macron arrives at the UN, I will ask him if he has solved all the problems in France and Europe. If he thinks coming here and pushing this conference will actually be constructive, it's not constructive.' He also criticised the resolution for not demanding the immediate release of the 55 hostages still being held, not condemning Hamas 'for the atrocities' it committed on October 7, and not holding the militant group accountable. In October 2023, the General Assembly called for an immediate humanitarian truce in Gaza, with 120 votes in favour. By December 2023, support grew significantly, as 153 countries voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. Later that month the assembly increased its call, adopting a resolution, with 158 votes in favour, demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire.


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Posturing or potential strikes? Iran tensions ramp up ahead of nuclear talks
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that an Israeli strike on Iran "may very well happen', as he confirmed that the US was evacuating some US officials and their families from the region. The US is evacuating non-essential US embassy staff and their dependents from the embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Other reports said the US was evacuating some staff from embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait, but the embassy in Bahrain denied a change in its posture on Thursday. Trump on Thursday said the risk of "massive conflict" led the US to draw down staff in the region. CBS News reported on Thursday that Israel is prepared to launch an attack on Iran's nuclear sites, and that US officials have been discussing how the US could assist Israel without taking a direct role. The report said options could include aerial refuelling or intelligence-sharing. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The steady drumbeat of leaks raises questions about whether a strike could take place in the future, or if the Trump administration is trying to put pressure on Iran ahead of a sixth round of nuclear talks scheduled to be held in Oman on Sunday. A US diplomat at one of the embassies restricting travel said the orders they have received were not out of the ordinary during flare-ups in local tensions. 'These steps don't necessarily mean military action is imminent. Still time for talks, it takes time to move people out. But these are steps that it would make sense to take as part of preparations, and to show seriousness. Provides important leverage in nuclear talks,' Danial Shapiro, a former US ambassador to Israel, said on X on Wednesday. 'Might help, could blow it' Trump himself toys publicly with the idea that the threat of an Israeli strike may help the US's negotiating position. "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' Trump said, referring to Israel, before quickly adding, "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." In some ways, the reports that Israel is "poised" to strike Iran are redundant. By Trump's own admission, Israel has been lobbying him for months to bomb Iran. One senior US official recently told Middle East Eye on the condition of anonymity that the Trump administration has been impressed by plans Israel shared with it that lay out unilateral strikes against Iran's nuclear programme without direct American involvement. The plans were discussed in April and May with CIA director John Ratcliffe, MEE reported. 'The Israelis have pinpointed everything they can take out that supports Iran's nuclear sites down to the water supply and power generation, etcetera,' the US official told MEE, referring to a process called Target Systems Analysis, by which militaries assess specific nodes to attack that support a bigger main target. Trump says Iran's proposal 'unacceptable' as Tehran touts intel on Israeli nukes Read More » Israel has also discussed combining cyberattacks and precision military strikes. Iran's nuclear facilities are buried deep in fortified bunkers in the Natanz desert and inside a mountain called Fordow. Analysts say Netanyahu has refrained from attacking Iran in defiance of Trump because he wants to share political responsibility if the strikes go wrong and preserve an American backstop in the likely case of Iranian retaliation. On Thursday, Axios reported that Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, told some Republican Senators that the administration fears Iran could retaliate against an Israeli strike with ballistic missiles, causing a 'mass casualty event". The article did not mention that Israel is widely understood to have its own arsenal of nuclear weapons. The Iranians have kept pace with Trump and upped their own rhetoric. During past flare-ups, Iranian officials have sent signals that they could shut down the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf, where 30 percent of the world's oil transits, and have leaked that they could bomb US bases in Gulf states if attacked. Iran has now clearly stated that threat. "All its [the United States] bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister added. Israel and Iran had two unprecedented exchanges of fire in October and April 2024. The US came to Israel's defence, shooting down missiles and drones in an attack Iran had carefully telegraphed beforehand. IAEA tensions Ahead of the talks on Sunday, tensions have also been rising with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Diplomats said the IAEA's board of governors adopted a resolution condemning Iran's "non-compliance" with its nuclear obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The resolution was carried by 19 votes in favour out of 35. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a "snapback" mechanism, which expires in October. This mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then-US president Barack Obama. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, said the resolution was "extremist" and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, he said Iran would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. The issue of whether Iran will be able to enrich uranium on its territory has become the main roadblock to nuclear talks with the US. Trump has insisted Iran will not be allowed to enrich any uranium.