Developer appointed for Brislington meadowland homes
The government has appointed a developer for a controversial project to build 260 homes on a beauty spot.Homes England announced on Monday that Keepmoat Homes is expected to begin work on Brislington Meadows, in Bristol, next year.The government's land and property agency won an appeal over the planning application in 2023 after Bristol City Council missed a deadline to make a decision.Campaigners have argued the site should not be built on for ecological reasons and local Labour MP Kerry McCarthy has vowed to try and halt the development.
The council designated the 22.5-acre site for housing in 2014. Homes England paid a total of about £15m to the council and private owners to buy the site in 2020.The current council has tried to protect the site, citing its ecological significance, including the habitat its trees, grassland and hedgerows provide for protected species.A spokesperson for Homes England said: "At Brislington Meadows, we are committed to delivering an exemplary scheme that will provide much-needed, high-standard homes, 30 per cent of which will be affordable, while delivering a 10 per cent biodiversity net gain, in an area that is close to local shops, community facilities, employment areas and public transport infrastructure."In a statement on the Brislington Meadows website on Monday, the agency added: "(Keepmoat) will now prepare a Reserved Matters planning application, which will include public consultation later in the year. It is currently anticipated that work will start on-site in 2026."
Danica Priest, from campaign group Save Brislington Meadows, said: "It's not a large site - it's not going to make a difference to the housing stock in Bristol. It kind of feels like spite that Homes England is going forward with it."There is so much brownfield land in that area that could be developed instead."She pointed out that the site only has outline permission and plans may be blocked when the developer submits more detailed ones. It is also being taken out of the council's Local Plan."It has opposition from every single political party in Bristol which is quite rare," she said."It's just really unethical to be building on a site of Nature Conservation Interest."
'Green lung'
Kerry McCarthy, Labour MP for Bristol East, said: "I remain of the view that the meadows development should not go ahead."As well as being a site of Nature Conservation Interest, the meadows is a key green lung for Brislington and developing it would have a detrimental impact on local residents."She added: "I will continue to look for realistic ways to prevent the development - if this isn't possible then I will be pushing as strongly as I can to reduce the development's footprint, to ensure access to local people to the wider meadows, and a promise that any biodiversity net gain remains in the local area."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said employers should be able to decide if their staff can wear burkas in the workplace. Mrs Badenoch also said people who come to her constituency surgeries must remove their face coverings 'whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. Ms Badenoch posted a video on X of part of her interview with the Telegraph, in which she said: 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear. 'I personally have strong views about face coverings. 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear for instance, it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' She added that France has a ban and has 'worse problems than we do in this country on integration'. On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said his party has 'triggered a national discussion'. Asked if he wants to ban burkas, Mr Tice told GB News on Sunday: 'We've triggered a national discussion. I'm very concerned about them (burkas). 'Frankly, I think they are repressive. I think that they make women second-class citizens. 'We're a Christian nation. We have equality between the sexes, and I'm very concerned, and if someone wants to convince me otherwise, well come and talk to me. 'But at the moment, my view is that I think we should follow seven other nations across Europe that have already banned them.' He called for a debate on the topic to 'hear where the country's mood is'. Meanwhile, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not', when discussing face coverings. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme if the Conservative Party's position is not to speak to people who cover their face, Mr Philp said of Mrs Badenoch: 'Well she was talking specifically about her constituency surgery I think, and it is definitely the case that employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not. 'But I don't think this is necessarily the biggest issue facing our country right now. 'There's a legitimate debate to have about the burka. 'You've got, obviously, arguments about personal liberty and choice and freedom on one side, and arguments about causing divisions in society and the possibility of coercion on the other. 'That is a debate I think we as a country should be having, but as Kemi said, it's probably not the biggest issue our nation faces today.' Asked if he would talk to people who would not show their face, the Croydon South MP said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The cruel government trick that drives voters to Reform: calling new homes ‘affordable'
I have got used to a scene that has been repeated in wildly different places all over the UK. Close to the centre of a town or city, there will be a construction project, centred on the delivery of brand new apartments. The air will be filled with the loud clanking of machinery; a hastily finished show flat might offer a glimpse of what is to come. I have developed an unexpected addiction to these places, always photographing the hoardings that hide building work from passersby, which usually feature ecstatic thirtysomethings drinking coffee and relaxing in upmarket domestic environments (they are usually accompanied by slogans like 'live, work, relax, dream'). And I have come to expect a kind of encounter that goes straight to the heart of one of our biggest national problems. Up will walk a member of the public, looking sceptically at what is under way. Their words may vary but the basic message is always the same: 'Who's this for? Not me.' At the last count, 1.3m households in England were on local authority housing waiting lists, the highest figure since 2014. About 164,000 children live in temporary accommodation. Average rent increases in the private sector recently hit a record high of 9.2%. Figures just released by the Home Builders Federation show that the number of new homes given planning consent in England in the first quarter of 2025 was the lowest since 2012, something partly blamed on the absence of any government support scheme for first-time buyers. The market for homes people can buy remains a byword for exclusion and impossibility, which is why those new apartment blocks are always such a dependable symbol of fury and frustration. The same anger has long since seeped into our politics. Fifteen years ago, I can vividly recall reporting from the London borough of Barking and Dagenham about chronic housing problems caused by the mass sell-off of council houses, and the area's increasingly toxic politics. A 60-year-old owner of a bakery told me about her daughter, who lived with her four-year-old son in a privately rented flat full of pigeon droppings that had apparently made him chronically ill. They were on the council waiting list. 'But every time,' she told me, 'she's, like, number 200 or 300.' She and her husband, she said, were going to vote for the neo-fascist British National party. At the time, it felt as if what I was seeing still sat at the outer edge of politics. But these days, the same essential story has taken up residence at the heart of the national conversation: the BNP has been chased into irrelevance and protest votes now go en masse to Reform UK, and the connection between the housing crisis and the febrile state of the political mainstream is obvious. Certainly, it's impossible to grasp the salience of immigration without appreciating many people's visceral feelings about the scarcity of homes. In the inner circles of Keir Starmer's government, there must be voices keenly aware of the need to finally tackle all this. Some of the right instincts were evident in Labour's promise to oversee the building of 1.5m new homes in England by the end of this parliament. The chancellor has recently reiterated the aim of delivering the 'biggest boost in social and affordable housing in a generation'. But what that means and whether any such thing is on its way are still clouded in doubt. The clock is loudly ticking down to this week's spending review. Last weekend, the Greater Manchester mayor, Andy Burnham, addressed an event put on by the progressive pressure group Compass, and said Rachel Reeves should 'unlock public land for mayors to use to build a new generation of council homes at pace – akin to the drive of the postwar Labour government'. Housing associations have pleaded with the chancellor to reclassify social homes as critical infrastructure (a category that covers such essentials as food, energy and 'data'), which would allow increased funding to fall within her fiscal rules. Meanwhile, Angela Rayner – the minister in charge of housing, who is said to be fiercely attached to the dream of a social housing renaissance – is seemingly locked in intense last-minute negotiations with the Treasury. Although the budget unveiled in March contained an extra £2bn for the government's affordable homes programme in 2026-27, its own publicity material said this was merely 'a down payment [sic] … ahead of more long-term investment in social and affordable housing planned this year'. Rayner is reportedly pushing the plain fact that the ever-more doubtful 1.5m target will be missed without much higher funding. We will see what happens on Wednesday, but housing seems to have fallen out of the government's messaging. Of late, it has seemed that Reeves and Starmer think investments in defence and public transport are a much higher priority than dependable shelter. There is a vital point at the core of this issue. Even if Starmer has often given the impression that the answer to the housing crisis lies in clearing away planning law and letting corporate developers do the work, their ring-road faux-Georgian cul-de-sacs will not provide anything like the entirety of the solution. Social housing – which, at the scale required, needs to be largely the responsibility of councils – is not just what millions of British people need as a matter of urgency; it will also have to be hugely revived if the government is to meet its aims: 1.5m homes in a single parliament equates to 300,000 a year. The last time such a feat materialised was in 1977, when about half of all new-builds were delivered by local authorities. A new version of that story will not be easy to realise. Threadbare councils are in no state to play the role in a housing revival that they need to. The UK is also faced with a dire construction skills crisis: despite the government's plans to train 60,000 new construction workers, industry insiders are adamant that we will only build what's required with the help of building workers from abroad. But failure should not be an option: it will not just deepen this country's social decay, but also boost malign forces on the hard right, and present a huge obstacle to Labour having any chance of winning the next election. In the midst of last year's contest, I went to Aldershot, the old garrison town at the centre of a constituency that Labour won from the Tories on a swing of 17 points. Grand buildings once used by generals and majors were full of luxury flats, and the town centre was scattered with empty shops. There, I came across a new development called Union Yard, which was on its way to completion. It contains 128 student 'units', 82 properties for private rent, and a mere 18 classified as 'affordable' (which, in keeping with one of the grimmest aspects of the politics of housing, means they will be let for no more than 80% of local market rent), set aside for people over the age of 55. Not long before, the waiting list for council homes in the surrounding county of Hampshire had hit 30,000. On a Tuesday afternoon, I sat facing the images of the high life that adorned the development's outer edges, and had a long conversation with a twentysomething woman who was full of a striking mixture of sadness and anger. I knew what she was going to say, and it came out pretty much verbatim: 'Who's that for? Not me.' John Harris is a Guardian columnist
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
'SNP has not recovered' - John Swinney admits after by-election humbling
Both the SNP and Scottish Labour saw their vote share fall in the by-election, while Reform UK surged in the polls. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... John Swinney has admitted the SNP has 'not recovered' after losing the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. The First Minister also warned Scottish Labour to be cautious after their by-election victory as 'the Labour vote has collapsed' in the constituency due to the rapid rise of Reform UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And he vowed to not 'do any sort of deal or cooperation' with Nigel Farage should his party perform well at the 2026 Holyrood election. John Swinney in Hamilton ahead of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election (Photo by Jeff) | JeffOn Thursday Scottish Labour's Davy Russell won the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election with a majority of just 602. However, both Scottish Labour and the SNP saw their vote share fall - Labour's vote share fell from 33.6 per cent in 2021 to 31.5 per cent. The SNP's vote share fell from 46.2 per cent to just 29.4 per cent. On the other hand, Reform UK managed to secure 26.2 per cent of the vote, well above where the party is polling nationally. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Speaking to BBC The Sunday Show, Mr Swinney said he recognised the SNP did not do enough to win this by-election. He said: 'I am disappointed we didn't win the by-election because we fought an energetic campaign with an excellent candidate and set out the rationale for voting SNP. 'I recognise that was not enough to win this constituency and we have got to build on that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We must recognise I came into office a year ago with an inheritance of difficulties for the SNP and we are in the process of recovery - we have not recovered, we are recovering.' First Minister John Swinney at Holyrood | Getty Images He said he believed the primary issues for voters in the constituency were the cost-of-living crisis and the NHS, two issues which he says will now be his focus as First Minister. He was also questioned on comments he made before the by-election that it would be a two-horse race between his party and Reform UK, dismissing Scottish Labour's potential in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. Mr Swinney said: 'What I said transpired - the Labour vote collapsed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'A year ago [in the general election] Labour commanded 50 per cent in this constituency and on Thursday that fell to just over 30 per cent. 'My point is that Labour support has collapsed compared to last year and Reform support has surged - that says to me that we must do all we can to stop Nigel Farage and Reform succeeding, and the best way to do that is to vote SNP because the Labour vote is collapsing.' He added he will 'make no apology' for standing up to the 'Brexit author' Farage. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Sarwar, meanwhile, accused Mr Swinney of running a dishonest campaign by focusing on the rise of Reform rather than the SNP's record in government. He said: 'All the issues you want to ignore that affect people's day-to-day lives are the responsibility of the Scottish Government - that's why the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse utterly rejected the SNP. 'These people sent a message to Mr Swinney, who ran a dishonest, disgraceful campaign of pushing people into the arms of Reform rather than confronting the issues he has caused. Scottish Labour Deputy leader Jackie Ballie, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar and Davy Russell, newly elected Scottish Labour MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse yesterday (Picture: Jeff) | Jeff'That is why people want him removed from office, and if you want them out of office, you have to vote Labour.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Sarwar said he learned three things from the by-election victory - that voters are 'tired of the SNP government that has failed them', that Scots 'reject the noise' of Reform UK, and that Scots want to see the UK Labour government moving faster on turning around their lives. On Sunday Mr Swinney also ruled out doing any sort of deal with Mr Farage if they do well in next year's Holyrood election. Reform UK is sitting at just under 20 per cent in the Holyrood polls, with some suggesting the party could become the official opposition in the Scottish Parliament. Speaking to Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips on Sky News, he pledged to never work with Mr Farage. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When asked if he would consider a coalition between the SNP, Labour and the Greens to keep Reform UK out of government, Mr Swinney said: 'We'll be going into that with the aim of winning that election. Nigel Farage's Reform UK party is the coming force in Scottish politics (Picture: Lia Toby) |'If you look at the result on Thursday, all the pollsters say that if that was applied across the wider electorate in Scotland, the SNP would remain by a country mile the largest political party in the Scottish Parliament. 'Now that's not good enough - I want to get stronger in that election, but I'll tell you one thing I will not do under any circumstances is do any form of deal or cooperation with Farage. 'I just won't do it, and people need to understand that.'
