
Top Florida officials ramp up criticism of judge who blocked state immigration arrests
Gov. Ron DeSantis and other top officials have ramped up their criticism of a federal judge in Miami who recently blocked the enforcement of a new state law that makes it a crime for undocumented immigrants to enter Florida after illegally crossing into the United States.
They have roundly denounced U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, saying she has overstepped her authority as she considers in late May whether to hold state Attorney General James Uthmeier in contempt of court for flouting a restraining order that she issued last month.
At a news conference in Tampa on Monday, DeSantis lumped Williams with other federal judges he said 'have just gotten out of control in this country' over immigration disputes. He said Williams 'wrongly' concluded the Florida statute was likely unconstitutional and that she was wrong as well she said a preliminary injunction was needed to prevent harm to illegal immigrants who have sued the state to stop enforcement of the misdemeanor offense.
DeSantis also said the judge has 'no authority' to order Uthmeier to instruct the Florida Highway Patrol and other police agencies to refrain from arresting illegal immigrants upon arrival in the state — which is at the center of the contempt issue — because law enforcement officers are not named as defendants in the immigrants' case.
'This is Law 101. She doesn't have jurisdiction,' Uthmeier told Fox35 in Orlando on Friday, saying he has obeyed the law. 'We hope the [federal] appellate court will fix the problems the lower court created and reaffirm that, as 'the least dangerous branch,' district court judges must stay in their constitutional lane.'
Jeremy Redfern, the communications director for Uthmeier, characterized Williams' position as 'lawfare' by an 'Obama-appointed judge' on the social media site X, suggesting she has used her power as a legal weapon to thwart the Republican-led government's efforts to assist the Trump administration on immigration enforcement.
The concerted verbal assault on Williams, a Democrat who served as a prosecutor and public defender in Miami before becoming a federal judge in 2011, has been striking. It contrasts sharply with how one of her colleagues on the federal bench in Miami was treated by the DeSantis administration when that judge halted the enforcement of a previous state immigration law.
Two years ago, DeSantis championed legislation that made it a crime to transport undocumented immigrants into Florida — a state law that he touted in his GOP primary campaign for president.
Last year, U.S. District Judge Roy Altman, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, stopped enforcement of the state law with a preliminary injunction sought by a farm workers' group. Altman wrote that he temporarily blocked the law because the group would otherwise 'suffer irreparable harm.' He said that its members would face family separations and that the law would affect service providers that transport immigrants across state lines to appointments for medical and immigration services.
At first, Altman said his preliminary injunction would be enforceable across the state, but then he ruled in March that it would only apply to the plaintiffs who sued the state. The federal case was filed in 2023 by the Farmworker Association of Florida, which advocates for about 12,000 seasonal and migrant farm workers across the state. It is represented by lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union.
But unlike their harsh criticism of Judge Williams, DeSantis and other Florida officials kept their objections to Judge Altman civil, limiting their differences with him to court filings. At the time, Ashley Moody, now a Florida senator, was the state attorney general.
There were no critical comments about Altman at news conferences or on social media, like the verbal barrage against Williams.
The political dynamics of U.S. immigration policy have changed dramatically under Trump. His administration has launched a sweeping crackdown on undocumented immigrants in the United States, targeting not only foreign nationals with criminal records but also Venezuelans and other migrants with so-called Temporary Protected Status and humanitarian parole granted by the Biden administration.
In executing his agenda, Trump has relied on Republican-dominated states like Florida in helping detain illegal immigrants so that U.S. authorities can deport them, leading to confrontations with federal judges like Williams.
'The significant difference between this year and last year is that the Trump administration has declared war on judges,' said Jon May, a longtime South Florida criminal defense attorney, who represented Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega on drug-trafficking charges in Miami.
'It's completely political,' May told the Miami Herald, noting what he called the state's and federal governments' 'defiance' of federal court orders. 'DeSantis wants to 'out-fascist' the Trump administration.... But Judge Williams is fearless. She's not going to be intimidated.'
Evan Power, chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, said the No. 1 issue for voters in the last presidential election was immigration enforcement. He said elected officials have grown increasingly frustrated with federal judges like Williams who block coordinated efforts to detain and deport undocumented migrants, including the state's new law criminalizing those who enter Florida.
'It shouldn't be up to random, politically motivated judges who are making these decisions,' Power told the Herald. 'What you're seeing is elected officials reacting in frustration.'
In a post on X last week, Power wrote: 'People don't want judges getting in the way of enforcing our laws or protecting Floridians from criminal illegals.'
'Surprised and shocked'
The showdown between Judge Williams and the state attorney general's office came nearly one month after the Florida Immigrant Coalition, Farmworker Association of Florida and others represented by ACLU lawyers filed suit in early April, saying that the new state law is unconstitutional because only federal authorities have the power to enforce immigration laws.
Williams agreed on a preliminary basis, citing the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution, which says federal law takes precedence over state and local laws.
In late April, Williams said she was 'surprised and shocked' to learn that Uthmeier first told police officers to obey her order not to arrest undocumented immigrants entering Florida but later said he 'cannot prevent' them from making arrests under the new state law.
Williams issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting all state law enforcement officials and police agencies from arresting undocumented immigrants who come into Florida.
The judge also scheduled a critical hearing for May 29 that could lead to Uthmeier being held in contempt of court for disobeying her prior restraining order in the immigration case. Williams said the state attorney general's directive telling police officers that they could make arrests 'threw everything out of whack,' leaving her with no choice but to hold a hearing to allow Uthmeier to explain why she should not hold him in contempt of her order.
'What I am offended by is someone suggesting you don't have to follow my order, that it's not legitimate,' Williams said.
Uthmeier and his office's lawyers argued that Williams' restraining orders and injunction should only apply to the defendants named in the immigrant groups' lawsuit, namely the state attorney general, statewide prosecutor and various state attorneys in Florida — not police agencies and officers.
Here's what triggered the confrontation in Miami federal court: Uthmeier told the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and other police agencies that they could continue to enforce the state statute criminalizing illegal immigrants arriving in Florida who hadn't notified federal authorities of their entry into the U.S. — contrary to Williams' April 18 restraining order.
That day, Williams scolded lawyers for the attorney general's office after learning that Florida Highway Patrol officers arrested more than a dozen people — including a U.S. citizen — after she had ordered them to stop on April 4 when she issued a 14-day temporary restraining order that 'prohibited the enforcement' of the state's immigration law.
The order applied to those 'who are in active concert or participation with' the defendants named in the immigration groups' lawsuit. Williams said her order enjoined the named defendants, the state attorney general and various state prosecutors in Florida, but also state, county and local police officers.
Saying she was 'astounded' by the FHP arrests, Williams extended her ruling for another 11 days, blocking the enforcement of the state immigration law through April 29. She spelled out that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Florida Highway Patrol and all other police agencies were bound by her ruling.
After the April 18 hearing, Uthmeier sent a memo to state and local law enforcement officers and told them they 'must refrain' from enforcing the law and obey the judge's order, even though he disagreed with it.
'Please instruct your officers and agents to comply with Judge Williams' directive,' he wrote in the memo. But five days later, he changed his mind, saying her latest order was legally 'wrong.'
'Judge Williams ordered my office to notify you of the evolving scope of her order, and I did so,' Uthmeier wrote in another memo on April 23 to Florida law enforcement agencies. 'But I cannot prevent you from enforcing [the state immigration law] where there remains no judicial order that properly restrains you from doing so.'
It's not known whether Florida police agencies have since made additional arrests of undocumented immigrants who entered the state.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Primary election 2025: Berks officials certify election results
Berks County election officials have finalized the tally of results from the primary election. During a special meeting Friday, the elections board voted unanimously to certify the vote totals and authorize the submission of the results to the secretary of the commonwealth. There is now a clear picture of which Democratic and Republican candidates will be on the November ballot for municipal, school, county and judicial races. In addition to those candidates who appeared on the primary ballot, nearly 100 candidates were added to the fall election through successful write-in campaigns. Independent and third-party candidates still have a chance to petition to be on the ballot before the lineup is finalized. Elections Director Anne Norton told the elections board that her term performed the required reviews and audits of the May 20 primary, finding no variations or discrepancies with the official tally. The official results of the election will be posted on the county elections website. Overall, just over 21% of registered Democrats and Republicans voted. Voter turnout was slightly lower than recent, similar elections. In the 2023 municipal primary, for example, turnout was about 24%. The elections board thanked the election services team as well as those who worked the polls and handled mail ballots for the hard work and long hours they put into making sure every vote was counted. 'A huge thank you to everyone involved,' Commissioner Michael Rivera said. Commissioner Dante Santoni Jr. also commended those who ran to represent their fellow residents in local positions. 'When you run for office it takes time away from other things,' he said. 'You stick your neck out for your community at all levels of government and I give kudos to everyone who participated in the democratic process.'

Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Berks officials send 2 alleged election violations to DA to investigate
Two allegations of potential campaign law violations in Berks County have been forwarded to law enforcement for investigation. At a special meeting of the board of elections Friday, members of the county legal team presented two complaints stemming from the May 20 primary election. One involved a candidate who failed to indicate who paid for campaign materials and the other involved a text message from an unknown sender. The first complaint involved Matthew McCluskey, a Republican candidate running to represent Washington Township on the board of supervisors, who failed to include a disclaimer on campaign material sent to voters about who paid for its distribution. While the board decided last month that they would not be sending the complaint to authorities for further review because they believed the candidate had taken the necessary action to fix the situation, Assistant County Solicitor Alexa Antanavage told the board Friday that the issue is still unresolved. They said upon closer examination of financial campaign documents filed by McCluskey and a committee acting on his behalf, the source of the money used to send mailers to Republican voters in the township ahead of the primary remains unclear. 'Given the totality of everything that's going on here and the discrepancies that we have seen, along with the failure to include disclaimers, I think it's appropriate to recommend referral to the district attorney's office for further investigation,' Antanavage said. The board agreed, voting unanimously to forward the issue to law enforcement. Contacted by the Reading Eagle, McCluskey said Friday afternoon that he believes further investigation of the latest campaign finance documents he filed will accurately show who was responsible for funding his materials. 'I made a mistake filling out the paperwork,' he said. 'There's not even a question about that because I misunderstood the instructions. Listen, I'm a rookie and I've never done this before.' McCluskey said he recently met with an attorney and financial adviser familiar with campaign finance filings to fix the mistakes that were made. 'I truly believe that everything is as it should be now,' he said. The second complaint involved an anonymous text message sent a day before the primary to Republican voters in the Oley Valley School District advocating for the election of several candidates. First Assistant County Solicitor Cody Kauffman said the message may have violated the silence period that prohibits candidates, committees and parties acting on their behalf from placing an advertisement in the 120 hours before an election without giving sufficient notice to opposing candidates. He noted the message is also problematic because it did not state who paid for its distribution to voters. Kauffman recommended the matter be sent to law enforcement for further review. The board voted unanimously to forward the issue to the district attorney. The two referrals to the district attorney's office bring to five the total number of potential violations regarding the handling of campaign material that the county has handed over for investigation this election season. Commissioner Michael Rivera, chairman of the elections board, said it appears this is a growing issue that needs to be addressed. He suggested the board put in place guidelines about how candidates should respond to complaints when they are brought to their attention. 'The remedy has to be equal to or greater than the infraction,' he said. 'So, in the case of the mailer sent out without a disclaimer, the candidate must send another mailer to the same people with the disclaimer. If you are sending a text message without a disclaimer, then another text message should be sent to the same people with the disclaimer.' Rivera said adopting that guideline would help the elections team more easily determine if the candidate has taken the appropriate action to address the complaint. His fellow board members agreed that adopting guidelines would be beneficial for the elections team and candidates who may be unfamiliar with the requirements. They asked Kauffman to work with Elections Director Anne Norton to craft guidelines for the board to approve.


New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters
Several Trump administration officials fired back at Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Friday after she pledged to oppose federal efforts to nab illegal immigrants — as cops in her city had to use flash bangs to disperse the violent mob of protesters who descended on the arrest sites. 'We will not stand for this,' Bass said in a statement released after federal immigration authorities arrested 44 people in raids across Los Angeles. 'I am deeply angered by what has taken place,' the Democrat mayor fumed, noting that her office 'is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations.' Advertisement 4 Bass slammed the Los Angeles immigration enforcement raids in a social media post. AFP via Getty Images White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller quickly dismissed Bass' declaration. 'You have no say in this at all,' Miller shot back on social media. Advertisement 'Federal law is supreme and federal law will be enforced,' he noted on X. Miller was one of several Trump administration officials that took issue with Bass' statements. 'They're Illegals. Not 'immigrants.' One just tried to burn Americans alive in Boulder,' White House adviser Sebastian Gorka wrote on X, referring to Colorado terror suspect Mohamed Soliman. The Egyptian national overstayed his tourist visa before allegedly firebombing a peaceful march for Israeli hostages still held by Hamas on Sunday in a heinous antisemitic attack. Advertisement 'If you're aiding and abetting them you're a criminal too,' Gorka said in response to the LA mayor's comments. 'Are you ready to be treated as a criminal? 'Because we are ready to treat you as one if you commit a crime,' he warned. 4 Miller noted that Bass has 'no say' in federal immigration enforcement. Chris Kleponis – CNP / MEGA 4 Miller was one of several Trump administration officials who reacted strongly to Bass' statement on the ICE raids. Stephen Miller, /X Advertisement Justice Department official Harmeet K. Dhillon was stunned by Bass' understanding of the law. 'It's amazing the number of elected officials who don't grasp the basics of federalism, or federal sovereignty over immigration issues, or the First Amendment,' Dhillon tweeted. The Los Angeles immigration raids sparked protests at the arrest sites, and at least one person was taken into custody for allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement. 'Federal agents were executing a lawful judicial warrant at a LA worksite this morning when David Huerta deliberately obstructed their access by blocking their vehicle,' US Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement. 'He was arrested for interfering with federal officers and will face arraignment in federal court on Monday.' 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are — if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted.' Huerta is president of the California branch of the influential Service Employees International Union. 4 The raids sparked protests in Los Angeles. AP Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin decried the city's response to protesters' clashes with federal agents – which escalated hours after the raids. Advertisement 'Assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings. 800 protestors have surrounded and breached the first layer of a federal law enforcement building in LA,' McLaughlin wrote on X. '@LAPD has not responded.' 'This violence against @ICEgov must stop.' Richard Grenell, President Trump's envoy for special missions, blamed Bass for the unrest. 'Karen Bass whipped all of this up. She attacked the rule of law. She undermined democracy,' Grenell wrote on X, sharing images of protesters attempting to block federal law enforcement vehicles. Advertisement 'The @MayorOfLA is creating chaos in LA,' he fumed. With Post wires