Red state education officials eager for end of Department of Education
Republican states are embracing the idea of a future with no federal Department of Education, preparing plans for its Trump-promised demise and voicing confidence their own agencies can pick up the slack.
President Trump has long called for the dismantling of the Education Department, and he's reportedly eyeing executive actions to gut its major functions while simultaneously pushing lawmakers to perform the coup de grâce.
The heads of the education departments in multiple GOP-led states describe the move as a potential opportunity to get rid of red tape around funding and burdensome reporting requirements on their schools.
The Trump administration is 'providing states greater control over the education of the children in their states,' said Frank Edelblut, the Republican commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Education.
Each state has 'different needs in order to serve our communities, to meet the educational objectives and needs of our children in our state,' Edelblut said. 'And so, we may have to do things differently. And so, I think, really, the conversation around providing states greater control over education is a really important and a healthy one.'
Megan Degenfelder, Wyoming's GOP state superintendent of public instruction, said that Trump following through on the promise to eliminate the department 'really aligns with my belief that education policy should be returned to the States, allowing for more localized and effective decision-making.'
The long-running fight over the federal department exploded last week after reports of Trump's plans came to light and Democratic lawmakers were locked out of the agency's headquarters as they were demanding a meeting with the acting secretary to discuss what the plans are inside the department.
Linda McMahon, Trump's pick for Education secretary, is scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday, and the potential destruction of her would-be job is sure to be a leading topic of senators' questions.
While the Department of Education only makes up around 10 percent of K-12 school funding, it also runs numerous programs to assist states and protect students.
Democrats' concerns around GOP plans for the department include future cuts and changes to programs such as Title I, which helps disadvantage schools, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the department's Office of Civil Rights.
'A productive partnership with and continued funding from the federal government are essential for North Carolina's students and schools,' said North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction Maurice Green (D).
'About $1.2 billion for North Carolina public schools comes from the U.S. Department of Education annually,' with the majority of funding going to Title I and IDEA, Green added. 'The complete loss of this funding would be detrimental to students and result in the loss of thousands of educator jobs.'
But the programs some are most concerned about are the ones that Republican states seem most excited to take over.
Edelblut told The Hill that on Title I, every year he hears from school leaders who 'think that the way that those funds are being distributed is not actually serving the best needs of our economically disadvantaged students, and that there may be a better way within the state of New Hampshire to allocate that.'
Trump is reportedly looking to slash Education programs not written into law and vastly cut down the number of employees at the agency.
The Institute of Education Sciences, the research arm of the department, appears to be among the first targeted for cuts, as it recently cancelled 169 government contracts.
Experts speculate that the powerful Office of Civil Rights, which investigates discrimination cases against schools, could be moved inside the Department of Justice.
'I think it would be helpful to alleviate the burdensome reporting' that office currently requires 'and allow school administrators to focus on being instructional leaders,' said Montana Superintendent of Public Instruction Susie Hedalen (R), adding that the reports schools are made to fill out for the federal department are on top of the 'intense program' Montana already has for the issue through their own attorney general's office.
'We're already ensuring that things are being handled appropriately, and those [federal] reports are often very out-of-date and and not actually helpful in our work,' Hedalen said.
Ryan Walters, the Republican state superintendent for Oklahoma who has vocally embraced Trump's agenda, is particularly looking forward to taking charge of the nutrition of his schools and special education.
'Special education has been one where the federal government continues to put red tape on this, and instead of helping those kids with special needs […] it becomes all this red tape,' said Walters, who used to work in a special education classroom. 'It becomes all this paperwork, rather than telling states, 'Listen, you need to make sure that these kids are getting a great education.''
The Hill reached out to the education departments in all 50 states for this story. Most either didn't respond or declined to comment, with many saying they were waiting for more concrete plans on the matter from the federal government.
Trump's promise to eliminate the Department of Education is not possible without an act of Congress.
And although Republicans in both the House and the Senate have introduced bills to do just that, it is unlikely members get 60 votes in the Senate to move the legislation to Trump's desk.
Republicans argue the evidence states should take over is plain in the scores of students around the country.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) recently showed students are still behind in reading and math, and that the gap between high-performing and low-performing students is widening.
'When it comes to education, we've seen the federal department's significant spending power just hasn't translated into adequate academic results, and this is evidenced by the widening achievement gap and declining reading scores that we saw on the NAEP release just two weeks ago,' said Degenfelder.
Degenfelder says she has confidence in the leadership at the federal Department of Education in following Trump's directives and changing the agency.
'I really anticipate having more flexibility to use federal funding to best meet the needs of Wyoming students and so without the red tape and bureaucracy from D.C., but receiving that funding in more of a block grant method,' she added. 'Then we can more effectively use those funds in ways that we know is going to work best in our state.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
'No Kings' organizers say protests drew large crowds: Here are their estimates
'No Kings' organizers say protests drew large crowds: Here are their estimates Show Caption Hide Caption Millions march in 'No Kings' protests across country Millions marched in cities and towns across the U.S. in "No Kings" protests to rally against the Trump administration. Organizers of the "No Kings" rallies that swept across the nation June 14 said the protests drew large crowds that marched against the Trump administration. The American Civil Liberties Union, a part of the coalition that put on the demonstrations, said in a late Saturday, June 14 statement that more than five million people participated in over 2,100 rallies and protests. Political organizing group Move On, who was a partner in the "No Kings" rallies, echoed the 5 million person estimate in a fundraising email. Jeremy Pressman, the co-director of the Crowd Counting Consortium – a Harvard University and University of Connecticut project that estimates political crowds – told USA TODAY June 15 that it will take "some time" to complete an estimate on the "No Kings" rallies. The Los Angeles Times reported that "tens of thousands" of people demonstrated in the city roiled by Trump's recent immigration enforcement. The New York Post reported that 50,000 people showed up in New York City, where President Donald Trump was born. "Today's protests are a resounding message that people across the nation will not be intimidated by President Trump's fear tactics," ACLU Chief Political & Advocacy Officer Deirdre Schifeling said in the statement. "Americans are brave, democracy loving people and will not sit idly by as the Trump administration feeds our Constitution into the shredder — nor will the ACLU." 'No Kings' protests across US largely peaceful The mostly calm marches, organized under the theme that no individual is above the law, coincided with the day Trump presided over a military parade on the streets of the nation's capital. A demonstration in Northern Virginia, about 70 miles from Washington, D.C., was met with violence when a man intentionally drove an SUV through a crowd of departing protesters, striking at least one person, police said. Police in Los Angeles hit protesters with batons, fired tear gas and ordered a large crowd in downtown to disperse; authorities said they were responding to people throwing "rocks, bricks, bottles," and "fireworks" at officials. In Minnesota, organizers canceled protests across the state out of an abundance of caution after a shooter targeted local lawmakers, killing one and her spouse at their home and injuring another lawmaker and his spouse at their residence. In a statement, the "No Kings" group said it was adhering to guidance from Minnesota State Patrol and Gov. Tim Walz, who urged people not to attend any rallies Saturday. Contributing: N'dea Yancey-Bragg, Sarah D. Wire, Jeanine Santucci, Jonathan Limehouse, Jay Calderon, Brian Day, USA TODAY.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Deployed to Meet an ‘Invasion,' Marines Were Once Invaders of Mexico
As they have sought to justify sending 700 active-duty U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have described the demonstrators in the city as carrying foreign flags with the intention of continuing an 'invasion' of the United States. To some Angelenos, the notion that their city was being invaded by Mexico might sound like a fantastical twist on the history of U.S.-Mexico military relations. After all, U.S. Marines were among the invaders in the 19th-century war between Mexico and the United States that forced Mexico to give up more than half of its territory — including what is now the state of California. 'Mexican Americans have a saying here, 'They didn't cross the border, the border crossed them,'' said Gaspar Rivera Salgado, director of the Center for Mexican Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles. In the historical memory of Mexicans and Mexican Americans, he added, the American invasion is remembered. The year was 1847, and the United States and Mexico were in the middle of a heated conflict that had begun the previous year under President James K. Polk, during an American push for westward expansion and white dominance. American troops landed near the port city of Veracruz on Mexico's eastern coast, alongside the ocean basin that Mr. Trump has sought to rename the Gulf of America. About 12,000 soldiers, including about 400 Marines, unloaded supplies, weapons and horses and laid siege to the city for 20 days, until it fell. The operation gave the American troops a base from which to advance westward to Mexico City. And there, on a cold and foggy morning that September, hundreds of U.S. Marines were among the 7,000 military men who descended on a rundown castle known as Chapultepec. They pushed past the Mexican defenses there with bayonets and cannons, and used ladders to scale the castle's stone walls. Inside, they expected to encounter more Mexican soldiers, but all they found were 132 military cadets. Few Americans today remember the Battle of Chapultepec, but in Mexican children's history books, the bravery of the young men is the stuff of lore. A garrison commander is said to have given the cadets orders to fall back, but six of them did not retreat — they fought bravely to the death. The Battle of Chapultepec let to the capture of Mexico City that essentially ended the war. Five months later, on Feb. 2, 1848, Mexico and the United States signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which carved a jagged new border, nearly 2,000 miles long. That border, modified further by the Gadsden Purchase six years later, became the backdrop for immigration battles past and present. The Marine Corps memorializes the Marines who fell in the Veracruz campaign. On their navy-blue trousers, Marines wear a scarlet stripe in their honor, a symbol of their bravery, and their blood.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump warns America ‘could get involved' directly in Israel-Iran conflict
President Trump warned Sunday that the US could get directly involved in the Israel-Iran conflict if things continue to escalate. While Trump predicted that Iran and Israel will 'make a deal' to end the deadly violence that has seen the Jewish state and Islamic republic exchange countless missiles since Friday, the president said the US may find itself involved if a truce doesn't happen. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News. 3 President Trump said Sunday that the US could get directly involved in the war between Israel and Iran. via REUTERS Advertisement 3 Iran continues to launch waves of retaliatory attacks on Tel Aviv after Israel's preemptive attack on it Friday. ATEF SAFADI/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Trump suggested that his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, could serve as a mediator between Israel and Iran, both of which the Kremlin has maintained relations. 'He is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation,' Trump said, referring to Putin's ongoing war in Ukraine. 'This is something I believe is going to get resolved.' Advertisement Despite Trump's denial that the US is already involved in the Mideast conflict, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters in Tehran on Sunday that it is clear Israel has been coordinating its attacks with the 'agreement and support of the United States. 'We have received messages from the US through various channels over the past two days stating that the US had no involvement and will have no involvement in this attack,' he said. 'As I said, we don't believe the US's claim.' 3 Smoke billows over Tehran during a wave of Israeli airstrikes Sunday. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement As the attacks between Israel and Iran escalate, the US State Department said it has authorized the 'voluntary departure of family members and some non-emergency U.S. government employees' from Israel. 'US citizens who wish to depart should not delay in taking advantage of commercial transportation options,' the State Department said in a memo, adding that the embassy's shelter-in-place order remains in effect until further notice. With Post wires
