logo
King Charles's visit to Canada: A Commonwealth flex with an audience of one

King Charles's visit to Canada: A Commonwealth flex with an audience of one

Globe and Mail24-05-2025

Long ago, in a land far, far away (the political landscape of four months ago), a small but mighty kingdom was being menaced by a much larger one with a mad king on its throne.
The leaders of the small kingdom gathered in the coldest month of the year to sort out how to protect themselves. One of those leaders, who hailed from a mighty rock perched in a savage sea, came forward with an idea.
The bigger kingdom heated its homes and powered its wondrous machines with fuel from the smaller kingdom. Perhaps that power source could be their queen – dangerous and powerful, even in repose – in this chess match no one had asked for, the man from the rock explained.
'We don't need to expose our queen this early,' he said. 'The opposition does need to know the queen exists, but they don't need to know what we do with the queen.'
As it turned out, at that first ministers meeting in Ottawa back in January, Newfoundland and Labrador then-premier Andrew Furey had the right idea on how Canada might seek leverage in the trade war started by U.S. President Donald Trump. He was just a little off in the particulars.
The royal element would not be a chess metaphor, but a literal thing, and the master move would involve not a queen, but the King.
It was in his first postelection news conference that Mark Carney unfurled the news that King Charles III would open Canada's 45th Parliament by reading the Throne Speech. The Prime Minister described it as 'a historic honour which matches the weight of our times.'
It is that, sure. But in the face of Mr. Trump's constant threats, this visit was also clearly designed by Mr. Carney as a branding exercise, a live-action history lesson, a sovereignty manifesto and – maybe most of all – a Commonwealth flex directed at the White House.
'I think it's a very deliberate way to say to the world – and Canadians as well – who we are and who we aren't,' said Patricia Treble, a Canadian journalist who covers the Royal Family. 'That we are a constitutional monarchy, we are not a republic. The King of Canada is Charles III.'
When Mr. Carney was first sworn in as Prime Minister, he described Canada as a country 'built on the bedrock of three peoples: Indigenous, French and British,' and he has repeated that framing over and over since.
His first official trip – to Paris, London and Iqaluit – echoed that trifecta. It was in London during his audience with the King that Mr. Carney invited him to read the Throne Speech, an idea he says the King 'warmly endorsed.'
When Mr. Carney announced that diplomatic coup, he couldn't resist pointing out that he'd been highlighting Canada's founding story since his first moments as Prime Minister, and now the head of state was coming to town. The whole thing was an elaborate set-up for geopolitical Show and Tell.
'If you want to really put your finger on Canadian sovereignty, well, bringing the person who personifies and embodies the Canadian state and Canadian sovereignty is a good way to do that,' said Philippe Lagassé, Barton Chair at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University and a specialist on the Crown and the Constitution.
A senior government source said the idea is to emphasize Canada's distinctive history and identity as a way of underlining its sovereignty in the face of U.S. aggression. The Globe is not identifying the source because they were not authorized to discuss these matters publicly.
The source agreed that the King's presence is a show of Canadian muscle, and said this is also intended to demonstrate that Mr. Carney has working relationships with leaders all over the globe.
Ms. Treble pins meaning to the fact that this visit was shoehorned into a packed royal calendar, even as the King deals with cancer.
'He's going across five time zones and however many kilometres for essentially 24 hours,' she said, adding, 'It is that important for him, and for him, he knows the symbolism of this.'
Only twice before has the sovereign delivered the Throne Speech in Canada ‐ in 1957 and 1977. The first occasion has clear echoes here, Ms. Treble said, because it was Queen Elizabeth's first visit to Canada after ascending the throne, as it will be for the King.
'This is incredibly rare, and that rarity, I think, emphasizes the importance,' she says.
A royal visit is always a chance to draw a global spotlight, but the peculiar nature of a Throne Speech means the Canadian government gets to put words in the King's mouth that the entire world will watch him say.
The government source said there has been extensive back-and-forth with Buckingham Palace to review the speech, though the content is broadly in line with the Liberal election campaign, platform and mandate letter Mr. Carney released for his cabinet.
'Even if the government is very careful not to put inappropriate language in the King's mouth, if it does try and send a signal through that speech, how is it going to be received in the U.S.?' said Mr. Lagassé.
And then there is the more vivid, lizard-brained message of this visit, aimed straight at Mr. Trump.
This is the President who redecorated the Oval Office with what looks like a can of gold spray paint and some garage sale picture frames, in an almost childlike performance of luxury and class. He reveres celebrity and social status, and the Royal Family possesses the rarest and therefore most valuable form of both: birthright.
'The signal intended, I think, is quite brilliant, because obviously the top of mind is how you deal with Donald Trump,' said Colin Robertson, a former Canadian diplomat and vice-president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. 'And Donald Trump, we know, loves the royals. He'd like to be King himself. The visit to Buckingham Palace when the Queen was there was one of the highlights – he said this several times – of his first term as President.'
None of that was lost on British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who arrived at the Oval Office brandishing a letter from the King inviting Mr. Trump on a second state visit, which Mr. Starmer touted with Trumpian superlatives as 'really special' and 'unprecedented.' It paid off in a trade deal between the U.S. and the Britain.
'Americans love pomp and circumstance. They revolted and separated from the U.K., but they have never really let go of their reverence, I think, for the glory,' said Roy Norton, former chief of protocol for the province of Ontario and the federal government, among other diplomatic experience. 'And nobody more than Trump more overtly revels in that. So I don't blame Starmer – it's a tool in the tool box.'
Mr. Carney has displayed a performative nonchalance in how he has talked about the King's visit. It reads like someone in a cartoon whistling casually while they dig a big hole in the ground, cover it with sticks and then hide behind a nearby rock to see who wanders by.
When a British reporter asked Mr. Carney whether he was 'trying to send a message' to Mr. Trump, he went all coy, saying that the message was 'first and foremost, to Canadians' about their own sovereignty.
She tried again: Really, it has nothing do with Donald Trump?
'All issues around Canadian sovereignty have been accentuated by the President, what he's said, they exist in normal times as well,' Mr. Carney said. 'So no, it's not coincidental, but it also will be a reaffirming moment for Canadians.'
Then she asked Mr. Carney what Canadians thought of the invitation to Mr. Trump for another state visit to the U.K.
'To be frank, they weren't impressed by that gesture,' Mr. Carney said, adding that it 'cut across' the message about Canada's sovereignty.
As Mr. Trump lumbers around the globe setting fire to anything that catches his eye, one of the few counterbalances to his immense, malevolent power is the fact that he is as intense and obvious as a small child in what he loves, wants and fears. He loves wealth, fame and status; he wants to be seen as possessing all of that by the gilded bucketload; he fears being disdained by those who have more of those things than he does.
One way to handle a man like that is to convince him that an honest-to-goodness King desperately wants to have him as a dinner guest. Another way to deal with that man is to show him that the King will come for dinner at your place if you invite him, because even if it's not always obvious, the King he idolizes belongs to you, too.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Trump in the Epstein files? Does Musk have TDS? How a bromance was shattered
Is Trump in the Epstein files? Does Musk have TDS? How a bromance was shattered

National Post

time23 minutes ago

  • National Post

Is Trump in the Epstein files? Does Musk have TDS? How a bromance was shattered

Elon Musk and Donald Trump had been inseparable for some time now. Article content Musk publicly endorsed Trump's presidency in a tweet less than an hour after the failed assassination attempt on the president's life. Their relationship began with mutual respect and compliments. Musk praised Trump's 'instinctual courage' in jumping up quickly after being grazed by a bullet and yelling 'fight, fight,' and Trump told rally attendees in Grand Rapids, Michigan: 'We have to make life good for our smart people and (Elon's) as smart as you get.' Musk engineered America PAC, a $1 million dollar daily giveaway aimed at getting voters in swing states to support Trump. In all, Musk donated around US$ 280 million to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. After the election, Musk was put in charge of managing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk visited the White House, often with his children. There were even sleepovers! Article content Article content Article content Alas, it now appears the honeymoon is over. And it just might be the most public break-up in history. Article content Article content The trouble appears to have began when Musk criticized Trump's massive tax cut and spending legislation, known as the ' One Big Beautiful Bill ' on Tuesday, posting on X, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The legislation is expected to add as much as $2.7 trillion in deficits over the next decade. Article content A pointed critique like that, coming from Musk, who had just finished his term last week as position as Special Government Employee leading DOGE in an effort to reduce government spending and increase efficiency, would've burned any president. Article content But Trump isn't just any president. Predictably, he took the comments very personally. Article content When asked about Elon's critique during a news conference at the White House Thursday, he made his hurt feelings known: 'Well, look, you know, I've always liked Elon and I was very surprised, you saw the words he had for me, the words… and he hasn't said anything about me that's bad, I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill.' Article content Article content 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' Article content Article content Trump then went into full attack mode, telling reporters that, 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill, better than almost anybody sitting here,' and suggested that Musk, who is CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla, only had a problem with the bill when he found out that Trump would be cutting EV tax credits. Article content The feud then spilled out of the news conference onto their own respective social media platforms — Musk's X (formerly Twitter) and Trump's Truth Social resulting in a cross-platform flamewar. Article content It began with a quick succession of tweets from Musk on X. Article content Musk responded to Trump: 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.'

Mia Hughes: Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care
Mia Hughes: Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care

National Post

time23 minutes ago

  • National Post

Mia Hughes: Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care

Article content The entire field is built upon research out of the Netherlands that has been shown to be methodologically flawed, and the diagnosis of gender dysphoria is shaped by political lobbying intended to reduce stigma and distress. Article content What's more, the Canadian Pediatric Society bases its recommendations on the field's standards of care which are set by the discredited World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). In a recently withdrawn legal challenge to Alabama's youth gender medicine ban, WPATH was forced to disclose over two million internal emails that revealed the organization blocked independent systematic reviews that showed low-quality evidence, consulted 'social justice lawyers' when drafting its medical guidelines, and, at the Biden administration's request, removed almost all lower age limits from its adolescent chapter to avoid undermining state-level legal battles. Article content Reimer also stated, without irony, that medical decisions should be based on 'the best science.' Yet the best science — specifically the systematic reviews from Sweden, Finland, England, and a team of researchers in Canada — has all concluded the evidence base for paediatric medical transition is of very low certainty. Alberta's Bill 26 reflects that consensus. The CMA's position contradicts it. Article content This isn't the first legal challenge to Alberta's legislation. Late last year, Egale Canada — originally a gay rights charity that expanded into trans advocacy in the early 2000s — teamed up with the Skipping Stone Foundation and five families to contest the law. That move is surprising given early research conducted by leading figures in gender medicine, Psychologist/Sexologist Kenneth Zucker and Psychiatrist Susan Bradley, found that most children with early-onset gender dysphoria would grow up to be gay or lesbian if left untreated, and same-sex attracted teens are overrepresented in the adolescent patients who began flooding gender clinics in the 2010s and among detransitioners. That a gay rights group would back medical interventions that have the potential to sterilize homosexual adolescents is a tragic reversal of purpose. Article content In an interview, Dr. Jake Donaldson, one of three Alberta doctors who filed the challenge alongside the CMA, inadvertently highlighted the questionable rationale for these extreme medical interventions. He believes that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones help gender-distressed youth blend in better as members of the opposite sex, which makes them 'safer and happier.' But even if that were true — and there is no high-quality evidence to suggest that it is — this approach only offers a superficial, short-term fix that ignores the deeper psychological struggles of these youth. And it can come at such immense long-term cost in the form of sterility, sexual dysfunction, and lifelong medical dependence. Article content 'Medicine is a calling,' explained the CMA president in her statement. 'Doctors pursue it because they are compelled to care for and promote the well-being of patients.' Article content Yet noble intentions are no safeguard against harm. History is littered with medical scandals. At the centre of each one, there were well-intentioned doctors who left a trail of devastation in their quest to help patients. The doctors who prescribed thalidomide didn't do so with the intention of causing major birth defects; the obstetricians who sent expectant mothers for prenatal X-rays didn't deliberately set out to cause childhood leukemia, and Walter Freeman famously believed his prefrontal lobotomies were a humane alternative to the deplorable conditions in insane asylums. Article content At this point, there is little doubt that paediatric gender medicine is destined to take its place in history alongside these medical catastrophes. Therefore, Alberta is not acting unreasonably; it is acting responsibly. By restricting unproven and irreversible treatments for minors, the province has commendably joined a global wave of governments re-asserting evidence and ethical principles in the face of medical groupthink. It is the CMA — not the Alberta government — that must reckon with its conscience. Article content Mia Hughes specializes in researching pediatric gender medicine, psychiatric epidemics, social contagion and the intersection of trans rights and women's rights. She is the author of ' The WPATH Files,' a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, and director of Genspect Canada. Article content

Years after it was pitched, Canada is still waiting for a national disaster agency
Years after it was pitched, Canada is still waiting for a national disaster agency

CTV News

time37 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Years after it was pitched, Canada is still waiting for a national disaster agency

Smoke filled skies from out of control wildfires in Norway House, Man., Tuesday, June 3, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/David Lipnowski OTTAWA — In 2023, as Canada suffered through its worst-ever wildfire season, the federal government was looking at creating a national disaster response agency. Two years later, the country is again facing another summer of wildfires. There is still no sign of such an agency, though governments are tapping the private sector to help with evacuations. Ali Asgary, a York University professor of disaster and emergency management, said the work to establish a national agency is 'unfortunately … not going as fast as our crises are going.' Public Safety Canada indicated in a media statement the government is still working on it. 'We continue to work closely with Canada's firefighters, as well as municipal, provincial and territorial government officials, to find solutions consistent with our country's unique character to enhance our ability to keep Canadian communities safe,' the statement said. 'We will continue to explore all proposed options and work in collaboration with our partners to enhance our preparation.' In 2023, The Canadian Press reported that discussions on a new approach to natural disasters and other emergencies were well underway and included analysis of the merits of creating a Canadian version of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the United States. Better known as FEMA, the agency is responsible for preparing for, preventing, responding to and recovering from major incidents such as terrorist attacks and natural disasters. It runs a national response co-ordination centre which organizes federal support for major disasters and can deploy teams of doctors and nurses. The consequences of not having a federal agency are being seen in the stress that communities, provinces and emergency management agencies are feeling now, Asgary said. 'We are still in early June,' he noted, adding we still don't know what's going to happen with wildfires through July and August. He said the fire season has already 'overwhelmed us. Imagine when it is getting closer to bigger communities.' Saskatchewan and Manitoba have declared provincewide states of emergency — a move meant to make it easier for governments to co-ordinate resources and support. Most of Canada's current wildfires are burning in those two provinces, where more than 30,000 people have been evacuated. Smoke has drifted as far as Newfoundland and Labrador in the east and Texas in the south. At a press conference on Parliament Hill earlier this week, Emergency Management Minister Eleanor Olszewski said 'this wildfire season has started off more quickly and it's stronger, more intense than previous years.' Saskatchewan has seen 243 wildfires so far this fire season; in a typical year the province would see roughly 135. Canadian Armed Forces have been helping with evacuations in Manitoba, where fires have forced more than 17,000 residents out of their homes, mostly in the remote north. The private company Xpera has been involved in emergency response in Manitoba. The company's services include private investigations, helping businesses bring in replacement workers during strikes, and managing evacuations during crises. Robert Garland, the company's vice-president for emergency security management for Eastern Canada, told The Canadian Press the company helped to evacuate 226 people to Niagara Falls and could evacuate around 3,000 in total. Garland said the work was done though the company's contract with Emergency Management Ontario, which extended the contract to Manitoba's Emergency Management Organization. He said 'the offer came from Xpera, with a contract with the provincial and federal partners.' When asked who is paying for the evacuees' accommodations, Garland said that 'the funding comes from the provincial and federal partners. That's a contractual agreement between Indigenous communities and the federal government, Indigenous Services Canada, and in partnerships with obviously Indigenous communities.' Garland did not answer additional email questions about whether the company has a contract with the federal government. A spokesperson for Olszewski referred questions about a federal government contract to Indigenous Services Canada, which did not answer by deadline. Xpera has previously received millions of dollars through federal government contracts for services involving asylum seekers. Daniel Henstra, a professor at the University of Waterloo who researches climate change adaptation and emergency management, said the 'wildfires in Western Canada are huge already and developing so rapidly and the numbers of evacuees are just staggering.' The situation requires a 'massive logistical capacity that the government in Canada itself just doesn't have, and I would doubt that any provincial government would have it either,' he added. 'If in fact there is a contract with Xpera, it means that the scale of the evacuation is such that it's beyond the capacity of even… a behemoth like the Canadian Red Cross.' 'That's pretty significant.' Currently, the federal government only becomes involved in emergency response if a province asks it to step in. Olszewski told reporters that the government has deployed the Canadian Armed Forces to evacuate people in Manitoba and is ready to 'assist Saskatchewan and Alberta should they make formal requests for federal assistance.' While the military has immediate response units that are activated to respond to disasters, former chief of the defence staff Gen. Wayne Eyre previously called on governments to lean less on the overstretched Armed Forces for disaster response. The military's main role in a disaster is to help local officials with logistics, planning and manpower. Asgary said a federal agency could take on various aspects of emergency management, including mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. The agency could exploit economies of scale for expenses like training or buying emergency system software. Henstra said the federal government should focus on shoring up local response capacity. He noted the government already held a consultation on a pan-Canadian Civilian Response Capacity. He suggested a 'mix of volunteers and professionals who receive money and training from government' who would be 'ready within the community to respond to disasters.' People in those communities have valuable local knowledge and experience and need resources to be able to respond, he said. For instance, they might know that a winter without a lot of snow means a bad fire season is ahead, putting them in a position to take steps like levelling areas to create a fire break. 'But you can't have even the military fly in with a C-130 full of bulldozers. That's just ridiculous, right? You need to have this equipment and experienced operators on the ground.' Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press — With files from Sharif Hassan This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store