Albuquerque Mayor, City Council disagree on use of opioid settlement funds
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – Albuquerque will get millions of dollars in opioid settlements funds over the next decade, but the latest decision over what to do with some of that funding has sparked disagreement between the mayor and city council. The Keller Administration is pushing for city council to change its proposal. The mayor wants more spent on existing programs, while some councilors want to see other non-profits get access to money.
Story continues below
Crime: APD arrests mother for shooting death of 2-year-old son
Community: Westside Albuquerque rallies around Cup of Cozy after robbery
National: Trump threatens additional 50 percent tariff on China
'The administration needs to know how they're going to fund these operations, not just one year at a time, so we need a plan, we haven't seen a plan,' said Renée Grout, Albuquerque City Councilor.
That's what she said is driving city councilors plan on where to spend millions in opioid settlement funds. 'I think it's really balanced plan that does meet what the community told us what they wanted, which was those non-profits to be taken care of,' said Tamy Fiebelkorn, Albuquerque City Councilor.
Meanwhile, Mayor Tim Keller's Administration is urging councilors to change their plan for roughly $14 million, saying the bulk of that money should go into existing programs like Serenity Mesa. 'I would hope that this money that Serenity Mesa would have an opportunity to apply for some of this funding, there's a lot of providers, really good providers in Albuquerque,' said Jennifer Burke, Serenity Mesa.
Councilors' current plan calls for $1.8 million for Albuquerque Public Schools' substance abuse prevention for school kids, while another $2 million would go toward smaller and medium-sized service providers. But the bulk of the money, $10 million, would go toward infrastructure grants for non-profits to expand. 'Nowhere in this resolution or the attachment does it say about building a new building, because no one I spoke to at any point in the last year and a half has said they wanted a new building,' said Councilor Fiebelkorn.
Facing uncertainty in the federal grant process, city administrators said now is the time to fund existing programs. 'If we wanted to bring on a new provider or expand our use of someone like Serenity Mesa, we currently can't do that because there is 10 million dollars locked away for three years for capital investment, capital projects, and buildings,' said JR Rael, Executive Operations Officer, City of Albuquerque.
City councilors are expected to vote on that resolution Monday night. If it passes, the mayor will ultimately have to decide if he'll sign or veto the plan. Albuquerque has already spent more than $18 million in opioid funds of the roughly $80 million they're expected to get over the next decade, including about $5 million on a pallet home community near Comanche Rd. and I-25.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
25 minutes ago
- Washington Post
‘Come and get me': Gavin Newsom has entered the meme war
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has found himself in the center of the internet's spotlight after squaring off with President Donald Trump on social media over the deployment of military troops to counter protesters in Los Angeles. While police deployed tear gas and shot at protesters in Los Angeles with rubber bullets on Monday, Newsom shared a screenshot on TikTok of a Washington Post headline reporting that California would sue Trump over the National Guard's presence, paired with a trending sound sampled from the movie 'Mean Girls. ' The video was captioned 'We will not stand while Donald Trump illegally federalizes the National Guard' and was liked more than 255,000 times.

Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.


Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump-endorsed Jack Ciattarelli wins Republican primary for New Jersey governor
Jack Ciattarelli easily won the Republican nomination for New Jersey governor on Tuesday with President Donald Trump's endorsement, setting up a November general election expected to be an early national bellwether for voters' views in the first year of Trump's second term. Ciattarelli was projected the winner shortly after the polls closed, the Associated Press reported. The winner of the crowded Democratic primary was not immediately clear Tuesday night, with six candidates splitting the vote in the most expensive election in New Jersey history. Trump played a central role in the Democrats' contest, too, as the candidates vowed to fight the White House and questioned each others' anti-Trump credentials.