Zelenskyy approves plans on special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy formally approved plans Wednesday to set up a new international court to prosecute senior Russian officials for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
The special tribunal will be created through an agreement between Ukraine and the Council of Europe, the continent's top human rights body. Zelenskyy visited the Strasbourg-based organization for the first time as part of the announcement.
The special tribunal aims to target senior Russian leaders for the 'crime of aggression,' which underpins the countless war crimes Ukraine accuses Russian forces of committing since the start of the war on Feb. 24, 2022. Existing international courts, including the International Criminal Court in The Hague lack jurisdiction to prosecute Russian nationals for that specific offense.
Since early in the conflict, Kyiv has been pushing for the creation of a special tribunal that goes beyond prosecuting war crimes that Ukraine alleged Russian forces committed — including bombing civilian infrastructure, killing civilians, rape, taking hostages and torture. Russia denies those accusations.
There are logistical details still to be resolved, including where the court will be based. The Hague has been suggested because of its existing legal infrastructure, but no final decision has been made.
Russia doesn't extradite its own citizens, and whether or not Russian President Vladimir Putin will ever end up in the dock remains to be seen.
Under international law, sitting heads of state and certain other top officials — often referred to as the 'troika,' including a country's head of state, head of government and foreign minister — enjoy immunity from prosecution. That means any potential indictment of Putin could only move forward if he leaves office.
There is no statute of limitation on the crime of aggression.
The institution will be funded by supporting countries known as the Core Group, including the Netherlands, Japan and Canada. The United States backed the project under former President Joe Biden, but President Donald Trump's administration didn't support the initiative.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Church of England praying for peace but preparing for war
The Church of England is preparing for how it might respond should 'serious conflict' break out, including looking back to the leadership shown by senior religious figures during the Second World War. The Bishop to the Armed Forces has said the Church wants to 'take seriously' the potential challenges ahead, warning that it does not want to be caught short in a similar way to the lack of preparedness there was for the pandemic. The Church's parliament – officially known as the General Synod – will hear from a senior military figure when it meets next month. Brigadier Jaish Mahan, a Christian who served in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Iraq and Afghanistan, will address Synod members on the current global climate and the challenges for the UK, as well as speaking of his own experience in the military. A Synod paper states: 'While a conflict directly involving the UK is not an immediate risk, given the very serious impact such a conflict would have on every person in the country, we must be prepared.' Reverend Hugh Nelson, Bishop of St Germans and Bishop to the Armed Forces, said he had been hearing from military personnel for the past two years 'rising concern about the threat of very, very serious conflict, including conflict that involves the UK'. During a briefing with reporters on Thursday, he referenced the Government's national security strategy, published earlier this week, which warned the UK must actively prepare for a 'wartime scenario' on British soil 'for the first time in many years'. Ministers said the UK now finds itself in 'an era in which we face confrontation with those who are threatening our security'. Mr Nelson said: 'As a Church, we want to take seriously those challenges, both to do everything that we can to pray for and work for and advocate for peace, because the kingdom of God is a kingdom of justice and peace, and to face the reality and to put in place, or at least to begin to have conversations towards plans about how the Church might need to respond and to be if there were to be a serious conflict. 'We do not want to be in the situation that we were all in – Church and wider society – pre-pandemic, when those that knew things said there will one day be a pandemic, and none of us had done anything in preparation for that. So we want to take that seriously.' Legislative changes are due to be brought before Synod, which would allow Armed Forces chaplains, when operating in their roles, to minister under an Archbishops' licence without also having to hold diocesan PTO (permission to officiate). The current rules add a serious administrative burden and make it more difficult for chaplains to deploy within the UK at the pace required by their roles, a Synod paper states. Mr Nelson described this as a 'tidying up exercise to enable chaplains to get on and to do what they need to do without having to go through quite a lot of administrative and bureaucratic steps in order to have permission to do that in any particular place'. While he declined to go so far as to say the work was putting the Church on a war footing, he noted that consideration is being given to how religious leaders acted in previous wartime scenarios. He said: 'We're encouraging the Church to pray for peace and to prepare for, or to begin to do some thinking and some work around, what it might mean for us to be a Church in a time of conflict. 'We have looked back at some of the ways in which senior Church leadership – archbishops and bishops – led, the things that they said, particularly in the Second World War.' Resources, including around working with schools on issues of peace, war and conflict, and practical suggestions for making churches hospitable and welcoming to Armed Forces personnel and their families, are expected to be published shortly after Synod. Across the Royal Navy, Army and Royal Air Force, there are almost 200 Church of England chaplains, serving as both regulars and reservists. The Church said its chaplains 'have provided spiritual, moral and pastoral care to military personnel and their families for more than 150 years and remain a highly valued part of the Armed Forces, often witnessing to Jesus Christ in complex and difficult contexts.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Overwhelming' evidence former Barclays boss Jes Staley was 'close' to notorious paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, tribunal rules
There is 'overwhelming' evidence that former Barclays chief executive Jes Staley had a close relationship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a tribunal has ruled. Mr Staley was fined £1.8 million and banned from holding senior roles in the financial sector by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 2023, after it found that he misled the regulator over the nature of his relationship with the financier. The American challenged the ban and the fine at the Upper Tribunal in London, with his lawyers saying that he 'never attempted to conceal his relationship with Mr Epstein', which the banker described as 'professionally fairly close' but not 'personally close'. The FCA opposed the challenge, telling a hearing held in March and April that Mr Staley and Epstein had a 'friendship'. In a unanimous decision on Thursday, Upper Tribunal judge Tim Herrington and tribunal members Martin Fraenkel and Cathy Farquharson dismissed Mr Staley's challenge, but reduced the fine to £1,107,306.92. They said: 'We regard the distinction between a close relationship which arises out of personal friendship and one that arises out of a professional relationship as being fallacious.' They continued: 'In our view, the evidence that Mr Staley had a close relationship with Mr Epstein is overwhelming and there was no evidence before us to suggest that many others had a relationship which was similar in nature to that we have found existed between Mr Staley and Mr Epstein.' They added: 'In our view, there is no basis on which Mr Staley could have drawn the conclusion that inclusion of the 'no close relationship language' was accurate.' Mr Staley acted as a private banker to Epstein during his time at JP Morgan, where he worked for more than 30 years before joining Barclays in 2015. In 2019, Epstein was arrested again after being jailed for child sex offences in 2008. He died in prison later that year while awaiting trial for sex trafficking offences. Leigh-Ann Mulcahy KC, for the FCA, told the tribunal in written submissions that the watchdog contacted Barclays in August 2019 for an 'assurance' that the bank's board had 'informed itself of and was comfortable regarding any association of Mr Staley or Barclays with Mr Epstein'. In a letter written to the FCA, approved by Mr Staley, Barclays chairman Nigel Higgins said 'Jes has confirmed to us that he did not have a close relationship with Mr Epstein' and that 'Jes' last contact with Mr Epstein was well before he joined Barclays' in 2015. The authority found that the letter was misleading and that Mr Staley acted 'recklessly and without integrity' by allowing it to be sent, with Ms Mulcahy telling the hearing that the pair maintained contact through Mr Staley's daughter up to at least February 2017. The barrister said emails showed Mr Staley describing Epstein as like 'family' and one of his 'deepest' and 'most cherished' friends, and that between March 2016 and February 2017, Mr Staley's daughter, Alexa Staley, was used as an intermediary. In a witness statement, Mr Staley told the tribunal that he would describe his relationship with Epstein as 'professionally fairly close' and that his reputation had been 'irretrievably damaged'. He said: 'It was a professional relationship which was predicated upon business. We were not personal friends, nor were we personally close.' Giving evidence in person at the tribunal, Mr Staley said he 'was not aware' of Epstein's abuse. He said: 'I think it was important to emphasise that it was a professional relationship because I think somebody with a very close personal relationship more than likely would have been aware.' In written submissions, Robert Smith KC, for Mr Staley, said that it would be 'entirely illogical' to conclude that Mr Staley would have approved the letter if he believed it was inaccurate or would mislead the regulator. But in their 93-page ruling, Judge Herrington, Mr Fraenkel and Ms Farquharson said it was 'not credible that Mr Staley did not think that the letter would mislead' the FCA. They continued that they 'would have expected Mr Staley to have been particularly careful' in ensuring the letter was accurate, and that his breaches of FCA rules were 'a serious failure of judgment'. The judges concluded that they saw 'no basis on which we should interfere' with the decision to ban Mr Staley, who they said had 'shown no remorse for his conduct'. But they reduced Mr Staley's fine to reflect the fact that, after the FCA published its decision in 2023, Barclays prevented him from deferring shares to which he could have been entitled. Following the ruling, Therese Chambers, joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: 'Mr Staley chose to take a calculated risk that we would take his inaccurate account of his relationship with Mr Epstein at face value. 'He hoped that the truth would never come to light and that he would get away with it. Such a serious lack of integrity flies in the face of the requirements we place on those at the top. 'The tribunal's decision shows that we can and will act to protect the financial system by holding those in senior roles to the high standards required of them.' The FCA added that Mr Staley has 14 days in which to appeal against the ruling.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ukraine halts Russia's advance in northern Sumy region, commander says
Ukrainian forces have halted Russia's recent advance into the northern Sumy region and have stabilized the front line near the border with Russia, Ukraine's top military commander said Thursday. Col. Gen. Oleksandr Syrskyi, commander in chief of Ukraine's armed forces, said that Ukrainian successes in Sumy have prevented Russia from deploying about 50,000 Russian troops, including elite airborne and marine brigades, to other areas of the front line. His claim couldn't be independently verified, and Russian officials made no immediate comment. Russian forces have been slowly grinding forward at some points on the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, though their incremental gains have been costly in terms of troop casualties and armor. The outnumbered Ukrainian army has relied heavily on drones to keep the Russians back. Months of U.S.-led international efforts to stop the more than three years of fighting have failed. Sumy, the city which is the capital of the Ukrainian region of the same name, had a prewar population of around 250,000. It lies about 20 kilometers (12 miles) from the front line. Russia's push into the Sumy region earlier this year compelled Ukraine to strengthen its defenses there. A special defense group has been formed to improve security in Sumy and surrounding communities, Syrskyi said. It's focusing on improving fortifications and accelerating construction of defensive barriers. In March, Ukrainian forces withdrew from much of Russia's neighboring Kursk region, parts of which they had controlled after a surprise cross-border attack in August. That retreat enabled Russia to launch a counteroffensive that advanced between 2-12 kilometers (1-7 miles) into Ukrainian territory, according to different estimates. Ukrainian officials say fierce fighting is also taking place in the eastern Donetsk region. The Russian Defense Ministry said Thursday that its forces have captured two villages, Novoserhiivka and Shevchenko, in Donetsk. Capturing Shevchenko marked an important stage in Russia's ongoing offensive that is trying to break into Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, which borders Donetsk and is a major industrial center, according to the Defense Ministry. Meanwhile, the two sides continued to launch long-range strikes. Russia's Defense Ministry said that 50 Ukrainian drones were downed over nine regions overnight, including three over the Moscow region. Ukraine's air force said that Russia deployed 41 Shahed and decoy drones across the country overnight, wounding five people. It said that 24 drones were either intercepted or jammed. ___
