
All schools should be ‘singing schools', says think tank in push for children's creativity
A new report suggests every primary school should become a "singing school' where music, drama, and visual arts are just as integral as literacy and numeracy.
The Centre for Young Lives think tank and the Child of the North initiative say teachers should be given the time and resources to nurture children's creativity through singing, music, painting, drawing and acting.
Among its recommendations is a call for the Government to put creativity and the expressive arts 'at the heart' of the primary school curriculum.
'A career in the arts, music, and cultural industries must not become the preserve of only the most advantaged,' former children's commissioner for England Baroness Anne Longfield, executive chair of the Centre for Young Lives, said.
'Creativity and the expressive arts should be part and parcel of every child's education from primary school, not just a small minority.'
The report has called for a £150 million 'arts premium fund' to develop the existing primary school workforce and train new teachers to provide arts learning.
It added that the Government should expand arts and music education – including offering free music or singing lessons for three years for every primary school child who wishes to learn.
The report said: 'A cultural shift is required to create inclusive schools and give the next generation the skills they require to grow the UK 's economy—one that places creativity and the arts at the heart of education and gives the creative industries the workforce they require.
'Schools should not merely be places of 'reading, writing and maths' but spaces where young people can express themselves, explore diverse identities, and develop the critical thinking skills needed to thrive. Embedding creativity into the curriculum is essential.
'Every primary school should be a 'singing school,' where music, drama, and visual arts are as integral as literacy and numeracy.'
The organisations have called for the arts to be integrated in subjects like history and science, and for Ofsted to recognise the importance of creativity and the arts in its inspections.
Baroness Longfield added: 'Britain's children have got talent – but we are often too slow to nurture it and we are frequently failing to harness the innate skills in our communities through our education system.
'This is hindering the ability of our country to flourish and thrive.
'Many of our most successful musicians and bands have benefited from a rich, cultural, and creative education in the private school sector.
'We need to invest in boosting the opportunities of children in our state schools, from all backgrounds, as part of a bold ambition to develop truly inclusive education, support creativity throughout childhood and to tackle problems like the attendance crisis and attainment gap.'
Camilla Kingdon, former president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said: 'We cannot afford to continue to squander the innate talent that exists everywhere in our country.
'We must encourage our future Benjamin Zephaniahs, Ed Sheerans, and Bridget Rileys – we have a rich cultural heritage to nurture. We want a society where children of all abilities and talents can flourish.
'That relies on creating an environment that enables a child to discover their hidden musical talent, or their under-developed dramatic skills, or their untapped artistic ability – and this cannot be reliant on having parents who have time and resources to nurture these talents.
'We must have an education system that sees investment in art and creativity as equally important to languages and maths or science.
'There cannot be a hierarchy of talents – all of them are important and should be collectively nurtured by society.'
A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'High and rising standards are at the heart of this Government's mission to break down barriers to opportunity and we are committed to ensuring access to the arts is no longer the preserve of a privileged few.
'To support this, we are investing in music education through our £79 million music hubs programme, a £25 million investment in instruments and equipment and our music opportunities pilot.
'The curriculum and assessment review is also bringing together leading education experts, leaders and staff, to consider how to ensure young people get the opportunity to access a broad and balanced curriculum.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
Overwhelming Jersey public support for £110 million Fort Regent plans, survey finds
A multi-purpose concert hall and a six-screen cinema have been voted the most popular features in the Government of Jersey 's £110 million plans to redevelop Fort Regent into a "premier leisure and entertainment hub". It comes after a large survey, commissioned by the Jersey Development Company, found there is widespread public support for the proposals. Almost 90% of the more than 6,000 residents, visitors and students who responded are satisfied with the ideas to transform the area. Accessibility from St Helier to Fort Regent was highlighted as a key area of concern, with 98% wanting improvements. What are people most excited about? Those who chose to take part in the survey were asked to answer a multiple-choice question on which proposed spaces they are most excited about. A multi-purpose concert hall came out on top after being backed by 71% of respondents, with a six-screen cinema ranking second at 59%. Bowling was championed by 46% of those surveyed, and a Ninja Warrior-style soft play, climbing, bouldering and sky trail rated at 43%. At the other end of the scale, just 16% were excited by a pump track - a type of track for high-intensity cycling and other wheeled activities. What else do people want? A swimming pool was the most requested new feature (8%), followed by calls to keep existing sports facilities (5%). Other ideas that were put forward include a roller-skating rink, go-kart track, casino, waterpark, nightclub, padel courts, and a ski slope. Did opinions change among different groups? Well, despite overall public support, only 28% of respondents aged 55 and over were satisfied with the plans - that is compared to 94% of students. Those with a higher household income were more likely to report being 'very satisfied'. On the proposed cable car from town to Fort Regent, more than nine in ten say they would use the service, with most prepared to spend up to £3 per trip. Jersey's Infrastructure Minister, Connétable Andy Jehan, says: "The response to the Fort Regent survey is nothing short of remarkable and sends a clear message: islanders and visitors are ready for this transformation. "With nearly 90% satisfaction across the board and even higher among our young people, it shows there is a strong desire for a new era at the Fort. "This vision has been shaped by the community, and it's encouraging to see such widespread support. We now have a mandate to move forward confidently, creating a vibrant, inclusive and accessible destination that meets the needs of future generations while respecting the Fort's historic significance." Lee Henry, Chief Executive Officer of the Jersey Development Company, adds: "This is an overwhelming response from the community and we look forward to working with the Government on advancing the regeneration of the Fort so that it once again delivers significant all-weather amenities for islanders and visitors. "Presentations were given to almost 2,000 secondary school students and the feedback was extremely positive, with fewer than 5% using the Fort today, and virtually all confirming that they would regularly use the regenerated Fort if this vision was delivered."


Wales Online
a day ago
- Wales Online
Lords' objections to Data Bill over copyright threatens its existence
Lords' objections to Data Bill over copyright threatens its existence – minister Sir Chris Bryant said the continued parliamentary ping-pong, where a bill bounces back and forth between the Lords and the Commons could "imperil" the Bill Protesters in central London in May called on the Government to ditch plans to allow AI tech firms to steal their work without payment or permission (Image: PA Wire/PA Images ) The continued refusal by the House of Lords to pass the Data Bill threatens its existence altogether, a minister has said, as the Commons passed an amendment to head off a challenge from peers. Sir Chris Bryant said the continued parliamentary ping-pong, where a bill bounces back and forth between the Lords and the Commons could "imperil" the Bill. The critical stand-off arose as artists and musicians including Sir Elton John and Sir Paul McCartney, raised concerns over AI companies using copyrighted work without permission. Baroness Kidron, who directed the second Bridget Jones film, had put forward an amendment aiming to ensure copyright holders could see when their work had been used, which was overwhelmingly passed by the Lords for the second time last week. However this has not won Government backing. In a concession to win around the Lords, the Government has instead said it will give a parliamentary statement six months after the passage of the Bill, where it will update MPs and peers on an economic impact assessment, and a report on the use of copyright works in the development of AI. A parliamentary working group will also be established. Article continues below Technology minister Sir Chris said the amendments showed the Government had "unequivocally heard concerns". However Conservative chairwoman of the Culture, Media and Sport select committee Dame Caroline Dinenage said MPs had been "gaslit". MPs voted in favour of the Government's amendment, which replace the changes put forward by Lady Kidron, by 304 votes to 189, majority 115. These will now go back to the Lords for peers to approve. During the last session in the Lords, where Lady Kidron had successfully forward her amendment, she told peers it she would not hold up the Bill further if the Commons chose to disagree with it. MPs heard the Bill will help establish digital verification services, a new national underground asset register which could speed up roadworks, and allow better healthcare and policing. It would also renew UK and EU data protection laws. The current agreement with Brussels will run out in December. Speaking at the start of the Bill, Sir Chris said: "Double insistence would kill the Bill, where ever the Bill has started. I take people at their word when they say that they don't want to kill the Bill." Sir Chris added: "Its provisions have the support of all parties in both Houses. "Which is why I urge this House to accept our amendments in lieu. "And I urge their Lordships not to insist on their amendment, but to agree with us. "It is worth pointing out, that if their Lordships do persist, they are not just delaying and imperilling a Bill which all parties agree is an important and necessary piece of legislation. "They are also imperilling something else of much greater significance and importance economically; our data adequacy with the European Union." He said he was "mystified" by Liberal Democrat and Conservative opposition to the Bill. "These amendments show our commitment to ensuring considered and effective solutions as I have just outlined, and demonstrate that we have unequivocally heard concerns about timing and accountability." Conservative shadow technology minister Dr Ben Spencer said the creative industries and peers "were not buying" the Government's approach. He said: "They're not buying it because the Government has lost the confidence of their stakeholders that it will bring forward legislation to enact effective and proportionate transparency requirements for AI models in the use of their creative content." Dame Caroline said Sir Chris and the Government were not engaging with the central issue. She said: "By being cloth-eared to the legitimate concerns of the world-leading creative industries for month after month after month; they have been virtually dragged kicking and screaming to this position now, where they bring forward a couple of tiny amendments. "By gaslighting members of all parties at both ends of this building who have attempted to draw attention to this. "By somehow pitting our world-leading creative industries against AI, almost somehow presenting them as luddites, that they are somehow allergic to innovation and technology when actually these are some of the most groundbreaking and innovative sectors out there; they are using AI every single day to produce world-breaking pieces of creative content." Responding, Sir Chris said: "I would just say to her (Dame Caroline) that she clearly has forgotten that the previous government actually introduced plans which would have brought forward a text and data mining exemption for commercial exploitation of copyrighted materials without any additional protections for creative industries at all. "That seems to have slipped her mind. Article continues below "We have moved a considerable deal since this Bill started. "We have moved and we have listened to what their lordships and, more importantly, what the creative industries have to say in this."


The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lords' objections to Data Bill over copyright threatens its existence
The critical stand-off arose as artists and musicians including Sir Elton John and Sir Paul McCartney, raised concerns over AI companies using copyrighted work without permission. Baroness Kidron, who directed the second Bridget Jones film, had put forward an amendment aiming to ensure copyright holders could see when their work had been used, which was overwhelmingly passed by the Lords for the second time last week. However this has not won Government backing. In a concession to win around the Lords, the Government has instead said it will give a parliamentary statement six months after the passage of the Bill, where it will update MPs and peers on an economic impact assessment, and a report on the use of copyright works in the development of AI. A parliamentary working group will also be established. Technology minister Sir Chris said the amendments showed the Government had 'unequivocally heard concerns'. However Conservative chairwoman of the Culture, Media and Sport select committee Dame Caroline Dinenage said MPs had been 'gaslit'. MPs voted in favour of the Government's amendment, which replace the changes put forward by Lady Kidron, by 304 votes to 189, majority 115. These will now go back to the Lords for peers to approve. During the last session in the Lords, where Lady Kidron had successfully forward her amendment, she told peers it she would not hold up the Bill further if the Commons chose to disagree with it. MPs heard the Bill will help establish digital verification services, a new national underground asset register which could speed up roadworks, and allow better healthcare and policing. It would also renew UK and EU data protection laws. The current agreement with Brussels will run out in December. Speaking at the start of the Bill, Sir Chris said: 'Double insistence would kill the Bill, where ever the Bill has started. I take people at their word when they say that they don't want to kill the Bill.' Sir Chris added: 'Its provisions have the support of all parties in both Houses. 'Which is why I urge this House to accept our amendments in lieu. 'And I urge their Lordships not to insist on their amendment, but to agree with us. 'It is worth pointing out, that if their Lordships do persist, they are not just delaying and imperilling a Bill which all parties agree is an important and necessary piece of legislation. 'They are also imperilling something else of much greater significance and importance economically; our data adequacy with the European Union.' He said he was 'mystified' by Liberal Democrat and Conservative opposition to the Bill. 'These amendments show our commitment to ensuring considered and effective solutions as I have just outlined, and demonstrate that we have unequivocally heard concerns about timing and accountability.' Conservative shadow technology minister Dr Ben Spencer said the creative industries and peers 'were not buying' the Government's approach. He said: 'They're not buying it because the Government has lost the confidence of their stakeholders that it will bring forward legislation to enact effective and proportionate transparency requirements for AI models in the use of their creative content.' Dame Caroline said Sir Chris and the Government were not engaging with the central issue. She said: 'By being cloth-eared to the legitimate concerns of the world-leading creative industries for month after month after month; they have been virtually dragged kicking and screaming to this position now, where they bring forward a couple of tiny amendments. 'By gaslighting members of all parties at both ends of this building who have attempted to draw attention to this. 'By somehow pitting our world-leading creative industries against AI, almost somehow presenting them as luddites, that they are somehow allergic to innovation and technology when actually these are some of the most groundbreaking and innovative sectors out there; they are using AI every single day to produce world-breaking pieces of creative content.' Responding, Sir Chris said: 'I would just say to her (Dame Caroline) that she clearly has forgotten that the previous government actually introduced plans which would have brought forward a text and data mining exemption for commercial exploitation of copyrighted materials without any additional protections for creative industries at all. 'That seems to have slipped her mind. 'We have moved a considerable deal since this Bill started. 'We have moved and we have listened to what their lordships and, more importantly, what the creative industries have to say in this.'