Texas bill would ban phones from classrooms
The Brief
HB 1481 would ban cell phones from Texas public school classrooms.
State Rep. Caroline Fairly believes it will help test scores and help combat bullying.
The bill is currently in committee.
There is a bipartisan bill in the Texas House that would ban all cell phones in public school classrooms.
HB 1481, co-authored by State Rep. Caroline Fairly (R-Amarillo), is currently in the House Public Education Committee.
The bill would require classrooms to designate a secure, out-of-sight area to keep phones during instructional times.
FOX 4's Steven Dial talked to Fairley about the bill and the impact it could have on schools.
What they're saying
State Rep. Caroline Fairly: "We have heard from so many teachers who have said, you know, we need the state to kind of have our back on this issue because we're in the classroom picking up phones and ending up being the bad guy when it comes to this policy."
FOX 4's Steven Dial: "Why do you think it's so important to to restrict cell phone access in the classroom?"
Fairly: "There's really three critical issues that are really important when you look at this piece of legislation. First is the student academic outcome. Second is the mental health aspect. And then third is classroom management for our teachers. When you look at all of those across the board, we are targeting being sure that our kids go to school to focus on academics, but we also protect them. You know, the amount of cyberbullying that's being cited in these schools is it's gone up so much more."
Dial: "Some North Texas school districts have implemented or are testing out a cellphone ban. How can the enforcement happen if this becomes law?"
Fairly: "We've been really careful with our legislation to allow for as much local control as possible. I think it's really important to address this. And so you're right, about 20, 25 school districts, to my knowledge, have already started implementing this and they're seeing test scores increase. They're seeing student interactions with the teachers and even other peers is going way better than it was before. But when you talk about enforcement, the reality is, we've allowed in the bill for the school to adopt their own disciplinary policy. And so again, it's back to local control, like we want the school districts to make the best disciplinary policy they see fit."
Dial: "I know it's a rare word in Austin: bipartisan. This bill has bipartisansupport. Can you just talk about why so many lawmakers are saying, hey, we're at a point where this is something that's needed."
Fairly: "When you talk about policy and even politics in Texas, we tend to sometimes see polarization on two different sides and there's a lot of middle ground policy that both parties agree on. I'm encouraged that this is one of them. We have a wide variety of members who have co-authored this bill and I think it's because on both sides, both parties are realizing whether it's the mental health component, whether it's the classroom management, the teachers need support from the state, and also student academic outcomes, both parties agree. I think for the most part, that we want our kids to have the best education in Texas. The 5.5 million kids we have in Texas, we want it to be good."
Dial: "What would your pushback be to a parent who says, I want to be able to contact my child in the event there's an emergency going on?"
Fairly: "When you talk about school shooters, most officers that are experts in this field, we spent a lot of time talking to them. They would say we would suggest that the last thing you want is probably a kid on their phone during a school shooting. Yesterday in testimony, we had a lot of people talk about, even from a parental perspective, that it's as much of an emotional issue, that you want your kid and immediately to talk to them. When you think about a school shooter, as horrible as that is, when 30 7th graders are on the phone calling 911, videotaping, they're creating noise, which is a target for the shooter. So I think that we just have to be mindful of how we address this, because it is important. I'm encouraged that we have another really big priority bill that addresses school shooting. My bill is more about phones being up and away, but there's another piece of legislation that is about schools adopting policy so that next time, if there's a school shooter, we have a plan and process in place."
Dial: "Is there a state funding component to this?"
Fairly: "We have been really mindful. It is very important to me to not have unfunded mandates. I mean, I live in a rural part of Texas, and so there's a lot of issues where bills are passed, and they're not funded, and it's not fair to put that burden on our school districts. So I've been working really closely with Chair of Appropriations to be sure that if we need to allot for some funding, it will be there to be sure if schools want the option to purchase a pouch, that there's some funding provided for them to do that, because, again, this is about allowing school districts to adopt the policy that they see fit for the funds to be up, in a way. Texas is so diverse. I mean, so diverse. I represent a rural district, but when you look at your urban areas, there's thousands of kids that attend school versus mine, maybe a few hundred and so there will be funding provided. If we see that, there's a need to be sure that we do support these school districts. It's really important that we do keep that a priority."
You can watch Texas: The Issue Is on FOX on Sunday nights or anytime on FOX LOCAL.
The Source
Information in this article comes from FOX 4's interview with State Rep. Caroline Fairly (R-Amarillo).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Frank White shares stadium discrepancy between county, KCMO and MO
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Day three of Missouri's special session went early into Thursday morning as state senators passed a package aimed at keeping the Chiefs and Royals in Missouri in the next decade. Republican State Senator Kurtis Gregory of Saline County and Marshall, Missouri was the bill's sponsor. He needed 17 other State Senators . He got 18, with the final vote being 19-13. Legislator Manny Abarca pleads not guilty to domestic battery charges in Johnson County Later that afternoon though, Jackson County Executive Frank White sent out a bar graph showing that the county contributes $54 million a year annually to the Truman Sports Complex, a county owned piece of property. White says they only get $6 million in return. Kansas City, Missouri on the other hand, according to the county, contributes $2 million but generates $22 million. White says the state of Missouri contributes $3 million, but gets back $40 million a year. Just four days before the April vote in the spring of 2024, White alluded to Mayor Quinton Lucas pitching the Royals the East Crossroads location, even though the team hadn't publicly named that site. The Royals ended up choosing the old Kansas City Star Press Pavilion site in the East Crossroads. The vote, attached with the Chiefs' , lost by 16%. With all of that in mind, FOX4 asked Lucas Thursday whether he felt like he's been under added pressure, talking about the stadium site change. 'No. Not at all. I don't feel pressure on that,' Lucas said. 'I do feel pressure in terms of how do we make sure that we have good packages long term to help keep these teams here?' Now the mayor has talked about Washington Square Park, just east of Union Station, as the new home of the Royals. In May, he told FOX4 if the Royals end up choosing that site, a stadium could be approved there by a Parks Board and City Council vote rather quickly. He also said that that site would not necessarily require a vote of the people. Download WDAF+ for Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV Thursday, Clay County Commissioner Jason Withington also told FOX4 his entity's still 'hundreds of miles' apart on a deal with the Royals if they're considering building their stadium north of the river in North Kansas City. . Regardless of site, the Missouri House of Representatives returns Monday to try to pass the Show-Me Sports Investment Act. The House already passed that bill at the end of May, but it died in the State Senate, which just approved it Thursday morning. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Axios
18 hours ago
- Axios
Tarrant County faces lawsuit over new commissioner precincts
Five Tarrant County residents are suing to block the county's redrawn Commissioners Court precincts, saying the new boundaries will unfairly impact Black and Latino voters starting next year. Why it matters: The redistricting is likely to reshape the court, which oversees county government, and give Republicans an edge over Democrats in upcoming elections. Driving the news: Commissioners voted 3-2 to approve the new map on Tuesday, with all Republicans voting in favor and all Democrats opposing, after a meeting that stretched seven hours and had hundreds of speakers. Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare, who voted in favor of the new map, said it will make the county's governance more conservative. Between the lines: It's rare for counties to redraw precincts in the middle of a decade. Redistricting typically happens every 10 years when census figures are updated. Friction point: O'Hare said on X that the updated boundaries align with the county's "longstanding conservative majority" and reflect "the will of the voters." The map's critics say it was drawn using outdated census data — not reflecting the county's recent growth — and will unfairly favor Republicans in future elections. Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker, Arlington Mayor Jim Ross, Grand Prairie Mayor Ron Jensen and several other mayors in Tarrant County had asked the commissioners to delay redistricting until more up-to-date demographic figures were released. State of play: County records show the previous Precincts 1 and 2 mostly favored Democratic candidates for governor, U.S. Senate and president since 2018, while Precincts 3 and 4 favored Republicans. The newly drawn Precincts 1, 2 and 3 have historically favored Republican candidates, per the county. Context: Redistricting is just one part of the Tarrant County judge's efforts to make Tarrant County more conservative. During O'Hare's tenure, the county has become an example of the impact that far-right Republicans can have in local government. The big picture: The county has added at least 400,000 residents since 2010 and has been politically purple in recent elections. President Trump lost the county in 2020 and won in 2024, while U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz narrowly lost last year. Unofficial Census Bureau figures from July 2024 show Tarrant County is 42% white, 31% Hispanic or Latino, 19% Black and 6% Asian. Yes, but: Since taking office in 2023, O'Hare has cut an organization's funding over its views on racial inequality and LGBTQ+ rights, questioned election integrity despite having no proof, and supported the placement of a Ten Commandments monument on county property. The intrigue: Higher-ranking Texas Republicans have also taken an interest in Tarrant County's politics in recent years. Republican Matt Krause served in the Texas House between 2013 and 2023. He is now a Tarrant County commissioner for Precinct 3. The redrawn districts put Globe Life Field, AT&T Stadium and Texas Live! in Krause's precinct. The area was previously in Precinct 2, represented by Democrat Alisa Simmons. State Rep. Tony Tinderholt, a Republican from Arlington, plans to retire from the Texas House and run for the redrawn Precinct 2. He told the Star-Telegram that the commissioners' redistricting vote "nudged" his decision. What they're saying: The federal lawsuit against Tarrant County alleges that the new precincts will "pack the bulk of the County's minority voters into a single precinct." The other side: "Far too often Democrats take ground while Republicans cede it. This is no longer the case in Tarrant County," O'Hare said in a statement on X this week.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tarrant County sued over new commissioners court map; lawsuit claims racial discrimination
The Brief Tarrant County and Judge Tim O'Hare face a federal lawsuit alleging their new commissioners court map is racially discriminatory. The suit claims the map violates voting rights by concentrating most minority voters into one precinct, diluting their influence elsewhere. The map was approved by a 3-2 vote on Tuesday. TARRANT COUNTY, Texas - A federal lawsuit has been filed against Tarrant County and Judge Tim O'Hare claiming the county's new commissioners court map intentionally discriminates based on race. The lawsuit comes just one day after the Republican-led Commissioners Court approved the new map in a 3-2 vote. The suit claims the new map violates the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution. The backstory Currently, Tarrant County Commissioners Court consists of Republican County Judge Tim O'Hare, two Republican Commissioners and two Democratic commissioners. Critics of redistricting say the new map increases the chances that at least one of the two Democratic-leaning precincts will flip during the next election. O'Hare told FOX 4 the redistricting effort fulfills a campaign promise to increase the court's Republican majority. "For us not to do that, when we are the controlling party, the majority party, would be foolish on our part, because we know if we lost, they would do the exact same thing," said O'Hare. "Tarrant County is alive and well in terms of being a red county and we intend to keep it that way." Dig deeper The lawsuit says that on April 2, 2025, Tarrant County entered into a contract with the Virginia-based Public Interest Legal Foundation to redraw the districts. According to the suit, the new map packs the bulk of the county's minority voters into one precinct while splitting the others among the three other precincts. "While Map 7 disenfranchises just 5% of Tarrant County's Anglo adults, it disenfranchises 19% of the County's Black adults and 12% of its Latino adults. Black adults are thus four times more likely than Anglo adults to be disenfranchised under Map 7 and Latino adults are over twice as likely to be disenfranchised than Anglo adults," reads the suit. Five Tarrant County voters who are now in new districts were named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The suit claims the Black and Latino voters are disenfranchised because they are now unable to vote for County Commissioner in the Nov. 2026 election. Under the previous map, they would have been able to cast their ballot. Typically, redistricting is done every 10 years after the census. The Tarrant County Commissioners Court voted not to change it after the 2020 census. The suit argues that there was no population imbalance or other reason to require the map change. "Specifically, the plan was drafted and passed in a process designed to be discriminatory, at least in part, to minimize the political power of Black voters and Latino voters by limiting their ability to influence commissioner court elections to a single district out of four when minorities are the majority of residents in the County and just shy of half of eligible voters in Tarrant County," reads the suit. The suit calls to permanently stop Tarrant County from adopting Map 7 and asks for any future maps to go under review in federal court. What they're saying FOX 4 reached out to Chad Ruback, an attorney who is not involved in the case, to get some outside perspective on the situation. While Ruback confirmed that it's legal to redraw district lines for partisan purposes, he also says it will be an uphill battle for the county officials. "On the other hand, it is not appropriate, it is not legal to redistrict for the purpose of diminishing the rights of certain classes of people like minorities," Ruback said. According to the attorney, the county will have to prove that increasing Republican representation is not the sole purpose behind redistricting. "I believe they could prevail if they showed that Judge O'Hare and his Republican colleagues on the commissioners court were motivated to specifically hurt minority votes," he said. The lawsuit attempts to do just that, citing examples of previous statements made by O'Hare, and his actions in previous government positions. However, Ruback says this may not be enough evidence. "If they have some statement made to a news reporter several years ago that sort of kind of might have suggested there might be redistricting, and it might hurt minority votes, that's probably not going to be enough to carry their burden," said Ruback. The other side O'Hare's office sent a statement to FOX 4 in response to the suit. It says, in part: "The refusal of Democrats to accept settled law will waste Tarrant County taxpayer dollars. The commissioners court voted by a 3-2 majority for more Republican representation, which is perfectly legal under all applicable laws of the United States and the state of Texas." What's next According to Ruback, if more lawsuits are filed on the same issue, they'll likely be consolidated to a single case. More evidence may be presented in the current suit, but Ruback says it remains unclear. He said it could be months before a resolution is made in the case. The Source Information in this article comes from a lawsuit filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Fort Worth Division and past FOX 4 coverage.