My neighbour's pointed a camera at my garden and is filming my every move... what can I do? DEAN DUNHAM replies
My neighbour has installed CCTV and one of his cameras points directly into my garden. Do I not have any right to privacy on my property?
R.M., via email.
Dean Dunham replies: You do have a general right to privacy in your own home and garden.
As I always say, never fall out with your neighbour unless it is absolutely necessary, so as a first step explain your concern to them and ask politely if they will adjust the camera angle or take other measures to ensure it does not capture your property.
If this does not work, you will need to adopt a more formal approach, and the good news here is that the law is on your side.
Your neighbour is obliged to comply with two laws due to his CCTV capturing your garden and these are called the General Data Protection Regulation – commonly known as GDPR – and the Data Protection Act 2018.
Under these laws your neighbour should have informed you that he was using CCTV and that your garden is within its sight. In addition, these laws give you the right to request access to the footage of your garden or to ask for it to be deleted and your neighbour must comply.
If your neighbour ignores his obligations under these laws and you are unable to resolve the matter amicably, your next step would be to file a complaint with the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), which regulates data protection laws.
The ICO will send a letter to your neighbour setting out the law and asking him to fall in line with his legal obligations.
However, contrary to popular belief, the ICO will rarely take any enforcement action against a homeowner, so if your neighbour ignores this you will have to either take legal action yourself or report the matter to the police.
In either case, this will need to be something you consider carefully and you will need to be able to demonstrate that this is causing you a fair amount of distress and that you are feeling 'harassed' by being captured on CCTV.
Insurance firm is blaming my guttering for leak
A few months ago water leaked into my home after a very heavy downpour.
My insurance claim has now been denied on the basis that my guttering was at fault as it had not been installed correctly. What are my rights?
P.J., via email.
Dean Dunham replies: I always warn that if an insurance provider can find an excuse to wriggle out of a claim, it will, and on this occasion a poorly installed gutter could indeed potentially be such a valid excuse.
Firstly, you need to ascertain from your provider why it has concluded that the guttering has been installed incorrectly.
Usually this will be down to the pitch being wrong – gutters, therefore, must be installed with the correct slope to ensure that water flows smoothly towards the downspouts.
It might be as a result of inappropriate materials being used, for example, not using sufficiently durable materials on a house near the sea, or having issues with joints, as too many of these can leave the guttering susceptible to leaks.
Once you have ascertained which of these issues your provider believes is the problem, you should obtain the advice of a roofing/guttering specialist and effectively seek a second opinion.
If they agree with your insurance provider's findings, then there is going to be little you can do, as your provider will almost certainly be within its rights to deny the claim.
If you had the guttering installed in the last six years, or if it is still within a guarantee period, your best route of redress will be via the company that installed the guttering.
You will have a claim under the Consumer Rights Act, which says that services, such as installing guttering, must be performed with 'reasonable care and skill'.
If, however, your guttering expert disagrees with the insurance provider, raise a complaint and make sure you provide a copy of the report.
If it continues to deny your claim, file one with the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm a travel expert but Booking.com host scam nearly caught me out'
For years holidaymakers have been losing cash through a scam that targets customers who have made bookings on Milo Boyd takes a look at why it's still catching out people As my thumb hovered over the link, the BBC's Rogue Traders researcher, who was helpfully sitting next to me, said: 'I'm pretty sure that's a scam. Block the number and don't click the link." I did as advised and felt a sense of relief at a bullet dodged, followed by a tinge of embarrassment at having almost fallen for a travel scam. That would be a bad look, given my job title and the fact I was at a travel event surrounded by colleagues when the message came through. In my defence, it was pretty convincing. The WhatsApp message arrived with a name and photo attached just after a bit of back-and-forth with the actual host on the site. The 'guest relations manager' mentioned where and when I was going, and when I made the reservation. All would be well with the booking, they assured me, so long as I could confirm that my card details were not stolen - something the system had flagged to them as a possibility. A quick click of the link to confirm my details and I'd be off on holiday as planned, no problem, they promised. I screenshotted the messages and blocked the account, repeating the process for the 'head administrator of the apartments' who later followed up on her colleague's behalf. In this instance, a scam avoided, but plenty of questions remained. How had they got my details? How much would they've stolen if I had clicked the link? How many others are being targeted this way? The answer to the first question came several days after I explained what had happened to A customer service representative apologised before blaming the security breach on the host, saying that they must have had their own website infected with malware, giving the hackers access to my information. This is an issue for websites such as which send customers to third-party websites. These are often run by B&B owners or holiday let landlords with one property, who are unlikely to have the same security resources as a major travel firm. Potentially adding to the security issues is the fact that it takes less than 15 minutes to set up a host page, with no requirement to show a passport or official ID. In terms of the second and third questions, the amounts stolen and the number of victims are significant. The scam has been bubbling along for years, with the UK's Action Fraud having received 532 reports from individuals, with a total of £370,000 lost between June 2023 and September 2024. Between them, they are more than £370,000 out of pocket. They may also have been victims of a breach of their data rights. Several years ago was slapped with a €475K fine for failing to take action following a GDPR breach. If anything, the problem seems to be getting worse. Last June, admitted that there had been an increase of between 500 and 900 per cent in scams carried out on the platform in the previous 18 months. In 2023 Dr Leigh Jones, a University of Oxford academic, told the Mirror how she had lost more than £1,000 at the hands of scammers after she booked multiple hotel rooms for her family ahead of her wedding day in Vietnam. "It was a really impressive phishing scam. After this, I will be done with Why is there no warning on their website? I'd advise people to switch to another way to booking holidays," she told the Mirror at the time. Earlier this year Which? found that some customers had been contacted by scammers through the company's official app, making it much harder to distinguish it from a genuine message from a host. Not only are customers losing money, the scammers are causing accommodation operators major headaches. Balaram Thapa runs a hotel in Kathmandu, Nepal. Recently, one of his customers fell victim to a phishing scam. "One of our guests booked a room at our hotel through received a confirmation, and then later got a message that appeared to come from us, asking them to reconfirm their payment via a third-party link. It looked completely legitimate, with our hotel name and reservation details included," the hotelier explained. The guest paid through the fake link and only realised it was a scam when they arrived. "It was a frustrating situation for both the guest and our team. Not only did they lose money, but it damaged their trust in the booking process—and in us, even though we had no role in the scam. It's become clear to me that travellers need to be especially cautious about messages they receive, even if they appear to be from official booking platforms." Balaram contacted and was told that the hotel's account may have been compromised. Their advice was to change the password. "They didn't offer any further assistance or compensation," the hospitality manager added. To help the distraught customer, Balaram offered a 50% discount on their stay. "It was a loss on both sides, but we did our best to make it right," he said. Sean Malloy is an American lawyer who has represented phishing scam victims in court and offered some advice for those fearful of being caught out. "I have dealt with numerous instances of phishing scams that resulted in financial or emotional losses. When platforms like are impersonated, consumers are often caught off-guard, especially since the communication can appear so legitimate," he told the Mirror. "To protect themselves, travellers should NEVER CLICK any payment links sent in email or text, and always verify bookings and requests by using the app or site itself. Turn on two-factor authentication when you can, and review your accounts periodically for evidence of hacking." A spokesperson for told the Mirror: "While we can confirm that systems have not been breached, we are aware that some of our accommodation partners and customers have been impacted by phishing attacks sent by professional criminals. Online fraud is unfortunately a battle many industries are facing, and at we are committed to tackling this issue head on. "We have a number of robust security measures in place and continually invest in advanced technologies, including AI and machine-learning, to detect and block the vast majority of threats before they can have an impact. Once a concern has been raised, our security teams will investigate immediately and work with partners to secure their accounts as quickly as possible." The spokesperson advised that customers concerned about payment messages should "carefully check the payment policy details on their booking confirmation to be sure that the message is legitimate. When in doubt, it's always best to contact our customer service team or click on 'report an issue' which is included in the chat function. It is important to note that we would never ask a customer to share payment information via email, chat messages, text messages or phone. If the customer has any concerns relating to credit card payments, they should contact their bank for further assistance. "Like many businesses operating in the e-commerce space, we and our partners can be attractive targets for cybercriminals. However, thanks to our robust measures, considering our global scope and the millions of bookings we facilitate weekly, actual incidents are rare. We continually invest in advanced technologies, including AI and machine-learning, to detect and block the vast majority of threats before they can have any impact. In the event of a confirmed partner account takeover scenario, we inform guests via email providing a warning about the potential of receiving phishing messages. "We take the process of verifying accommodation listings seriously. While partners can register in less than 15 minutes, they are then exposed to multiple controls and checks during sign-up, after submission and before their listings become bookable."
Metro
5 days ago
- Metro
Family business 'loses £10,000' after Meta blocks their accounts for 12 weeks
A family photography business feel like 'nobody cares' after Meta locked them out of their social media accounts for more than three months. Couple Gavin and Jenni Rolph estimate their business has lost £10,000 because their crucial Instagram account have been down since March 6. They have attempted to contact Meta three times a week but have hit a brick wall, with even legal letters going unanswered. The nightmare began on March 6 when the pair, who planned their Rolph and Co Photography business while on their honeymoon, claim they received an email that someone from Vietnam was trying to access their account. Half an hour later, they say eight of their accounts were disabled for supposedly 'breaching community guidelines'. 'I appealed straight away, but as far as I can tell it has been 12 weeks and no human has looked at it,' Gavin told Metro. The bans have stopped the pair accessing personal accounts, work account and even a Facebook page called Totally Locally Macclesfield, which supports small businesses in the area. One account survived the cull, Jenni's work Facebook account, which allows them to post on Rolph and Co Photography's Facebook page. But its their Instagram that drives people to their site the most and that access to that app remains shut off. Their customers have begun thinking their business has closed down, as a simple 'page not found' message appears when you try visiting their Instagram. Gavin added: 'We rely on Instagram a lot more. It's costing us money, people can no longer find us on there. 'For a small business their turnover's only around £100,000, losing £10,000 is a big chunk for a small business with only 2 employees. 'I feel ignored. We know we have done nothing wrong. 'It is a very personal impact from a very big company who really don't care.' The pair have been battling daily to try restore their accounts, which remained down when Metro checked on June 3. They appealed the decision immediately and have been continuing to appeal it three times a week in the last three months. The photographers, who have been running their business since March 2018, even had to pay £10 for Meta verified to talk to a real human at Meta support, but they say that hasn't helped. Instead, Gavin says they are constantly told a 'specialist team' is working on their case, but nothing has changed since. 'It really brings me down when I'm dealing with it,' Gavin said. 'You literally just click appeal. There is no chance to explain it. 'On chats I get someone pasting an automated response teling me it is with the appropriate team.' 'For the first few weeks, it was like, 'Oh, it'll be next week. It'll be next week.' 'We cannot set up new accounts because they will recognise where it is from. More Trending 'We both quit our jobs to do this. If something were to go wrong it is both of our jobs on the line.' Gavin says he has submitted requests for personal information to Meta under GDPR rules, but the tech giant have not responded within the legal 30 day limit. He and Jenni also sent a legal notice to Meta, accusing the company of 'breach of contract and gross negligence', but have not had any response. Meta did not respond to Metro's request for comment. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: I loaned my parents a few hundred quid — then they stole thousands MORE: 'SXSW London will be a love letter to the city – we ought to be here' MORE: Why so many young Brits are being 'manipulated' into smuggling drugs
Daily Record
31-05-2025
- Daily Record
Bar manager wins £10k after she was sacked for checking CCTV over claims of 'spiking'
Sophie Marsh was sacked on the spot for CCTV footage after receiving a report of a suspected spiking incident. A bar manager has won nearly £10,000 in compensation after she was unfairly sacked for checking CCTV footage for evidence of a "spiking" incident. Sophie Marsh, from Mauchline in East Ayrshire, worked at S altcoats Labour Club for two years before she was suddenly dismissed on October 11 last year. Bosses sacked the 40-year-old on the spot after claiming she had breached GDPR when she checked the footage at the request of a female customer who suspected her drink had been tampered with during a karaoke night. Sophie was dismissed without any investigation or disciplinary action and the case was put before an employment tribunal in Glasgow last month. It ruled that Sophie was not afforded the right to an investigation or an opportunity to put her side across before a dismissal decision was made. She was awarded a total of £9,500 for the unfair and wrongful sacking. Speaking of the outcome, Sophie told the Record: "I wasn't checking the CCTV footage for my own leisure, I was checking it to see if criminal activity had taken place within the bar. "A customer suspected she had been spiked and as bar manager, I had a duty of care to her as my customer. "In this case, there was no criminality but what if there had been and I was sacked for simply trying to investigate this?" Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. During the tribunal, bosses were asked to clarify the data breach they claimed to have occurred, however, neither could provide a clear explanation. Instead, one of them argued Sophie viewing the CCTV was "like it were a screening of a night out at the club.' It further heard that in the months before Sophie was dismissed, several members of the club's committee had been hostile to her after she made a grievance about a committee member. However, Judge E Mannion ruled that although she had been subjected to a level of enmity after making the report, it was not the sole reason why she was sacked. Handing down her findings, Judge Mannion ruled that viewing the CCTV would, at most, be "a breach of an internal policy." She went on to describe the case as a "wholescale" breach of the Acas Code of Practice - a set of fairness standards that employers are required to follow. She said: "While it is appreciated that the respondent is a small organisation, I cannot think of a more egregious breach of the Acas Code of Practice than this case. "It was a total and wholescale breach. Every aspect of it was departed from." Sophie said: "Losing my job right before Christmas plunged my life into a period of stress and uncertainty. "I already suffer from anxiety so this had a profound impact on my mental health. "Taking this to tribunal wasn't about money but rather to clear my name. " Saltcoats is a small town so it is crucial people know the truth. "Even after the truth coming to light and them being proved to have wrongfully dismissed me, I still haven't received even an apology from any of the people that have put me through this."
