logo
Now Indian destination weddings exit Turkey. How much will it cost the nation?

Now Indian destination weddings exit Turkey. How much will it cost the nation?

First Post17-05-2025

Amid calls to boycott Turkey over its support for Pakistan, the former is witnessing massive cancellations by Indian wedding planners and families. Turkey has been a popular choice for destination weddings in India. It generated a tourism revenue of nearly $150 million in 2024 alone read more
In 2024 alone, Turkey hosted 50 grand Indian weddings, each averaging $3 million. However, following a recent diplomatic standoff triggered by India's 'Operation Sindoor' and Turkey's support for Pakistan, Indian wedding planners and families are now pulling out en masse. Image courtesy: Image for Representation. Pixabay
Over the years, Turkey has become a dream destination for many Indian weddings, with its luxurious resorts, scenic venues, and warm hospitality offering the perfect blend of East-meets-West celebration.
However, that equation now seems to be changing.
Following a recent diplomatic standoff triggered by India's 'Operation Sindoor' and Turkey's support for Pakistan, Indian wedding planners and families are now pulling out en masse.
The result? A wave of high-profile cancellations has threatened to unravel years of growth that Turkey's thriving luxury tourism sector has seen.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Indian wedding travellers contribute over $140 million annually to Turkey's tourism economy, and the impact of this shift is seismic,' Nikhil Mahajan, Senior Representative at Kestone Utsav, an Indian wedding planning firm, told Financial Express.
So, how big is the Indian wedding market in Turkey? And what ripple effects could this rift leave behind? Here's a closer look.
How Turkey became a desi-wedding wonderland
From Istanbul's palaces to the turquoise coastline of Bodrum, Turkey had fast become a dream destination for Indian couples craving grandeur without blowing the budget out of proportion.
In 2024 alone, Turkey hosted 50 grand Indian weddings, each averaging $3 million, with a few reaching up to $8 million.
These weren't just ceremonies; they were elaborate, multi-day celebrations. Most weddings hosted around 500 guests, who stayed for three nights and enjoyed everything from VIP airport transfers and five-star resorts to celebrity performers and gourmet spreads, contributing significantly to local vendors and tourism-linked businesses.
Over the years, the Indian wedding market had exploded in Turkey, growing nearly 300 per cent — from just 13 weddings in 2018 to 50 in 2024. Image for Representation. Pixabay
According to industry data, a typical Indian wedding package for 100 guests started at €350,000 (around $385,000), a figure that easily outstrips the average Turkish wedding, which typically ranges between $1,600 and $5,400.
Over the years, the Indian wedding market had exploded in Turkey, growing nearly 300 per cent — from just 13 weddings in 2018 to 50 in 2024. They generated a tourism revenue of nearly $150 million in the last year alone.
The flourishing industry was on track to hit similar numbers in 2025, until the boycott disrupted everything.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
How the boycott could hit Turkey's wedding biz
Turkey's public alignment with Pakistan in the India-Pakistan standoff has triggered a sharp backlash from Indian wedding planners and families.
In May 2025 alone, around 2,000 tourist bookings were cancelled, and 30 out of the 50 planned Indian weddings for the year now hang in the balance.
Given that each Indian wedding in Turkey is typically worth around $3 million, the country could be staring at direct losses of up to $90 million, according to The Financial Express.
But the impact goes far beyond just financials. Indian weddings are large-scale productions that employ hundreds of local vendors — from florists and chefs to photographers and transport providers. Over the years, they've also helped position Turkey as a go-to destination for luxury celebrations, bringing with them international visibility and future tourism from wedding guests.
'These weddings featured celebrities and business elites, offering marketing value that money can't buy,' Mahajan noted.
In May 2025 alone, around 2,000 tourist bookings were cancelled, and 30 out of the 50 planned Indian weddings for the year now hang in the balance. File image/Reuters
To make matters worse, the boycott has come right in the middle of peak wedding season. Typically, 60 per cent of Indian weddings take place between May and December, a window now under threat. Turkey risks losing a premium clientele that has consistently delivered high-value returns.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Where are Indians planning to go then?
As per Mahajan, 'Families [are] increasingly exploring alternative international locations like Italy and the UAE. Simultaneously, there's a strong resurgence in demand for Indian destinations such as Udaipur, Jaipur, Goa, and Kerala, places that offer grandeur, accessibility, and cultural resonance.'
These locations, he adds, reflect shifting preferences, focusing more on safety, ease of travel, and meaningful cultural experiences.
Tourism industry to feel the ripple effects
As the Indian wedding market in Turkey begins to shrink, the ripple effects are expected to hit the broader tourism industry , one that earned a hefty $61.1 billion in 2024.
According to data from Turkey's Ministry of Culture and Tourism, 3,30,000 Indians visited the country last year, a massive leap from just 1,19,503 in 2014.
But with rising calls to boycott both Turkey and Azerbaijan, countries that have openly sided with Pakistan, Indian travellers are starting to steer clear of these once-popular destinations.
Tourists and commuters sail through Bosphorus on a ferry in Istanbul, Turkey, April 23, 2025. File Photo/Reuters
Govind Gaur, CEO of D2C travel tech firm WanderOn, told Moneycontrol that cancellations are already pouring in. 'Over 50 per cent drop in bookings is expected from India to Azerbaijan and Turkey. India is one of the biggest markets after China for the destinations,' he said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He also believes the financial blow to both countries could be even more severe than the fallout from the Maldives boycott in 2024, which followed derogatory remarks made against Prime Minister Narendra Modi by some Maldivian ministers.
'I see a much larger impact as compared to the Maldives. Baku or Azerbaijan is on travellers' minds because of Indian tourists. Last year, they had the highest number of people travelling to Azerbaijan from India. There won't be any new bookings and this is peak season time for them. Turkish Airlines will also see a significant impact because they are already boycotting the airline. We will see a much larger impact on them in the coming days,' Gaur added.
It's not just tourism and weddings that are pulling out, Bollywood may soon follow.
This week, the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) urged Indian filmmakers to rethink Turkey as a shooting destination.
'We therefore appeal to all production houses, line producers, actors, directors, and crew members across the Indian film fraternity to stand in solidarity with the nation and boycott Turkey as a location for film shoots until such time that the country revisits its diplomatic stance and aligns with principles of mutual respect and non-interference,' FWICE said in a press release.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
All signs point to a significant fallout for Turkey, with losses stretching far beyond cancelled weddings.
With input from agencies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence equipment, oil, cars: Where India could lower tariffs to reach deal with US
Defence equipment, oil, cars: Where India could lower tariffs to reach deal with US

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Defence equipment, oil, cars: Where India could lower tariffs to reach deal with US

With US trade negotiators set to reach India Thursday for a two-day visit, the India-US trade deal negotiations are entering their final stage and could soon see Delhi opening its market and lowering tariffs on a range of American products – from select agricultural goods to defence equipment. This is in exchange for concessions on reciprocal tariffs and improved access to the US market for India's labour-intensive sectors such as textile and leather products. The White House said Tuesday that the US had asked countries to make their best offers on trade negotiations by Wednesday, as the July 8 deadline for reciprocal tariffs is just five weeks away. 'I can confirm the merits and the content of the letter. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) sent this letter to all of our trading partners just to give them a friendly reminder that the deadline is coming up,' White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said. Improving market access for US exports such as oil, armaments, soybeans, corn, whisky and automobiles could help address Washington's concerns over its goods trade deficit with India and high tariff barriers. US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that the US aimed to bring back advanced manufacturing and bridge the trade deficit by increasing exports to India, adding that both sides had 'found a place that really works' for them. Indian officials have indicated that diversifying oil and defence procurement is in the country's strategic interest and sourcing more from the US could also significantly help bridge the goods trade gap, as India's refining capacity has been increasing alongside oil import dependency, which surged to 90 per cent in April 2025. India's oil import mix has already undergone a significant shift since the Ukraine war, with Russia emerging as the top supplier, replacing Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Official trade data showed that India had already stepped up oil purchases from the US. India's import of crude oil from the US jumped 11.49 per cent to $63 billion in March 2025 compared to the previous year. India has had long standing defence ties with Russia, owing to its reliability during times when Western countries imposed sanctions. However, the US now appears to be leveraging its position as the world's largest market to boost defence equipment exports to India and reduce Delhi's dependence on Russia. Speaking at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) in Washington DC, Lutnick said: 'There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the United States the wrong way. For instance, they generally buy military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get under the skin of America, if you go to buy your armaments from Russia.' He said India is already 'addressing' this issue. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the largest share of India's arms imports between 2020 and 2024 still came from Russia at about 36 per cent. However, this was significantly lower than the 55 per cent recorded in 2015-19 and 72 per cent in 2010-14. SIPRI's report released in March suggested that India has increased domestic manufacturing and is shifting its arms supply relations towards Western suppliers – most notably France, Israel and the US – at a time when Russia is prioritising domestic production amid the ongoing Ukraine war. US arms exports grew by 21 per cent between 2015-19 and 2020-24. The US share of global arms exports rose from 35 per cent to 43 per cent – nearly equal to the combined total of the next eight largest exporters, according to SIPRI. From high tariffs on agricultural imports to restrictions on genetically modified (GM) seeds and products, the US has criticised several Indian trade policies that have limited US exports. Under the new trade agreements, the US is seeking increased market access for its agricultural products, especially soya and corn – two of its top export items to China. Amid the likelihood of a protracted trade tussle with China, the US deal with India is likely to ensure greater market access for these two products. Additionally, the US may also secure improved access for its apples. A NITI Aayog working paper in May stated that India could offer some concessions on 'soybean oil imports' to reduce the trade imbalance, without harming domestic production. India is the largest importer of edible oil globally, and the US has a surplus of soybean exports. 'We should also explore the option of importing soybean seed and using it for extracting oil in coastal areas, then selling the oil in the domestic market and exporting the meal, for which there is adequate overseas demand. This will avoid genetically modified (GM) feed entering the Indian market,' the paper, authored by Senior Adviser at NITI Aayog Raka Saxena and Member Ramesh Chand, said. 'Similarly, corn may be imported for ethanol blending, and its by-products – like Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) – can be entirely exported to avoid GM feed in the country. US corn is cheaper and can be used to meet India's biofuel targets without disrupting local food and feed markets,' it said. Notably, soybeans and corn are among the top exports of US to China and according to a Reuters report, US soybean exports could drop 20 per cent and prices may plunge if the US-China trade dispute remains unresolved. If the trade agreement with the UK is any indication, India is likely to open its highly protected automobile and alcoholic beverage sectors to the US, its largest trade partner. Even before negotiations with the US began, India slashed duties on bourbon whisky to 50 per cent from the earlier 150 per cent. Bourbon whisky is primarily produced in the US, with about 95 per cent made in Kentucky. Under the UK deal, India cut tariffs on automotive imports from over 100 per cent to 10 per cent – although the reduction is phased over 10 to 15 years. A similar, if not more favourable, deal could be offered to the US. President Donald Trump had previously stated that high tariffs in India made it difficult for companies like Harley-Davidson to operate in the country.

French trade minister meets Piyush Goyal, says France one of India's best economic partners
French trade minister meets Piyush Goyal, says France one of India's best economic partners

The Print

time37 minutes ago

  • The Print

French trade minister meets Piyush Goyal, says France one of India's best economic partners

'With my Indian counterpart Piyush Goyal, I reaffirmed a conviction: France is one of India's best economic partners… Reforms, stability, innovation, access to EU and India markets: there's everything to strengthen our bilateral relationship,' Saint-Martin stated in a post on X. The minister highlighted the potential to further strengthen bilateral ties through 'reforms, stability, innovation, and enhanced market access to the EU and Indian markets.' Paris : French Foreign Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin on Tuesday reaffirmed the 'conviction' that France is one of 'India's best economic partners' after his meeting with Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal in Paris. Following his meeting with Goyal, Saint-Martin also expressed optimism about the ongoing India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations, anticipating a possible agreement in the coming weeks or months. 'It's important to demonstrate that we believe in free trade, not trade wars,' he stressed. 'Minister Goyal arrived with a strong business delegation – over 50 companies, which is significant. At a time when global trade is facing challenges, we believe it's crucial for India and France to strengthen their ties… The European Union and India are progressing toward a Free Trade Agreement, and as a member of the European Commission, we fully support this… I'm optimistic that we could see an agreement in the coming weeks or months… It's important to demonstrate that we believe in free trade, not trade wars,' the French Minister told reporters. He emphasised the importance of fostering deeper cross-border trade and investments between the two nations. 'At the same time, we must foster deeper bilateral relations between France and India, which means enhancing cross-investments, more cross-border trade… All the friendship that President Macron and PM Modi have will, of course, help our bilateral relations to go deeper now,' he added. Earlier on Monday, the Union Minister held a productive meeting with French Minister of Economy, Finance, and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty, Eric Lombard, focusing on deepening the India-France economic partnership with an emphasis on trade, investments, and technology cooperation. The discussions, which took place during Goyal's three-day official visit to France, also reviewed the progress of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations, signalling a strong intent to bolster bilateral ties amidst a shared commitment to innovation and economic growth. 'Held a productive meeting with Eric Lombard, French Minister of Economy, Finance, and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty. Exchanged views on deepening our economic partnership, enhancing trade & investments with a special focus on technology and innovation across key sectors. Also discussed the progress of the India-EU FTA negotiations. Looking forward to stronger India-France economic ties,' Goyal said in a post on X. He also expressed optimism that India could finalise its Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the European Union (EU) ahead of the year-end deadline, citing minimal divergences between the two economic blocs. Goyal also held a series of high-level meetings in Paris with top French CEOs to explore new opportunities for India's growth across key sectors such as renewable energy, automobile manufacturing, electric vehicles (EVs), and consumer products. The minister commenced his three-day official visit to Paris on Sunday as part of his ongoing visit to France and Italy from 1 to 5 June 2025. This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content Also read: US, India to give preferential access to each other's businesses, says Piyush Goyal

Group insolvency framework: When one is not for all
Group insolvency framework: When one is not for all

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Group insolvency framework: When one is not for all

The principle of separateness is no minor technicality. It lies at the heart of company law. The landmark 1896 ruling by the British House of Lords, in Salomon vs Salomon & Co, established that once incorporated, a company acquires its own legal identity, distinct from its shareholders, directors, or affiliates. This was more than a formalism; it unleashed the modern economy, shielding personal assets from business risks and allowing capital to move freely. India's Supreme Court has affirmed this on many instances, underscoring that corporate separateness is not a legal fiction to be set aside for convenience, but a deliberate construct governing credit, liability, and risk. The IBC reflects this. It treats companies as distinct legal persons, with debts, defaults, and proceedings that are all individually determined. Section 3(7) defines a 'corporate person' in individual terms—one corporation at a time. Section 5(8), which defines 'financial debt,' presupposes a direct relationship between debtor and creditor, not a complex web of inter-corporate obligations. And from Section 6 onwards, the entire resolution mechanism is built around initiating proceedings against 'a corporate debtor'—not a group, conglomerate, or an economic cluster. Of course, the notion that each company is a sealed legal island has its exceptions. Courts in India and abroad have occasionally 'pierced' the corporate veil—especially when the structure is used to commit fraud or evade the law. As early as 1933, Lord Denning remarked that courts could 'pull aside the corporate veil' to see the true actors behind it (Gilford Motor Co vs Horne). Indian courts have likewise reaffirmed that corporate identity is not a shield for misconduct. But these are the exceptions to the rule, triggered by fact-specific abuse, not tools for convenience or policy innovation. The call for a group insolvency framework stems from real-world frictions, not just theory. Consider the Srei Group, where both the parent and its subsidiary were forced into parallel insolvency proceedings, despite shared cash flows, cross-guarantees, and overlapping liabilities. This created a procedural quagmire: creditors filed claims in both forums, there was confusion over ownership of assets, and value was steadily lost. The Videocon case posed an even starker dilemma. Thirteen companies, all functionally run as one business, were admitted into distinct CIRPs—only to be later resolved collectively by judicial innovation, not legislative design.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store