Kirby McInerney LLP is Investigating Potential Shareholder Claims Against Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC)
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP reminds investors that the firm is investigating potential claims against Sable Offshore Corp. ('Sable' or the 'Company') (NYSE:SOC). The investigation concerns whether Sable and/or certain of its officers have violated the federal securities laws and/or engaged in other unlawful business practices.
[Click here to learn more about the investigation]
On May 19, 2025, Sable announced that it had resumed oil production from one of three offshore platforms related to its Las Flores pipeline (the 'Onshore Pipeline') in California as of May 15, 2025.
On May 21, 2025, Sable announced the pricing of its previously announced underwritten public offering of 8,695,654 shares of its common stock, by the Company at a price to the public of $29.50 per share (the 'Public Offering'). The Company subsequently announced the closing of the Public Offering on May 23, 2025, with gross proceeds of approximately $295 million.
On May 23, 2025, the California State Land Commission sent Sable a letter warning the Company that, 'The [May 19] press release appears to mischaracterize the nature of recent activities, causing significant public confusion and raising questions regarding Sable's intentions.' According to the letter, Sable had conflated offshore well testing activities required by a federal regulatory agency with the restart of operations.
Then, on May 28, 2025, the Santa Barbara County Superior Court approved a preliminary injunction requested by the California Coastal Commission regarding Sable's maintenance and repair work in the coastal zone related to its Onshore Pipeline. On this news, the price of Sable declined by $5.04 per share, or approximately 15%, from $32.93 per share on May 27, 2025, to close at $27.89 on May 28, 2025.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired Sable securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, contact Thomas W. Elrod of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at investigations@kmllp.com, or fill out the contact form below to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters without any cost to you.
[CONTACT FORM]
Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs' law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm's efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars.
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta and energy company announce plans for geothermal plant in New Mexico
Meta and a California-based geothermal energy company announced plans on Thursday to build a geothermal power plant in Northwestern New Mexico, as Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham and other officials touted a report outlining how the state has the resources to produce substantial geothermal power. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, and XGS Energy aim to build a geothermal energy site capable of producing 150 megawatts at a location that has not yet been named. A recent report indicates the Santa Fe region, as well as portions of Sandoval and Tao counties, are particularly well positioned to produce geothermal energy. "We sit on, no kidding, one of the best dry hot rock energy resources not just in Western United States but in the entire world," said Josh Prueher, XGS Energy CEO, during a news conference at the state Capitol, flanked by Lujan Grisham. "The statistics are staggering." Meta in 2019 opened a sprawling data center in Los Lunas where the tech giant stores videos, photos and other media that its billions of users have posted to the social network. It is unclear whether the new geothermal power plant would support its existing footprint in New Mexico and the Southwest or a future expansion. Prueher said XGS is considering public, private and tribal lands to site the planned plant and is engaged with landowners in each of those categories. Asked whether Sandoval, Santa Fe and Taos counties might be potential locations, Prueher said they could be. The 200-page "The Future of Geothermal in New Mexico" report, published by Project InnerSpace in collaboration with New Mexico Tech and the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, notes the potential for 163 gigawatts of geothermal power to be generated in the state. The Future of Geothermal in New Mexico The vast subsurface heat present in the state could help boost the Land of Enchantment's clean energy future, advocates of the project say. "It's a big damn deal," Lujan Grisham said, praising the economic and job creation impact the project could have. Geothermal resources, typically reservoirs of hot water that exist at various temperatures, generate renewable energy from hot water sources deep beneath Earth's surface. Most of the geothermal power plants in the U.S. are in western states and Hawaii, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, where geothermal energy resources are close to the earth's surface. California generates the most electricity from geothermal energy. Lujan Grisham said the project is not receiving state money at this time. The geothermal power plant in Northwestern New Mexico would be the second in the state, with one such power plant already in operation in Hidalgo County. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Washington Bridge won't be ready until late 2028. Here's how much it will cost and why.
A new Interstate 195 westbound Washington Bridge is expected to cost $427 million to build and will not be ready for drivers until late 2028, more than two years later than initially hoped, Gov. Dan McKee announced on June 6. When all costs are considered, the new bridge price tag could be double what McKee's Department of Transportation expected a new bridge to cost when they decided to tear the old one down in March 2024. And the new cost estimate exceeds the more recent projection of $368 million from last year. But amid concern that construction costs alone could surpass the half-billion-dollar mark and blow a hole in next year's state budget, McKee framed the new bridge construction awarded by the state to Walsh Construction as a win. "The good news is that the price is well within what we budget," McKee told reporters at a Rhode Island State House news conference. "By having competition between industry leaders, we kept the cost down and the timeline tight." Chicago-based Walsh Construction Co. was chosen over American Bridge Co. of Pittsburgh in the final round of bidding. Rhode Island Director of Transportation Peter Alviti Jr. said both companies were qualified and made similar technical proposals, but Walsh won with a lower price. Bid documents show American Construction edged Walsh by two points on technical score. Walsh bid $340 million in hard construction costs versus $387 million for American Construction, according to bid documents. The total $427 million for the Walsh bid includes $87 million in soft costs, including a $10 million incentive if Walsh finishes before Nov. 3, 2026. The old westbound bridge was closed suddenly during the evening commute on Monday, Dec. 11, 2023, three days after engineers who had been working to repair the span found damage and structural instability that warned of potential catastrophic collapse. At first, the Department of Transportation attributed the damage to a sudden impact or large truck and hoped the bridge could be repaired in three months. By the winter of 2023, engineers studying what was wrong with the bridge found that the steel support system within the concrete was failing and the structure was rotting out from the inside. Records show professional engineers have warned about the condition of the bridge and urged repairs for a decade. When McKee announced in March 2024 that the bridge repair project would become a demolition and replacement project, he said the DOT expected that the entire process, including demolition, would cost $250 million to $300 million and be finished by August of 2026. But when they went out to bid that summer on the bridge replacement project, no companies were interested, and the state was forced back to the drawing board. In a second procurement based on recommendations from contractors, the DOT abandoned the idea of reusing the old vertical piers that held up the old bridge to support the new one. That change more than doubled the cost of demolition, for which a contract had already been signed, from $40 million to $98 million. The old bridge is mostly gone, with underwater work remaining over the summer, and the entire demolition is expected to be wrapped up by the end of this year. Adding the current estimated demolition price to the new Walsh bid reconstruction project brings the total estimated cost of replacing the failed bridge to $525 million. And that doesn't include the $46 million that was spent dealing with the emergency closure, including everything from structural inspections to traffic mitigation and the brief experiment with East Bay ferry service, which takes the all-in total to $571 million. And even that leaves out the roughly $55 million spent on the repair and widening project that had been underway when the structural problems were found and expenses from an abandoned 2018 attempt at doing that work. The new bridge is now slated to be more than four times more expensive than the Henderson Bridge, which crosses the Seekonk River about a mile to the north but carries fewer vehicles than the Washington Bridge. The Henderson Bridge cost $84 million. The new westbound bridge will look fairly similar to the old one, but without most of the decorative arches along the side that, when the now-defunct bridge was built in the 1960s, were meant to mimic the 1930s span it was built next to (and which remains in part to carry the East Bay Bike Path.) There will still be prefabricated arches across local streets on either end of the bridge. In lieu of arches, the bridge will be illuminated with LED lights running along the underside of the superstructure. The construction project will include new off-ramps to Gano Street in Providence and Waterfront Drive in East Providence, plus a new on-ramp from Taunton Avenue, all of which had been planned in the $78 million repair project that was abandoned in 2023. Also as in that original project, the bridge will be widened from four lanes to five. One new addition to this latest rebuild is a widening of I-195 West − from three lanes to four − from Broadway in East Providence to the start of the bridge. To save money, the new bridge will be 450 feet shorter than the old one, the DOT said. The new bridge will be paid for with a mix of state funds, including cash and borrowing, plus federal highway aid and grants. McKee said the state has a potential $713 million to spent on the bridge, although not all of that spending in future years has been approved by state lawmakers and may not all be needed. The funding sources include: $334 million in borrowing against future federal highway aid $220 million in federal grants $107 million in state Capital Plan Fund cash $15 million from a repurposed federal grant $35 million in unused federal pandemic aid House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi said the House Finance Committee will review the bridge contract's impact on the state budget slated to be unveiled soon and the House will "continue its work ensuring the Administration is accountable." Shortly after the old bridge was closed, westbound traffic was rerouted onto the remaining, and newer, eastbound span. But there have been lingering questions about whether doubling the traffic volume on the eastbound bridge will cause it to deteriorate. Alviti told reporters he is not concerned about that. "There is no change to the original assessment," Alviti said about the existing span. "The structural engineering company that did the original load assessment reaffirmed that the bridge is safe, it is good to be used with six lanes of traffic that we currently have on it, and we have put in place an inspection and maintenance process that will assure that that continues to be the case three years until 2028 when we reopen the westbound." After deciding that the old westbound bridge needed to be torn down, McKee sued 13 companies that had worked for the state inspecting, analyzing, designing or repairing it. He said the lawsuit would provide a "day of reckoning" for those who were responsible for the bridge's demise, which does not include any state officials. No DOT employees have been fired or disciplined over it. The case is currently in discovery. In January 2024 the Department of Justice began investigating whether any false claims for federal funds had been made on the bridge, but no information has been provided about the status of that probe. This story has been updated to correct an inaccuracy. This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: New I-195 Washington Bridge will be ready in late 2028, will cost millions more
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cyberattack cripples Whole Foods distributor, leaving shelves bare
June 12 (UPI) -- A cyberattack has crippled distribution channels for one of the nation's top organic food distributors, leading to empty shelves at grocery stores nationwide. Rhode-Island-based United Natural Foods Inc., a major supplier to Whole Foods, became aware of the attack on June 5th, a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission said. UNFI said the breach affected its ability to fulfill customer orders. "It's affecting operations in a very, very significant way," an employee at a Sacramento Whole Foods told NBC News. "Shelves don't even have products in some places. The shipments we receive are not what we need, or we did need it but it's too much of one product because UNFI can't communicate with stores to get proper orders." A spokesperson for Whole Foods apologized and said the company is working to restock the shelves as quickly as it can. In a statement, UNFI acknowledged the ransomware attack. "We have identified unauthorized activity in our systems and have proactively taken some systems offline while we investigate," UNFI said in the statement. "As soon as we discovered the activity, an investigation was initiated with the help of leading forensics experts and we have notified law enforcement. We are assessing the unauthorized activity and working to restore our systems to safely barring them back online." UNFI said it is working closely to keep its customers updated amid the confusion and distribution disruptions. At a quarterly earnings meeting Tuesday, UNFI CEO Sandy Douglas told investors that it is supplying customers on a "limited basis." "We are partnering with customers across the country and across our formats in various short term modes to serve their needs as best we possibly can," he said. "Any way that we can help them with their needs, we're doing." Douglas said the company is working with the FBI and other authorities to track the source of the breach and why UNFI's security systems failed. The UNFI security breach comes amid a series of cyberattacks on retailers in recent weeks that have crippled the operations of several high profile retailers with ransomware.
