Why Cloud Misconfigurations Remain A Top Cause Of Data Breaches

Forbes

08-04-2025

Anshu Bansal is the founder/CEO of CloudDefense.AI—a CNAPP that secures both applications and cloud infrastructure.
It's 2025, and the industry has built some of the most advanced cloud environments ever seen—automated deployments, real-time threat detection and infrastructure that scales with just a few lines of code. Yet, data breaches aren't slowing down—why?
Because a single misconfiguration—often as simple as an overly permissive IAM role or an exposed storage bucket—can wreck everything.
In fact, cloud misconfigurations are often termed as a "technical oversight." But they're a systemic failure—a gap between how we build, secure and perceive risk in the cloud.
Having spent over a decade in tech, I've seen organizations pour millions into cutting-edge tools, only to be blindsided by breaches caused by overlooked settings. Misconfigurations remain the number one cause of cloud breaches, not because we lack the technology to fix them, but because we keep treating the symptoms, not the root causes.
Here, I'll break down why the industry keeps stumbling on this issue and, more importantly, how we can finally get ahead of it.
Misconfigurations often get dismissed as "careless mistakes." For instance, a forgotten storage bucket left open to the public or an IAM role with broader permissions than necessary.
Easy fixes, right? Not quite.
In modern cloud environments, what looks like a single misstep is usually the byproduct of complex, fast-moving workflows. For example, take a developer spinning up a new microservice, working in a CI/CD pipeline and deploying infrastructure as code (IaC). The security team might not even see the new environment until it's live. If the template they used includes overly permissive IAM policies, that misconfiguration automatically spreads to every future deployment.
And, here's what most people miss: misconfigurations don't happen in isolation. They're often tied to contextual blind spots. A storage bucket open to the public isn't always dangerous—unless it contains sensitive production data or exposes internal infrastructure paths. But cloud security tools typically flag everything equally, drowning teams in alerts while critical issues get buried.
Key complexities that often go unnoticed:
• Cloud Drift: Configurations change rapidly across environments, creating gaps.
• Automation Blindspots: IaC can automate vulnerabilities if underlying templates contain misconfigurations.
• Lack Of Context: Tools flag issues without understanding their real-world impact.
The real challenge isn't fixing misconfigurations; it's understanding them in context. And that's where traditional security approaches fall short.
If misconfigurations are the root cause of most breaches, why haven't traditional security solutions solved the problem? Because they focus on detection, not prevention.
For instance, again let's consider that a developer spins up a new cloud instance for a project under a tight deadline and fast-paced sprint. They use an IaC template that worked last time without any issues. The project goes live. Weeks later, security flags an open port exposing sensitive APIs. Sound familiar? If yes, this is where the traditional approach falls short:
Ask most people why misconfigurations happen, and they'll say "human error." That's only half the story. The real causes run deeper—tied to the way modern cloud environments operate.
Here's what's really fueling these vulnerabilities:
• Speed Over Security: Cloud thrives on agility. Developers push code fast, often under tight deadlines. Security checks? They're seen as bottlenecks. When speed wins, security loses.
• Configuration Drift: Even secure deployments don't stay that way. Someone adjusts a security group for testing and forgets to revert it. This "drift" creates gaps traditional tools often miss.
• Lack Of Context: Security tools flag issues but don't prioritize risk. Is an open port on a dev instance as critical as one on production? Most tools treat both the same, drowning teams in noise.
• Siloed Workflows: Developers deploy. Security scans later. Issues get flagged post-deployment, often days or weeks later. By then, the damage might already be done.
• Default Configurations: Cloud providers offer quick-start setups, but these defaults prioritize functionality, not security. Unless teams manually tighten settings, they're exposed from day one.
Eliminating cloud misconfigurations is not just about patching individual issues. It's about fixing the system that allows them to exist in the first place. From my experience, the most effective approach involves shifting left and integrating security into every stage of the cloud lifecycle.
Here's what works.
• Shifting Left With Developer-Led Security: The easiest problems to fix are the ones that never make it to production. Developers should have tools that flag risky settings while writing code, not after deployment. If your pipeline isn't scanning IaC templates, you're flying blind.
• Enforcing Least Privilege By Default: Excessive permissions are a common culprit. Adopt the principle of least privilege for IAM roles, service accounts and APIs. Ensure every identity—human or machine—has only the permissions they absolutely need.
• Implementing Continuous Misconfiguration Monitoring: Cloud environments change constantly. One small update can undo weeks of careful security work. Continuous monitoring tools help catch these shifts—before they turn into real threats.
• Automating Policy Enforcement: Humans miss things. Automation usually doesn't. Use policy-as-code frameworks like AWS Config, Azure Policy or Open Policy Agent to enforce security standards. If a misconfigured resource doesn't meet policy, it shouldn't deploy—simple as that.
• Using Advanced Cloud Security Tools: This is where cloud security posture management (CSPM) shines, especially in multi-cloud environments. These platforms don't just say, 'Hey, something's wrong!' They prioritize risks, show potential impact and even guide remediation.
• Closing The Visibility Gap: A misconfigured bucket hosting non-sensitive logs doesn't deserve the same urgency as one holding customer data. Tools that combine configuration alerts with risk context help prioritize fixes effectively.
After working in this space for years, I can say with confidence that tools alone won't save us. It takes a mindset shift. When everyone—from developers to leadership—understands the risks and owns their part, the whole system gets stronger.
The cloud isn't going anywhere, and neither are misconfigurations. But if we build smarter habits, use the right tools and stop trusting defaults, we can keep them from becoming headlines.
The bottom line? Cloud security isn't someone else's job. It's everyone's.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?