Daily Briefing: India strikes back
In the most expansive and widespread retaliation by India in recent years, the Indian armed forces attacked nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in the intervening night of Tuesday and Wednesday. Here's what you should know:
Codenamed 'Operation Sindoor', ostensibly a reference to only men being singled out based on their faith before being killed in Pahalgam, the retaliation comes two weeks after the April 21 terror attack. The high-precision missile strikes targeted locations in Bahawalpur and Muridke in Pakistan's Punjab and Muzaffarabad and Kotli in PoK. These cities are home to terror camps belonging to Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba. The strikes saw unanimous support from leaders across party lines, who hailed the armed forces.
Pakistan, meanwhile, resorted to a sharp escalation in ceasefire violations along the Line of Control, hours after the Indian strikes. Cross-border shelling in the Rajouri and Poonch districts and the Uri and Tangdhar sectors in the Kashmir Valley forced residents of frontier villages to flee or hide in underground bunkers. At least three civilians have been killed and five others injured in the firing, per Army sources.
Flight operations have been hit across Indian airports, particularly those close to the India-Pakistan border or in the vicinity of key Indian Air Force bases. Airports in Srinagar, Amritsar, Jammu, Leh, and Dharamshala have suspended civilian flights. At least 20 flights were cancelled at the Delhi airport this morning. A real-time flight tracker, Flightradar24, showed no airplanes flying north of Delhi or over western India and Pakistan.
Meanwhile, India will conduct nationwide mock drills today to assess and enhance civil defence mechanisms in the event of a hostile event. The drills will be carried out in 244 categorised Civil Defence Districts. Does your home fall in the district, and how will the drills impact your life? Read all about it here.
On that note, here's what else is brewing today.
India, UK sign trade pact
India and the United Kingdom have sealed the long-awaited free trade agreement (FTA) to enhance bilateral trade, create jobs and boost investments in both countries. Once the deal comes into effect, UK tariffs on several commodities, including footwear, textiles, automobile components, and electrical machinery, will be eliminated. India, on its part, will significantly cut tariffs on whiskey and gin and slash automobile duties from 100 per cent to 10 per cent.
The recent volley of tariffs unleashed by United States President Donald Trump and the ensuing global uncertainty have pushed countries to negotiate trade deals with partners. India also wants to sign pacts with the US and the European Union. Don't miss my colleague Shubhajit Roy's explainer on the agreement's geo-economic significance.
Must Read
Reshaping the Republic: In an ongoing Express series tracking landmark cases, today's spotlight is on Sajjan Singh, a landowner in Rajasthan. Singh's 1964 case against the state's land ceiling laws raised a pertinent question, which remains contentious even today: What is the extent of Parliament's power to amend the Constitution? Read on.
Rules: Satellite communication firms like Elon Musk's Starlink, Amazon's Kuiper and Eutelsat OneWeb are looking to roll out their services in Indian markets. However, the government has some conditions: manufacture in India, store data locally, cooperate with law enforcement, and more.
And Finally…
Two players locked in a silent battle over a chessboard might not make great TV. Add in the unpredictable length—a tense three-hour duel that could still end in a draw—and it's easy to see why chess has struggled to break into mainstream broadcasting. But with India's chess scene exploding and a new wave of young prodigies taking on the world's best, the question is shifting: Can chess evolve into a broadcast-friendly spectacle, or is it destined to remain in online streaming? My colleague Amit Kamath may have some answers.
I leave you with the latest episode of the '3 Things' podcast. Today's lineup: an update from the LoC, the significance of Mission Sankalp and another NEET scandal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pakistan's 'what if China stops Brahmaputra flow' threat gets curt Himanta Biswa Sarma response
Reacting to a Pakistani official's threat that China can also halt the flow of the River Brahmaputra into India, Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Monday described the remark as Islamabad's new "scare tactic" and said the water body grows after entering the country. He said China contributes only 30-35 percent of the river's total flow. Sarma's response came after a senior aide to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Rana Ihsaan Afzal, reportedly said that, on the lines of India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, China can take similar measures by stalling the flow of the river, reported ANI. Himanta Biswa Sarma said Pakistan is "spinning another manufactured threat". "What if China stops the Brahmaputra Water to India? A Response to Pakistan's New Scare Narrative. After India decisively moved away from the outdated Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan is now spinning another manufactured threat: What if China stops the Brahmaputra's water to India? Let's dismantle this myth -- not with fear, but with facts and national clarity: Brahmaputra: A River That Grows in India -- Not Shrinks," he wrote on X. Himanta Biswa Sarma said the Brahmaputra swells after entering India because of torrential monsoon rainfall in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Nagaland and Meghalaya. 'China contributes only 30-35% of the Brahmaputra's total flow, mostly through glacial melt and limited Tibetan rainfall. The remaining 65-70% is generated within India, thanks to: Torrential monsoon rainfall in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Nagaland, and Meghalaya; major tributaries like Subansiri, Lohit, Kameng, Manas, Dhansiri, Jia-Bharali, Kopili; and additional inflows from the Khasi, Garo, and Jaintia Hills via rivers such as Krishnai, Digaru, and Kulsi,' he said. "At the Indo-China border (Tuting): Flow is ~2,000-3,000 m3/s. In Assam plains (e.g., Guwahati): Flow swells to 15,000-20,000 m3/s during monsoon," he added. He said the river is not dependent on upstream flow because it is a rain-fed Indian river system, which strengthens after entering Indian territory. "Even if China were to reduce water flow (unlikely as China has never threatened or indicated in any official forum), it may help India mitigate the annual floods in Assam, which displace lakhs and destroy livelihoods every year. Meanwhile, Pakistan, which has exploited 74 years of preferential water access under the Indus Waters Treaty, now panics as India rightfully reclaims its sovereign rights. Let's remind them: Brahmaputra is not controlled by a single source -- it is powered by our geography, our monsoon, and our civilizational resilience," he said. India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty -- which governs the flow of water from India to Pakistan -- in April in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in Gujarat last week that the stoppage of water flow had made Pakistan sweat. Pakistan, meanwhile, has said that "water is the country's red line", which mustn't be crossed. 'Pakistan will never accept Indian hegemony. Water is Pakistan's red line, and we will not allow any compromise on this basic right of 240 million Pakistanis,' Pakistan army chief Asim Munir said last week.
Scroll.in
11 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
US rejects India's challenge to aluminium, steel tariffs at WTO
The United States has rejected India's notice to the World Trade Organization proposing retaliatory tariffs after Washington increased the import duties on aluminium and steel to 25%, The Indian Express reported on Tuesday. The US argued that it had imposed the tariffs on the grounds of national security and claimed there were procedural errors in India's case. In a note sent to the World Trade Organization on May 23, the US stated that India had wrongly treated the tariffs on aluminium and steel as safeguard measures, the newspaper reported. Washington said that it had imposed the levies under section 232 of the US law, which allows such measures if imports are considered a threat to national security. In response to the challenge made by India, the US told the World Trade Organization that it 'will not discuss the section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure', reported The Indian Express. The US also claimed that India had committed procedural errors by not acknowledging Washington's offer to discuss the tariffs in a communication dated April 16. 'Accordingly, India has not complied with the obligations under the Agreement on Safeguards, the agreement that it mistakenly contends applies to the tariffs in question,' the newspaper quoted the US as having said. On May 9, India notified the World Trade Organization that it may impose retaliatory tariffs on the US after Washington increased the import duties on aluminium and steel to 25%. The Donald Trump administration had first imposed higher tariffs on aluminium and steel imports in 2018. This was modified in February to impose duties of 25% on imports of the two metals. The measures took effect in March. Washington also removed country-specific and product-specific exemptions that several countries had managed to negotiate. On Friday, US President Donald Trump announced that his administration will double the tariffs on steel to 50%. While Washington has claimed that the increased tariffs had been taken in the interest of national security and were not safeguard measures, New Delhi argued that the actions were safeguard measures. 'The measures have not been notified by the United States to the WTO, but are, in essence, safeguard measures,' The Hindu had quoted India as having communicated to the international organisation in May. 'India maintains that the measures taken by the United States are not consistent with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards.' India argued that it had the right to impose retaliatory tariffs as the US had not held consultations, as are mandatory under the Agreement on Safeguards. India's levies were to take effect a month from the date it notified the World Trade Organization. New Delhi said that the measures it was proposing would be in the form of suspending concessions on select products from the US. This effectively meant an increase in tariffs on the products. The Indian reciprocal tariffs could be imposed on imports worth $7.6 billion from the United States, which would lead to a duty collection of $1.9 billion, The Hindu had quoted the communication as saying.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will we get to see a Tharoor vs Bhutto? India and Pakistan delegations to be in US same day
NEW DELHI: The all-party delegation, led by , is scheduled to be in Washington, DC, on Wednesday—coinciding, perhaps not so coincidentally, with the visit of a Pakistani delegation headed by Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While the Congress MP-led delegation is confident about getting India's message across, a Tharoor vs Bhutto might be on the cards. Talking about this Tharoor said that the presence of both the delegations would lead to an "increase in interest" as the States, whose president has repeatedly claimed credit for India-Pakistan truce, would get to hear two diametrically opposite views on the same day. "In Washington, we'll have the interesting phenomenon of the Pakistani delegation in America, and almost exactly the same days... Tomorrow almost they will be in Washington, while we are in Washington on the same date. So there's going to be perhaps an increase in interest because there are two duelling delegations in the same city," Tharoor told ANI on Tuesday. He further assured that even though India's side might not be a central agenda for the American media, the delegation would get the "message across very, very easily." "It's a challenging environment. America is a very crowded media space, the world's news generator. Therefore, our story may not be at the top of their minds. But if we can get the attention of those who care about South Asia, those who care about India, those who care about terrorism, we can get our message across very, very easily," he said. Tharoor noted that Pakistan's decision to send its own delegation is no coincidence, but unlike India's broader outreach, they are focusing only on countries they consider strategically important. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "It's no accident that the Pakistanis have also sent a delegation abroad, but they're not going to as many countries as the Indian delegations are. They're focusing on what they consider a few key capitals, namely, Washington, Brussels. London. That seems to be the thrust of the Pakistani effort. We have gone to all those capitals and more," he said. Pakistan People's Party (PPP) chairman on May 17, revealed that Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had entrusted him with leading a delegation to advocate the country's position amid recent escalations with India. The delegations by both the nations are meant to present their respective sides after they launched military operations against each other post Pahalgam terror attack.
