Doubt is cast over assisted dying Bill as poll suggests most MPs would vote against it
Doubt has been cast over the legislation for assisted dying as a poll suggested most MPs would vote against it.
Since the Bill allowing state support for terminally ill people to end their own lives passed its first hurdle in the Commons last year, concerns have been raised as proposed safeguards were rejected by its architect, Labour backbencher Kim Leadbeater.
Many MPs backed it initially only because of the requirement that a High Court judge would have to sign off applications – but this was scrapped in favour of an expert panel.
Now a survey of MPs has for the first time suggested that the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will be voted down when it returns to the Commons this month.
The poll of 104 MPs by Whitestone Insight, commissioned by anti-assisted suicide campaign group Care Not Killing, found that 42 planned to vote against it and five said they would abstain.
A protester outside the Houses of Parliament in London calling for reform as peers debate the new assisted dying legislation
Only 36 intended to back the Bill, while 13 were undecided and another eight declined to answer.
And only 30 agreed that replacing High Court oversight with a panel gave them more confidence in the Bill, while 41 disagreed.
Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said: 'This bombshell poll confirms that the more MPs hear about assisted suicide and what it entails, the less likely they are to support changing the law.'
He added MPs clearly recognised removing the High Court from the process 'makes the Bill much less safe' and that it 'would put the lives of vulnerable people at risk' if it passed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
13 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'My daughter's murder was preventable - ridiculous loophole needs closing'
Libby Squire's mum, Lisa Squire, she was horrified to learn men who commit indecent exposure often avoid being put on the sex offenders register because of a legal loophole The mum of a 21-year-old student murdered by a prolific sex offender says lives will be saved when a "ridiculous" legal loophole is finally closed. Lisa Squire, whose daughter Libby was killed in 2019, said she was horrified to learn men who commit indecent exposure often avoid being put on the sex offenders register - meaning they dodge monitoring by police. Ministers voiced their outrage at the outdated legislation amid growing evidence those responsible for such acts can go on to commit violent offences including rape and murder. Libby's killer Pawel Relowicz had a history of indecent exposure, as did evil cop Wayne Couzins, who murdered Sarah Everard in 2021. This week a landmark Bill making sure offenders do not slip through the net will return to the Commons. Lisa, who branded the change 'Libby's Law part one', said: 'It's a perfect legacy for Libby. Her death was so preventable, it shouldn't have happened, but she's making a difference. If we can learn from her death that's perfect, it makes it a bit less senseless." Under current law, prosecutors need to prove someone aimed to cause "alarm or distress" to get a conviction for exposure. As a result, offenders may instead be charged with outraging public decency - which requires at least two potential witnesses and does not result in being added to the register. Lisa said: "I never even imagined that they wouldn't be. When I found out they weren't I thought it was ridiculous. These are people that we should be watching." Announcing the Government will change the law, Justice Minister Alex Davies-Jones said: 'Exposure is a degrading and cowardly crime, which can often escalate into serious offending. We're strengthening the law to bolster protection for victims, meaning offenders with a broader range of motivations, such as the intention to cause humiliation or for the purpose of sexual gratification, can be prosecuted - and added to the sex offender register where necessary. 'I am grateful to Libby's family, and other victims and survivors, who have bravely campaigned for change in this area.' Lisa has called for jail terms for those convicted of non-contact sex offences like exposure and voyeurism. She has also demanded compulsory treatment programmes to stop their behaviour escalating. She believes her daughter's death could have been prevented if tougher action was taken against her killer at an earlier stage. Since the horrific tragedy in Hull, Lisa has campaigned for victims to report all non-contact sex offences to police. Doing so will prevent more cases like Libby's, she said. Figures uncovered by The Mirror reveal the number of indecent exposure cases reported to police has soared since 2019. Data from 37 of the 43 police forces in England and Wales show a 15% rise in five years, while arrests have gone up by around 35%. "It's certainly better than it was, the previous figures were appalling," said Lisa, who is now training as a counsellor to help survivors of sex offences. I'm really pleased that people are reporting it and they're being taken seriously." Soon after Relowicz was arrested, Lisa was told he had a history of committing sexual offences. He went on to plead guilty to nine sexual offences unrelated to Libby's murder, including voyeurism and outraging public decency. "If more people had come forward and reported their experiences, and if police had been able to join the dots there might have been a different situation," Lisa said. Last year Dame Diana Johnson, now Labour's Policing Minister, told MPs that in five years almost 250 men found guilty of indecent exposure were subsequently found guilty of rape. She told the Commons: "Indecent exposure and non-contact sexual offences are gateway crimes that are still not taken seriously enough." Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that there were 8,878 indecent exposure cases reported to police in 2024, resulting in 1,894 arrests. In 2019 there were 7,696 from the same forces, with 1,405 arrests. Andrea Simon, Director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW) said the rise in reports could indicate "growing awareness" after being "historically under-reported and trivialised". She said: "Indecent exposure is deeply harmful in its own right, but can also be part of a pattern of offending that can include rape and murder. It must be taken seriously by the justice system." The Home Office has commissioned research into the link between non-contact sex offences and violent crimes. This was a key recommendation of the Angiolini Inquiry, which focused on Ms Everard's murder. In the first part of her report published last year, Dame Elish Angiolini found investigations into indecent exposure were "poor" and treated as "low-level". She called for improvements in the way police pursue reports, as well as study into the link between non-contact offences and violent attacks. A National Police Chiefs' Council spokesman said: 'Sexual exposure is an incredibly serious crime which can be invasive and distressing for victims. We have been working hard to improve our response to sexual exposure and other non-contact sexual offences." He said victims must know that cases are taken "extremely seriously", with enhanced training rolled out to officers. A Home Office spokeswoman said: "This government is committed to halving violence against women and girls in the next decade. We recognise the devastating impact non-contact sexual offences can have on victims and that there is further to go to ensure people have the confidence to report these offences. "That's why we are fundamentally reviewing the police's response to offences such as exposure and have committed to strengthening their training on violence against women and girls. We have also supported the development of a new training programme on non-contact sexual offences to ensure victims trust they will be taken seriously when they report these offences."
Telegraph
16 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour MP accuses families hit by private school tax raid of ‘crying to the courts'
A Labour MP has accused families hit by the private school tax raid of 'crying to the courts'. Jonathan Hinder, the MP for Pendle and Clitheroe, criticised families who were hit by Labour's 20 per cent VAT levy on private school fees after they lost their challenge at the High Court on Friday. He said taking the case to the High Court was 'crazy', before adding in the post to X: 'A tax commitment included in an election-winning manifesto, duly delivered. That's democracy. Campaign to reverse it if you like. Fine. 'But this habit of going crying to the courts all the time is silly. Obviously the right decision, but crazy that it got to the High Court.' Three separate challenges were heard together in a judicial review between April 1 and 3, using more than a dozen families as case studies. In a single written judgment issued on Friday, the three judges presiding over the case said they 'dismiss the claims'. Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain said the VAT policy was 'proportionate' in its aim to raise extra revenue for state schools. A spokesman for the lobby group Education not Taxation told The Telegraph that 'crying to the courts' was 'entirely justified'. He said: 'The court's ruling that the taxation of independent schooling is discriminatory and will have a disproportionate, prejudicial effect on children with special educational needs (SEN) clearly demonstrates that any 'crying to the courts' was entirely justified. 'Without the action taken by the claimants, the government's prejudicial behaviour would have gone unchecked, obscured by the false narratives and political spin used to justify this attack on educational choice. 'While it is disappointing that the court ruled the action is not illegal, it nevertheless makes a powerful statement: the policy is discriminatory.' Julie Robinson, the chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said that schools were 'right' to have escalated the challenge to the High Court. The ISC was part of the legal challenge and represents more than 1,400 private schools. 'This is an unprecedented tax on education and it is right that its compatibility with human rights law was tested,' she said. 'Thousands of families have already been negatively affected by the policy, with more than 11,000 children leaving independent education since last year – far more than had been anticipated by the government. 'As the court noted, there was interference with human rights and this policy is likely to have an outsized impact on families of faith and children with SEND but without an EHCP.' In the wake of the VAT hike, private schools across the country have been forced to close. Queen Margaret's School for Girls in York said it had been forced to make the 'deeply distressing' decision to close following Labour's VAT raid. The £43,000-a-year boarding school said it was 'unable to withstand mounting financial pressures' after the introduction of the tax in January led to student enquiries 'declining sharply'. According to the school's website, the enrolment numbers for the coming academic year were below the level needed to keep the school open. The 'heart-wrenching' decision was taken after failing to secure fresh investment. The school also blamed 'increased national insurance and pension contributions, the removal of charitable-status business rates relief, and rising costs for the upkeep and operation of our estate'. Queen Margaret's alumni include the socialite Manners sisters – Lady Violet, Lady Alice, and Lady Eliza – daughters of the 11th Duke and Duchess of Rutland. The independent boarding and day school for girls aged 11 to 18 was due to celebrate its 125th anniversary next year. It will close at the end of their summer term on July 5. Alicia Kearns, the shadow minister for home affairs, described the tweets as 'class warfare'. She said: 'Parents in my communities have been put through enormous stress and their children's education disrupted. 'They do not deserve the ridicule of Labour MPs indulging in class warfare and crowing about manifesto promises whilst glaringly silent on the extra money promised for state schools. 'No sign of keeping that promise, quite the opposite as state schools struggle and Labour Ministers this week admit their funding is insufficient to cover staff pay rises next year, and the NEU calling it a 'crisis in funding'. 'I wouldn't be quite so glib if my ideological experiment had left our state schools worse off.'
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
'A lot of people' to get DWP benefit cuts with 13-week rule coming
Dr Simon Opher, a GP and Labour MP for Stroud, said the protections were 'not very much really' A Labour MP has bluntly downplayed the Government's tactics to calm a revolt over welfare reductions, branding them as "not very much really". Dr Simon Opher, a GP and the MP for Stroud, told the BBC he's set to defy the party line in an impending vote, revealing that "a number of colleagues are in the same situation". Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is expected to enforce "non-negotiable" safeguards into the Welfare Reform Bill, such as assuring those removed from personal independence payments (Pip) will continue receiving support for an extended period of 13 weeks. On BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday, Dr Opher highlighted the reality behind the changes: "It's a slight delay in the disability cuts – it's 13 weeks rather than four weeks – so it's something, but not very much really. "And it doesn't change the basic fact that they're... planning to cut disability payment to quite a lot of people really. So not terribly impressed, but it's something at least." The Government has encountered criticism from members of its own party regarding the proposed reforms intended to diminish the figure of working age people receiving sickness benefits. Only last month, a group of Labour MPs beseeched the Prime Minister to halt and re-evaluate the impending reductions, labelling the plans as "impossible to support". Asked about his stance on the upcoming vote in the Commons, Dr Opher told the programme: "I am going to rebel. And this comes hard to me, I've never actually voted against the Government and I know a number of colleagues in the same situation. So I just urge the Government really to just consider parts of this again." A Green Paper had initially introduced suggestions for a "transitional protection for those who are no longer eligible for Pip", yet the recent disclosures from the Government have now confirmed the duration as 13 weeks. Ms Kendall had previously told The Guardian: "When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. "I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. "That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. "These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable." The Government's own impact assessment released with the reform cautions that due to the alterations, approximately 250,000 individuals, which includes around 50,000 children throughout England, Scotland, and Wales might end up experiencing relative poverty post housing costs.
