IndusInd Bank share price in focus after Sebi bars former CEO, four others from securities market for insider trading
IndusInd Bank share price will be in focus on Thursday after capital markets regulator Sebi barred the company's former CEO Sumant Kathpalia, and four other senior officials from accessing the securities markets in connection with an alleged insider trading in the bank's shares.
The Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has also impounded ₹ 19.78 crore collectively from the five individuals.
The other officials of IndusInd Bank restrained by the regulator for alleged insider trading are former executive director and deputy CEO Arun Khurana, treasury operations head Sushant Sourav, global markets group (GMG) operations head Rohan Jathanna, and Anil Marco Rao, chief administrative officer of consumer banking operations.
'There is no impact on the financial, operation or other activities of IndusInd Bank arising out of the Interim Order,' IndusInd Bank said in a regulatory filing on Wednesday.
According to the interim order passed by Sebi, it was found that these senior executives allegedly traded in IndusInd Bank shares while in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI) related to discrepancies in account balances of the bank's derivative portfolio. By doing so, they violated insider trading regulations.
The case originated from a Master Direction issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which had a significant operational and financial impact on IndusInd Bank.
Sebi noted that the internal team of the bank was aware of the financial implications due to discrepancies in the derivative portfolio and had already begun calculating the impact internally.
The bank informed its executives that the estimated financial impact stood at ₹ 1,749.98 crore.
In its order, Sebi noted that noticee nos. 1 to 5 (five officials) traded in the scrip of IBL while being insider and accordingly barred them 'from buying, selling or dealing in securities, either directly or indirectly, in any manner whatsoever, until further orders.'
On April 29, CEO Kathpalia and Deputy CEO Khurana resigned from the bank. Following their exit, the IndusInd Bank Board appointed a Committee of Executives to oversee daily operations until a new MD & CEO takes charge or for a period of three months, whichever is earlier.
The fraud-hit private sector lender earlier this month reported a ₹ 2,329 crore loss for the March quarter, its worst performance ever, as the interim management opted to go for a deep-clean exercise beyond recognising the impact of wrong accounting practices.
In the March quarter, the bank took impact of all the irregularities brought to the notice, including a ₹ 1,960 crore hit from incorrect recognition of derivative trades, cumulative interest income reversal of ₹ 674 crore due to incorrect accounting, disclosed a ₹ 172 crore fraud where employees had led it to incorrectly classify the amount as fee income under the microfinance business, set off ₹ 595 crore of incorrect manual entries posted as "Other Assets" and "Other Liabilities" in the past, and also recognized the higher slippages.
The internal audit report of the bank revealed 'involvement of senior Bank officials, including former Key Management Personnel (KMP), in overriding key internal controls'. The bank reported the likely involvement of senior management in the accounting fraud to the Central Government.
IndusInd Bank share price has fallen 19% in three months and 17% YTD. Over the past one year, IndusInd Bank shares have declined 45%, while the stock is down 13% in three years.
On Wednesday, IndusInd Bank share price ended 1.99% lower at ₹ 804.75 apiece on the BSE.
Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Sebi issues correction in IndusInd Bank insider trading case
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel Capital markets regulator Sebi has issued a corrigendum to its recent interim order in the IndusInd Bank insider trading case. The market regulator clarified that a key document in its investigation was incorrectly referred to as a 'board note' in the original order but should have been described as an 'engagement note.'In its June 6, 2025, corrigendum, Sebi explained that the term 'board note' will now be read as 'engagement note (signed by the CFO and two senior executives)' in the interim order issued in late regulator had initially stated that KPMG's appointment to review the derivative issues was based on a board note. The corrigendum clarifies that it was actually based on an engagement note — a document typically signed by top company officials but not necessarily a formal board-level insider trading case revolves around allegations that these executives sold shares of IndusInd Bank while in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI) regarding significant derivative losses at the to Sebi's order, IndusInd Bank's internal review had identified a negative financial impact of Rs 1,572 crore — approximately 2.35% of its net worth. However, this information was not disclosed to the public until March 10, investigation revealed that Kathpalia and Khurana sold shares — 1.25 lakh and 3.48 lakh, respectively — before the public announcement. By doing so, they avoided losses estimated at nearly Rs 20 has frozen their bank and demat accounts to the extent of the gains and barred them from trading in securities until further notice.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Sebi issues correction in IndusInd Bank insider trading case
Sebi has issued a corrigendum in the IndusInd Bank insider trading case, clarifying that a key document referred to as a 'board note' in its interim order should have been called an 'engagement note.' The case involves allegations of UPSI-based share sales by top executives before disclosing Rs 1,572 crore in derivative losses, helping them avoid nearly Rs 20 crore in losses. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Capital markets regulator Sebi has issued a corrigendum to its recent interim order in the IndusInd Bank insider trading case. The market regulator clarified that a key document in its investigation was incorrectly referred to as a 'board note' in the original order but should have been described as an 'engagement note.'In its June 6, 2025, corrigendum, Sebi explained that the term 'board note' will now be read as 'engagement note (signed by the CFO and two senior executives)' in the interim order issued in late regulator had initially stated that KPMG's appointment to review the derivative issues was based on a board note. The corrigendum clarifies that it was actually based on an engagement note — a document typically signed by top company officials but not necessarily a formal board-level insider trading case revolves around allegations that these executives sold shares of IndusInd Bank while in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI) regarding significant derivative losses at the to Sebi's order, IndusInd Bank's internal review had identified a negative financial impact of Rs 1,572 crore — approximately 2.35% of its net worth. However, this information was not disclosed to the public until March 10, investigation revealed that Kathpalia and Khurana sold shares — 1.25 lakh and 3.48 lakh, respectively — before the public announcement. By doing so, they avoided losses estimated at nearly Rs 20 has frozen their bank and demat accounts to the extent of the gains and barred them from trading in securities until further notice.
The Hindu
19 hours ago
- The Hindu
RBI's gold loan direction brings clarity, standardisation, greater consumer protection, says Manappuram Finance MD
'The 'Lending Against Gold and Silver Collateral Directions, 2025' notified by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday has brought clarity, standardisation, and greater consumer protection to the gold and silver loan segment, said V. P. Nandakumar, Managing Director and CEO of Manappuram Finance Ltd. 'The guidelines on valuation, assaying, and loan-to-value (LTV) ratios are timely and progressive. In particular, the provision allowing a maximum LTV ratio of 85% for loans amount up to ₹2.5 lakh. It will significantly benefit small-ticket borrowers,' he said. Stating that the new directions have consolidated and replaced earlier circulars, he said these have create a uniform code applicable to all regulated entities, including NBFCs, banks, and cooperative institutions. 'These guidelines aim to promote transparency, ethical practices, and prudential discipline while enhancing financial access for individuals and micro-enterprises,' he said. Highlighting that the continued eligibility of gold jewellery, ornaments, and coins as collateral reflected the RBI's recognition of the critical role of gold loans in meeting short-term liquidity needs, he said the standardised assaying process—mandating borrower presence and use of reference prices from the Indian Bullion and Jewellers Association (IBJA) or SEBI-regulated exchanges—would foster uniformity across the industry. 'Manappuram Finance has long adhered to rigorous valuation norms, and we view this framework as an endorsement of our transparent and ethical lending model,' he emphasised. On the revised LTV guidelines, Mr Nandakumar said, 'The RBI has prudently capped LTVs at 85% for loans up to ₹2.5 lakh, 80% for loans between ₹2.5 and ₹5 lakh, and 75% for loans above ₹5 lakh. These thresholds strike a balance between borrower access and systemic stability. We are fully aligned with these stipulations and will implement them rigorously.' Regarding bullet repayment loans, he acknowledged the RBI's cap of 12 months for such loans, with renewals allowed only upon creditworthiness and interest repayment. On the customer conduct and protection norms, he said, 'The emphasis on clear documentation, borrower communication, and transparent auction procedures aligns with our customer-first approach. We already involve borrowers in the assaying process and provide detailed disclosures in loan agreements, and these practices will continue.' On collateral management, he said, 'We place the utmost importance on secure storage, stringent internal audits, and surprise verifications. The RBI's directives reinforce our long-standing commitment to safeguarding customer assets.' Welcoming the RBI's provisions for fair compensation in the event of loss, damage, or delayed return of pledged assets, and its emphasis on disbursing loans directly into verified bank accounts in compliance with KYC and Income Tax Act provisions, he said' These directions reflect the regulator's focus on integrity, accountability, and customer rights. 'We are fully prepared to implement the new guidelines well ahead of the April 2026 deadline. We believe this framework will further bolster public trust in gold loans as a reliable and responsible source of credit,' he stated.
